Interactions of Particles with Matter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

Interaction of Particles with Matter
Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology Chapter 15: Interaction of Photons and Charged Particles with Matter Professor Yasser M. Kadah Web:
Детектори - II 4-ти курс УФЕЧ Спирачно лъчение (bremsstrahlung) Z 2 electrons, q=-e 0 M, q=Z 1 e 0 A charged particle of mass M and charge q=Z.
Particle interactions and detectors
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Interactions with Matter
Particle Interactions
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Introduction V.Ivanchenko, M.Maire, M.Verderi  Process interface  Physics categories  Electromagnetic physics  PhysicsList.
Department of Physics University of Oslo
Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Charged particle tracking.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #10 Monday, Feb. 17, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Photoelectric Effect Compton Effect Pair production/Pair annihilation Monday,
Calorimeters Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Interactions of Photons.
Resident Physics Lectures Christensen, Chapter 4 Basic Interactions Between X-Rays and Matter George David Associate Professor Medical College of Georgia.
Interactions of high energy photons with matter
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
© Jimoid.com 2005 Ionising Radiation There are two types of radiation; ionising and non-ionising. Radiation Ionising Non-ionising Indirectly ionising (neutral.
Electrons Electrons lose energy primarily through ionization and radiation Bhabha (e+e-→e+e-) and Moller (e-e-→e-e-) scattering also contribute When the.
Monday, Oct. 16, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Monday, Oct. 16, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Total Electron.
1 Photons: X-rays, γ- rays; electrons, positrons Lecture 2 Shell structure of the atoms. Notion of the cross section of the interaction.
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Interactions of EM Radiation with Matter
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
The Hybrid Scheme of Simulations of the Electron- photon and Electron-hadron Cascades In a Dense Medium at Ultra-high Energies L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov.
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Basic photon interactions
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
1 Calorimetry - 1 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Interaction of gamma rays with matter
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Experimental Particle Physics
Interaction of gamma rays with matter
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
Particles going through matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

Interactions of Particles with Matter From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Interactions of Particles with Matter Interactions of Photons Pair Production  An electron-positron pair can be created when (and only when) a photon passes by the Coulomb field of a nucleus or atomic electron  this is needed for conservation of momentum. Threshold energy for pair production at E = 2mc2 near a nucleus. E = 4mc2 near an atomic electron  Pair production is the dominant photon interaction process at high energies. Cross- section from production in nuclear field is dominant. First cross-section calculations made by Bethe and Heitler using Born approximation (1934).  + e-  e+ + e- + e-  + nucleus  e+ + e- + nucleus Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Interactions of Particles with Matter From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Interactions of Particles with Matter Interactions of Photons Pair Production Photon pair conversion probability (attenuation length is 9/7 X0) Cross-section independent of photon energy (once well above threshold), ~ Z2 P=54% http://pdg.lbl.gov Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Photon absorbtion lengths Interactions of Photons Photon attenuation length for different elemental absorbers versus photon energy http://pdg.lbl.gov Here λ = 9/7 X0 Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Interactions of Particles with Matter From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Interactions of Particles with Matter Summary of the basic EM interactions e+ / e- Ionisation Bremsstrahlung P.e. effect Comp. effect Pair production E g dE/dx s Z Z(Z+1) Z5 Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic showers Cascade of pair production and bremsstrahlung is known as an electromagnetic shower number of low-energy photons (or electrons) produced is proportional to initial energy of electron or gamma Energy collected in each of e± and γ is also proportional to initial energy Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic Shower Development From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Electromagnetic Shower Development A simple shower model Shower development: Start with an electron with E0 >> Ec  After 1X0 : 1 e- and 1  , each with E0/2  After 2X0 : 2 e-, 1 e+ and 1  , each with E0/4 .  After tX0 : Maximum number of particles reached at E = Ec  [ X0 ] Number of particles increases exponentially with t equal number of e+, e-,  Depth at which the energy of a shower particle equals some value E’  Number of particles in the shower with energy > E’ Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic showers Radiation length X0 used to characterize longitudinal shower development Peaks at depth of ~7 X0 Transverse shower size due to multiple Coulomb scattering; scales with Moliere radius (radius of cylinder containing 90% of shower energy) RM = X0Es/Ec where Es = me√4π/α ~ 21 MeV and Ec is the critical energy Two dimensionless variables: t=x/X0 and y=E/Ec govern shower development Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic Shower Development From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Electromagnetic Shower Development A simple shower model Cu Longitudinal profile of an EM shower Simulation of the energy deposit in copper as a function of the shower depth for incident electrons shows the logarithmic dependence of tmax with E. EGS4* (electron-gamma shower simulation) Number of particle decreases after maximum *EGS4 is a Monte Carlo code for doing simulations of the transport of electrons and photons in arbitrary geometries. Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic Shower Development From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Electromagnetic Shower Development Shower profile From previous slide, one expects the longitudinal and transverse developments to scale with X0 EGS4 calculation EGS4 calculation Longitudinal development 10 GeV electron Transverse development 10 GeV electron RM  RM less dependent on Z than X0: Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Electromagnetic Shower Development From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures Electromagnetic Shower Development Energy deposition The fate of a shower is to develop, reach a maximum, and then decrease in number of particles once E0 < Ec Given that several processes compete for energy deposition at low energies, it is important to understand the fate of the particles in a shower.  Most of energy deposition is by low energy e±’s. 60% e± (< 4 MeV) 40% e± (< 1 MeV) EGS4 calculation e± (>20 MeV) Ionization dominates Spring, 2009 Phys 521A

Shower images ICARUS, liquid argon drift chamber (measures ionization) Play around with an online simulator from Sven Menke: http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/~menke/elss/home.shtml Spring, 2009 Phys 521A