Wastewater Workgroup Conference Call December 6, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accommodating CSO Flows /Loadings in the Chesapeake Bay Nutrient TMDL
Advertisements

Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
w-fn005 1 Ocean Outfall Legislation Compliance City of Hollywood Department of Public Utilities LARGE USER MEETING October 2, 2008.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
WEAO2012 Technical Conference USING ONLINE ANALYZER FOR OPTIMIZING CHEMICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESS IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT Ottawa, Ontario,
Strategic Process Engineering Liquid Treatment Processes at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant Tier 1 Workshop Blue Plains Users October.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Rivers and Upper Bay Presented by: Jennifer Cragan Environmental Scientist.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Rates History since 2001 Cost per 2-month billing period, not adjusted for inflation 2012 and 2013 rates are probable, not yet adopted.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
. Topographic map of the Refuge marsh (figure provided by Dr. E.A. Meselhe based on USGS topography data). Elevations are in feet, NGVD29.Form USGS data;
Loch Vale Watershed, Rocky Mountain National Park.
Cañon City Weather Averages Boulder Weather Averages Denver Weather Averages Colorado Springs Weather Averages Fort Collins Weather Averages Total Avg.
NYCDEP Evaluation of Watershed Management Programs FAD requirement: Last one ; Next FAD Assessment : Use models to evaluate effects.
Model Application for WQS Review Process December 14, 2011 Laura Weintraub.
Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Agriculture Giacomo Trombi, Roberto Ferrise, Marco Moriondo & Marco Bindi DiSAT – University of Florence Rome –
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
McMaster Innovation Park 114A-175 Longwood Road South Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1 Canada Brazil Water and Wastewater Mission.
Scientific Irrigation Scheduling provisional analysis and research plan BPA December 2014.
Department of the Environment Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program Phase I- Trading between point sources and trading involving connecting on-site septic.
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
Recent hydrological and climatological changes V. Barros.
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
The Annual Analysis of Tax Bill Changes. Prepared by the Bedford Board of Assessors December 30, 2013.
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium Update Holly Greening Tampa Bay Estuary Program March 2014.
Atmospheric Deposition Strategy Straw Proposal. What Pollutants Matter? Highest priority – known impairment AND air sources: Hg, dioxins Moderate priority.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
1 Briefing Materials Flow and Nitrogen Issues By: D.C. Water and Sewer Authority February 28, 2008 Blue Plains Regional Committee Presented to: District.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate a suite of management scenarios to address the Old Tampa Bay issues using integrated modeling tools.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
Freshwater Flow to Puget Sound is Declining Why? 2009 American Water Resources Association Annual Water Resources Conference Curtis DeGasperi King County.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
COG staff - Presentation to WRTC September 6, 2013 COG’s Round 8.2 Cooperative Forecast & Regional Wastewater Flow Projections.
November 17, 2015 NC AWWA-WEA Annual conference
Point Sources Progress Reporting Management Board Conference Call February 9, 2012.
All Flow to YCUA WWTP is Pumped Original Stations Built Early 1980s – Std Centrifugal Sewage Pumps – Extended Motor Shafts – Throttling to Match Flow.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
RB-Explorer M7a –Water Quality and Ecology Workgroup WFD-Explorer model wrapup.
Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Conference Call Tuesday, July 10, 2012 Marty Hurd WWDB Data Reporting System.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #5 July 15 – September 15.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
1 NPRR638 (Seasonality) Back-Cast Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public October 3, 2014.
Drought in the Western U.S.. Mean US Precipitation (in inches) Average Precipitation in 1 Year (in inches):
Performance Measurement Workgroup 12/16/ Update on CMMI Waiver Target Metric  HSCRC and CMMI have agreed to Version 5 of readmission measure,
Update on PI Modeling and Nitrogen Removal at Blue Plains
Performance Measurement Workgroup
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Manchester’s CSO Program: A Look Behind and a Look Ahead
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
2011 Census - Household Results for Wales
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Revision of Error Margins Agenda point 9 (point for decision)
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Summary of Slide Content
Revision of Error Margins Agenda point 3.4 (point for decision)
Performance Measurement Workgroup
Figure 1. a) Location of the two study watersheds and land use in these two watersheds in 2008; b) Field allocation number and BMPs implemented in the.
Arno River Basin Authority
Estimated Available Nutrient Credits
EDGECUMBE SITE RECONSENTING DISCHARGES TO RANGITĀIKI RIVER
Presentation transcript:

Wastewater Workgroup Conference Call December 6, 2011

2 Estimating Point Sources for Progress Scenarios Issues/Concerns: 1.Comparable modeling of Point and NP sources for progress runs, milestones, Bay Barometer –NPS: estimates are based on 10-year average hydrology –PS: estimates are based on discharge flow data 2.PS flow discharge data is influenced by weather conditions 3.Accounting for reductions in recently upgraded facilities where discharge data is not available.

3 Estimating Point Sources for Progress Scenarios Actions Requested: –Provide feedback on proposed supplemental indicators –Provide feedback on methodology –Decide on flow averaging period –Decide on TN, TP for upgrade facilities where data is not yet available.

4 Progress Scenarios – Flow Comparison Are we comparing Apples and Oranges? Q ave Nonpoint Sources Q ave Point Sources

WWTP Flow = 515 mgd TN Load M lb 2007 WWTP Flow = mgd TN Load M lb 2001 Prec = inches 2007 Precip = inches WWTP Annual Flows CY Annual Precipitation CY Precipitation vs Flows/Loads General Trend: Dry years => Lower WWTP Flows Wet Years => Higher WWTP Flows

6 Estimated WWTPs Flow Increase based on Population Growth

7 Annual Upgraded WWTP Flows Annual TN Load

8 Annual Flow Weighted TN Concentrations Trend – Concentration decreases showing Progress Annual Upgraded WWTP Flows

9 Annual Flow Weighted TN Concentrations Trend – Concentration decreases showing Progress Annual Upgraded WWTP Flows

10

11

12 Estimating Point Sources for Progress Scenarios Proposed supplemental indicators –Use 10-year rolling average to estimate PS Loads –Use Actual TN, TP for facilities operating with upgrades for about a year –Use default TN, TP for facilities where data is not yet available