1 The BaBar EMC, and B  J/  hh analysis Nick Barlow, Yaw Ming Chia January 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Advertisements

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
Fully Inclusive b->s  Status Report UCSC: Eisner, Schmitz, Schumm Edinburgh: Tinslay Pisa: Bucci, Walsh Royal Holloway: Brown, McMahon SLAC: Jessop,
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
QM Interference in τ ± →π ± π + π - π 0 ν τ decays at BaBar Tim West The University of Manchester.
The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Τ ± → π ± π + π - π 0 ν τ decays at BaBar Tim West, Jong Yi, Roger Barlow The University of Manchester Carsten Hast, SLAC IOP HEP meeting Warwick, 12 th.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Analysis Meeting vol Shun University.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
Jin Huang, Xin Qian For Transversity Analysis Meeting May 3, 2010.
1 Warsaw Group May 2015 Search for CPV in three-bodies charm baryon decays Outline Selections Mass distributions and reconstructed numbers of candidates.
1 What I did last year Nick Barlow Manchester Christmas meeting January 2005.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Point source analysis with tracks and showers Aart, Javier, Tino 1.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Search for the decay with the BaBar detector at SLAC Hella Snoek Nikhef Monday Dec Part I One way of measuring γ Part II Analysis.
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Guglielmo De Nardo for the BABAR collaboration Napoli University and INFN ICHEP 2010, Paris, 23 July 2010.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
LPNHE Richard Kass December Measurement of the Branching Fraction of B - → D 0 K* - J. Chauveau, M. John, R. Kass, G. Thérin Details of this.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Elisa manoni FastSim meeting January 21st, FastSim meeting, FastSim meeting, January 21st, 2010 Had Breco code: status report Elisa Manoni INFN.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Inclusive Tag-Side Vertex Reconstruction in Partially Reconstructed B decays -A Progress Report - 11/09/2011 TDBC-BRECO.
analisys: Systematics checks
Converted photons efficiency
Hadronic recoil analysis:
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
EMCal Recalibration Check
Data/ Monte Carlo comparisons for the EMC
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Hadronic recoil analysis:
Hot Topic from Belle : Recent results on quarkonia
Presentation transcript:

1 The BaBar EMC, and B  J/  hh analysis Nick Barlow, Yaw Ming Chia January 2006

2 Contents EMC stuff: EMC calibrator proxies Interactive Kanga Analysis stuff: Data/MC comparisons Background studies Fit validation Future plans

3 EMC calibrator proxies (1) “Raw” energy of EMC clusters needs to be calibrated to correct for: Radiation damage to crystals shower leakage from the back of crystals or gaps between them Calibrations are applied at read-time using constants stored in the “Conditions database” Bit of code that gets the calibrator from the database is called a “proxy” Should keep a cached copy of the calibrator until it is no longer valid.

4 EMC calibrator proxies (2) In July, database experts found that an EMC proxy was accessing the database 3 times per event processed Significant impact on processing time, particularly when many jobs running in parallel Found that this was due to using a single custom EMC proxy to retrieve different types of cluster calibrator “Old” pi0 calibration, “new” pi0 calibration, MC calibration Fixed by using different instance of standard proxy template for each type of calibration Speeds up the processing of all BaBar jobs by up to 10%

5 Interactive Kanga (1) The (no-longer) new BaBar computing model (CM2) uses ROOT-based “Kanga” files as its event store Can run traditional jobs over these Kanga files to produce ntuples or rootuples, OR can access files directly from ROOT command line using “Interactive Kanga” (E. Charles) Kanga files contain detector-level objects (individual hits), reco-level objects (e.g. tracks, EMC clusters), analysis-level objects (“BtaCandidates”)

6 Interactive Kanga (2) Accessing data interactively is NOT good for: Combinatorics Vertexing, kinematic fitting Particle ID using “standard” selectors However, with a bit of foresight, can do this stuff in “skim” job (centrally run), and store composite BtaCandidates along with associated “UsrData” in Kanga files It is possible to navigate from BtaCandidates to associated “reco” objects.. However, until recently, EMC reco objects had no useful accessor functions Requires access to conditions database for calibration constants

7 Interactive Kanga (3) Added accessor functions to persistent EMC classes for every variable people might use: Raw and calibrated energies, cluster centroid positions, shower shape variables, cluster energy sums Potentially useful for physics analysis, but already very useful for EMC studies.. Studies that would previously take hours or days writing code and running ntuple-making jobs, can be done in minutes or seconds from the ROOT command line.. e.g. Track intersection bugProjectivity correction to theta

8 B  J/  +  - analysis (with Yaw Ming Chia)

9 Comparison of continuum MC and off-resonance data Points = off-res data Yellow=uds MC Light blue = ccbar MC Hint of a rho peak in data, not reproduced in MC?? M(pipi) DeltaE Not enough statistics in off-res data for meaningful comparison

10 Comparison of generic MC and on- resonance data (1) Jpsi peaks look pretty clean Virtually no continuum background in Jpsi->ee Mass peak slightly shifted to the left in data Points = on-res data Yellow=uds MC Light blue = ccbar MC Dark blue = B+B- MC Green = B0B0bar MC Jpsi->mumu Jpsi->ee

11 Comparison of generic MC and on-resonance data (2) M(pipi), grand sideband of mES/DE plane mES, upper DE sideband mES, lower DE sideband MC shapes and normalisations agree reasonably well with data BBbar background much larger than continuum Points = on-res data Yellow=uds MC Light blue = ccbar MC Dark blue = B+B- MC Green = B0B0bar MC

12 Generic B0B0bar MC with and without Jpsi events Black histos are all generic B0B0bar Red histos have events containing Jpsi removed (at MC truth level)

13 Fits to non-Jpsi background (generic MC) uds, ccbar, BBbar generic MC (with Jpsi events removed) scaled to data luminosity and added together DE cut is wider than in final analysis (to increase statistics) PDFs used here are those used in previous BaBar analysis (J. Boyd, J. Weatherall) – will be revisited.. Looking at MC truth for events in this peak – seem to be from D0->K0pi+pi- decays where we miss the K0 Could perhaps remove some of these by combining pi pi combination with Ks cands and applyind D veto No success so far.. Argus function Wiebull function plus reversed Wiebull function, plus B-W at rho mass

14 Inclusive Jpsi MC with and without signal events Black histos are all inclusive Jpsi MC Red histos have B->JpsiPiPi, B->JpsiKs, B->JpsiRho0, B->Jpsi f2 events removed (at MC truth level)

15 Fits to Jpsi background (inclusive Jpsi MC) |DE|<40MeV cut seems to remove most JpsiK* events, but what if DE is shifted in data wrt MC? From looking at MC truth, these are JpsiK* events with kaon mis- identified as a pion Consider using separate PDF for B->Jpsi K* (BF known to 5% accuracy) Argus function plus Gaussian at B mass Wiebull function

16 Fit validation Generate “toy MC” events from PDFs used in fit, and perform fit, comparing input number to fitted number of events in each category Repeat for 1000 “experiments”, and plot the distribution of “pulls” i.e. (fitted # - input #)/(error on fitted #) Looks OK for toy MC However, not so good when we instead randomly sample events from full MC. This shows that the PDFs do not describe the distributions very well

17 Angular analysis of B  J/  0 Necessary to distinguish CP-even and CP-odd components (prerequisite for CP violation measurements) Define angles in “transversity frame”: Have written code to calculate angles, next step is to convert these into transversity amplitudes and check on signal MC B0B0 J/  00 l+l+ l-l- ++ --  tr  tr x tr z tr y tr

18 Future plans Next steps: Investigate background PDFs and possible vetoes on problematic peaking backgrounds Continue toy and embedded MC tests to validate fit “unblind” and measure BF(B  J/   +  - ) Longer term Measure Branching Fraction for B  J/   + and set upper limits for B  J/  K + K - and B  J/   Angular analysis for B  J/   0 Possibly leading on to time-dependent CP violation measurement (sin2  eff )