Determination of initial conditions for dam erosion due to overtopping and possible integration into a probabilistic design concept Dr.-Ing. K. Broich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS Ron Conner Corps of Engineers.
Advertisements

The Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) is an event calculated by FERC to occur once every 10,000 years By comparison, the flood of September, 1986 was a 100-year.
Stability and Failure Mechanisms of Dams A dam safety research project Kjetil Arne Vaskinn.
IMPACT Project Breach Modeling Tests. Dam Failures Increasing (?) Worldwide.
A COMPARISON OF HOMOGENEOUS AND MULTI-LAYERED BERM BREAKWATERS WITH RESPECT TO OVERTOPPING AND STABILITY Lykke Andersen, Skals & Burcharth ICCE2008, Hamburg,
Analysis of dike breach sensitivity using a conceptual method followed by a comprehensive statistical approach to end up with failure probabilities 4 th.
Haley & Aldrich, Inc Elevated Roadway – Proposed Alignment APPROXIMATELY 400 FT IN LENGTH.
On time invariant probabilistic modelling of duration of load effects for timber Sven Thelandersson Structural Engineering Lund University.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Forces Acting on Dams To design a dam, various forces must be considered to insure the safety of the dam. The most important forces are: Weight of dam.
Workshop September 2004 Sandilands, United Kingdom COMRISK Subproject 8 “Risk Assessment Lincolnshire, Pilot Studies” (SP8)
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
A conical tank (with vertex down) is 10 feet across the top and 12 feet deep. If water is flowing into the tank at a rate of 10 cubic feet per minute,
Ecosystem Services and Other Values Andrew Manale National Center for Environmental Economics October National Center for Environmental Economics.
National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal Risk Assessment, RASP and IMPACT Ian Meadowcroft.
Chapter 14 Simulation. Monte Carlo Process Statistical Analysis of Simulation Results Verification of the Simulation Model Computer Simulation with Excel.
Toronto, May 6-8, 2008Flood Defence1 Risk assessment in trans-boundary cooperation between the Netherlands and Germany Jan Stijnen.
William B. Reed Senior Hydrologist Colorado Basin River Forecast Center CBRFC Support for Dam Breaks DamBreak and EAPs Arizona 2011 Spring Hydrology Seminar.
Flood maps – Modeling a levee break
Reliability Model for Compressor Failure SMRE Term Project Paul Zamjohn August 2008.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk modeling.
Hydrologic Design and Design Storms Readings: Applied Hydrology Sections /18/2005.
1 Flood Hazard Analysis Session 1 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Hazard Assessment.
WP1.2: Inundation modelling to support uncertainty analysis Jeff Neal 1, Ignacio Villanueva 2, Nigel Wright 3, Thomas Willis 3, Timothy Fewtrell 4, Paul.
Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation Virginia Dam Safety & Floodplain Programs William G. Browning, Director Dam Safety & Floodplain Management.
Presentation Ling Zhang Date: Framework of the method 1 Using Distribution Fitting for Assumptions 2 monte – carlo simulation 3 compare different.
BREACH FORMATION A Review of State-of-the-Art Mark Morris HR Wallingford IMPACT Project Workshop Wallingford, 16/17 May 2002.
Coastal Resilience. 2 Contents  Traditional approach  Current trends:  Coastal Resilience  Soft measures  Example projects  Dune creation  ‘Sandengine’
Industry & Research: Issues, needs and conclusions from the US IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes & Uncertainty Workshop at HR Wallingford,
2013 NWHA CONFERENCE FERC’S RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING Doug Johnson – Regional Engineer - Portland From PFMA to Risk Assessment.
A. Betâmio de Almeida Assessing Modelling Uncertainty A. Betâmio de Almeida Instituto Superior Técnico November 2004 Zaragoza, Spain 4th IMPACT Workshop.
Monte Carlo Methods1 T Special Course In Information Science II Tomas Ukkonen
7. Reliability based design Objectives Learn formulation of reliability design problem. Understand difference between reliability-based design and deterministic.
__________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS COMPLEX WATERSHEDS SITES IN SERIES.
Formulation of a New Breach Model for Embankments IMPACT Project Workshop, Wallingford 2002 Breach Formation Theme.
Reliability analysis of statically indeterminate steel frame (pilot study) David Pustka VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava Faculty of Civil Engineering.
A MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING OPERATING RULES OF MULTIPURPOSE RESERVOIRS ALLOWING FOR BOTH EXTREME FLOODS AND ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE 4 th International.
1. 2 Contents Aim: why this work? Probabilistic design Some results Conclusions.
A SHFORK -B AINBRIDGE S TEEL D AM S TRUCTURAL E VALUATION P ROJECT DWP Engineering Diwei Chen Wen Cui Paul Garrett.
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
Penny Coombes Sarah Wharton Gary Davies Simon White River Bee, Desing FLOOD ALLEVIATION FEASIBILITY.
IMPACT 5 November 20044th IMPACT Workshop - Zaragoza1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty UniBwM Breach Modelling Dr.-Ing. Karl Broich.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS When a system contains elements that exhibit chance in their behavior, the Monte Carlo method of simulation may be applied.
Components are existing in ONE of TWO STATES: 1 WORKING STATE with probability R 0 FAILURE STATE with probability F R+F = 1 RELIABLEFAILURE F R Selecting.
Engineering Economy, Sixteenth Edition Sullivan | Wicks | Koelling Copyright ©2015, 2012, 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. EXAMPLE.
Application of the Continuity Equation Dr. Eyad Abushandi.
River Mechanics Activities River Mechanics Group Hydrology Laboratory Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Probability of ship fracture John Kent Contents 1What is brittle fracture 2Material fracture toughness 3Calculation overview 4Results.
Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis with the
RASP - Risk Assessment of flood and coastal defence for Strategic Planning A High Level Methodology Project partners and co-authors Paul Sayers / Corina.
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
Rural e-Science what we may need to survive ourselves! Jeong-Jae Lee & Byong-Lyol Lee Seoul Nat’l Univ. / NCAM.
Basic simulation methodology
Applications to Rural e-Science
Experiment 2 Finding density of an object
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Kick-off Conference “Risk Management for
Date of download: 1/14/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Monte Carlo Simulation Managing uncertainty in complex environments.
Probabilistic Methods: Theory and Application to Human Anatomy
Efficient Quantification of Uncertainties Associated with Reservoir Performance Simulations Dongxiao Zhang, The University of Oklahoma . The efficiency.
Volume = pr2h Part (a) dV/dt = -5p(h)1/2 V = 25ph dV/dt = 25p(dh/dt)
قوانين برگزاري مناقصات و آيين نامه مالي و معاملاتي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي و خدمات بهداشتي ،درماني تهران
Unit 3 Review (Calculator)
(A) Change of failure probability of a fishnet pulled horizontally caused by varying the aspect ratio k/n gradually from 1:N to N:1 at constant number.
2nd IMPACT Workshop Mo i Rana, Norway 12/13th Septemper 2002
Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =
Rupro, breach model used by Cemagref during Impact project
Presentation transcript:

Determination of initial conditions for dam erosion due to overtopping and possible integration into a probabilistic design concept Dr.-Ing. K. Broich University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich

1.Initial conditions 2.Case study 3.Monte Carlo simulation

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich t dH/dt dz/dt Q Initial perioddepletion

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich 1.Flood wave 2.Initial breach 3.Initial water depth 4.Outlet 5.Overtopping 6.Dam coverage

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich

Proposal : Safety factor for Overtoping failure of earthen dams = Scaling factor on design flood wave needed to start erosion

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich 1.Initial conditions 2.Case study 3.Monte Carlo simulation

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich Test case : 1.Calculation with scaled design flood wave HQ1000 and initial water depth at flood water level 2.Calculation with unscaled PMF flood wave and initial water depth at dam crest

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich V H

1.Initial conditions 2.Case study 3.Monte Carlo simulation

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich

Load variables for overtopping Failure mode Flood wave *) Initial water depth *) bivariate variable -> volume

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich (Hable,2001)

University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich The probabilistic method using a Monte Carlo simulation (Hable, 2001) can be extended to calculate the probability of an overtopping failure. The failure condition has to be substituted by the mentioned „CIRIA-condition“.