A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to the State Plan Committee December 14, 2006.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Ohio’s Vocational Rehabilitation Program Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities' (OOD) mission is to ensure individuals with disabilities achieve.
COOPERATIVE PARTNERSHIPS & RESOURCING OPTIONS Michigan Rehabilitation Services Michigan Association On Higher Education And Disability Cooperative Partnerships.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Cash Management and Business Officers Hal Deuser Assistant Bursar Webster University.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters:  Madelyn Johnson, Auditor, U.S. Department of Education, OIG, Dallas Regional Office,
Overview of Statewide AT Program Fiscal and Contract Management.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
SILC-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization 1 Resource Development within the Scope of SILC Duties March 27, 2014 Presenter:
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Tanielle Chandler, Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation.
1 Civil Rights & Federal Financial Assistance General Overview  Various Federal civil rights laws apply to recipients of Federal financial assistance.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Bureau of Rehabilitation Services (BRS) Department of Rehabilitation Services (DORS) Understanding the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 2) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
1 1 Roles and Responsibilities in the CDBG Program For Grant Administrators.
Program and Fiscal Compliance Issues Geri Baucom, Fiscal/Contracts Specialist Johnna Meyer, Policy Manager California Department of Aging.
Audio is available via internet. Please be sure your… speakers are attached and turned on and your volume is up.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) edgar.html.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Program Review Guide-Through An interactive, step by step guide to preparing for RSA’s program review Rik Opstelten- NATTAP Begin This is an inter-active.
WV Birth to Three NECTAC Medicaid Conference Call December, 2006 Presented by Pamela Roush, Director WV Birth to Three.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
 1. Adequacy of Support from Tribal Applicant  2. Reasonable Project Costs  3. Reasonable Costs to Serve Consumers 1.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) Monitoring Overview.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
AFP and Telework Program Review U.S. Department of Education OSERS/RSA Rob Groenendaal and Brian Bard.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
Effective Grant Writing For YTP Keith Ozols Vocational Rehabilitation Keith Ozols Vocational Rehabilitation.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
1 CDBG Roles and Responsibilities For Local Officials.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Over 34,000 people served in Coops of which, more than 4,000 cases resulted in successful employment closures annually.
Effective Grant Writing For YTP Michael Johnson, U of O Clayton Rees OVRS Michael Johnson, U of O Clayton Rees OVRS.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 1) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Low-Income Tax Credit Provisions Beth Mullen March 5, 2009.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. VR PRACTICES. REORGANIZATION OF THE DESIGNATED STATE AGENCY AND THE DESIGNATED STATE UNIT Presenters: Jim Doyle, VR Program Specialist,
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services United States Department of Education Program Review and Best Practices: Who, What, When, Where,
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Rehabilitation Services Administration
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Low-Income Tax Credit Provisions Beth Mullen March 5, 2009.
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Uniform Guidance and Internal Controls
Presentation transcript:

A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Craig McManus, Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration, (202) Tonya Stellar, Vocational Rehabilitation Program Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration, (202) Match and MOE Management THIRD-PARTY COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENTS (TPCA)

Topics TPCA as Match Requirements Considerations Implementation of TPCA Requirements Examples

Match State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program Non- Federal: Minimum: 21.3 percent Federal: Maximum: 78.7 percent 34 CFR CFR 80.24

Match Sources in General: Political Subdivisions Donations Randolph-Sheppard Set-Aside funds Surface Transportation Act funds

Match Sources in General: State Legislature Transfers from State Agencies Establishment Projects TPCAs

Sources of Match Requirements 34 CFR The cooperating agency must furnish all or part of the non-federal share… 2.New or modified services with a VR focus 3.Only available to applicants for, or recipients of, VR services 4.DSU must maintain administrative supervision… 5.State plan requirements apply! 6.Statewideness

Requirement 1 The cooperating agency must furnish all or part of the non- Federal share… The designated State unit may enter into a third-party cooperative arrangement for providing or administering vocational rehabilitation services with another State agency or a local public agency that is furnishing part or all of the non-Federal share… 34 CFR (a) The cooperating agency must be a State or local public agency...

Requirement 2 New or Modified Services with a VR Focus The services provided by the cooperating agency are not the customary or typical services provided by that agency but are new services that have a vocational rehabilitation focus or existing services that have been modified, adapted, expanded, or reconfigured to have a vocational rehabilitaton focus. 34 CFR (a)(1)

Requirement 2 (con’t) Generally, the question of whether services are “new” or “modified, adapted, expanded, or reconfigured” may be difficult to discern. The services cannot be services that the cooperating agency is already providing or has the legal responsibility to provide. The services must have a VR focus.

Requirement 3 Only Available to Applicants for, or Recipients of, VR services The services provided by the cooperating agency are only available to applicants for, or recipients of, services from the designated State unit. 34 CFR (a)(2) It is important to look at whom the program will serve. Only applicants for, and individuals who are eligible for, VR services can participate.

Requirement 4 DSU Must Maintain Administrative Supervision… Program expenditures and staff providing services under the cooperative arrangement are under the administrative supervision of the designated State unit. 34 CFR (a)(3) The DSU must maintain administrative supervision over both funds and staff. This does not mean that the staff has to be employees of the DSU. The DSU must maintain control of the non-delegable functions.

Requirement 5 State Plan Requirements Apply! All State plan requirements, including a State's order of selection, will apply to all services provided under the cooperative program. 34 CFR (a)(4) If an agency is on an order of selection, the third party cooperative arrangement program must also adhere to that order of selection for the individuals that it serves.

Requirement 6 Statewideness If a third party cooperative agreement does not comply with the statewideness requirement in §361.25, the State unit must obtain a waiver of statewideness, in accordance with § CFR (b)

Requirement 6 (con’t) The statewideness requirement set forth in 34 CFR states, “The State plan must assure that services provided under the State plan will be available in all political subdivisions of the State, unless a waiver of statewideness is requested and approved in accordance with § ” A waiver of statewideness is almost always required for the following types of cooperative arrangements: with school districts to provide transition services; and with a county developmental disability or mental health office.

Considerations When reviewing sources of match, keep in mind programming must meet the needs of the consumers served. In addition, sources of match, including TPCA, must generally be used for prescribed purposes and/or to provide services to specific groups of individuals.

Considerations (con’t) Allowable Services for TPCAs: must meet the requirements at 34 CFR , identifying the provision of VR services; and 34 CFR 361.5(b)(58) defines VR services provided to an individual as those listed in 34 CFR

Considerations (con’t) Differences between TPCAs and Inter-agency Transfers: With Inter-agency Transfers – VR provides the VR services; and The public agency provides all cash.

Implementation of TPCA Requirements EDGAR 34 CFR Standards for financial management systems. (a) “A State must expend and account for grant funds in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for its own funds.”

Implementation of TPCA Requirements (con’t) EDGAR 34 CFR Standards for financial management systems. BUT… they must be sufficient to permit: preparation of reports; and tracing of funds to establish that they were not used in violation of restrictions and prohibitions of applicable statutes.

Implementation of TPCA Requirements (con’t) Remember your Cost Principles (2 CFR Part 225). Agencies must be able to trace expenditures, ensuring the certified expenditures are allowable and allocable to the TPCA.

Implementation of TPCA Requirements (con’t) EDGAR 34 CFR 80 requirements: “Grantees are responsible for managing the day-to- day operation of grant and subgrant supported activities… to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved.”

Implementation of TPCA Requirements (con’t) Contract Considerations: fiscal information – detailed budget (total non-Federal and Federal Shares); scope of services – list services and describe how they are new, modified and expanded; VR agency staff responsibilities– describe supervision and procedures for accountability (monitoring of on-site files, vouchers, payroll activity reports, and quarterly match reports); and performance goals- include performance measures to evaluate fiscal and program operations.

EXAMPLES THIRD PARTY COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENTS

Example 1: Concerns Outreach services provided to VR consumers such as providing transition fairs or parent/student meetings do not have a VR focus, but are the usual or customary services provided to all students at the school, and are covered by the interagency agreement (34 CFR (a)(1). As a result students who are not applicants for, or recipients of, VR services are receiving the same services as VR consumers (34 CFR (a)(2).

Example 2: Concerns Services provided to VR consumers are provided to students not in the VR program; therefore, they are the usual or customary services available to all students at the school (34 CFR (a)(1). Even if services were new or modified with a VR focus, only half of the X program participants are applicants for, or recipients of, VR services (34 CFR (a)(2). All participants under the arrangement must be applicants for, or recipients of, VR services

Example 3: Concerns The Y program did not follow the VR agency’s OOS as required by 34 CFR (a)(4). According to the cooperative agreement, the Y program curriculum was available to “all” students. The time sheets of Y program staff failed to demonstrate activities were traceable to the VR program as required by 34 CFR 80.20(a)(2), and thus chargeable to the third-party cooperative arrangement. Therefore, activities and expenditures cannot be traced to the VR program adequately enough to determine whether all requirements have been satisfied.

Example 3: Concerns (con’t) The Y program curriculum did not have a new or expanded VR focus as required by 34 CFR (a)(1), but focused on teaching students critical skills related to non-VR issues. The curriculum was not limited to individuals who were VR applicants or consumers as required by 34 CFR (a)(2). Instead, the third party cooperative agreements indicated that “all” students would be served through the Y program curriculum. The VR agency did not maintain administrative supervision of the expenditures or staff providing services pursuant to the Y program agreements, as required by 34 CFR (a)(3).

For more information… Matching Requirements 34 CFR Matching and cost sharing 34 CFR Third-party cooperative arrangements involving funds from other public agencies 34 CFR Waiver of statewideness 34 CFR Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for individuals with disabilities 34 CFR Standards for financial management systems 34 CFR Monitoring and program performance 34 CFR Cost Principles 2 CFR Part 225 RSA-TAC Sources of Non-Federal Share for the Vocational Rehabilitation Program

QUESTIONS?