Partitioning The Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Communications VT Communications comprising VT Merlin Communications and Vosper Mantech Group Geoff Spells HFCC Broadcasting Statistics.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
MADELEINE GABRIEL & JULIE DAS 9 FEBRUARY PURPOSE OF THIS SESSION Introductions Purpose of our input today Our role – we are evaluating the programme,
Network Matrix and Graph. Network Size Network size – a number of actors (nodes) in a network, usually denoted as k or n Size is critical for the structure.
PLAN Results FALL PLAN Overview -I gave you back your score report, Using Your ACT PLAN Results booklet and your test booklet. The PLAN test is.
Abstract Characterizing the hydrology of the shallow riparian groundwater of the Rio Grande Bosque is important for understanding the interactions with.
Stelios Lelis UAegean, FME: Special Lecture Social Media & Social Networks (SM&SN)
DR MACIEJ JUNKIERT PRACOWNIA BADAŃ NAD TRADYCJĄ EUROPEJSKĄ Guide for Applicants.
Relationship Mining Network Analysis Week 5 Video 5.
Voice Project Survey Report (c) Voice Project Pty Ltd & Access Macquarie Ltd – Overview Of Results Page 1 Guidelines For Interpretation Of Results.
Summary of Key Results from the 2012/2013 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Undertaken by Premium Research Prepared: July 2013.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Centrality and Prestige HCC Spring 2005 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Aliseya Wright.
Whole School Attendance Whole School Attendance 94.64% Overall School Absence 5.36%
1 Member Findings Christmas Donations An Amárach Report // February 2015 //
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING Cheryl Wolting Numeracy Facilitator Small and Northern Boards.
Core Methods in Educational Data Mining HUDK4050 Fall 2014.
Combined Leadership Team – Feb 2013 (and this will be our typical format) 7:30pm Supper 7:45pm Common Time: Setting Up the Year Leadership Groups Staff.
MATHS LESSON Statistical data and charts 1. Introduction 2. Grouping of the data 3. Number of categories 4. Relative frequencies 5. Pie chart 6. Polygon.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Workforce Engagement Survey Accessing your survey results and focussing on key messages in the survey data.
Summary of Key Results from the 2013/2014 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Survey undertaken by: Premium Research Report prepared:
© 2012 ISACA. All Rights Reserved. Topic Leader Training 2012.
Copyright of Shell Jenniffer Gearheart-Tang Mentors September 2013.
Danielle Varda & Carrie Chapman University of Colorado at Denver, School of Public Affairs.
UNDERSTANDING PROPOSAL “A” IN A DECLINING MARKET DWAYNE G. MCLACHLAN CMAE 4 CITY ASSESSOR CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS PRESENTED BY.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Advanced Software Engineering PROJECT. 1. MapReduce Join (2 students)  Focused on performance analysis on different implementation of join processors.
BDO Monthly Business Trends Indices July 2010 Page 1 Current Confidence Index BDO Output Index BDO Optimism Index Movement in Month BDO Inflation Index.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 21/06/2011 COASTAL Google Analytics Report March 2011 – June /03/2011 – 08/06/11.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 09/12/2010 COASTAL Google Analytics Report September 2010 – December /09/2010 – 08/12/2010.
Measuring Complex Achievement
Network Weaving Community of Practice December 12, 2013 C&NN Grassroots Leaders WELCOME.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
BMW Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Murtaza Abbas Asad Ali. NETWORKOLOGY THE SCIENCE OF NETWORKS.
Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences PSY505 Spring term, 2012 April 25, 2012.
KM4DEV Discussion Group Social Network Analysis 2012 Prepared by:A/Prof Graham Durant Law CSC, PhD Correct at:6:00 am AEST on the 24 th of June 2012.
Presentation Template Social Network Analysis using Socilyzer.
Special Topics in Educational Data Mining HUDK5199 Spring 2013 March 25, 2012.
Suzuki Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Citroen Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
1.Introduction Prediction of sea-ice is not only important for shipping but also for weather as it can have a significant climatic impact. Sea-ice predictions.
1 Social Business Intelligence from Open Government Data Brand Niemann Senior Enterprise Architect US EPA November 27, 2010 DISCLAIMER: While allowed to.
Sunglasses Sales Excellence Discussion. Sunglasses Identify and describe at least one further feature of this time series data with reasons. – Sunglasses.
ORDC Options Analysis SAWG Market Analysis 12/16/2015.
S urvey Question #1: How many pairs of shoes do you own? S urvey Question #2: How many times a month do you go to the mall? Name Class Period Date.
Core Methods in Educational Data Mining HUDK4050 Fall 2015.
1 Finding Spread Blockers in Dynamic Networks (SNAKDD08)Habiba, Yintao Yu, Tanya Y., Berger-Wolf, Jared Saia Speaker: Hsu, Yu-wen Advisor: Dr. Koh, Jia-Ling.
Competency-Development Project 08-December MDIC 2 What is the Competency-Development Project? ‏ Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve.
1 Accenture Celebrating Performance Results (1 of 4) Receiver Engagement Index (GES FY08) Celebrating Performance award receivers have a 17 point higher.
The Global Forum on Food Security and Nutrition A platform for inclusive, multistakeholder policy dialogue Rome December 2015.
HOW TO WRITE THE EQUATION OF A LINE Y = MX + B A SIX STEP APPROACH.
Heather Hooker, Brendan Kim, Faith Lyons, Libby Reeves, Michael McConnell December 2015 UVA Honor Committee Network Analysis Discussion.
1 Patterns of Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs Jure Leskoves, Mary McGlohon, Christos Faloutsos, Natalie Glance, Matthew Hurst SDM 2007 Date:2008/8/21.
Year 10 Research Action Plan Sunday, 20 March 2016 Topic5A3 – Issues in Australian Environments ThemeUrban Growth and Decline Weighting25% DueWeek 9, Term.
(date) © Copyright 2014.
Findings – January  Respondents  Access to the practice  Repeat prescription service  Test results  Practice staff  Overall satisfaction 
4-3-3 Frequency Modulation.. Learning Objectives:At the end of this topic you will be able to; sketch, recognise and analyse the resulting waveforms for.
Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Marketing Research 2e by Lukas, Hair, Bush and Ortinau Slides prepared by Judy Rex 19-1 Chapter Nineteen.
A Snapshot Review of Long Copy Ads 27 th April 2011 (Revised July 13 th 2011)
GroupMap Starter’s Guide Think Better Together Plan, brainstorm, discuss and prioritise for action. © GroupMap Pty Ltd |
CHARTER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS (CMO) AND CHARTER SCHOOL RELATIONS: AN EXPLORATION OF THE SOCIAL NETWORKS AHMET ULUDAG PH.D – ACCORD INSTITUTE.
Core Methods in Educational Data Mining
7 INVERSE FUNCTIONS.
Quarterly Business Review – SAMPLE DATA
NASA Satellite Images for 2007
An Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Topic Leader Training 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Partitioning The Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd 1

The Growth of the Escort & Expediter Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd2 1.Only Escorts and Expediters who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort & Expediter Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd3 1.Only Escorts and Expediters who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort & Expediter Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd4 1.Only Escorts and Expediters who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort & Expediter Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd5 1.Only Escorts and Expediters who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

Escort & Expediter Network Metrics Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd6 People103 Unique Links631 Reciprocated Links354 Total Links985 Maximum Geodesic Distance (Diameter)4 Average Geodesic Distance Graph Density Geodesic distance means theoretically everyone in the network can reach each other in a maximum of 4 steps. Most can reach everyone in two steps: that is, there are two degrees of separation in the network. 2.Graph density might be low given this is a “knowledge exchange” network, these are the key players, and less than 9% of all possible links are present.

Escort & Expediter Network In-Degree (Providers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd7 1.The key Providers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Out-Degree (Seekers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd8 1.The key Seekers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network In-Closeness (Receivers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd9 1.The key Receivers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Out-Closeness (Transmitters) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd10 1.The key Receivers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Betweenness (Bridges) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd11 1.The key Bridges in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Eigenvector (Influencers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd12 1.The key Influencers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Coordinator Brokerage Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd13 A BC 1.The key Coordinators in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Gatekeeper Brokerage Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd14 A BC 1.The key Gatekeepers in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Representative Brokerage Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd15 A C B 1.The key Representatives in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Consultant Brokerage Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd16 A C B 1.The key Coordinators in order are:

Escort & Expediter Network Key Players Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd and did not participate in this group in 2011.

Comments As is expected the Expediters are clearly the hub of the network. Activity in this group peaked in 2010 (the adjacent top map). This was followed by a dramatic decline in 2011 (the adjacent bottom map). –Expediters remained in the network and connected. –31 Escorts left or did not participate in this group. Given Escorts are the “pivot” group of the KM4Dev Discussion Group - see Slide 37, it is recommended KM4Dev survey this group to ascertain why they reduced participation, or stopped participating altogether, in 2011.Slide 37 Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd18

Further Partitioning The Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd 19

The Growth of the Escort Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd20 1.Only Escorts who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd21 1.Only Escorts who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd22 1.Only Escorts who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

The Growth of the Escort Network Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd23 1.Only Escorts who participated from 2008 to 2011 are in the network 2.This diagram does not include the previous years links.

Escort Network Metrics Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd24 People82 Unique Links208 Reciprocated Links80 Total Links288 Maximum Geodesic Distance (Diameter)8 Average Geodesic Distance Graph Density Geodesic distance means theoretically everyone in the network can reach each other in a maximum of 8 steps. Most can reach everyone in four steps: that is, there are four degrees of separation in the network. 2.Graph density might be low given this is a “knowledge exchange” network, these are the key players, and less than 4% of all possible links are present.

Escort Network In-Degree (Providers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd25 1.The key Providers in order are:

Escort Network Out-Degree (Seekers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd26 1.The key Providers in order are:

Escort Network In-Closeness (Receivers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd27 1.The key Receivers in order are:

Escort Network Out-Closeness (Transmitters) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd28 1.The key Transmitters in order are:

Escort Network Betweenness (Bridges) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd29 1.The key Bridges in order are:

Escort Network Eigenvector (Influencers) Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd30 1.The key Influencers in order are:

Escort Network Coordinator Brokerage Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd31 A BC 1.The key Coordinators in order are:

Escort Network Key Players Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd People coloured red did not participate within this group in However some, such as Riff Fullan, did participate in the wider Escort Expediter Group.

Comments The Escort group should be the “pivot” group of the KM4Dev Discussion Group - see Slide 37.Slide 37 The Escort Group has never been as strongly connected as it might be. –Connections peaked in 2010 (the adjacent top map) –In 2011 this group appears to become disengaged, with almost 50% no longer participating within the group (the adjacent bottom map). Given Escorts are the “pivot” group of the KM4Dev Discussion Group - see Slide 37, it is strongly recommended KM4Dev survey this group to ascertain why they reduced participation, or stopped participating altogether, in 2011.Slide 37 Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd33

Conclusions and Recommendations Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd 34

Main Conclusions Between September 2000 and March 2012 there were 703 identified individuals in the network exclusive of “Anonymous” and identified pseudonyms. Using Gloor’s Index these identified individuals can be categorised as follows:Gloor’s Index –No Role (low frequency senders and receivers) = 297 people. –Experts (low frequency receivers ) = 23 people. –Envois (low frequency senders) = 270 people. –Escorts (medium frequency senders and receivers) = 92 people. –Expediters (high frequency senders) = 21 people. In 2011 the actual size of the active participating group was 242 people. Wu’s Heuristic predicts the current size of the KM4Dev Discussion Group is 2,420 people, comprising: Wu’s Heuristic –2,178 lurkers, –218 occasional contributors, and –24 hyper-contributors. Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd35

Main Conclusions (continued) Initial network growth has a remarkable correlation with Dunbar’s numbers (5, 10, 18, 35, 85, 153, 280, 375, 550, 1500)Dunbar’s numbers From 2008 the active or public network appears to have stabilised around Wellman’s number (250). Wellman’s number The literature suggests growth beyond the 250 to 375 range may be difficult, unless the group is actively nurtured. Posting activity peaked in 2008, but has been in slow decline since. The peak posting months are February, March and October. The peak posting day is Wednesday. Most posts occur between 10:00 am and 2:00 pm Greenwich Mean Time. Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd36

Main Conclusions (continued) Reciprocal posts appear low given this is a “knowledge exchange” network. –It is perhaps indicative of a “knowledge seeking” organisation rather than a “knowledge sharing” organisation. –The best days to pose a question are Sunday and Monday. Between the 1st of January 2008 and the 31st of December 2011 t he Expediter Group remained stable and (as expected) was the hub of the group. The Escort Group’s activity peaked in 2010 and then suffered a 50% decline in internal communication. –The Escort Group is, or should be, the lynch pin of the discussion group. –A decline of activity within this group may herald a decline in overall activity in the discussion group. Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd37

Key Network Leaders for the Future of the KM4Dev Discussion Group Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd38 Based on this analysis, the key players in the future of the KM4Dev Discussion group are shown in the table below. (Interestingly this is an exact Dunbar number.)

Recommendations Given Escorts are the “pivot” group of the KM4Dev Discussion Group - see Slide 37, it is strongly recommended KM4Dev survey this group to ascertain why they reduced participation, or stopped participating altogether, in Slide 37 KM4DEV should consider ways of weaving the Escort Group together. Without a detailed knowledge of KM4Dev and other attribute data it is difficult for HyperEdge to recommend specific weaving actions. Some actions might include: –soliciting weaving and engagement ideas from the Key Network Leaders Group identified in the pervious slide; –consciously closing network triangles with the Key Network Leaders Group to facilitate greater collaboration within this group; –designating several “network weavers” from within the Key Network Leaders Group whose task is to connect with the Expert and Envoi groups, and in turn connect them to the appropriate people; and –identifying and enacting a small project that will weave the people on the edge of the respective groups together. Copyright © 2012: HyperEdge Pty Ltd39

For more details please visit our website at Alternatively contact Graham Durant Law at: or +61 (0) Copyright © 2012 – HyperEdge Pty Ltd