Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR): Historical Overview David LaRoche.
Advertisements

Laura McKelvey, U.S. EPA. 2  CAA Implementation Authority [Section 301(d)] ◦ 1990 CAA Amendments ◦ Tribal air management authority ◦ TAS / TIP.
Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.
Forest County Potawatomi Natalene Cummings Air Quality Program Manager.
PSD Workgroup David Klemp State of Montana. Problem Statements Redesignation –Untimely processing of PSD Redesignation requests and limited guidance for.
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AQRV WORKGROUP (FLAG): CONSTRUCTING A CONSISTENT PROCESS.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Public Review vs “affected state” Review: advantages of TAS for section 505 Reviewing NSR and Title V Permits Natalene Cummings Forest County Potawatomi.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Working with State and Federal Regulatory and Land Management Agencies Trent Wickman USDA Forest Service Eastern Region, Lakes States.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
1 Gila River Indian Community By Will Antone III, Air Quality Specialist.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Mississippi Air Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality September 12, 2012.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Tribal Perspective and Engagement: Regional Haze Planning March 2015 Regional Haze Planning Meeting – TEAM.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe Courtesy of the Southern Ute Air Quality Program Presentation Prepared by: James Temte and Virgil Frazier.
1 GRIC Tribal Implementation Plan Development Dan Blair, Air Program Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
1 GRIC TAS Development Process Dan Blair Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Welcome Revisions of Chapter WAC Sections -035 and -036 Rule advisory committee workshop #5 Lacey, WA October 28, 2009.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Recent PSD Experiences in SWRO Regulatory & Statutory Requirements Relationship with EPA Federal Land Managers - FLAG Appeals.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Distinguishing between SIP/FIP/TIP Chris Lee ITEP/TAMS Center.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
PSD Permitting Process Nancy Mayer EPA OAQPS. 2 Topics Find technical resources for permit review Describe how permits are constructed Describe what to.
TRIBAL DECISION ON IMPLEMENTATION TAS/DELEGATION/TIP TIP/TAS Training December 3, 2012.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
Treatment as a State Willard Antone III, (Air Quality Specialist) Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
The Grants Documents File ITEP – Air Program and Grants Management Milwaukee, WI August 30-September 2, 2011 Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
GRIC Case Study Permit Review Dan Blair, Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Regional Haze, PM, and Permits Update WESTAR Fall Meeting September 26, 2006.
David Klemp State of Montana
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Sources Committee Presentation Spring 2003 WESTAR Business Meeting
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
Preparing for Permit Review
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
Treatment in the Same Manner As A State (TAS)
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
PSD Issues in PM2.5 Transition Proposal
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
Designations for Indian Country
Class I Redesignations
Navajo Nation Minor Source Regulations
David Klemp State of Montana
Presentation transcript:

Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011

WHAT DOES CLASS I HAVE TO OFFER Smaller/tighter increments for 3 pollutants (not all) II I SO PM NO μg/m 3 annual Smaller increment extends 100km (62 miles) beyond the exterior boundary of the reservation. Protections for Air Quality Related Values (AQRVs) Opportunity to review permit application, and the opportunity to provide weighted comments that must be addressed by state/feds. Permit applications must include 1) an analysis of the increment consumption of the proposed project, 2) a cumulative impact analysis and, 3) an AQRV analysis in air permit application.

Mandatory Federal (CAA § 162) – In existence prior to August 1977 International parks National memorial parks and wilderness areas exceeding 5,000 acres National parks exceeding 6,000 National monuments, primitive areas, and preserves where AQRVs are important attributes of the area (no size indicated) Non-mandatory State - (CAA § 164 (b)) – Areas as the state deems appropriate for Class I, State lands A national monument, primitive area, preserve, rec area, W&S river, wildlife refuge, or lake/sea-shore exceeding 10,000 acres (no date) (Federal Non-mandatory) National park or wilderness areas exceeding 10,000 acres established after August 1977 (Federal Non- mandatory) NONE TO DATE Indian Reservations (CAA § 164 (c)) – Land within the exterior boundaries of reservations of federally recognized Indian tribes may be redesignated only by the appropriate Indian governing body (no size indicated) Flathead - MontanaFort Peck – Montana Northern Cheyenne – MontanaSpokane – Washington Forest County Potawatomi - Wisconsin Types of Class I Areas

December 1993letter of intent to EPA Fall 1994 technical report submitted June 1995 Michigan and Wisconsin file dispute w/EPA Forest County Potawatomi Community’s Class I History

“On again – off again”relationship with Wisconsin

Dispute Agreement with WDNR Michigan Wisconsin FCPC agrees to specified AQRVs FCPC agreed to reduced radius (10 miles) for increments – kept 100 km (62 mi) for AQRV analysis requirement FCPC responsible for AQRV effects analysis

2004Final request to EPA to resolve Michigan’s dispute and grant FCPC Class I October 2006FCPC files notice of intent to litigate with EPA August 2007Tribal Council flies to D.C. to check on status of Class I request with EPA April 29, 2008Class I Approved!!!! Forest County Potawatomi Community’s Class I History cont.

Life After Class I Happy Ever After

The Permit Application Notification and Comment Process

When the honeymoon is over Class I will most likely take much longer for approval than a construction permit will. Class I does not prevent a pollution source from being approved for construction. NSR PSD major permits for new or modified sources (Part 70 Title V operating permits not included). Pollution permits are written in a foreign language. “Æ 2 ð Đ  Ω ↙ c. S134ð € =- O Łő oms”

What is the baseline for increment if it hasn’t been triggered yet?

“Whether it’s a TIP or a FIP they still have to do a SIP” FCPC Class I not standard Wisconsin’s Class I SIP for standard Class I areas “If Tribe writes FIP, we don’t have to write a SIP.”

“Oh yeah but, WHO’s is the FLM (Federal Land Manager) for the FCPC’s Class I, hmmm?”

What would a TIP for Class I consist of? What would a TIP for Class I consist of?

And they all lived happy ever after