Keys to Creating a Safe and Respectful Environment on Our Nation’s School Buses presented by Michael J. Martin Executive Director National Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements


A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Peaceful School Bus Program © 2008 by Hazelden Foundation. All rights reserved.
Student Support Services NHCS Bullying Protocol Review Team
Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying NJ State Board of Education February
Policy 8207 – Harassment, Intimidation, or Bullying The district is committed to establishing a safe and civil educational environment for all students.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
Everyone Has A Role in Keeping Children Safe ! Community Partnerships for Protecting Children.
Rick DeMarco District Anti-Bullying Coordinator September 28 th, 2011.
Hertfordshire County Council
Moving Forward with Safety Management Systems December 9, 2014 Standing Committee on Public Transportation Winter Meeting American Association of State.
Child Protection Training
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying Policies and Legislation
Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act By: Frank P. Cavallo, Jr., Esquire Parker McCay P.A.
update Christine A. D’Avirro TG ABS. Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Intended to strengthen standards for preventing, reporting, investigating, and.
The Dignity Act SHS presentation. Effective July 1, 2012 Intent to provide a school environment free from discrimination and harassment for all students.
PUBLIC ACT (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011) AN ACT CONCERNING THE STRENGTHENING OF SCHOOL BULLYING LAWS 1.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Harassment, Intimidation, & Bullying Presented by the Allendale and Northern Highlands School District An Overview of the Law and Major Changes September.
Professor Mona O’Moore Anti-bullying National Research and Resource Centre Dublin City University Ireland Sonet-Bull EU project, Liege, 27 th May,2015.
2015 Robertson County Schools Parent Survey Results (pre-K -5 th grade) Facilitated by a cooperative effort of the Robertson County Schools and Robertson.
EMSB SAFE SCHOOL ACTION PLAN 1 Name of school :  Elementary  High school  Outreach  Social affairs Name of school Principal: Gail Callender Principal’s.
Dignity and Respect in the Workplace
AIDE AND PARAPROFESSIONAL TRAINING September 2013.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.
Broker and Pool Client Presentation November 15 & 16, 2006.
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Office of Special Populations Providence School Department Reviewing Bullying & Harassment Policies -Procedures Nuts and Bolts August 2012 Presented by:
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying …what the new law means for school  policies  procedures  stakeholders …what the new law means for school  policies.
July 18, 2013 v WI School Safety Summit Nancy Dorman and Rick J. Kaufman, APR School Safety Policies & Procedures.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Manifestation Determination and Bullying
School District #59 Strategies for Safe Schools
SAS: Resiliency December 8, Build: SAS Resiliency Clear Standards and Curriculum Frameworks –Update –Student / School Resiliency and School Climate.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
School Bus Drivers Inservice 2011– Key Responsibilities. 2. Teamwork. 3. Physical Demands. 4. Pre & Post-trip with Child-check. 5. Federal and.
June 4,  Why are we spending time discussing elements of effective group work ?  Effective and collaborative group work requires an intentional.
FEA WEBINAR 10/20/11 NEW JERSEY’S ANTI-BULLYING BILL OF RIGHTS.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Parent Training Definition of HIB Reporting & Investigation Timeline School Culture and Climate.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
New Rules for the Digital Age NSW Ombudsman Symposium 26 May 2009.
What Is Bullying? “Harassment, intimidation or bullying" means any gesture, any written, verbal or physical act, or any electronic communication, whether.
ROBBINSVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying Prevention Guidance for School Stakeholders.
Key messages related to quality assurance management Trust Tools Time
Dignity for All Students Act & Sexual Harassment Avoidance Annual Training.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. School, Family, and Community Collaboration Chapter 3.
Putting a STOP to Bullying By Talice Harper
+ It Gets Better Bullying By Ashley Rolling. + It is not the job of the victim to stop being bullied. It is the bully’s job to stop bullying.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
Scottsbluff Public Schools Safety and Security. A safe school is… …a place where students can learn and teachers can teach in a welcoming environment,
Eric Bunting EDAS 8309 LRSD’s Anti-Bully Policy Educational Policy Project.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
An Enhanced Support Model to Promote Mental and Behavioral Wellness among Students in the Avon Public Schools Kelly Grant Director of Pupil Services.
Seattle Public Schools 26 October CARE Agenda  Defining & Evaluating CARE  District Climate Survey Trends 2008 – 2010  Bullying at TOPS  2010.
Requirements from the HIB Law Sea Girt Elementary School Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying Policy.
Relational Bullying Lauren Wazio, Shanda Harclerode, Susan Nourse.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Bullying Prevention at the Jr. High Nathan Ballagh, Haley Hockensmith, Jenny Rinehart.
Anti-Bullying Parent Presentation Hannah Caldwell Elementary School
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK
Chapter 6 The School Health Program: A Component of Community Health
Navigating the Education System
The Halton District School Board expects that everyone associated with the Board has a right to be treated with respect and dignity and to teach, learn.
Presentation transcript:

Keys to Creating a Safe and Respectful Environment on Our Nation’s School Buses presented by Michael J. Martin Executive Director National Association for Pupil Transportation

What Do We Know? Bullying is a significant problem among our children. The School Bus is fertile ground for bullying. Well-thought policies can make a difference in the lives of our children.

In Our Ideal World… School transportation leaders would be at the table with other school leaders. School bus drivers and teams would be consulted and trained in line with other staff. Lines of authority and responsibility for school bus behavioral issues would be clearly defined. Training of administrators and drivers would be diverse and broad-based.

Our Effort to Assess the Real World Who? NAPT members surveyed * 70% identified themselves as the “transportation director or equivalent” What? appraise, canvass, gauge When? May 2011 Where? Online via Survey Monkey How many? >25% response rate

About What Did We Learn? In a survey of NAPT members, we learned about: The extent of bullying on school buses and at school bus stops The role transportation officials play in shaping policy and practice The extent to which school bus drivers are engaged in shaping and executing policies and practices

What Did We Learn? We learned that: 52.2% believe that bullying is a serious problem on their school buses Two-thirds receive complaints frequently or multiple times per week Plus research tells us that most (2/3) bullying goes unreported National Center for Education, Evaluation and Regional Assistance – Petrosino, A., Guckenberg, S., De Voe, J., and Harrison, T. (2010)

What Did We Learn about Why Students Bully? We learned that “bullies bullied” for many “reasons” with the most frequent being: Ethnicity and race Gender or gender preference Weight and physical appearance 72%) Disability or the appearance of being disabled

“Reason” or “Premise” for Bullying

What Does This Tell Us? The range of training for school bus drivers is wide with a need for emerging social as well as traditional issues being covered. Policies must address tolerance and positive, respectful school and learning environments – to help children to embrace their differences.

What Did We Learn about Policy? Most districts have clearly defined policies that involve bullying on school buses. BUT most transportation staff (55.6%) were not involved in developing those. As a result, the policies do not address the role of the bus driver or the cooperation between the driver and a school principal.

What Did We Learn About Policy? We learned that most districts (97.2%): had key elements of a sound policy framework, role definition for school administrators and clearly defined penalties did NOT clarify the role of a school bus driver in addressing bullying (43.8%) did NOT clarify role of parents in resolving the problem and working with the child (51.3%)

And What About the Drivers? The survey showed us that: 80% of school bus drivers have received some form of training about bullying Only 19% trained drivers together with other school employees Only 42% provided drivers with training about disabilities Only 16% provided drivers with training about sexual orientation and gender preferences

Most Requested Training Topics Ideas to help bus drivers defuse crisis situations (92%) Best Practices in student management & behavior (78.5%) Reporting responsibilities, especially when an incident involves bullying or other unacceptable behavior Information about the children and their problems Understanding social and community issues Understanding and awareness of disabilities

Other Findings While training in disability issues is high (81%), there is a corresponding need for more training in disability issues (47%). Need to build respect for school bus drivers and their value in the school system Need for greater cooperation between school principals and school transportation/drivers Need for parental awareness and involvement in supporting codes of conduct (< 1/3 involved)

The Importance of Reporting Reporting is an important precursor to school response to bullying. Kazdin & Rotella (2009): Teachers observe only the most flagrant and frequent bullying. Teacher observation occurs in only 4% of incidents, even though 85% of incidents occur in front of others, usually peers. School bus drivers – by nature of their roles – hear and see students in ways teachers cannot; that makes them an asset to us.

Probability? Or Chance?

Why Are We Here Today? The U.S. Department of Education has developed bullying prevention and intervention training for school bus drivers. We’d like everyone, including other administrative decision-makers and especially education policy-makers, to know about, support and promote the implementation of this training.

Why Are We Here Today? We’d also like everyone, including other administrative decision-makers and especially education policy-makers, to know about, and help us address strong demand for additional training.

What Can Be Done? NAPT would like to move forward with the U.S. Education Department and our partners to: Share model policies for behavior and bullying management on school buses Encourage and empower transportation officials to become more involved and proactive Establish lines of communication with School Boards and Principals and Teachers and Parents Advance training programs for administrators and school bus drivers

NAPT Believes… At NAPT, “we have no tolerance for bullying and stopping it is one of our national public policy priorities.” (from NAPT statement, see