 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ecology Core Dataset: Information to Support Effective Management in the Pacific Northwest The Ecology Core Dataset: Information to Support Effective.
Advertisements

The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Research, Citizen Involvement, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Jack Sullivan Science Services Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Thinning intensity studies and growth modeling of Montana mixed conifer forests at the University of Montana’s Lubrecht Experimental Forest Thomas Perry.
- Description of scenarios -No treatment -Status quo -Resilience - Preliminary model results - Management and decision making in Envision.
Sustainable Landowner Options for Aspen Forests Charly Ray, Northern Ecosystem Services Jason Fischbach, UW-Extension June 8, 2013.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
An Envirothon Primer Glenn “Dode” Gladders
What is Silviculture? Silviculture is the application of the principles of forest ecology to a stand of trees to help meet specified objectives. Objectives.
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY SUB-GROUP UPDATE THURSDAY 23 RD JANUARY 2014 YVETTE DICKINSON.
Overstory and understory vegetation management to meet fire resilience and wildlife habitat objectives Eric Knapp, Becky Estes, and Carl Skinner U.S. Forest.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
“The conservation objective in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is to provide forested habitat capable of supporting sustainable populations of all forest.
Physical Evidence used to Establish Reference Conditions for the Southwest Jemez CFLR Project In order to set goals that underlie restoration treatments,
Key Recommendations and Products From a Series of Dry-Forest Workshops in Oregon and Washington Redmond, OR October 14, 2009.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Applying Density Management to Develop Late Successional Features Klaus J. Puettmann Oregon State University.
Effects of Beech Bark Disease and Silvicultural Management in Northern Hardwood Ecosystems: Tree Growth, Tree Regeneration, and Invertebrate Biodiversity.
Examples. Using FEPF to identify priority treatment areas based on soil erosion potential and critical fish habitat In the Bitterroot Valley, MT.
A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
A Scientific Basis for Ecological Restoration and Management of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed-Conifer Forests of the Colorado Front Range Context Need for.
Sugar Bush Management: Module 2 - Management Planning 1 Principles and Practices of Sugar Bush Management Module 2 – Management Planning.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Wisconsin’s Continuous Forest Inventory State Forest Working Group Meeting Plymouth, WI May 10, 2006 Teague PrichardChip Scott WDNR State Lands SpecialistUSDA.
CFLRP MONITORING Pike & San Isabel National Forests & Cimarron & Comanche National Grasslands 2013 FIELD TRIP September 13, 2013 Front Range Round Table.
1 America’s Longleaf Restoration Initiative Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class Definitions Update Clay Ware US Fish and Wildlife Service April 25, 2013.
Commonly referred to as MIS.  From the 1982 planning regulations 36 CFR (a)(1)- “… certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the.
Terrestrial Resources Working Group June 3, 2008.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Wildlife Working Team 1 Rick & Lynne to edit by may meeting Team Scope Roundtable.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
North Coast Forest Conservation Program Northern Spotted Owl Status Overview Madison Thomson (707)
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Front Range CFLRP 2011 Social and Economic Monitoring Results November 14, 2012 Kathie Mattor, Kawa Ng, Julie Schaefers, Tony Cheng, and Carrie Tremblatt.
The Vegetation Module Seth Bigelow, Malcolm North Sierra Nevada Research Center, USDA-FS Pacific SW Research Stn, UC Davis Dept of Plant Sciences.
Planning for Inventory & Monitoring Chip Scott National Inventory & Monitoring Applications Center (FIA-NIMAC) Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service.
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Landscape Restoration Team CY 2014 Goals CY 2014 Deliverables Scope Why this? Why.
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Biological Planning Process for Partners in Flight How to Translate Population Targets into Habitat Objectives at Eco-Regional Scales West Gulf Coastal.
Responses of Large Mammals to Prescribed and Wildfires in Southwest Jemez Mountains, New Mexico James W. Cain III 1, Robert Parmenter 2, Mark A. Peyton.
Sustaining Front Range Forests & Communities February 26, 2010.
Small Mammals Mark Peyton, Ruth Passernig, Robert Parmenter.
SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES. SILVICULTURE The application of various treatments such as; tree planting, pruning, intermediate cuttings and harvest cuts.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Karen Honeycutt, CFLR Coordinator, Natural Resource Program Manager LiDAR and the Northeast Washington Forest Vision 2020.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
2015 Collaborative Forest Restoration Program Annual Workshop CFRP Eligibility: Attend an annual workshop with other stakeholders for the purpose of discussing.
CFI NPT Forestry & Fire Management Division.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
The Yin and Yang of Monitoring: Lessons Learned From Development of Monitoring Programs on Federal and Private Lands Brett Wolk Colorado Forest Restoration.
René Alfaro, Jodi Axelson, Brad Hawkes, Lara vanAkker and Bill Riel
Ozark Highlands CFLR Restoration planning
Hawks Aloft, Inc. Fire Avian Monitoring for Jemez Collaborative Landscape Forest Restoration Project
Funding: National Park Service, U.S.G.S.
Forestry.
how do I know when I’m done?
Ecological Restoration of Standing Dead Wood: Evaluation of the use of bark beetle pheromones and other snag-creation methods to provide standing dead.
Forestry Canadian Geography.
Forestry Geography of Canada.
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Kirk Hanson (360)
Forestry Geography of Canada.
Rancheria Forest Restoration Project
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including wildlife habitat components such as snags, dead/down material 2

Tier 2: Monitoring and/or research we would like to see completed that could be funded by partners, grants, and so on  Examples include:  Aquatic Invertebrates as a measure of Watershed Restoration  Wildlife Indicator Species for each of the Stand Types  Research by SRME 3

Two Levels of Monitoring:  Landscape Scale  Treatment Area (Stand) Scale 4

Landscape Level –  How are defining landscape?  800,000 acre restoration zone  Restoration zones around the northern focus areas and southern focus area  HUC 6  Look at Trend towards restoration as identified in Kauffman papers (or future research)  Change in Fire Behavior (an aggregation of Stand Data collected at Stand or Treatment Unit level) 5

6

 Stand/Treatment Level – Separate ranges for the 2 major cover types in the restoration area: ◦ Ponderosa pine ◦ Mixed Conifer: Ponderosa Pine/Douglas-fir 7 Metrics Include: Trees per acre Basal Area Tree species composition Age Classes Canopy Cover Crown Base Height Canopy Bulk Density Understory species composition Presence of noxious weeds/exotics

 Restoration zone is defined in the CFLR Proposal as the Lower Montane (as identified in 2006 Roundtable Report). The definition can be refined as needed.  Current NEPA is based on Kauffman Paper(s).  Doesn’t allow diameter limits or age limits in defining trees to be left after treatment  Future NEPA can be based on what we learn through monitoring and additional research 8

 Definition of Old Growth is a Forest Plan level decision, not something that can be decided by this group, independent of other stakeholders.  AR has an old growth definition in their Current Forest Plan  Pike doesn’t have an old growth definition but it will be defined when the forest goes through the forest plan revision process in a year or two 9

 Metrics need to be easily measured given yearly funding limitations  Desired conditions need to be displayed in ranges, not absolute amounts 10

11  What we know – ◦ MPB is spreading into Ponderosa Pine Type (PP)  History – ◦ MPB has cause extensive mortality before  Research – ◦ Increased MPB mortality in higher stocking (BA & # trees/acre) and larger diameter trees  What Could Happen - ◦ Could and currently are experiencing heavy mortality in PP type

12