QAA Review Incorporating the GOsC Recognised Qualification (RQ) Renewal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personal Development Plans (PDPs) Subject-specific PDPs in Economics.
Advertisements

Academic review of HE in FECs. Student support: an overview Alan Bradshaw Assistant Director QAA.
Development of HEAR at Ulster Background to HEAR Content of HEAR Challenges in development Academic performance (4.3) Additional information (6.1) Roll.
Head teacher Performance Management
Understanding Major & Annual Review September 2014 Donna Crighton, Cheryl Strong & Nikki Sowerby Research Section, QMD, Academic Registry.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Student Induction Student Representation
Welcome Welcome and thank you for agreeing to become an External Examiner for Goldsmiths, University of London. Our External Examiners play an important.
BA Year 2 SBT Briefing for Class Mentors Wednesday, 29 th April 2015 Ben Wye Year 2 Cohort Leader - Crewe Tel Archana Hinduja.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 PRELIMINARY VISIT DAYS Wednesday 1st October Wednesday 8 th October 8 WEEK BLOCK.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Professional Skills Development
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
1Induction for Subject External Examiners Nicola Clarke Academic Standards and Quality Assurance Manager.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Performance Management and the cycle of appraisal.
Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Student Education Service QUALITY ASSURANCE QAA Update HEFCE consultation on future of quality assessment arrangements QAA Quality Code Alignment - programme.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
The Personal Tutoring System Background for new personal tutors and other student support staff.
Personal Tutoring. Purposes of this session To confirm our understanding of the purposes and procedures of the Personal Tutoring Scheme To identify key.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at Middlesex University Ian Pearson, Head of Academic Quality.
University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
New Professional Mentor Training MMU PM training
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Self Evaluation Document and Programme Specifications (SED) Planning and preparation meeting(s) Use of reference points (Benchmark Statements/Code of Practice)
Pre-placement Meeting October Aim To clarify the role and responsibilities of the Mentor / Class teacher, working alongside the University of Gloucestershire,
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 VISIT DAY Wednesday 7th October WEEK BLOCK SCHOOL EXPERIENCE 1 (SE1) Monday.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Unit Assessment Support Packs are confidential materials and you must ensure the security of these documents These UASPs are available from the secure.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Session 4 Leading Improvement.
Monday, March 07, 20161Chairing PARM Events Programme Approval, Review and Modification: The roles and responsibilities of the PARM Chair Peggy Cooke Head.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
EYITT Mentor University of Gloucestershire Wednesday 9 th September 2015 Cathie Clarke Updated 16/09/15.
Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Academic excellence for business and the professions CASE The accreditation event: roles and expectations Gill Harrison 1st September 2014.
Year 1 BA Primary Teaching Summer Term 2016 School Experience University of Hull BA Primary Teaching.
Professional Recognition and Development (PRD) Scheme
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Vicki Stokes School of Education 02/10/17
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

QAA Review Incorporating the GOsC Recognised Qualification (RQ) Renewal

Maintenance of RQ Status – 3 elements Triennial / Quinquennial review Annual Report Use of external examiners in monitoring the clinical assessment programme

GOsC versus QAA The GOsC now ‘employs’ the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) to conduct the triennial or quinquennial reviews

Review Rationale The review is based on the Self Evaluation Document (SED) which is prepared by the institution This contains detail on the following areas

Statement of overall course aims Aims and outcomes Curricula Governance and Management Teaching and Learning Learning Resources Achievement Student Progression Student Support and Guidance Assessment Maintenance of Standards and Quality Enhancement

Who was involved in the SED? Paula Fletcher Renzo Molinari Christian Fossum Mark Piraino Gary Riley Dèvan Rajendran Rob Thomas Steven Bettles Nigel Hales Erica Bell Jacquie Harris Peter Collins George Savage Elizabeth Briggs Rachel Milner Lance Bird

Why so many individuals? The SED should reflect wide consultation and avoid blandness Some members were involved at every stage whilst others offered consultative views Every level of the school was represented, from Student to Senior Management

What is the SED? A reflective document where we identify strengths and weakness as well as setting out plans for dealing with these Allows the Visitors to gain a snapshot of the school before their visit We are also using the SED to give direction to our development

The Process – Stage 1 The SED and supportive documents are sent to the Co-ordinator and Visitors Visitors request any supportive documents via the Institutional Contact (PF) Our SED was submitted electronically on the 12 th September

The Process – Stage 2 Co-ordinator visits the school for a meeting with the Senior and Middle Managers Arranged for 13 th October 2005

The Process – Stage 3 Visitors and Co-ordinator Inspection 15 th, 16 th and 17 th November 2005 First two days are for the inspection Last day is for reflection and discussion / feedback

What happens during the visit? Tuesday 15 th and Wednesday 16 th November 2005 Visitors will observe some classes Visitors will observe some clinic sessions Visitors will meet with students, faculty and staff both formally and informally Visitors will read documentation not already seen

What happens during the visit? Thursday 17 th November 2005 Private meeting of Visitors Feedback session with Senior Management and Department Heads

The Process – Stage 4 The final outcome and report is prepared and issued to the institutions in the early part of 2006

What can I do to help? Read and understand the key areas of the SED Familiarise yourself with your course content, running order and expected outcomes Prepare lesson plans based on the simple proforma Lecturers and Assistants must prepare jointly for the lectures – ensuring a good coherent session

What can I do to help? Be aware of where your subject area fits in the overall curriculum and alignment with the overall aims and outcomes of the ESO Ensure correct and professional use of Assistants Clearly state at the beginning of a session (class or clinic) what your objectives for that day are and the sum up at the end of a session in the same context Be conversant with the S2K and how it can be linked with our curriculum Be continually smart and professional in demeanour

What about Clinic Tutors? As lecturers but also … Must be aware of the progression stage of students throughout the year – we can help with this Must prepare their tutorage in line with the stage of progression of the students Be continually smart and professional in demeanour Be aware of the GOsC Code of Conduct and how it applies to the Clinic

What will the Visitors do? Visitors will not interrupt teaching or tutoring They will not appraise individual tutors – they are there to appraise the student experience They will meet with lecturers and assistants prior to lectures to discuss session objectives and intended benefits to the students They will work in pairs – except in the clinic due to space constraints

What are they looking at ? Quality of teaching and learning opportunities offered to students Correlation of these with the broad aims and outcomes of the relevant part of the programme

Where can I get more information? The Student Handbook Faculty Handbook Student Code of Conduct Student Fitness to Practice Document Degree Submission Document (We will provide you with an ‘easy to use’ guide on where to find particular issues within these documents)

In Later Sessions We will cover… The SED document The Committee Structure (Including Decision Making) Hierarchy of Individuals (Functional & Organisational Charts) Quality Assurance Process (Role of external examiners / approval of exam papers / teacher training / student disability / feedback) Curriculum and Assessment Development Strategy