Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Reporting Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Accounts: Stakeholder Engagement. Introduction.
Advertisements

Northern Trauma System Regional Conference 2014 High quality trauma care from ‘Roadside to Recovery’
SINAP Results First Quarterly Public Report July 2010 – June 2011 admissions An interactive slideshow allowing you to click on links to take you to the.
The Trauma Audit & Research Network Electronic Data Collection & Reporting system: The New CORE DATASET Launched January 2011.
Results in a SNAP A MUST for effective compliance monitoring? Emily Walters, Chief Dietitian.
Inefficiencies in provision of acute care with poor use of estate Dependence on hospital care with failure to transfer care to community Need for more.
SINAP Results First Quarterly Public Report July 2010 – June 2011 admissions An interactive slideshow allowing you to click on links to take you to the.
Ohio State Board of Emergency Medical Services Trauma Committee Geriatric Trauma Triage Criteria: How and Why.
ASE Event Slides  Major Trauma  Sepsis  QIPP 114 June 2010.
West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust Analysing mortality data derived from Secondary User Services.
TRAUMA DESIGNATION: RAISING THE BAR.  MAR was filed Aug. 8 th, published on Aug. 21. The comment period ends on Sept. 18 th and we should be able to.
A Major Problem for the Health Service p Worldwide injury is a major public health problem p The commonest cause of death between the ages of 1 and 40.
Healthcare The London for LondonTrauma System Launch Maralyn Woodford The TRAUMA Audit & Research NETWORK The Trauma Audit & Research Network.
CMS/RTI Multipayer Advanced Primary Care Project (MAPCP) Practice Feedback Reports Overview.
SINAP Results Second Quarterly Public Report July – September 2011 admissions An interactive slideshow allowing you to click on links to take you to the.
Identifying cases & Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Today Background Inclusion criteria Identifying cases
Measuring trauma outcomes & processes of trauma care The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Carol Hawley1, Magdy Sakr2, Sarah Scapinello, Jesse Salvo, Paul Wren, Helga Magnusson, Harald Bjorndalen 1 Warwick Medical School 2 University Hospitals.
Twitter : #nhfn Using informatics to target use of Specialist Nurses to improve hospital care for people with learning disabilities Daniel Marsden – Practice.
Trauma Services Backboard Removal Project. First off, we need a volunteer please……
London Specialised Commissioning Group 10 th September 2009 Major Trauma Services for London Commissioning and Finance Arrangements Sean Overett Divisional.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
Better Care Fund Indicators April 2014 Hertfordshire Health and Wellbeing Board 18 June 2014 Item 4 Appendix 2.
Online Reporting The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Reporting Session.
EDCR: Other features The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Data Entry: System structure The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session Log into:
How to download and PRINT your Moving ON Audits Monthly Audit and Indicator reports (click on the ▼button on your computer to continue this presentation)
Oklahoma Aggregate Data 4 th Quarter 2012 October 1 – December 31, 2012 EVERY WEEK COUNTS.
IR for Trauma & Trauma Networks Professor Keith Willett Working in partnership with.
Welcome The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Probability of Survival (Ps) & Hospital Survival Rate (Ws) The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Re-Audit of the Rehabilitation Pathway for Critically Ill Patients against NICE Clinical Guideline 83 Kirsten Mitchell, Team Lead Respiratory Physiotherapist,
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Identifying cases The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Online Reporting The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Injury profile of deer- vehicle collisions Theresa D. Oey-Devine, M.D., James M. Haan, M.D., Stephen D. Helmer, Ph.D. Department of Surgery, The University.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine VTE Risk in Lower Limb Immobilisation in Plaster Cast Clinical Audit National findings The Royal College.
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK
Probability of Survival (Ps) & Hospital Survival Rate (Ws) The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Data completeness % (quantity)
The Second Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Welcome The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Online Reporting The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Case ascertainment % (quantity)
Data Quality Case ascertainment (Data Completeness) & Data Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Online Reporting The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLANNING SUBMISSIONS (CAPS) & MULTI-SECTOR SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENTS (MSAA) CAPS And Schedule Refresh.
Identifying cases The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Unscheduled Care Analysis
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
Oklahoma Aggregate Data 2nd Quarter 2013 April 1 – June 30, 2013
Every Week Counts Oklahoma Aggregate Data
National Data Report 2018 Prof Conor O’Keane
Every Week Counts Oklahoma Aggregate Data
How to undertake a Specialty review using Discovery
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
Every Week Counts Oklahoma Aggregate Data
Are we Doing to Many Procedures? (Example Tonsillectomy)
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
Trauma scoring systems and databases
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
Unscheduled Care Analysis
Unscheduled Care Analysis
Are we Doing to Many Procedures? (Example Tonsillectomy)
Presentation transcript:

Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Reporting Session

TARN Reports Clinical reports Performance comparisons Major Trauma Dashboards

Themed Clinical Reports Published 3 times a year, at end of: March:Theme: Thoracic & Abdominal July:Theme: Orthopaedic & Pelvic November: Theme: Head & Spinal Includes submissions Dispatched up to end of previous month Data shown by Financial years: Currently patients Admitted April 13-March 14 & April 14-March 15 Core section: All patients admitted during time period Themed section: All patients admitted during time period with relevant injuries

CORE SECTION Data completeness & accreditation Without good data completeness & accreditation scores the rest of the report may not reflect true practice

CORE SECTION Ws/Survival Rate graphs Caterpillar plot Plotted in Ws/Survival Rate order Funnel plot Ordered by precision

ISS & mechanism counts Totals ISS > 15 Personnel Trauma team activation Mode of transport GCS < 9 only Time to intubation ISS & MechanismPre-hospitalIntubation of GCS < 9 CORE SECTION

Most senior doctor Direct admissions only 5 minutes 30 minutes In the ED Different patient categories Direct admissions only Median time to CT / operation Different patient categories Time to CT / operation CORE SECTION

Patient pathway Thoracotomy outside of theatre Visited critical care Head injuries Transfer summary ISS <= 15 ISS > 15 Visited critical care In critical care Length of stay CORE SECTION

Performance Comparisons Updated 3 times a year, at end of: March, July & November Includes submissions Dispatched up to end of previous month Data shown by last 4 Calendar years: Currently patients Admitted January 2012-June 2015 Includes: Data completeness Data Accreditation Hospital Survival Rate Ps Breakdown Standards of care results: Head, Spine, Chest and Open fractures

Performance Comparisons

Trauma Dashboards Major Trauma Dashboard Launched July 2012 Children’s Major Trauma Dashboard Launched July 2015 Trauma Unit Dashboard To be launched Autumn 2015

Dashboard documentation  Trauma Unit Dashboard  Support document: Each measure explained

Dashboard documentation  Amendments spreadsheet: Which MUST be used to submit any changes  List of all patients included in each measure Non compliance highlighted in red

Dashboard format Caterpillar plot Bullet chart Run chart Data displayed in 3 formats:  Caterpillar plot  Bullet Chart  Run Chart

Caterpillar plot  Comparing all similar Trusts (MTCs or TUs) performance during last quarter  Green marker: Individual Trust figure

Bullet chart  Comparing your Trust with National average of MTCs or TUs (vertical bar)  Grey area: Expected range  Green area: Better than expected  Red area: Worse than expected

Run chart  Blue bar: Your Trust performance over last 8 quarters  Purple bar: National quarterly average for all MTCs or TUs  Red bar: Lower control limit  Green bar: Upper control limit

MT Dashboard example content

If Numerator <6, numbers not shown as too small for effective comparisons

MT Dashboard example content

Exact TU Dashboard measures being finalised MT Dashboard example content

Major Trauma Dashboards: Timescales  Initial Dashboard ed to Trust & Network leads  Validation period: amendments submitted  Validated Dashboard published  Similar publishing pattern for TU Dashboard

Children’s Major Trauma Dashboard  Developed by TARNLet committee  Benchmarking between Children’s MTCs & Adult/Children combined MTCs  Age <16 years at time of incident  12 Key Performance Measures, divided into 3 groups: 1.Data quality: 2.Evidence based Measures: NICE, BOAST, TXA 3. System indicators: Consultant led Trauma teams, Time to CT  Bi-annual or Rolling year data used: Published half yearly

Children’s Major Trauma Dashboard: Timescales

Children’s MT Dashboard: new measures

Trauma Unit Dashboards  Developed by MT Clinical Reference Group  In conjunction with TU Working Party  Benchmarking between English Trauma Units  All ages included  Key Performance Measures, divided into 3 groups: 1.Data quality: Accreditation & Completeness 2.Evidence based Measures 3.System indicators  Quarterly data analysed: Published 4 times a year

Reports Summary Clinical reports 3 times a year Dashboards quarterly/half yearly Performance comparisons refreshed 3 times a year Bespoke analysis available on request