Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic Performance Indicators TYNDP/CBA SJWS 6 – 13 May 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aims Competitive Industrial Base (Lisbon jobs and growth) Climate Change (greatest long-term challenge facing the human race) Right Mix/Balance – critical.
Advertisements

Update on Transparency Obligations Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOGs Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
GRIP South South Region Second Edition Gas Regional Investment Plan SGRI – 15 November 2013.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Simulation (GETS 4) GETS 4 - an assessment of future world GHG emission reduction schemes to 2012 and beyond June,
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Tier 3 Approaches, Complex Models or Direct Measurements, in Greenhouse Gas Inventories Report of the.
Concept of Data Collection Vincent Scherrer Junior Adviser, System Development ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW AND OPTIONS THINKING APPROACHES APPLIED TO CLEAN ENERGY INVESTMENT – THE CASE OF CCS Chi Kong CHYONG David REINER Danny RALPH CUEN.
CBA Results Files Filling in the templates. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015
CBA Results Files Getting started. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015
Methodologies for Quantifying Energy Security in the Power Sector William Blyth 24 th April 2005.
1 Hybrid Vehicle Projects © 2006 IARC Decision Support Tool (DST) What is the Decision Support Tool?
Decision and Risk Analysis Financial Modelling & Risk Analysis Kiriakos Vlahos Spring 2000.
Infrastructure projects Initial proposals for SJWS #5 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 April 2012.
Cost-Benefit Analysis Modelling: indicators & Monetization TYNDP/CBA SJWS 6 – 13 May 2014.
CBA Results Files Analysing the results. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015
Market Integration & SoS Initial proposals for SJWS #5 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 March 2012.
Global Competitiveness in a Liberalised EU Energy Market Wim Groenendijk, Member of the Board Brussels, 22 November 2011 Gas infrastructure and Markets.
‘Projections in Hindsight’ – An assessment of past emission projections reported by Member States under EU air pollution and greenhouse gas legislation.
College of Management & Economics, Tianjin University Projections of energy services demand for residential buildings: Insights from a bottom-up methodology.
1 The Basics of Capital Structure Decisions Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
TYNDP SJWS #3 Demand TYNDP – 3 rd SJWS 08 March 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
The current position: a policy stocktake and reflection on the role of economic modelling to date Sarah Hendry, Department for Environment, Food & Rural.
TYNDP SJWS #1 Infrastructure Projects -- Supply & Demand TYNDP st SJWS 24 January 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
Peter HinrichsEconomic Questions and Data Needs1 ELPEN. European Livestock Policy Evaluation Network.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
TYNDP SJWS #2 Security of Supply – Market Integration TYNDP – 2 nd SJWS 15 February 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
Benoît ESNAULT Commission de Régulation de l’Energie 17th Madrid Forum Madrid, 15 January year network development plan ERGEG recommendations.
Concept of Transparency Platform Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
Generation Portfolio Options Study Philip O’Donnell Manager, Generation Analysis 14 October 2009.
1 Chapter 8 Economic Integration. 2 Learning Objectives To review types of economic integration among countries To examine the costs and benefits of integrative.
Copyright © 2006 by Applied Strategies Consulting. All rights reserved. Applied Strategies Consulting 400 S El Camino Real, Suite 375 San Mateo, CA
TYNDP concept SJWS #7 – conclusion on TYNDP concept TYNDP Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 29 May 2012.
TYNDP SJWS #5 Demand & Supply – Infrastructure Projects TYNDP – 5 th SJWS 20 April 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
CAPRI EC4MACS Kick Off meeting, Laxenburg, Peter Witzke, EuroCARE The role of EuroCARE and Bonn University in EC4MACS The role of EuroCARE.
Analyzing Supply Chain Performance under Different Collaborative Replenishment Strategies AIT Masters Theses Competition Wijitra Naowapadiwat Industrial.
Implementation of Transparency Guidelines Martin Reisner Advisor Current Status and future Challenges Ljubljana – 13 September 2012.
The impact of accessibility on the location value of commercial real estate Bart De Smedt Prof. Dr. Ann Verhetsel Department of Transport and Regional.
Proposed Analytical Approach - Modeling Phase 3 - Formation of new team December 9, 2003 Steering Committee Presentation.
On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid Rochelle.
Transparency Platform Project introduction Panagiotis Panousos Business Area Manager, System Operation ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September.
Projects and topology Ádám Balogh Adviser How does your data submission translate into a Project in the topology TYNDP 2017 SJWS Energy Community.
European Ten Year Network Development Statement Volker Schippers GTE+ Senior Adviser GTE+ Workshop on GTE+ Work Programme 24 June 2008.
Chapter 13 Aggregate Planning.
Default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing on the Commission’s final decision for financial market analysts 28 February 2013.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Francesco ANGELINI European Commission, DG for Regional Policy Coordination Unit – Major Projects Team.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Agriculture Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Ankara, March 2016.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Monopsony Lesson aims:
How the PCIs are developed Céline Heidrecheid System Development Business Area Manager TYNDP perspective on project progress Copenhagen – 24 June 2016.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
HydroEurope 2017 Week 2: Flood Map Accuracy & Resilience Estimation
SESSION 3a Tuesday 12– Risk Allocation.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY SCENARIOS - BULGARIA
New indicators: measuring progress of cohesion policy
Introduction to Economics of Water Resources Lecture 5
Frank Troch, Thierry Vanelslander, Christa Sys
Brussels, 29th April 2009 Presentation by Martin Altstätter
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
مدل زنجیره ای در برنامه های سلامت
ACER opinion on ENTSOG’s 2011 Ten-Year Network Development Plan
ESD 71 Final Project: Second-Mile Internet Data Backhaul in Kenya
ESD 71 Final Project: Second-Mile Internet Data Backhaul in Kenya
Anne Baschwitz Gilles Mathonnière
Workshop 1: PROJECT EVALUATION
Expert Group on Climate Change and Water State of Play
Including climate change in river basin planning
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
The establishment of the 2nd list of Projects of common interest
2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan:
Presentation transcript:

Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic Performance Indicators TYNDP/CBA SJWS 6 – 13 May 2014

2 Synthetic indicators…

3 Sensitivity to assumptions >Resulting in a single value, the indicators may give the impression they can be directly used to rank projects but they have the same link to assumptions as any other outputs from the methodology:  Benefits are dependent from demand and supply assumptions  Costs are dependent from CAPEX, OPEX and commissioning date accuracy >The firsts are mitigated through the scenario approach and the seconds by a sensitivity-study on project data >Therefore the PS-CBA step results in one value per indicator and case (around 5) plus the variation linked to project data Possible aggregation >The ENPV and EB/C ratios calculated at case level can from a mathematical point of view be easily aggregated but:  Aggregation of cases will dilute project benefits  Hide the link between results and input data …but still not resulting in a project ranking

4 Example of calculation on a fake project

5 What Regional Groups and NRAs can get from the results >A high degree of comparability between projects (same methodology same data) >A good understanding of project impacts and when they could materialized >An idea of the robustness of benefits if they appear in a large range of cases >This knowledge can be obtained if result analysis is not limited to aggregated EPIs A methodology to inform not to decide >Readers of the ESW-CBA results will have a good understanding of the impact of each project but the methodology cannot forecast the occurence of coal, gas and CO2 prices nor the evolution of demand >Therefore decision-makers will need to have a political vision of the evolution of such parameters in order to select PCIs >Uncertainty about the materialization of conditions favorable to project benefits and competition between certain projects will mean that the backing of project by financial commitment from the market is the most robust way to move from the selection to the commissioning Guidance on the interpretation of results

Thank You for Your Attention ENTSOG -- European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas Avenue de Cortenbergh 100, B-1000 Brussels EML: WWW: Olivier Lebois Business Area Manager, System Development