TACTICS IN CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS: Part III: 4 Tactics to Refute Relativism This material is adapted from Francis Beckwith & Gregory Koukl’s Relativism:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Of.
Advertisements

THERE SHOULD BE NO TALKING.
Asking the Right Questions: Chapter 1
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Your Honor, I would just like to let you know that… Learning Goal: The student will understand what an objection is, how and why they are used, and what.
When Immorality Comes to Church March 14. Agree or Disagree … Because Christ has forgiven me, I can do what I want Because Christ has forgiven me, I can.
THE COIN TOSS Prior to each round the teams will flip a coin. The team winning the coin toss may choose either Side of Topic: Pro or Con or Order of Speaking:
Skills Diary: Y7 Rhythm – World Percussion 1 Talk Understand Respect Always Positive In Control Try Ask Talk Question Plan Think Find Out Work on my own.
Application of Ethical Reasoning
Moral -Introduction -“Right and wrong as clue to the meaning of the universe.” C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity) -If there is a moral “law”, then there is.
Eleven by Sandra Cisneros
MIDGLEY DON’T TRY OUT YOUR NEW SWORD ON ME. Mary Midgley (born 1919) English moral philosopher Champion of animal rights and animal basis of human nature.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Bumper Sticker Ethics S Wilkens Cultural relativism: when in Rome do as a Romans do From one culture to another, and from one of time to another within.
1 Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III): The following four tactics are adapted from Gregory Koukl, Stand to Reason Ministries, Reason;
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Communication Effective Listening.
Discerning Spiritual Receptivity
Strategies and Tactics How to engage the sceptic Dr. C.K.Tan BPharm MSc PhD MRPharmS PgCertMedEd PgCertPsychTherap St. James’ church, Audley.
Socrates: Greek Philosopher Essential Skill: Examine information from more than one point of view.
Using the Scientific Method
APOLOGETICS TRUTH. JOHN 18:37-38a What is TRUTH? John 14:6 Is there a difference between the WAY, TRUTH, LIFE.
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
Classroom Discussions
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Tactics : A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions.
Defending The Faith Series
Philosophy Series.  In this age, we have lost the confidence that statements of fact can ever be anything more than just opinions. The word "truth" now.
Truth “Truth means seeing reality as it is.” –Sheed Truth means “telling it like it is” –Kreeft “Saying of what is that it is and of what is not that it.
Should We Judge? 1 Corinthians 15:1-12 June 22, 2008 (Evening Service)
Skills Diary: Y8 Melody – Classical Music 1 Talk Understand Respect Always Positive In Control Try Ask Talk Question Plan Think Find Out Work on my own.
Always Knowing What to Say: Tactics in Evangelism.
Socratic Seminars EXPECTATIONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL DISCUSSION.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Lesson 1. Understanding Science What is scientific inquiry? What are the results of scientific investigations? How can a scientist prevent bias in a scientific.
R.A.C.E. Response = Better Answers How to Sound Smart Answering Constructed Response Questions.
Communication skills Test. You can judge your communication skills by answering strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree or strongly disagree.
Criminal Justice Ethics. Why worry about whether the CJ system is moral? What can we learn from moral philosophy about CJ ethics? Does the CJ system have.
James 1:1-8.
Interpersonal Communication. Introduction Interpersonal communications means "showing appropriate ways to exchange your ideas and needs."
Presentation skills 1 Group work: discussion and presentation on the topic Qualities to Work in a Care Home 1)suppose you are volunteers in a care home.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Relativism, or Moral Facts
Lesson 2: Common Misconceptions. Misconception 1 “Christianity must be proven scientifically; I’ll accept Christianity when you prove it with the scientific.
Christians and Tolerance (3) Answering Arguments.
Christian Apologetics
Session 6 THE DEFENSE OF THE FAITH. A particular method for defending the faith. Presuppositionalism pre = before, prior to in rank supposition = a proposition.
Sight Words.
Presuppositionalism Truth Talks Apologetics Series: Week 6.
Absolutism and the Euthyphro dilemma LO: I will know what is meant by absolutism I will attempt to resolve the Euthyphro dilemma Hmk: Come up with some.
Nature of Science C0L1P1.
Apologetics WEEK 2- JANUARY 13 TH, How can you think your religion is the only true one?  Remember, we live in a world that has a Postmodern Worldview.
The Toulmin Model in Brief “The heart of moral experience does not lie in a mastery of general rules and theoretical principles, however sound and well.
LESSONS 35, 36 AND 37 – PEER PRESSUREAND DEFENDING SKILLS Teen Leadership.
Introduction L.O : We are learning what type of morality we agree with and be able to define absolutist theory of morality.
4/10/ DOES GOD EXIST?  THE MORAL ARGUMENT Objective realities Objective realities Objective (definition) Objective (definition) expressing or dealing.
Christian teachings on forgiveness and reconciliation
 As an exercise, assume that Jesus did survive the crucifixion and his resurrection appearances were just the man Jesus meeting his followers. What problems.
Part II Pro-Life Christians Establish a Foundation for the Debate.
What is ethics?. What is ethics? “Ethics is about my feelings” Agree or disagree?
Ethical Theories.
God reveals Science, Science reveals God.
CX Purpose and Strategies
Owning your worldview presents:
How to use Questions to help you with personal evangelism
Owning your worldview presents:
Owning your worldview presents:
Presentation transcript:

TACTICS IN CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS: Part III: 4 Tactics to Refute Relativism This material is adapted from Francis Beckwith & Gregory Koukl’s Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid Air, pages

Defending the Christian Faith: TACTIC # 1: Show the contradictions of relativism!.

Tactic 1: Show the Contradictions of Relativism: If a relativist uses certain objections against you, he or she will get stuck on his or her own objections: “You shouldn’t judge others…” “You are intolerant…” “You shouldn’t force your morality on me…” “Who are you to say…”

Tactic 1: Show the Contradictions of Relativism: 1.“Who are you to say?” answer with, “Who are you to say, ‘Who are you to say’?” 2.“You shouldn’t force your morality on me,” simply ask, “Why not?” The person has a hard time explaining why you shouldn’t impose your views without imposing his or her morality on you.

Tactic 1: Show the Contradictions of Relativism: 3.“You have a right to your opinion, but you have no right to force it on anyone.” Respond by, “Is that your opinion.” 4. “Who are you to correct my correction, if correcting in itself is wrong.” 5. “If I don’t have the right to challenge your view, then why do you have the right to challenge mine?”

Tactic 2: Press their hot button: One of the simplest and most effective ways to refute relativists is to pick their hot button (racism, animal rights, intolerance, gay-bashing, feminism, etc) and then relativize it. This causes their moral intuition to rise to the surface, undermining their position.

Tactic 2: Press their hot button: 1. If you encounter a relativist, you can usually prove him or wrong in five minutes when moral words like “should” or “ought” creep into the conversation. 2. When moral words creep in, expose the inconsistency. 3. Always remember that morality is built in; humans have an innate capacity to reason in moral categories and to make accurate moral judgments.

Tactic 2: Press their hot button: Ex. “You are Judgmental!” Respond to the accusation by saying something like, “If it’s wrong to judge people, then why are you judging me?”

Tactic 3: Force the Tolerance Issue: Force the tolerance issue. This third tactic makes capital of a relativist’s commitment to tolerance. If we reject another’s idea or behavior, we can be accused of rejecting the person and of being disrespectful. To day we’re intolerant of the person because we disagree with the idea is confused. On this view of tolerance, no idea or behavior can be opposed, regardless of how graciously, without inviting the charge of incivility.

Tactic 4: Have a Ready Defense: Take the offensive is a key strategy when dealing with relativism. 1. “Whose Values?” respond, “Whose values are right?” 2. “Oh, you believe in absolutes?” What are they?” Press a hot-button by giving a statement that would cause their moral intuitions to come to the surface.

Tactic 4: Have a Ready Defense: Take the offensive is a key strategy when dealing with relativism. 1. “Whose Values?” respond, “Whose values are right?” 2. “Oh, you believe in absolutes?” What are they?” Press a hot-button by giving a statement that would cause them to be “violated.”