Main Injector Lambertson Aperture Scans David Johnson and Ming-Jen Yang March 17, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Operation of MI8 Collimation Bruce C. Brown All Experimenters Meeting 22 January 2007.
Advertisements

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
David Johnson –APC -.  The Proton Improvement Plan is tasked with Booster upgrades which will increase the Booster throughput required for future operation.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
Fermilab 1 AP Dept. Activities Report September 20, 2006Dixon Bogert AP Dept. - Activities Report Dixon Bogert - AP Dept. Meeting September 20 th, 2006.
T-980 Crystal Collimation Recent Results T-980 Collaboration: FNAL, SLAC, BNL, CERN, PNPI, IHEP, INFN D. Still CM14 April 27, 2010.
Commissioning of the Fermilab Accelerators for NuMI Operation Robert Zwaska University of Texas at Austin NBI 2003 November 7, 2003.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
SPS scrubbing experience: electron cloud observables L. Mether on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, September 8, 2015.
Accelerator Physics Issues Shekhar Mishra Sept 17-19, 1996 Main Injector DOE Review.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
August 05, Startup 2013 Machine Status:  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac Booster  Main Injector Startup.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys 2006 Shutdown Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Injection and Extraction Systems Issues and Solutions by M. Plum for the SNS team and our BNL collaborators.
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Septum & Dipole Magnets (April 12, 2010)
Concepts for New Recycler Lambertons GW Foster Dec 2000.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Fermilab 1 SNUMI Civil Issues September 18, 2006Dixon Bogert SNUMI Civil Design & Site Considerations; Issues and FESS work Dixon Bogert SNUMI Meeting,
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Antiproton Acceptance Keith Gollwitzer Dept. of Energy Review March 30, 2005.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hair System NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hairs Target Hall Instrumentation Review November 18, 2002 David Ayres Argonne National.
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
FCC DUMP SYSTEM W. Bartmann, B. Goddard, R. Ostojic FCC Dump Meeting, 14 th Jan
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
MI Beam Loss upon Acceleration 5E11/div 11BLMA=LM GeV/c 9.8GeV/c Start of Ramp Fast loss ~10 ms Slow loss.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
MI/RR Status January 3, 2014 D. Capista. MI Preformance.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Q1 IR Septum Quadrupole for LHeC
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
GROUP 12 CAS – Erice - March 2017 Andrea DE FRANCO
Centroid TUTORIAL.
Proposal for quadrupole families
Presentation transcript:

Main Injector Lambertson Aperture Scans David Johnson and Ming-Jen Yang March 17, 2006

Motivation and Data Collection The goal is to document the loss free apertures through the Main Injector Lambertson regions prior to the installation of the WQB wide aperture quads. The expected increase in circulating beam aperture in the Lambertson regions is due to: –the increase in beam pipe dimensions of the WQB on the inside of the ring, –the shifting of the Lambertson septa to the radial outside (which will also require new Lambertson flanges and the re-alignment of the upstream end of the transfer line. The wide aperture quad (4”) will allow the extracted beam to be farther to the outside of the ring without loss on the quad pole tip.

LM520A (61-0) LN520B (61-1)LN520C (61-2/2)* LN520D (61-3/4)* LN520E (61-45)* LM521A (61-5) LN521B (61-6/6) * LN522A (61-7/7)* LM522B(61-8) LM522C(61-9) LM522D (61-10) LM522E (61-11) LM522F (62-0) LM522G (62-1) LM522H (62-2) Q523 Q522 Q521 Q520 Q522 Q521 V701Q701LAM52CLAM52B LAM52A ES52BES52AK520A,B LM701 (P1) H522 TAR521 *Goes to chassis 2 w / beamline integrators – reset / hold timers I:LMNUMR and I:LMNUMH The numbers in parenthesis are the house - slot number and the number after the “/” is the slot in crate 2 LM523 (62-3) MI-52 Loss Monitor Placement

LM607A(63-7) LM607B(63-8) LM608A(63-9) LM608 B(63-10) LM608 C(63-11) LM608 D(64-0) LM608 E(64-1) LM608 F(64-2) LM608 G(64-3) LM608 H(64-4) Q609 Q608 Q607 Q608 V101Q101LAM60CLAM60B LAM60AH608RF cavities MI-60 Loss Monitor Placement Around NuMI Lambertsons LM on Lambertson Flange LM on conduit LAM60 LMQ608 LAM61A LAM60 – NuMI Loss Monitors LAM61B V100 Q101 LM609(64-5)

Q620 Q619 V101Q101LAM60CLAM60B MI-62 Loss Monitor Placement LM619B (64-4) Q620 LAM60A H620 Q621 LM619C (64-5) LM619D (64-6) LM619E (64-7) LM619F (64-8) LM620A (64-9) LM620B (64-10) LM620C (64-11) LM620D(65-0) LM621 (65-1) LM619A (64-3) pbars

Data Collection Injection scans were performed using a dedicated 8 GeV $2E cycle. Extraction scans (MI52 and MI60) were performed on low intensity stacking and NuMI cycles. First turn data was taken by aborting the beam after only one pass thru the Lambertson region of interest. The loss monitor “sample and hold” event, $2C, was set to measure the peak of the loss monitor response. Data on beam intensity, positions, loss and magnet currents were taken using I90. Data was transferred to excel for data analysis

Expectations What apertures are expected through Lambertsons? –Field Free: 60 mm loss free (1/2 MI beam pipe if septum edge is located on MI centerline) –Field Region: 50 mm loss free (on axis) due to 50 mm field region aperture. Expect first loss on outside of ring to occur on the Lambertsons either side of the quad What aperture is expected vertically in MI beam pipe? –The inside dimension of MI beam pipe is ~47mm For 20  and  = 55m, 6  = 26.4 mm => +/-10.3mm free aperture

Summary of Aperture Scan Data Sets MI40 8 Gev –Horizontal scan Field and Field Free region with 1 st turn H402:3 –Vertical scan of Field Free close to notch (V401:4) –Horizontal scan of Field region (only toward septum) K400 MI52 8 Gev –Horizontal scan Field region with 1 st turn KPS5S –Horizontal scan Field Free circulating using H522:3 –Horizontal scan Field Free and Field region 1 st turn using H522:3 MI Gev –Horizontal scan Field Free region using H522:3 –Vertical scan of Field Free region using V521:4 –Horizontal scan of Field region using KPS5S and H522:3 MI60 8 Gev –Horizontal scan Field Free region 1 st turn H608:3 –Horizontal scan Field Free (and Field) region 1 st turnH608:3 MI Gev –Horizontal scan Field region KPS6S –Horizontal scan of Field Free region (only toward septum) circulating H608:3 MI62 8 Gev –Horizontal scan Field Free (and Field) region 1 st turn H620:3

Summary of LAM40 Scan Assume 10  beam 8 Gev First turn using protons (060201) –Field Free Region Centroid of 8 Gev beam at HP402 is mm Inside loss start mm on HP402 as seen on LM402G Loss on septum starts at -11 on HP402 or mm motion from the nominal Loss free aperture ~30 mm+ 16mm beam size -> ~46 mm –Field Region Beam strikes loss monitors LM402F,G,and H septum first on both sides of the field region The edge of loss free region based upon the upstream loss monitors is 33.6 and 57.6 which gives a width of 24 mm + beam width which would eb ~ 40 mm

LAM40 First Turn Scan

MI40 Position Calibrations

Summary of LAM52 Scans Assume 10  beam,then 6  would be ~16 mm at entrance to 1 st Lambertson Calculate aperture relative to position at entrance to first Lambertson HP_LAM52A 8 Gev First turn Field Free (060130) –Centroid of 8 Gev beam is mm at LAM52A –Inside loss start -44 mm on beam pipe –Outside loss starts -6 mm on septum –Loss free aperture 38 mm + beam size (~16mm)-> ~ 54 mm 8 Gev Circulating Field Free (060131) –Inside loss starts at -39 mm –Outside loss (septum) first loss -12 mm –Loss free aperture 24 mm + beam size (~16mm) -> ~40 mm 120 Gev Field Free(060223) –Centroid circulating beam -13 mm –First loss seen on LM522A at mm –No loss seen on inside beam pipe –Vertical scan

Aperture of LAM62C 8 Gev 1 st Turn

LAM52 Field Free 8 GeV First Turn Aperture

LAM52 Field Free 8 GeV Circulating Aperture

Lam52 8 Gev Field Region

Summary of LAM60 Scans Assume 10  beam 8 Gev First turn Field Free (060130) – Centroid of 8 Gev beam is -32 mm –Inside loss start -46 mm beam pipe –Outside loss starts -14 mm on septum as seen by LM608F –Loss free aperture 24mm+beam size -> ~37mm 8 Gev First Turn Field Free (060131) –Inside loss starts at -40 mm –Outside loss (septum) first loss -18 mm –Loss free aperture17mm+beam size (~16mm) -> ~34mm 120 Gev Field Free and Extraction (060223) –Centroid circulating beam -23 mm –First loss seen at -3 mm –Centroid of extracted beam mm –First loss seen on LM608A at 11.4 mm

LAM608 8 GeV 1 st Turn Beam Aperture Scan

Trajectory thru LAM60

LAM Gev Field Region Scan

LAM Gev Field Free Region Scan

Position of 120 Gev Beam at HP608 Sigma 20  ~ 1.2 mm Shows a movement of 5mm

Summary of LAM62 Scan 8 Gev First turn using protons (060201) Assume 10  beam –Field Free Region Centroid of 8 Gev beam at HP620 is mm Inside loss start -52 mm on HP620 as seen on LM620A and B First loss seen on LM621 moving toward seputm at -19 mm on HP520 followed by LM620D with LM619C Loss free aperture 30 mm + 23 beam size -> ~53 mm –Field Region Lambertsons on at 8 Gev level-> bend protons up to hit the pole tip of Q620 which saturate loss monitors close to quad and raises background due to backscatter on loss monitors farther upstream When scanning from field region toward the septum, the beam strikes LAM62C septum first due to septum offsets Loss free width on LM619D is 21 mm followed by LM619E (both on LAM62C) and then on LM619C is 25 mm + beam size Loss on LM619C is back scatter. This loss monitor is not saturated and will be used to estimate beam size –Beam Size Comments Based upon beta at upstream end of LAM62C (28m) the sigma for a 10  should be 2.2 mm and 6 sigma should be 13.2mm. Use the non saturated LM619C loss monitor to estimate beam size by scanning the beam across the septum of LAM62C. Beam extends to about 21 mm full width which gives a 11.5mm half width which implies beam extends out to 5.3 .

Cartoon of LAM62 Layout Q620 LAM62A LAM62C LAM62B 2.54mm 5mm Field free region LM619C LM619D LM620A LM620B LM620D p PBARS

Circulating Field Free Region Extraction Field Region protons Pbars Q622 Q620 Q618

LAM62 8 Gev Field Free Region

Beam size from LAM62C septum scan

Summary of Horizontal Apertures

Cross Section at Q608 Beam out to about 6.5  on circulating beam Start loss with single pass beam Start loss with circulating beam Beam out to ~ 4.5  on 1 st turn beam Assume 10   ~ 3.1 mm +/-3 sigma beam at nominal HP608 position