SHEF and IPEDS Annual FTE Data: A Comparative Study Professional Development Conference August 15-17, Chicago Takeshi Yanagiura, Data Analyst State Higher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Fifty Nifty United States
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
5 Year Total LIHEAP Block Grant Allotment (FY ) While LIHEAP is intended to assist low-income families with their year-round home energy needs,
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2003 CONFERENCE, BURLINGTON, VT SEPTEMBER 3-5, 2003 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education J. Michael Mullen WVFAA November 6, 2003.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
State Support for Higher Education Illinois Board of Higher Education January 26, 2010 Paul E. Lingenfelter, President State Higher Education Executive.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
By Carol Fahringer. I.The United States: Divided Into 8 Different Political Regions.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
USA ILLUSTRATIONS – US CHARACTER Go ahead and replace it with your own text. This is an example text. Go ahead and replace it with your own text Go ahead.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
2012 IFTA / IRP MANAGERS’AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WORKSHOP
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The United States.
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Content Objective: Language Objectives:
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Fifty nifty United States
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Fifty Nifty United States
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Facilities Forum State-by-State Analysis of Demographics, Affordability, and Appropriations.
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Regions of the United States
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Presidential Electoral College Map
2012 US Presidential Election Result
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The estimated number of adults and adolescents living with AIDS in each region of the 50 states and the District of Columbia increased from 1993 through.
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
In 2006, approximately 46% of all AIDS cases among adults and adolescents were in the South, followed by the Northeast (26%), the West (16%), and the Midwest.
Misinformation – We are not extremely over taxed
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

SHEF and IPEDS Annual FTE Data: A Comparative Study Professional Development Conference August 15-17, Chicago Takeshi Yanagiura, Data Analyst State Higher Education Executive Officers

Why did we do this study? SHEF Visibility ↑ SHEF increasingly used as a source of information on enrollments and operating revenues for public higher education SHEF increasingly used as a source of information on enrollments and operating revenues for public higher education Alternative Data: IPEDS Other high-profile policy analyses use IPEDS finance and enrollment data (Measuring Up, NCHEMS Funding Adequacy Study) Other high-profile policy analyses use IPEDS finance and enrollment data (Measuring Up, NCHEMS Funding Adequacy Study) We need to understand the nature and magnitude of differences between the two data sources

Annual FTE % Difference IPEDS Relative to SHEF, (Public 4-year and 2-year institutions) *Dept. of Technical & Adult Education (DTAE) institutions were not included in Georgia's SHEF response in % 39.6% -0.5% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% California Idaho Wisconsin New York Missouri Tennessee Maine Kentucky Pennsylvania Texas Indiana Vermont Ohio Minnesota Hawaii Alaska US Arkansas Virginia Nebraska North Dakota Massachusetts Iowa South Carolina West Virginia Alabama Arizona Louisiana New Mexico North Carolina Utah Maryland Oregon Montana Oklahoma Michigan New Hampshire Mississippi Colorado Wyoming Illinois Connecticut Rhode Island Washington Florida South Dakota New Jersey Delaware Nevada Kansas Georgia*

SHEEO’s Inquiry Timing February – April 2006 February – April 2006 We Provided… Public 2 & 4 yr Annual FTE (AY 2004) from IPEDS Enrollment Survey Public 2 & 4 yr Annual FTE (AY 2004) from IPEDS Enrollment Survey  This is the most recent year for which IPEDS and SHEF annual FTE were available  Prior to , IPEDS FTE estimated from Fall term headcount We asked for… An institution by institution listing of Annual FTE reported to SHEF An institution by institution listing of Annual FTE reported to SHEF Response Rate 34 state agencies responded to SHEEO’s inquiry 34 state agencies responded to SHEEO’s inquiry

Main Findings Differences in SHEF data Relative to IPEDS SUR doesn’t collect Summer FTE SUR doesn’t collect Summer FTE Tribal Colleges Excluded Tribal Colleges Excluded Estimate based on prior year’s data Estimate based on prior year’s data FTE calculation method difference FTE calculation method difference Timing of data collection (End of Term, Census Date) Timing of data collection (End of Term, Census Date) Career Centers, Vocational Training Centers, etc. might be excluded from SHEF even if considered “Public 2-year” in IPEDS Career Centers, Vocational Training Centers, etc. might be excluded from SHEF even if considered “Public 2-year” in IPEDS SHEF excludes non-funded FTE (e.g. Adult Education) SHEF excludes non-funded FTE (e.g. Adult Education)

SHEF and IPEDS: Fundamental Differences Reporting Dates vary by institutions Reporting Dates vary by institutions N = 57 (SHEF) vs. N = Approx (IPEDS) N = 57 (SHEF) vs. N = Approx (IPEDS) State vs. Institutional Perspective State vs. Institutional Perspective Non-funded vs. Funded FTE Non-funded vs. Funded FTE Numeric agreement is not the goal!

Refresh Our Memory I: SHEF FTE Definition 1 Undergraduate FTE = 1 Undergraduate FTE = 30 Credit Hours (for semester systems) 30 Credit Hours (for semester systems) 45 Credit Hours (for quarter systems) 45 Credit Hours (for quarter systems) 900 Contact Hours 900 Contact Hours 1 Graduate/First Professional FTE = 1 Graduate/First Professional FTE = 24 Credit Hours (for semester systems) 24 Credit Hours (for semester systems) 36 Credit Hours (for quarter systems) 36 Credit Hours (for quarter systems) A few states calculate First Professional differently A few states calculate First Professional differently

Refresh Our Memory II: SHEF FTE Definition SHEF FTE Includes: SHEF FTE Includes: Summer FTE (even if it is not state-funded) Summer FTE (even if it is not state-funded) Non-degree credit vocational-technical, remedial and other program enrollments which result in some form of certificate or other formal recognition Non-degree credit vocational-technical, remedial and other program enrollments which result in some form of certificate or other formal recognition SHEF FTE Does Not Include SHEF FTE Does Not Include Non-credit continuing education, adult education, or extension courses, unless they are state-funded. Non-credit continuing education, adult education, or extension courses, unless they are state-funded.

With Identical Institutions Public 2 Public 4 Public 2&4 All Responded States’ Avg. -0.8%1.4% 0.6 % The Largest Difference 20.0%34.6%24.4% IPEDS FTE relative to SHEF FTE

IPEDS Relative to SHEF FTE With Identical Institutions: Public 2-year (States responding to SHEEO’s inquiry Only)

IPEDS Relative to SHEF FTE With Identical Institutions: Public 4-year (States responding to SHEEO’s inquiry Only)

IPEDS Relative to SHEF FTE With Identical Institutions: Public 2- and 4-year Combined (States responding to SHEEO’s inquiry Only)

Implications Over-time Consistency is the most important factor in SHEF Over-time Consistency is the most important factor in SHEF If you want to change FTE reporting method to SHEF, please do so at least from FY 2001, preferably from FY 1991 If you want to change FTE reporting method to SHEF, please do so at least from FY 2001, preferably from FY 1991