TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary Laboratoire LORIA (CNRS, INRIA, Universités de Nancy) ISO meeting London, 14 August 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMF - a tutorial Part 3: Designing (schemas and) filters TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
Advertisements

Major Influences on the Design of ODM Dan Chang (IBM) Elisa Kendall (Sandpiper) MDSW 2004.
Can I Use It, and If so, How? Christian Lieske SAP AG – MultiLingual Technology Discussion of Consortium Proposal for OLIF2 File Header.
The eXtensible Markup Language (XML) An Applied Tutorial Kevin Thomas.
What is XML? a meta language that allows you to create and format your own document markups a method for putting structured data into a text file; these.
XML/EDI Overview West Chester Electronic Commerce Resource Center (ECRC)
RDF Schemata (with apologies to the W3C, the plural is not ‘schemas’) CSCI 7818 – Web Technologies 14 November 2001 Van Lepthien.
IFLA Namespaces Gordon Dunsire Chair, IFLA Namespaces Technical Group Session 204 — IFLA library standards and the IFLA Committee on Standards – how can.
MLIF: A Metamodel to Represent and Exchange Multilingual Textual Information ISO TC37 SC4 WG Samuel Cruz-Lara, Gil Francopoulo, Laurent Romary,
METS What is METS ? What is METS ? A schema that provides a flexible mechanism for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata for a.
Knowledge Acquisitioning. Definition The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
Interchange using TBX 8 th Metadata conference Berlin April 2005 Alan K. Melby Brigham Young University, Provo campus.
The Semantic Web Week 12 Term 1 Recap Lee McCluskey, room 2/07 Department of Computing And Mathematical Sciences Module Website:
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Metadata : Setting the Scene or a Basic Introduction Wendy Duff University of Toronto, Faculty of Information Studies.
10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.
TMF - a tutorial TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
Metadata Standards and Applications 4. Metadata Syntaxes and Containers.
Knowledge Mediation in the WWW based on Labelled DAGs with Attached Constraints Jutta Eusterbrock WebTechnology GmbH.
1 CIM User Group Conference Call december 8th 2005 Using UN/CEFACT Core Component methodology for EIC/TC 57 works and CIM Jean-Luc SANSON Electrical Network.
Provo, 16 Aug 2007 LMF meeting 1 Lexical Markup Framework: ISO Provo meeting Gil Francopoulo.
DMSO Technical Exchange 3 Oct 03 1 Web Services Supporting Simulation to Global Information Grid Mark Pullen George Mason University with support from.
Multilingual Issues in the Representation of International Bibliographic Standards for the Semantic Web Gordon Dunsire Independent Consultant; Chair of.
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Second RMSIG Workshop Methodology and Process Wolfram Höpken.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Towards Translating between XML and WSML based on mappings between.
Standards for language resources the ISO/TC 37(/SC 4) perspective
“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.
Using ISO/IEC to Help with Metadata Management Problems Graeme Oakley Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Environmental Terminology Research in China HE Keqing, HE Yangfan, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering
Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct
Experiments with ODD outside the TEI framework Laurent Romary & Piotr Banski The ISO-TEI connection.
Project Proposal: CTS2 SDK Presentation to OHT Steering Committee.
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
TEXT ENCODING INITIATIVE (TEI) Inf 384C Block II, Module C.
Classification and the Metadata Registry Judith Newton NIST IRS XML Stakeholders/ XML Working Group May 18, 2004.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
Scalable Metadata Definition Frameworks Raymond Plante NCSA/NVO Toward an International Virtual Observatory How do we encourage a smooth evolution of metadata.
XML A web enabled data description language 4/22/2001 By Mark Lawson & Edward Ryan L’Herault.
Connecting Connexions: Organizing and Integrating Open Learning Content with Topic Maps Darina Dicheva Lars Johnsen.
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. For internal MITRE use 13 June 2013 Meeting #3 hData Record Format Taskforce 1 © 2012 The MITRE Corporation.
ISO/IEC CD and WD : Core Model and Model Mapping ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32/WG September 2005, Toronto SC32/WG2 Japan (Kanrikogaku Ltd) Masaharu.
Towards multimodal meaning representation Harry Bunt & Laurent Romary LREC Workshop on standards for language resources Las Palmas, May 2002.
ISO a tutorial Part 2: Representing data categories TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Presentation Title: Day:
ISO/TC 211 WG4 WI 18 Encoding Foil no. 1 Annex C XML and XMI David Skogan SINTEF Telecom and Informatics
A comprehensive framework for multimodal meaning representation Ashwani Kumar Laurent Romary Laboratoire Loria, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy.
Evidence from Metadata INST 734 Doug Oard Module 8.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Metadata : an overview XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is supported.
ISO CD Editorial and technical comments. Contact Mailing list Subject: sub FirstName LastName.
Problems with XML & XML Schemas XML falls apart on the Scalability design goal. 1.The order in which elements appear in an XML document is significant.
STEP Tutorial: “ Fundamentals of STEP” David Briggs, Boeing January 16, 2001 ® PDES, Inc NASA STEP Workshop step.nasa.gov.
ISO TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
SemAF – Basics: Semantic annotation framework Harry Bunt Tilburg University isa -6 Joint ISO - ACL/SIGSEM workshop Oxford, January 2011 TC 37/SC.
ISO TC37/SC4 N435 Nov 12, 2007 Presented by Miran Choi/ETRI Written by Jae Sung Lee/Chungbuk National Univ.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
DC Architecture WG meeting Wednesday Seminar Room: 5205 (2nd Floor)
Ontologies Reasoning Components Agents Simulations An Overview of Model-Driven Engineering and Architecture Jacques Robin.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Oksana Hoard LIS Overview MatML stands for Materials Markup Language It is a freely-available XML schema designed to describe materials (metals,
Information Architecture WG: Report of the Fall 2004 Meeting November 16th, 2004 Dan Crichton, NASA/JPL.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
DATEX II version 3.0 Methodology improvements Josef Kaltwasser
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
Stanford Medical Informatics
Introduction to Metadata
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Piotr Kaminski University of Victoria September 24th, 2002
Semantic Information Modeling for Federation
Presentation transcript:

TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary Laboratoire LORIA (CNRS, INRIA, Universités de Nancy) ISO meeting London, 14 August 2000

Background 4 Current work with n382 (MSC), n385 (Geneter) –Defining interoperability conditions Two options –Direct mappings between both –Defining a general framework for terminological representation which may encompass both formats –Second option adopted here In continuity with the work conducted on the meta- model (n380)

Proposal 4 Defining one single standard for the representation of terminological data Taking into account the work achieved within n380, n382 and n385 Identifying shared components Finding consensus on pending issues Guiding the evolution of ISO towards a more formal representation

Definitions 4 TMF: Terminological Mark-up Framework Definition of underlying structures and mechanisms needed for the computer representation of terminological data Independence with regards any specific format 4 TML: Terminological Mark-up Language One specific representation format generated within TMF E.g.: Geneter and MSC are two possible TMLs

Principles 4 Abstract structure cf. meta-model: extension of the notion of core structure (e.g. ‘language section’) –Shared and optional (?) components 4 Data constraint specifications –Mainly based upon a formalised version of –Additional constraints (“free” in n385) 4 Vocabularies (e.g. ‘ldl’ vs. ‘langSet’) 4 Styles (as defined in n382)

External resources 4 Resources closely related to terminological description –Described as a TMF component e.g.: domain hierarchy 4 Resources external to “core” terminological description –External module made available to any specific TML e.g.: bibliographical record, formatting instructions

Technological background 4 Data model –UML specification –XML schema specification Abstract structure defined as general element types One TML: element types derived from abstract structure and combined with data constraints 4 Data constraint specification –RDF definitions of data categories –May comprise vocabularies at this stage

Technical background (cont.) 4 Making full use of the XML background –xml:lang –Character encoding decl. –namespaces –Modularity (external resources, cf. namespaces) –XML schemas More flexible and powerful than classical DTDs –Data typing, Element abstraction, Coherent XML syntax –XML links

XML links 4 Transparency as to the actual location of a resource (internal vs. external) 4 Maybe useful to identify ontologies –External links between concepts entry i entry j entry i entry j

Relation with current work items 4 MSC and Geneter may appear as normative or informative appendices –Resp. blind-TMF and open-TMF 4 Does not change current activities within national, international or industrial projects –Both formats are part of the framework

Relation with interoperability work 4 Interoperability achieved through the abstract model defined by the framework –Kind-of “langage pivot” –Necessity to include, in a coherent way, specificities of both formats  strong involvement of current editors of n382 and n385 (point for discussion: optional components, since implies possible incompatibility)