NDE Data Conference April 29, 2013 Dr. Valorie Foy Dr. John Moon

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to DPAS-II Student Growth Measures Working Group July 14, 2010 Dr. Michael Stetter, Acting Director Accountability Resources Director, Curriculum,
Advertisements

NCLB Highlights Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Winter Conference January 18, 2007.
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Pat Roschewski, Ph.D. Director of Statewide Assessment
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
2013 NeSA-Writing Grade 4 Paper/Pencil Test Administration Training 1.
Accountability Policy Update (Schools) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Instructional Core Adapted from Harvard University PELP Framework.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Level 1 Data Warehouse Primer for Principals Timothy Johnson.
NAEP 2012 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Utah State Office of Education.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
Tea with Troy Presentation by Troy Couillard Director, Office of Student Assessment August 2015.
Questions to: Kristen Lewald, Ed.D. PVAAS Statewide Core Team PVAAS Update to PAIU Curriculum Coordinators December 2010.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
NAEP 2014 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) Updates to Curriculum Directors September 2013.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 2015 Missouri Assessment Program Assessment Updates Shaun Bates Director.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
South Carolina Succeeds
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
Accountability Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services August 15, 2014.
Cohort Determination Process G-CAT and Lookup Tools Ramifications.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
The New York State Education Department
Grades 3-12 Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science and Social Studies
Transition to College and Career Ready Assessment
Transition to College and Career Ready Assessment
Administrator Days Statewide Assessment Presented July 30, 2014
ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Alternate Assessment Updates
Edenton-Chowan Schools Preliminary Testing Results
“Read by Grade Three” Law
Illinois State Board of Education Assessment & Accountability
Presentation transcript:

NDE Data Conference April 29, 2013 Dr. Valorie Foy Dr. John Moon

The Assessment Team Dr. Valorie Foy, Director Jeremy Heneger, Assistant Director Dr. John Moon, NeSA Project Manager Dr. Ed Foy, Writing Coordinator Dr. Ted Larson, NAEP Coordinator Jackie Naber, Administrative Assistant

Data Quality Due date when assessment data is available to districts. During the auditing window districts can submit changes to the data (at least two weeks). Districts are encouraged to use the validation and verification reports in the portal to audit their data. After auditing window, the data is considered final and ready for official use.

Data Uploads to DRC Provide updated student data to NSSRS for writing upload to DRC – December 2, 2013 Data for writing assessment uploaded to DRC on December 5, 2013 Provide updated student data to NSSRS for reading, math, and science (RMS) upload to DRC – January 31, 2014 Data for RMS assessments uploaded to DRC on February 3, 2014 Alternate Flag in Special Education Template needs to be updated as well.

Comparability Site (SOSR) Compare tool on the State of the Schools Report allows you to select between 2 and 7 districts or schools to compare. The selected schools/districts can be compared for characteristics, NePAS, NeSA, and AYP. Characteristics – poverty %, ELL %, SPED %, Mobility %, Grad %, Membership, Highly Mobile % NePAS – Status, Improvement, and Growth for all three levels NeSA – Percent Proficient – by subgroup, by grade, by subject AYP – Met or Not Met – by school level, by reading and math.

Audit NeSA Assessment Data Available through the Portal, districts will be able to audit assessment the following assessment data for district/school: ▫Average scale score by subgroup, by subject, and by grade. ▫Performance Level – percent below, meets, and exceeds by subgroup, by subject, and by grade. ▫Student scale scores, performance level, and reason not tested. ▫Shows both NeSA General and Alternate results

NeSA-Writing Release April 29 NeSA-Writing results released to districts in eDIRECT. Data are embargoed until May 24 th, 2013 May 13NeSA-Writing Score Verifications due at NDE May District Preview of NeSA Writing results prior to public release May 20NeSA-Writing results released to Superintendents through secure site May 24NeSA-Writing aggregated results released to public. Subgroup information remains embargoed until release of SOSR.

Release for Reading, Math, Science July 10, 2013 NeSA Reading, Math and Science results released to districts in eDirect August 5-7, 2013 District Preview NeSA Reading, Math, Science results prior to public release August 13, 2013 NeSA Reading, Math and Science results released to public (district and school level data only )

Conversion Charts for Reading, Math, Science Posted on NDE-Assessment Site May 9 or 10

Reading, Math, Science Corrections Window June 10-June 21

NePAS

Section I- Scores with Rankings- Four Charts Elementary Grade-Level Configuration Grades 3-5 Middle Grade-Level Configuration Grades 6-8 Secondary Grade-Level Configuration Grades 9-12 District Grades 3-12

Assessment Components Status Improvement Growth Participation

Scale Scores and Rankings Status=Average Scale Score ReadingE M S D MathE M S D Science E M S D Writing E M S D

S tudents’ Average Scale Score in Reading Grades rd Grade Student 1135 Student th Grade Student 3116 Student 482 Student th Grade Student 6196 Student 7200 Student 8119 Student 9121 Student / 10=

Scale Scores and Rankings Improvement= Difference of Average Scale Scores Compares scores of groups of students (classes) Reading E M S D Math E M S D ScienceE M S D WritingE M S D

Students’ Scale Scores Reading Grades rd Grade Student 1135 Student th Grade Student 3116 Student 482 Student th Grade Student 6196 Student 7200 Student 8119 Student 9121 Student / 10= Students Scale Scores Reading Grades rd Grade Student 3115 Student 482 Student th Grade Student 6Had not enrolled Student 7200 Student 8100 Student 9110 Student th Grade Student Student 1288 Student Student /11= Improvement=21.98

Scale Scores and Rankings Growth= Average of Differences in Scale Scores Growth based on matched student data in the same district- consecutive years Reading E M D Math E M D

Students’ Scale Scores Reading Grades rd Grade Student 1135 Student th Grade Student 3116 Student 482 Student th Grade Student 6196 Student 7200 Student 8119 Student 9121 Student 1096 Students’ Scale Scores Reading Grades nd Grade Student 1 Student 2 3 rd Grade Student 3115 Student 482 Student th Grade Student 6Had not enrolled Student 7200 Student 8100 Student 9110 Student 1099 x x x /7=5.57 Growth 10 or more students 0 Growth = One Year

NeSA

Highest and Lowest Standards- Reading Vocabulary 3.1.5aL L L LL 3.1.5c HHH 3.1.5d LLLHL Comprehension a H L 3.1.6bH H 3.1.6c HHHHL 3.1.6d LLH 3.1.6eL H LLH 3.1.6fH H 3.1.6gLLL L 3.1.6h H 3.1.6jHH H 3.1.6k HL

Highest and Lowest Standards Math Number Sense/SystemL LH H LLH LNT 3.1.2OperationsL L NT 3.1.3ComputationNT LL 3.1.4Estimation HH 3.2.1Characteristics of ObjectsH HHNT HH Coordinate GeometryL H 3.2.3Transformations 3.2.4Spatial Modeling 3.2.5Measurement H LLL LH 3.3.1Relationships H L 3.3.2Modeling in Context 3.3.3Procedures L L Data Display & Analysis/Probability ConceptsHH LH 3.4.2Predictions and Inferences L 3.4.3Inferences H L

Check for Learning

C4L- Early April 170 member districts Over 7,000 teacher created items in reading, math, and science Over 112,000 student accounts Over 255,000 tests have been administered online Districts have created over 31,000 unique assessments

C4L Last Week 190 test administrations