The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Joe Rouse California Department of Transportation Division of Traffic Operations Office of System Management Operations.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Fargo-Moorhead Metro COG Wade E. Kline, AICP.  Depict existing freeway operations: I-94 & 1-29 Metro Area  Model existing conditions (2008), 2015, and.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ROUTE 29.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen.
Lecture #12 Arterial Design and LOS Analysis. Objectives  Understand the factors in arterial design Understand how arterial LOS is determined.
1 Lei Xu Term Project Presentation – CVEN 689 – Spring 2005 CVEN 689 – SPRING 2005 LEI XU May 2th, 2005 hide A GIS-BASED STUDY OF HOW THE HOT LANE IMPLEMENTATION.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
US 101 Corridor Plan Prepared by: Oregon Department of Transportation May 2013.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
More on Modeling / Tools…  What do we have now?  Where do things go wrong?  How can I match the right tool?
Department of Transportation Consideration of Potential City of Pasadena Position Related to SR710 Extension Alternatives Being Considered By Metro City.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Forecasting/Simulation Interface on I-694 Reconstruction from I-35E to I-35W Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating Committee December 12, 2005 Meeting.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
1 VISSIM Protocol ITE Oregon Traffic Simulation Roundtable May 31, 2012 Chi Mai.
Policy for New/Modified Access to Controlled Access Facilities.
Projects of Division Interest PoDI PoDI Plans. All SYP Projects.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
1 Briefing on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) Andrew J. Meese, AICP Melanie Wellman COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee November 27, 2007.
The MnDOT Metro District Microsimulation Experience Kevin Sommers, PE Minnesota Department of Transportation
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Advanced Simulation and Performance Measurement in the BNMC-CDB North Area.
INTEGRATING ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN PROJECT-LEVEL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Meiwu An, Pikes Peak Area Council.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Status Report on the Regional Value Pricing Study Ronald F. Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning November 15, 2006 Item 11.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Interstate Operations Study Planning + Simulation
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
Adopt a Resolution of the City of Pasadena Approving the Submittal of a Functional Classification Change for Local Streets and Roads to the State of California.
Presentation transcript:

The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating Committee – May 28, 2008

Stimuli for the Interstate Operations Study Increasing congestion at particular interchanges along I-94 and I-29 Need to consider operational enhancements vs. addition of lanes, interchanges, etc. Regional growth projections causing concerns about new bottlenecks and delay Area Transportation Plan Update involving two states

Opportunities Transportation Technical Committee - There is a current reason to perform micro simulation. Develop ‘Local’ Expertise – Advanced Traffic Analysis Center (ATAC) to become a primary resource for microsimulation Mn/DOT (Kevin Sommers – Metro) shared expertise using CORSIM and toolbox created with SRF FHWA can use ‘lessons learned’ and developed methodology to assist in writing the next set of guidelines for Applying VISSIM Microsimulation Modeling Software Future studies in Fargo – Moorhead will take advantage of the new VISSIM model in the context of a regional model.

FHWA Traffic Analysis Toolbox

Progress Intersection, Interchange and Segment counts, turning movements, travel times and queue data has been collected

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 1 The existing interchanges and/or local roads and streets in the corridor can neither provide the necessary access nor be improved to satisfactorily accommodate the design year demands while at the same time providing the access intended by the proposal.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 2 All reasonable alternatives for design options, location and transportation system management type improvements (such as ramp metering, mass transit, and HOV facilities) have been assessed and provided for if currently justified, or provisions are included for accommodating such facilities if a future need is identified.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 3 The proposed access point does not have a significant adverse impact on the safety and operation of the Interstate facility based on an analysis of current and future traffic. The operational analysis for existing conditions shall, particularly in urbanized areas, include analysis of sections of Interstate to and including at least the first adjacent existing or proposed interchange on either side. Crossroads and other roads and streets shall be included in the analysis to the extent necessary to assure their ability to collect and distribute traffic to and from the interchange with new or revised access points.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 4 An accident analysis must identify accident history and rates in the freeway section and surface streets affected and project the crash rates, which will result from traffic flow and geometric conditions imposed by the proposed access. The proposed access connects to a public road only and will provide for all traffic movements. Less than “full interchanges” for special purposes access for transit vehicles, for HOV’s, or into park and ride lots may be considered on a case-by-case basis. The proposed access will be designed to meet or exceed current standards for Federal-aid projects on the Interstate System.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 5 The proposal considers and is consistent with local and regional land use and transportation plans. Prior to final approval, all requests for new or revised access must be consistent with the metropolitan and/or statewide transportation plan, as appropriate, the applicable provisions or 23 CFR part 450 and the transportation conformity requirements of 40 CFR parts 51 and 93.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 6 In areas where the potential exists for future multiple interchange additions, all requests for new or revised access are supported by a comprehensive Interstate network study with recommendations that address all proposed and desired access within the context of a long-term plan.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 7 The request for a new or revised access generated by new or expanded development demonstrates appropriate coordination between the development and related or otherwise required transportation system improvements.

From: “Guidance for the Preparation of a FHWA Interstate Access Request” Policy Point 8 The request for a new or revised access contains information relative to the planning requirements and the status of the environmental processing of the proposal.