Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
Advertisements

The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
By Devin Gay Radio Ice Cerenkov Experiment. RICE got off the ground and into the ice in 1995 They got started when AMANDA collaborations agreed to co-
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
IceCube System Testing
November 24, 2004 Rolf Nahnhauer1 PROJECT : IceCube Digital Optical Module Production at DESY Zeuthen.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
Physics results and perspectives of the Baikal neutrino project B. Shoibonov (JINR, Dubna) for the Baikal collaboration February 2009.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
radio lobe sound disk  t p ~ km  optical light cone The Vision *) see e.g. A. Ringwald,ARENA 2005 Build ~100 km 3 hybrid detector to: Confirm GZK cutoff.
Studies on PINGU’s Sensitivity to the Neutrino mass Hierarchy P. Berghaus, H.P. Bretz, A. Groß, A. Kappes, J. Leute, S. Odrowski, E. Resconi, R. Shanidze.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
Cascade and Flasher Workshop Welcome! n Logistics n Agenda n Goals Spencer Klein, LBNL.
J. Vandenbroucke N. Bramall, M.D’Agostino, A. Morey, P. Sandstrom, M.Solarz, I.Taboada Calibration of the Standard Candle: How Standard Is It? IceCube.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
Determination of True Attenuation Lengths using SPASE-AMANDA Coincidence Data Tim Miller JHU/APL.
Ice Investigation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW (photon propagation code)
Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS.
Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Laguna Beach, CA March 2003 String-18 Progress and Plans.
The AMANDA-II Telescope - Status and First Results - Ralf Wischnewski / DESY-Zeuthen for the AMANDA Collaboration TAUP2001, September.
Hagar Landsman, Mike Richman, and Kara Hoffman On behalf of the IceCube Collaboration Ice index of refraction n(z) Ice Attenuation Length (point to point)
David Seckel, IceTop Baseline Review, Madison, Dec. 4, 2003 IceTop Baseline Review Dec. 4, Madison WI.
Ice model update Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison IceCube Collaboration meeting, Calibration session, March 2014.
Calibrations Accomplishments in PY03 Plans for PY04 Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 lead – Detector Characterization.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser1 IceTop IceTop station 2004 test tanks Calibration Verification 04/05 DOM operation Summary.
IceCube Dust Loggers Kurt Woschnagg, Ryan Bay Physics Department, UC Berkeley Instrumentation Session IceCube Collaboration Meeting Bartol, March 2004.
Simulation of a hybrid optical, radio, and acoustic neutrino detector Justin Vandenbroucke with D. Besson, S. Boeser, R. Nahnhauer, P. B. Price IceCube.
Feasibility of acoustic neutrino detection in ice: First results from the South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS) Justin Vandenbroucke (UC Berkeley) for.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
South Pole Glaciology with the IceCube telescope Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley for the IceCube Collaboration Open Science Conference,
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010 effective scattering coefficient (from Ryan Bay)
Deployment Monitoring & Drill Logging (offline) at Pole Kurt Woschnagg IceCube collaboration meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
The ARA concept and history construction activities Future plans The ARA concept and history construction activities Future plans Kara.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Bergische Universität Wuppertal Jan Auffenberg et al. Rome, Arena ARENA 2008 A radio air shower detector to extend IceCube ● Three component air.
The prototype string for the km3 scale Baikal neutrino telescope VLVnT April 2008 Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration for.
Future high energy extensions of IceCube with new technologies: Radio and/or acoustical detectors Karle.
Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice
Doug Cowen/High-Level Analysis Preparation/SAC Meeting
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
IceCube System Testing
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
Calibrations What’s new in Kurt Woschnagg, UCB
South Pole Ice (SPICE) model
IceCube Deployment Monitoring System (PTS)
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Light Sources for AMANDA/IceCube Cross-Calibration
Dust Logger stratigraphy studies
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Experimental setup (SPICE)
IceCube Construction and Analysis Report
Presentation transcript:

Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004

Objectives for first four strings What we need What we need DFL measurements (gain, angular acceptance) → DB DFL measurements (gain, angular acceptance) → DB Timing (RAPcal, DAQ software) Timing (RAPcal, DAQ software) Charge (on-board LED, DAQ software) Charge (on-board LED, DAQ software) Geometry Geometry Timing/geometry verification (flashers, muons) Timing/geometry verification (flashers, muons) What we want What we want Optical properties below 2100 m Optical properties below 2100 m Dust profile with volcanic ash bands Dust profile with volcanic ash bands Cross-calibration with AMANDA and SPASE Cross-calibration with AMANDA and SPASE Deep temperature profile → ice flow Deep temperature profile → ice flow

Calibration devices Flasher boards geometry, timing, vertex, energy, ice Flasher boards geometry, timing, vertex, energy, ice Dust loggers ice properties Dust loggers ice properties On-board LEDs charge, timing (transit time) On-board LEDs charge, timing (transit time) Pressure sensors geometry, deployment Pressure sensors geometry, deployment Payout, drill, GPS geometry Payout, drill, GPS geometry Laser distance meter well depth (geometry) Laser distance meter well depth (geometry) Thermistors ice properties Thermistors ice properties Acoustic televiewer hole diameter (drilling) Acoustic televiewer hole diameter (drilling) AMANDA, IceTop, SPASE verification, cross-calibration AMANDA, IceTop, SPASE verification, cross-calibration In following years Standard candles (lasers) vertex, energy, (geometry, x-calib) Standard candles (lasers) vertex, energy, (geometry, x-calib)

Geometry calibration in 3 stages ► Stage 1 (~days) Combine deployment data: surface survey, drill log, pressure data, payout etc. ► Stage 2 (~weeks → days?) Interstring calibration with flasher data Requires: timing calibration ► Stage 3 (~months → weeks → days?) Muon survey Requires: timing calibration, reconstruction

Geometry calibration – Stage 1 Initial geometry from deployment data: GPS survey of surface locations GPS survey of surface locations Pressure sensors Pressure sensors Well depth Well depth Drill log Drill log Cable payout Cable payout + Hole diameter from acoustic televiewer (?) → Absolute OM positions within ~1 m Time scale: days → day?

Geometry calibration – Stage 2 Take data with 8-10 flashers on each string Take data with 8-10 flashers on each string Dedicated calibration runs (length: TBD) Dedicated calibration runs (length: TBD) Cross-calibrate with AMANDA OMs and flashers (string 18) Cross-calibrate with AMANDA OMs and flashers (string 18) → Relative string positions within ~0.5 m within ~0.5 m Time scale: weeks → days? Time scale: weeks → days? Global interstring fit to flasher timing data

Measuring ice flow with cosmic-ray muons Rigid down to 2000 m Stuck at bedrock Lagging 1.Reconstruct downgoing muon tracks 2.Find location for each OM that minimizes its contribution to the reconstruction likelihood

Geometry calibration – Stage 3 Survey with downgoing muons → OM positions within ~0.3 m Time scale: month(s) → weeks → days? Test: finds artificial shifts Development and testing on AMANDA data UCB (Jeff Allen, Dima)

Timing/geometry verification Use reconstructed (downgoing) events Use reconstructed (downgoing) events IceCube muons IceCube muons AMANDA muons AMANDA muons SPASE coincidences SPASE coincidences In-situ light sources In-situ light sources IceCube flashers IceCube flashers AMANDA flashers, lasers AMANDA flashers, lasers Look at Look at time residuals time residuals amplitudes amplitudes reconstructed vertex position reconstructed vertex position

Cross-calibrations With AMANDA: AMANDA light sources seen with IceCube strings AMANDA light sources seen with IceCube strings IceCube light sources seen with AMANDA strings IceCube light sources seen with AMANDA strings Separate and common (not in Y1?) reconstruction Separate and common (not in Y1?) reconstruction Matching dust profiles Matching dust profiles With SPASE: Geometry survey – sensitive in depth coordinate (muon tomography sensitive in x,y) With IceTop: Can we do something with 8 tanks?

Ice Properties with first four Design, build, deploy first dust logger Design, build, deploy first dust logger Adaptable to IceCube holes? Adaptable to IceCube holes? Verify AMANDA dust profile Verify AMANDA dust profile Ash bands Ash bands Flasher data Flasher data Optical properties from timing fits Optical properties from timing fits Absorption/scattering below 2100 m Absorption/scattering below 2100 m Thermistors Thermistors Firm up deep temperature profile Firm up deep temperature profile Ice flow model Ice flow model