Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) 464-3609 (DSN 367-3609) / UNCLASSIFIED 1 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
THE BRAC PROCESS – Not Your Usual Brownfields Redevelopment Mary K. Ryan.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 5 June.
PMOBRAC Ms. Kimberly Kesler Director, BRAC Program Management Office March
Department of Defense Facilities Unit Hazardous Waste Management Program of the EPD Land Protection Branch.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS. SCHOOL DIVISION WIDE ENROLLMENT FORECAST CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY568 Students FORECAST ENROLLMENTDEFICIT 2007 School.
Foreign Affairs Security Training Center
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Dr. Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 22.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
Warrior Logisticians JOINT CULINARY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (JCCoE) 2010 RESERVE COMPONENT FOOD SERVICE WORKSHOP FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT DIVISION Welcome.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Project X RD&D Plan Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) Russ Alber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
COL Mark UNCLASSIFIED 13 August 2013 US Army Environmental Command SAME Presentation 20.
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDR’s Conference DOL Transition Update 2 OCT 2012 COL Dan Reilly.
2 Governor’s Principles for Fort Monroe Respect Fort Monroe’s history Maintain Public Access Achieve economic sustainability.
1 of 19 ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE “INSTALLATION CAPABILITIES FOR A TRANSFORMED ARMY” October 3, 2005 Joseph W. Whitaker.
Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center 1 MCAGCC Future Plans and Development.
City Council October 21, 2013 Strategic Planning Retreat Next Steps.
Fort Bliss Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Meeting November 2009.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Port Everglades Master / Vision Plan Status Broward County Board of County Commissioners May 4 th, 2010.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Consideration Of The Aggregate Recycling Systems Illegal Disposal Site For The Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program and Augmentation.
CPT Scott M. Winter / SFIM-AEC-TSS / / DSN / 1 of MAR2005 Future Range Mission Analysis Process.
As of Oct 08 UNCLASSIFIED G-1 FORSCOM 1 “Team Transition One Team, One Future” Headquarters FORSCOM/USARC Base Realignment and Closure Relocation.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Track 5 Project FinanceSession 6 Renewables Through Private Financing.
The Defense Economic Adjustment Program Responding to BRAC 05 The Counselors of Real Estate November 14, 2005 David F. Witschi Associate Director.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army Installations and Environment Our Installations Supporting the War: Relevant and Ready “Installation Transformation.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
11/21/2015 8:15:59 AM11/21/2015 8:15:59 AM1 Installation Sustainability: Envisioning the Army’s Future LTC DAVE JONES Office of the Director of Environmental.
1 NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (NCWCP) June 17, 2005 Briefing for Dr. David A. Sampson Deputy Secretary of Commerce.
Our Mission:Manage Army installations to support readiness and mission execution – provide equitable services and facilities, optimize resources, sustain.
Sikes Act Coordination Workshop - Army Army Orientation: Mission/Organization/Issues Bill Woodson HQDA Staff , FAX ,
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.
Background on Joint Land Use Studies Ft. McCoy and Monroe County, Wisconsin Bryan Law Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission.
1 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) The Army’s Approach to Managing Resources 10 August 2005 Mr. Jeff Giangiuli Vice President CALIBRE.
Team Successes at the Former Memphis Depot, Memphis, Tennessee Presented by: David D. Nelson, P.G.Thomas C. Holmes Project Manager, CH2M HillProject Manager,
Environmental Officer Course Introduction Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 12/24/2015.
Army BRAC Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
Installation Sustainability Program (ISP) - a model for ARNG Training Centers LTC Jeffrey G. Phillips US Army War College Fellow US Army Environmental.
Name/Office Symbol/(703) XXX-XXX (DSN XXX) / addressDate-Time-Group 19 September 2008 Fort Monroe Closure Environmental Planning.
HEALTH WORKFORCE HEALTH SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION Oklahoma State Innovation Model.
1 United States Joint Forces Command United States Joint Forces Command Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E) Interagency and Multinational.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY USAFMCOM UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.
PLANNING FOR A NOAA SCIENCE CENTER June 28, 2000.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
1 The Department of Energy And Electronics Stewardship : How DOE Attained “Green Status” on the OMB Environmental Scorecard Federal Environmental Symposium.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Remediation and Redevelopment at the Former Fort Devens, Massachusetts.
Office of Economic Adjustment Roles and Assistance David F. Witschi Associate Director, OEA
Environmental Acquisition Strategy Performance-Based Contracting
Professional & Scientific Council Update
Mirko Rakigjija, PE (256) Dr. Michael E. Stovall, PE (256)
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Design and Construction Cost Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 1 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Army BRAC 2005 Environmental Issues 20 June 2007 Dana Perkins, BRAC Environmental PM, IMCOM-SE (404) / Our Mission Manage Army installations to support readiness and mission execution – provide equitable services and facilities, optimize resources, sustain the environment and enhance the well- being of the Military community Our Mission : Manage Army installations to support readiness and mission execution – provide equitable services and facilities, optimize resources, sustain the environment and enhance the well- being of the Military community Leading Change for Installation Excellence

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 2 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Agenda Background & Process IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Process/Program –National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) –Environmental Condition of Property (ECP) Challenges

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 3 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Army BRAC Environmental Structure ACSIM Leadership/Direction BRAC-D PM assigned to each installation Installation Base Transition Coordinator (BTC) BRAC Environmental Coordinator (BEC) Lead Organization (IMCOM, MACOM) DASA-I&H DASA-ESOH Direction, Leadership Oversight, Policy DASA-I&H DASA-ESOH Direction, Leadership Oversight, Policy AEC Mobile NST

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 4 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Background & Process Centralized execution of BRAC Environmental Program –U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District NEPA Support Team (NST) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/Supporting Studies –8 EIS’s (Active Army); –183 EA’s (42 Active Army; 118 Army Reserve; & 23 Army National Guard) –7 new AE contracts in place –Over $42 million in contract capacity available –$22,430,000 - estimated NEPA costs –$9,000,000 - estimated cost for environmental studies to support NEPA preparation –U.S. Army Environmental Command (AEC) Environmental Condition of Property (ECP), Cleanup, & Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, & Liability Act (CERCLA) compliance –18 “Major” installation ECP’s –176 Army Reserve facilities require ECP’s

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 5 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Background & Process Army BRAC-D Expectations for NEPA document completion: –EA’s – 6 mos. –EIS’s – 12 mos. Historically… –BRAC NEPA: 16 to 48 mos. –Army NEPA: EA’s – 6 to 12 mos. EIS’s – 18 mos. +

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 6 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Background & Process Closure ECP Process Participants

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 7 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Background & Process BRAC-D cleanup & execution strategy –Work early & closely with regulators, Local Reuse Authorities (LRA’s) & community stakeholders. –Dispose of what we can “as is” & to “like reuse” as quickly as possible. –Use Environmental Services Cooperative Agreements (ESCA’s) & Performance Based Contract (PBC) tools. –Utilize “Early Transfer” authority when possible. –Utilize Army model deed & Finding of Suitability to Transfer.

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 8 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE IMCOM-SE BRAC NEPA Program BenningEISAug - Nov 07 BraggEA 24 Jan 07 CampbellEA18 Dec 06 EglinEIS30 Sep 08 Air Force GillemEA 30 Dec 07 JacksonEA08 Sep 06 KnoxEA24 Oct 06 McPhersonEA 30 Feb 07 Redstone EA 26 Dec 06 ShawEA30 Sep 07 Air Force Includes non-BRAC actions occurring during POM as appropriate.

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 9 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE GillemECP Phase I:30 Jan 07 w/CERFA Letter ECP Phase II:Field work in Summer 07 McPhersonECP Phase I:30 Jan 07 w/CERFA Letter ECP Phase II:Field work in Summer 07 IMCOM-SE BRAC ECP Program

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 10 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Challenges Very ambitious NEPA completion schedules/timelines. Scoping very difficult & complex. Emphasis on cantonment construction & supporting associated construction timelines.

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 11 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Very Ambitious NEPA Completion Schedules “Get Ahead Studies” –Traffic Studies –Noise Studies/Modeling –Economic Impact Forecast System (EIFS) Studies –Natural Resources/TES Surveys –Building Eligibility Determinations –Construction Site Clearance –Archaeological Surveys & Site Eligibility Determinations –Jurisdictional Wetland Surveys –Waste Water Collection System Compliance Master Plan –Asbestos Surveys EA’s: 6 mos. EIS’s: 12 mos. … EA’s: 6 mos. EIS’s: 12 mos. …

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 12 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Very Ambitious NEPA Completion Schedules Central execution & management through Mobile. Matching installations with NEPA contractors. Pre-negotiating contract task orders for rapid award. Scoping meetings held at each installation with region. Utilizing in-house staff/resources from other IMCOM-SE installations. Early & regular coordination with regulators throughout. –Senior Department leadership level –Regional leadership level –Staff & field office level “Flattening” the Army staffing & review process. –Concurrent reviews –Electronic transmission of signatures –On-site IPR’s for comment resolution & document revision EA’s: 6 mos. EIS’s: 12 mos. … EA’s: 6 mos. EIS’s: 12 mos. …

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 13 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Scoping Very Difficult & Complex BRAC on top of Army Campaign Plan/Transformation initiatives –Huge construction program…

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 14 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Examples of Construction Program Analyzed in NEPA Fort Benning Cantonment BRAC Projects22 Projects Cantonment Non-BRAC Projects20 Projects Training Area BRAC Projects Alt A10 Projects Training Area Non-BRAC Projects Alt A13 Projects Training Area BRAC Projects Alt B9 Projects Training Area Non-BRAC Projects Alt B17 Projects Total Projects Alt A:65 Projects Total Projects Alt B:68 Projects *Total Acreage in Area of Potential Effect Alt A:~10,740 Acres *Total Acreage in Area of Potential Effect Alt B:~19,010 Acres *Does not delineate between renovation or previously disturbed areas & newly disturbed areas Scoping Very Difficult & Complex

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 15 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Examples of Construction Program Analyzed in NEPA Fort Bragg *12 BRAC Projects~2,838,000 sf *20 Non-BRAC Projects~2,561,800 sf *32 Total Projects:~4,932,300 sf Fort Knox *7 Cantonment BRAC Projects~1,800,000 sf *13 Non-BRAC Cantonment Projects~447,600 sf *7 Non-BRAC Training Area ProjectsNot Available *27 Total Projects:+ ~2,247,600 sf *Does not delineate between renovation or previously disturbed areas & newly disturbed areas Scoping Very Difficult & Complex

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 16 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Examples of Construction Program Analyzed in NEPA Redstone Arsenal *9 BRAC Projects~4,390,719 sf *9 Non-BRAC Projects~1,492,860 sf *18 Total Projects:~5,883,579 sf *Does not delineate between renovation or previously disturbed areas & newly disturbed areas Scoping Very Difficult & Complex

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 17 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Scoping Very Difficult & Complex Transformation of Construction Process (Design / Build) –Used land-use planning approach Established development / construction “Polygons” Construction program late in stabilizing –Included all proposed but not validated BRAC & transformation actions in performing “Get Ahead Studies” –Once stabilized used the validated FY07 – 13 POM to refine scopes

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 18 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Emphasis on Cantonment Construction & Supporting Associated Construction Timelines Coordinate with range & training staff to scope potential impacts to the environment from new training/maneuver requirements. –Especially challenging at Benning with introduction of Armor School training. –Needed to know more than just training requirements & throughput Led planning charrettes to determine how & where Armor School training is proposed to occur on the Benning landscape.

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 19 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Conclusion BRAC 2005 is extremely complex & we have a tremendous challenge in the coming years. We learn as we go & refine. Coordination, coordination, coordination… Success requires support of all stakeholders both internal & external to the Army at all levels. “Together We’re Better”

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 20 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Backup Slides

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 21 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Background & Process NEPA prepared to support: –BRAC Commission directed realignment actions (gain new missions or personnel) –Discretionary moves (to be combined with above NEPA documentation) –Disposal & reuse of property where an installation is completely closed or where an enclave is retained No NEPA prepared for: –Installations that remain open and only lose missions or personnel –Vacating leased space or buildings

BRAC NEPA EXECUTION BRAC Commission recommendations (Sept 05) Installation, Command, BRACD, and SAM agree on DOPAA (Oct - Nov 05) Installation, Command, BRACD, SAM agree on NEPA level and cost est (Oct - Nov 05) Army G3 sets BRAC execution priorities (work in progress) SAM prepares SOW negotiates task orders (Nov - Dec 05) BRACD funds & directs SAM to execute (Jan 06 until all funded) SAM issues task orders to Contractors (Jan 06 until all funded) SAM & Contractor prepare draft NEPA documents & supporting studies – EAs 6 to 12 mo. EISs – 18 mo plus Draft NEPA docs reviewed by SAM, Installation, Command staff (TJAG ELD will review EISs but not EAs) NEPA docs approved for release to public by Army decision maker EAs – garrison commander EISs – DASA ESOH SAM signs NEPA document as preparer EA FNSIs signed by garrison commander, EIS RODs signed by DASA ESOH BRAC action may proceed after FNSI or ROD signed

Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 23 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental Program IMCOM-SE Estimated Number of BRAC NEPA Documents & Costs Active Army –8 EIS’s (realignments) - $7,300,000 –29 EA’s (realignments) - $2,415,000 –13 EA’s (closures) - $3,950,000 USAR –48 EA’s (closures) - $2,215,000 –70 EA’s (realignments) - $5,000,000 ARNG –21 EA’s (realignments) - $1,400,000 –2 EA’s (closures) - $150,000