Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.3 - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Advertisements

Chapter 1: Methods of Voting
The Mathematics of Elections
Mathematics The study of symbols, shapes, algorithms, sets, and patterns, using logical reasoning and quantitative calculation. Quantitative Reasoning:
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express.
MAT 105 Spring  There are many more methods for determining the winner of an election with more than two candidates  We will only discuss a few.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
The Plurality Method The Borda Count Method
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
1 The Mathematics of Voting
Voting Review Material
Fair Elections Are they possible?. Acknowledgment Many of the examples are taken from Excursions in Modern Mathematics by Peter Tannenbaum and Robert.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
§ 1.4 Plurality-with-Elimination (Instant Runoff Voting)
Homework Read Pages 6 – 23 Page 30: 18, 19, 24, 28, 29, 30, 33, 59, 60, 71.
How is this math? Mathematics is essentially the application of deductive reasoning to the study relations among patterns, structures, shapes, forms and.
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.2, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
MAT 105 Spring  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express their.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting The Paradoxes of Democracy Vote! In.
Slide 15-1 Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 2 - Slide Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
May 19, 2010Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics 12.5 Homework Solutions 27. (a) 28. (b) 29. (d) 30. (e) 53. Positive Correlation, Weak 54. Negative Correlation,
Ch Voting Preference tables E, F, G, and H are running for math club president If everyone is asked to rank their preferences, how many different.
Mathematics for Liberal Arts Chapter 1 The Mathematics of Voting.
1 Voting: Perception and Reality Do voters vote in their best interest? When they do, does the outcome of the vote reflect those interests? What type of.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Voting theory: application of methods that affect the outcome of an election. Sec 1: Preference Ballots and Schedules.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have seen many methods, all of them flawed in some way  Which method should we use?  Maybe we shouldn’t use any of them,
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.1, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods.
Voting Tie Breakers. With each method described – plurality method, Borda count method, plurality with elimination method, and pairwise comparison method.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide Election Theory Voting Methods.
Warm-Up Rank the following soft drinks according to your preference (1 being the soft drink you like best and 4 being the one you like least)  Dr. Pepper.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Flaws of Voting Methods.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting.
14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.Conclusion - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting CONCLUSION Elections, Fairness,
Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system to satisfy.Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system.
My guy lost? What’s up with that….  In the 1950’s, Kenneth Arrow, a mathematical economist, proved that a method for determining election results that.
1.
Voting: Does the Majority Always Rule?
Discrete Mathematics Election Theory Unit.
Voting and Apportionment
Plurality and Borda Count Method
1 The Mathematics of Voting
1.
8.2 Voting Possibilities and Fairness Criteria
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Lecture 1: Voting and Election Math
Warm Up – 5/27 - Monday How many people voted in the election?
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Social Choice Theory [Election Theory]
Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting
5-2 Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Voting Preference Ballots and Preference Schedules
Project PResentations
Approval Voting.
Chapter 1 – MATH ANALYSIS
Warm Up – 1/27 - Monday Who wins by Plurality with Elimination?
Voting Methods Introduction.
Quiz – 1/24 - Friday How many people voted in the election?
Section 14.1 Voting Methods.
Flaws of the Voting Methods
Voting Fairness.
Presentation transcript:

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference Schedules 1.2The Plurality Method 1.3 The Borda Count Method 1.4The Plurality-with-Elimination Method (Instant Runoff Voting) 1.5The Method of Pairwise Comparisons 1.6Rankings

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Each place on a ballot is assigned points With N candidates, 1 point for last place, 2 points for second from last, and so on First-place vote is worth N points Tally points for each candidate separately Candidate with highest total is winner Candidate is called the Borda winner The Borda Count Method

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Let’s use the Borda count method to choose the winner of the Math Appreciation Society election first introduced in Example 1.1. Table 1-4 shows the point values under each column based on first place worth 4 points, second place worth 3 points, third place worth 2 points, and fourth place worth 1 point. Example 1.5The Math Club Election (Borda Method)

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example 1.5The Math Club Election (Borda Method)

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Tally the points: Example 1.5The Math Club Election (Borda Method) A gets: = 79 points B gets: = 106 points C gets: = 104 points D gets: = 81 points The Borda winner of this election is Boris! (Wasn’t Alisha the winner of this election under the plurality method?)

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. In contrast to the plurality method, the Borda count method takes into account all the information provided in the voters’ preference ballots, and the Borda winner is the candidate with the best average ranking - the best compromise candidate if you will. On its face, the Borda count method seems like an excellent way to take full consideration of the voter’s preferences, so indeed, what’s wrong with it? The next example illustrates some of the problems with the Borda count method. What’s wrong with the Borda Method?

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. The last principal at Washington Elementary School has just retired and the School Board must hire a new principal. The four finalists for the job are Mrs. Amaro, Mr. Burr, Mr. Castro, and Mrs. Dunbar (A, B, C, and D, respectively). After interviewing the four finalists, each of the 11 school board members gets to rank the candidates by means of a preference ballot, and the Borda winner gets the job. Table 1-5 shows the preference schedule for this election. Example 1.6The School Principal Election

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example 1.6The School Principal Election

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. A simple count tells us that Mr. B is the Borda winner with 32 points. Example 1.6The School Principal Election What about Mrs. A? Majority candidate, 6 of 11 first-place votes, and Condorcet candidate, with 6 first-place votes beats each candidate in head-to-head comparison

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. The Borda Method violates two basic criteria of fairness: What’s wrong with the Borda Method? Majority criterion Condorcet criterion Despite its flaws, experts in voting theory consider the Borda count method one of the best, if not the very best, method for deciding elections with many candidates.

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. (1)Although violations of the majority criterion can happen, they do not happen very often, and when there are many candidates such violations are rare; and (2)violations of the Condorcet criterion automatically follow violations of the majority criterion, since a majority candidate is automatically a Condorcet candidate. In Defense of the Borda count method?

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. individual sports awards (Heisman Trophy winner, NBA Rookie of the Year, NFL MVP, etc.) college football polls music industry awards hiring of school principals, university presidents, and corporate executives Borda count method in Real Life