IPBSM response to non-Gaussian beam 20130211 K. KUBO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Representation of synchrotron radiation in phase space Ivan Bazarov 1.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
RESEARCH ON BEAM SIZE MONITORS S. Csorna, Vanderbilt U. LCCOM2, June 30, ’02, Santa Cruz Proposal for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnosis Using Diffraction.
Fourier Transforms on Simulated Pulsar Data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Simulation of IP beam size with orbit jitter + wakefield in EXT-FF ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
ATF2 Progress Report For CLIC Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
XP NSTX Results Review Beam Modulation Effects on Ion Power Balance XP 737 P.W.Ross.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Statistical Description of Charged Particle Beams and Emittance Measurements Jürgen Struckmeier HICforFAIR Workshop.
REALISTIC UNDULATORS FOR INTENSE GAMMA-RAY BEAMS AT FUTURE COLLIDERS Ayash Alrashdi King Abdul-Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) POSIPOL Workshop.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Proposal of Halo collimation system for ATF2 A.Faus-Golfe, N. Fuster-Martínez J. Resta-López (IFIC) P. Bambade, S. Liu, S. Wallon (LAL) 113/02/1417th ATF2.
Phase amplification in Digital Holographic Microscopes
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
Optics with SC horizontal vertical BC0BC1BC2 XFEL, design optics.
ATF2 Kiyoshi KUBO Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) at KEK ATF – Designed as a prototype of damping ring and injector of LC – Achieved low vertical.
Recent Results in Analysis of Errors in Fringe Scans by Shintake Monitor (IPBSM) ATF2 Topical Meeting July 8, 2013 KEK ATF2 Topical Meeting Jacqueline.
Higher Physics – Unit Waves. a a λ λ crest trough Wave Theory All waves transmit energy. The energy of a wave depends on its amplitude. a = amplitude.
2014 LWS/HINODE/IRIS Workshop, Portland OR, Nov 2-6, 2014
European Linear Collider Workshop ECFA LC2013 BDS+MDI IPBSM Beam Size Measurement & Performance Evaluation May 29, 2013 DESY ECFA LC 2013 Jacqueline Yan,
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
ATF2 Report ALCW Kiyoshi KUBO, for ATF2 Collaboration.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Issues in Simulating the Effects of Wakefields Roger Barlow LET Workshop 13 th December 2007.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
Taikan SUEHARA, ATF2 meeting, KEK, 2006/11/22 Status of fringe stabilization of Shintake-monitor Taikan SUEHARA The University of Tokyo.
Brief review of past studies on Wakefield ATF2 Proj. Mtg K.Kubo.
T. Burnett: Anagroup 5/24/04 1 Latest PSF and Point-source sensitivity prediction status Anagroup meeting Toby Burnett 24 May 04.
Injector Requirements Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 1st, 2004 Cécile.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Design for a New Optical Table of the Shintake Monitor Takashi Yamanaka The University of Tokyo ATF2 weekly meeting 2007/9/26.
Taikan SUEHARA, Joint Meeting of PRPPC in Honolulu, Hawaii, 2006/10/30 Laser Fringe Stabilization of 35nm IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake monitor) for ATF2/ILC.
Progress of Shintake Monitor (ATF2 IP-BSM) ATF2 weekly meeting 2008/9/3 Takashi Yamanaka The University of Tokyo.
Technical Board Summary Preliminary Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Université Paris 11, Orsay, France ATF2 project meeting, Technical.
Wakefield of cavity BPM In ATF2 ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Intensity dependence of Beam size at IP and Wakefield in ATF2
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Andrei Shishlo ORNL SNS Project Florence, Italy November 2015
James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab
ATF2 Recent Wakefield (Beam size Intensity dependence) Studies
Telecommunications Engineering Topic 2: Modulation and FDMA
Emittance Partitioning between x (or y) and z dimensions
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
Bandpass Modulation and Demodulation
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Presentation transcript:

IPBSM response to non-Gaussian beam K. KUBO

Motivation of this study We sometimes observe apparent discrepancies between beam sizes measured with different IPBSM crossing angles (different modulation pitches) May come from systematic errors of IPBSM But, may come from non-Gaussian beam shape, because beam size is evaluated assuming Gaussian beam. – How IPBSM measurement depends on beam shape?

What IPBMS measures Interference of two laser beams: photon density is Scanning the phase , “modulation” is For electron density  (y), signal height is Modulation is, basically, amplitude of Fourier transformation of electron density. 1+a 1-a

For Gaussian beam For two Gaussians beam Cannot tell beam size and beam shape. Effect of tail is different for different fringe pitch (crossing angle). But, only important if T is comparable with C.

Modulation for beam of sum of two Gaussians Calculated modulations as functions of sigma of 2 nd part (tail) of the beam. Population of 1 st and 2 nd part =1:1 Dashed line: Modulation with 174 deg, calculated from the modulation with 30 deg, assuming a single Gaussian beam. Sigma of 1 st part =37 nm

Rectangular beam

Tracking simulation of ATF2 beam line  IPBSM modulation Set very large energy spread  might simulate large non-linear effects (?)  large tail

Tracking simulation of ATF2 beam line  IPBSM modulation Set strong transverse wakefield

Conclusion We should keep in mind that IPBSM is not necessarily measuring sigma or RMS beam size. Modulation is not necessarily monotonic function of RMS, or sigma of core part of the beam. Evaluated beam size from modulation assuming Gaussian beam can be different for different crossing angle on leaser beams. If electron beam shape is far from Gaussian. No conclusion about the actual beam size and beam shape. Here, only possibilities are shown.