California Child Welfare Indicators Project YOUTH IN EXTENDED FOSTER CARE Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.

Advertisements

Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,

Crowne Plaza Hotel, Foster City, California January 23, 2008 STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIPS TO BUILD A PLAN FOR CAPTA CHANGES.

California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%

Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.

How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%

How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.

California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.

The C-CFSR or Some of My Best Friends are Outcome Measures National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data.

Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.

An overview of basic California foster care data Joe Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.

Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.

CWS Outcomes System Update: (data through April 1, 2008 ) Racial/Ethnic Disparities (data for CY 2007) Center for Social Services Research University of.

Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.

California Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability Legislation: Evolving Toward System Improvement with Longitudinal Data & Analysis Panel on Increasing.

The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Making the Most of Your Composite Computational Spreadsheet: Tools from California.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 National Standard/Composite Scores Center for Social Services Research.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Prepared for The California Disproportionality Project Center for Social Services.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Foster Care in California: What the Data Tells Us Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.

Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.

Safety and Permanence in Child Welfare Second Canadian Roundtable on Child Welfare Outcomes October 8-9, 2009 Montreal, Canada Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.

AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.

Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: A Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,

Child Welfare Administrative Data: The UCB Performance Indicators Project cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSReports Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services.

Presentation originally created by William C Dawson & Amy C Nuñez The Performance Indicators Project & the Administrative Office of the Courts: Toward.

County of __________ Welcome to our System Improvement Planning Process! Facilitated by:

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts Children’s Roundtable Summit.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Safety and Permanence in Child Welfare Second Canadian Roundtable on Child Welfare.

AB 12: California Fostering Connections to Success Act Policy Overview and Implications for THP-Plus Presentation to THP-Plus Institute July 28, 2009.

When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.

Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.

CALIFORNIA’S MOST VULNERABLE PARENTS: WHEN MALTREATED CHILDREN HAVE CHILDREN Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW Julie Cederbaum, PhD Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare Performance Indicators Project: “irresistible information”

Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.

Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.

AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.

Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.

RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Applying Data for System Improvement: Probation Agency Staff Daniel Webster,

Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.

Changing the Outcome: Achieving and Sustaining a Safe Reduction in Foster Care: A Policy Institute November 4-6, 2009 Tampa, FL Setting the Course: Unpacking.

Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University of California, Berkeley

Changing the Outcome: Achieving and Sustaining a Safe Reduction in Foster Care: A Policy Institute November 4-6, 2009 Tampa, FL Addressing Disproportionality.

CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.

Kinship Foster Care in California Testimony to Assembly Select Committee on Foster Care Sacramento, CA 2/15/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social.

Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.

Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.

Everything you always wanted to know about S. - urvival Curves (

Center for Social Services Research

Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts Children’s Roundtable Summit November 21, 2009 Making Data Informed Decisions (Ramblings from the Left.

Foster Care in California: What we Know from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.

BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD

Presentation transcript:

California Child Welfare Indicators Project YOUTH IN EXTENDED FOSTER CARE Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley The California Child Welfare Indicators Project (CCWIP) is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation

Research Questions? How many youth age are in extended foster care (EFC)? How has the number of youth age in foster care changed since the implementation of AB12? What are the demographic and case characteristics of youth in EFC? Are there county differences in the percentage of foster youth in EFC? How many EFC youth will be turning 21 and no longer be eligible for EFC? 1

How many youth age are in EFC? 2

As of July 1, 2014, 9,032 youth age were in foster care in California. Of these, 83 percent were child welfare supervised and 17 percent were probation supervised. 3

How many youth age are in EFC? 4

How has the number of youth age in foster care changed since the implementation of AB12? The number of youth age in foster care in California increased 211 percent between July 1, 2010 (2,908) and July 1, 2014 (9,032). The number of youth age in foster care increased 187 percent among child welfare supervised youth and 418 percent among probation supervised youth. 5

Caseload Trends 6

The growth in the foster care caseload age is attributable to: a decline in exits, and an increase in reentries to foster care, after implementation of AB12. 7

Exit Trends 8

Exits from foster care among youth age declined 46 percent between 2010 (5,787) and 2014 (3,145). Exits declined primarily among youth in child welfare supervised foster care. 9

Reentry Trends 10

Reentry Trends Following implementation of AB12 in 2012, reentries to foster care among youth age have risen each year. In 2012, 300 youth age reentered care and in 2013, 553 did so. Reentries following implementation of AB12 were most common among youth in child welfare supervised foster care. 11

2014 Youth Age In Foster Care (8 or More Days in Care) Race/EthnicityGender 12

2014 Youth Age In Foster Care (8 or More Days in Care) 13

2014 Youth Age In Foster Care (8 or More Days in Care) Time in Care 14

2014 Youth Age Receiving Child Welfare Services 15

What are the demographic and case characteristics of youth in EFC? Black and Latino youth account for the majority of year olds in EFC. Thirty-eight percent of year olds in EFC are living in supervised independent living placements (SILP). More than half of year olds in EFC have been in care for 4 or more years. Eighty-one percent of youth age receiving services in 2014 were in supportive transition. 16

Are there county differences in the percentage of foster youth in EFC? 17

Are there county differences in the percentage of foster youth in EFC? 18

Are there county differences in the percentage of foster youth in EFC? 19

Are there county differences in the percentage of foster youth in EFC? The proportion of the foster care caseload age 18-20, increased between 2010 and 2014 for all except two counties. The proportion of California’s foster care caseload age increased from 5 percent in 2010 to 14 percent in

California: Allegation, Substantiation, Entry, and In Care Rates per 1,000 How many EFC youth will be turning 21 and no longer be eligible for EFC ? 21

Questions? For more information please contact: Stephanie Cuccaro-Alamin 22

Needell, B., Webster, D., Armijo, M., Lee, S., Dawson, W., Magruder, J., Exel, M., Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Putnam- Hornstein, E., King, B., Sandoval, A., Yee, H., Mason, F., Benton, C., Pixton, E., Lou, C., & Peng, C. (2014). CCWIP reports. Retrieved 12/2014, from University of California at Berkeley California Child Welfare Indicators Project website. URL: 23