Local Agency Programs An Overview Gonzalo Puente, PE Shaun Bates, PE Development Engineer Project Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.

Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).

ODOT Structure Project Management Seminar Bridge Preliminary Design Report.

Contract and Project Management: A Field Perspective Moderator Michael Peek, PE CCE CFM Office of Engineering and Construction Management.

Update on FHWA/FTA Proposed Rulemaking. MAP-21 Requirements Section 1318(a)(3) o Solicit requests from state DOTs, transit authorities, and MPOs, for.

1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.

Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.

Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…

With the Genesee County Road Commission By Fred Peivandi, P.E. And Ken Johnson, P.E. Local Road Funding.

1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.

FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.

Project Prospectus and Design Acceptance Package ( and a little more) Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist January 30, 2009.

1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Satvinder Sandhu & Frances Sakaguchi, FHWA.

2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.

Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.

NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

January Goals: Streamline permitting process for certain solid waste facilities and activities Expand use of 3 rd party inspectors to allow MassDEP.

EMS / NEPA Integration at the Idaho National Laboratory Bruce Angle & John Irving Battelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory Environmental Management.

Safety Project Request received by TDOT Safety Project Request sent to RSAR Coordinator Safety Planning Office completes Letter of Findings for internal.

2005 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Using VE in Design Build Presented by: Jerry R. Blanding Innovative Contracting Engineer FHWA – NRC July 21, 2005.

HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.

MassDOT P3 Project Overview. MassDOT Project Mobility.

THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.

GWAC Ordering Procedures Overview

Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.

CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.

Genesee County Road Commission Fred Peivandi, P.E. County Highway Engineer MTPA July 15, 2011 TIP Project Administration.

INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.

U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Practical Design Decision Matrix.

Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

California Energy Commission Options for Developing Contingency Mitigation Measures 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report UC Irvine Campus, Irvine, California.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.

Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.

Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers.

Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.

Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,

Presented to: 34 th Annual Airports Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, CEP Date: March 3, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Planning and Environmental Guidance.

Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.

CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.

The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.

LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.

An Introduction to Health Impact Assessment Paul J. Anderson, MD, MPH HIA Program Manager Section of Epidemiology Division of Public Health Department.

National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Engineer US Army Garrison.

By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.

Winton Emmett, Chief Project Implementation North January, 2016 Division of Local Assistance John Hoole, Chief Project Implementation South.

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.

National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.

Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.

CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.

DISTRICT 7 DESIGN-BUILD PUSH BUTTON (FEDERAL SAFETY AND STATE FUNDS)

Construction Oversight

Construction Management & Inspection

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

AX7665D82 Areawide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Design-Build

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

General comments: These projects are locally owned and the LPA should be involved and informed throughout the project. The project agreement is between.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

Environmental Requirements and planning grants

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)

Presentation transcript:

Local Agency Programs An Overview Gonzalo Puente, PE Shaun Bates, PE Development Engineer Project Manager

Local Agency Programs (LAP)  LAP is involved with projects selected by MPOs and RTFs.  These projects are either federally or state funded.  LAP is responsible for implementing all required state and federal requirements for the Urban, Rural, Bridge, Enhancement and Safety Programs.

Federal and State Requirements  There are several requirements that shape our review and have an impact on the project timeline:  Projects need to meet minimum design guidelines and must have their permits and ROW cleared before obligation of funds can take place.  Federally funded projects must be evaluated for potential impacts to the environment in accordance to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Environmental Evaluation Your project is either a:  CE (Categorical Exclusion) – minimal or no impact to the environment  EA (Environmental Assessment) – unsure of the extent of impact. FONSI needed.  EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) – Impacts are clear and significant. ROD needed.

MDOT/FHWA process  Project is selected (planning phase)  Design & environmental clearance (LAP)  Project advertisement, let & award (LAP/Contracts Division)  Construction phase (TSC)  Billings to Finance Division (TSC)  All projects are subject to audit. (Commission Audit)

GI meeting scheduled  Grade Inspection meeting scheduled. Program ApplicationProgram Application Project limitsProject limits Type of work needs to match TIPType of work needs to match TIP  4R (Reconstruction)  3R (Resurface, Restoration, Rehab)  PM (Preventive Maintenance) projects

MDOT LAP review of GI submittal  GI meeting  Draft proposal prepared by MDOT LAP GI comments addressedGI comments addressed All necessary permits and ROW obtainedAll necessary permits and ROW obtained  Obligation request is turned in

What can hold up obligation request What can hold up obligation request  ROW  SHPO clearance  DEQ, DNR and MDOT permits  TIP issues: Project limits, scope, $s.

Project turn in for advertisement  Project has been obligated  Local Agency authorization to advertise project  Contractor inquiries  Once project has been let, then LAP turns project over to the TSC to oversee the construction phase

MDOT Web Site

Local Agency Programs