Developing a Governance Framework for National SAICM Implementation “ Experiences, lessons learned and perspectives ” Dr. Mario Yarto National Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inaugural Discussions on the Global Programme on Sustainable Ship Recycling Dhaka, Bangladesh – 12 January 2008 Donata Rugarabamu Secretariat of the Basel.
Advertisements

Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Linking GHS to SAICM & the SAICM Quick Start Programme.
The Synergy of Chemical Conventions; Opportunities Obstacles - an IPEN Perspective - Contamination shows no respect for territorial borders Countries alone.
1 GHS Conference for ASEAN: Implementation Towards 2008 & Beyond GHS Implementation in ASEAN: looking ahead Jakarta Indonesia 9-11 May 2007.
A Presentation by UNEP At the UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund Fairmont Hotel Macdonald Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3—5 May 2006.
Reducing Human and Environmental Risks from the Insecticide Lindane Irina Ize and Keith Chanon ACS symposium SMOC WG Meeting March, 2005.
3 rd Global Networking Conference on RECP September 4, 2013 Evelyn Swain GEF-6 Update.
The CEC North American Regional Action Plan on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment D C McKay.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Management of Chemicals at the Global Level Presentation by John Arseneau April 2005.
1 Multilateral Environmental Agreements Overview.
UNITAR Global Thematic Workshop on Governance, Civil Society Participation and Strengthening Partnerships for Chemicals and Waste Management and SAICM.
1 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) and its implementation in Albania Dr. Lindita Tafaj Institute of Public Health Department.
SAICM: A Business and Industry Perspective Paul Sykes, ICCA CSD-18 Learning Centre, May
1 GHS in the Context of National Chemical Management Programmes and Sustainable Development Peter J. Peterson Senior Special Fellow UNITAR Regional Workshop.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
NATIONAL SAICM IMPLEMENTATION: DEVELOPING A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Gillian Guthrie Ministry of Local Government and Environment June 19, 2006 THE CASE OF.
Sound Management of Chemicals Executive Director’s Overview Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals Working Group and Stakeholders.
The GEF in Mexico Integrating GEF Programmes and Strategies at Country Level Cape Town, August, 2006.
Design and Development of an Inventory of Chemical Substances in Mexico General Bureau of Urban and Regional Pollution Research Bureau of Chemicals and.
Chemicals Update GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 30 October to 1 November 2012 Arusha, Tanzania.
Chemicals Update GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 30 October to 1 November 2012 Arusha, Tanzania.
1 International Chemicals Management Activities SMOC WG Public Meeting Tucson, Arizona March 5-6, 2008.
Awareness Raising, Draft Guidance and Pilot Projects Regional Meeting on Nano for CEE Lodz, Poland: 26-27June 2011.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
COLLABORATION BETWEEN NORWAY AND THE WBG – 2 nd WORKSHOP/DIALOGUE GEF’s Role in Reducing and Eliminating Persistent Organic Pollutants 14 May 2004.
Development and Transfer of Technologies UNFCCC Expert Workshop On Technology Information Technology Transfer Network and Matchmaking Systems: a LA & C.
Chemicals Management Forum San Antonio, Texas May 15-16, 2012 Chemicals management indicators in the movement toward sustainable cities in Mexico Dr. Leonora.
Toxics Programs at the Global and Continental Scales Werner H. Braun for Council of Great Lakes Industries.
GEF IN TAJIKISTAN Dr. Neimatullo SAFAROV CBD and CPB National Focal Point Republic of Tajikistan.
Roles of GEF National Focal Points & Experiences in GEF Coordination and Integration Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland,
Thematic Workshop on Governance, Civil Society Participation and Strengthening Partnerships for Chemicals and Waste Management and SAICM Implementation.
UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Accelerating Change Management Response and Key Actions.
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals Working Group and Stakeholders Tucson, Arizona, March 4 – 7, 2008.
North American Commission For Environmental Cooperation Chemicals Management in Mexico Chemicals Management in Mexico M AURICIO LIMÓN AGUIRRE Under Secretary.
Nano Draft Guidance and Pilot Projects Rob Visser UNITAR Senior Advisor Nano African Regional Meeting April 2011, Nairobi.
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Updates on Current Activities 2008.
A.Karim H. Rashed SAICM, Project Technical Manager Head, Recycling & Treatment Unit Kingdom of Bahrain Supreme Council for Environment 10 June 2013 Dubai,
1 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal Brief background The Convention Implementation actors.
Report of the EM&A Standing Committee Monitoring and Assessing Pollutants across North America Tucson, Arizona, USA. March, 2008.
1 Improving International Collaboration TRI National Training Conference February 2008.
1 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) SAICM Secretariat.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Eastern and Southern Africa Nairobi, Kenya, May 2009 Review of POPs activities in the Region.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
Risk and Crisis Management Building OECD Principles on Country Crisis Management.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
M en C ALFONSO FLORES RAMIREZ DGGIMAR/SGPA San Antonio, Texas Environmental Chemicals Management, Domestic Agenda / Mexico March-April, 2009, San Antonio,
North American Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Commission for Environmental Cooperation Ned Brooks, Chemicals Program Manager Commission for Environmental.
Ibrahima Sow, Chemicals Cluster Coordinator GEF Climate and Chemicals GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF-5 Strategy for.
SAICM preparations towards International regulation of chemicals = dismal pace. Example, the asbestos in all its forms, is no fully listed.
1 Integrating (Mainstreaming) Sound Management of Chemicals into National Development Planning United Nations Development Programme Energy and Environment.
Reduction of Mercury in Products Action Plans. 2 Action Plan  describes the activities to be carried out and the related implementation strategies for.
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) and Environmental Monitoring & Assessment (EM&A) Presented.
1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs. Role of Regional Centres.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
International Context for PRTRs Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
SAICM Quick Start Programme (QSP) Strategic Priority B Matthew Gubb, Coordinator, SAICM secretariat Caribbean Workshop on SAICM and related chemicals and.
GEF GEF Global Project on PRTRs Use of SAICM and GEF resources for a common goal.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Adrián Vázquez – Executive Director Measuring Results The CEC’s Strategic Plan: An Interim Report on.
Session 3: Advancing National Action and Capacity Development
Sound Management of Chemicals Program
Actions to Reduce Mercury
Reducing the Risk from Mercury in North America
HHPs under SAICM – What next? Geneva 6 May, 2015
Enhancing North American Air Quality Management
THE COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION OF NORTH AMERICA       The CEC on Disaster Resilient Communities JPAC Regular Session Mexico City,
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Governance Framework for National SAICM Implementation “ Experiences, lessons learned and perspectives ” Dr. Mario Yarto National Institute of Ecology MEXICO Geneva, June 2006

Content Background on regional experience Achievements Future directions in NA Mexico´s own experience –Grey Agenda (SAICM at a National level) –Lindane –Lessons learned

Background note “regional experience” Mexico, through the NAFTA, is part of the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, and is actively involved in the Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) initiative, which gives priority to the management and control of substances of mutual concern that are persistent and toxic, but also envisaged cooperation on other aspects of the sound management of the full range of chemical substances in the three countries

Chemicals Management in North America Chemical industry is important in Canada, Mexico, United States Sound management of chemicals is critical to health, environment, global competitiveness Key opportunities exist for leadership in chemicals management CEC provides a valuable forum for chemicals management in North America.

The mechanism for trilateral work on persistent and toxic chemicals has been through North American Regional Action Plans (NARAPs). NARAPs have been developed for DDT, Chlordane, PCBs and Mercury taking a substance-by-substance approach. In addition, a NARAP on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment has been developed to address pathways of exposure and assess progress in controlling pollution. Furthemore, a NARAP for Lindane is seeking approval by the Council of Ministers (2006) How it works

CEC Sound Management of Chemicals Agenda 1995–2005 Aligning North American priorities for chemicals management Implementing North American Regional Action Plans (NARAPs) as top priorities –chlordane, DDT, PCBs, D/F & HCB, mercury, lindane, environmental monitoring and assessment Helping the three countries to advance international objectives

Achievements through NARAPs PCBs (1996): environmentally sound management & control of existing PCBs throughout their life-cycles with objective of virtual elimination through safe phase out and destruction DDT (1997): DDT no longer manufactured in North America; Total elimination of use in 2000, surpassing plan target of 80% reduction by 2002 Chlordane (1997): Chlordane no longer registered for use or used; sole North American producer voluntarily ceased production Mercury (Phase 1 NARAP 1997; Phase 2 NARAP 2000): –50-percent reduction in national mercury emissions by 2006 –Phase-out or ban specific mercury uses where there is an unreasonable or otherwise unmanageable risk of release to the environment or risk to human health

International recognition of SMOC program DDT & Chlordane NARAPs profiled as leading examples in the International Forum on Chemical Safety (IFCS) and Intergovernmental Negotiating Sessions (INCs) leading to the Stockholm Agreement ( ). Mercury NARAP has helped to inform the work of UNEP global assessment on mercury. Transfer of North American expertise on DDT via a joint Mexican- Central American demonstration for Action and Demonstration of Sustainable Alternatives to DDT for Malaria Vector Control.

Proposal for a Renewed Approach (2006–2020) Re-aligning with Puebla Declaration (Information for Decision Making, Capacity Building, Trade and Environment) and existing domestic and international activities Actively involving stakeholders as partners Leveraging our resources Helping Parties advance international objectives (SAICM, WSSD 2020 Goals) Cross-linking with other CEC programs

Overall achievements The most important actions for the success of these Regional Action Plans have required –c–close coordination and synergies between agencies in the three countries, –c–communication to the public and public participation, –e–exchange of information, –c–capacity building process

Mexico´s Experiences G Grey Agenda Lindane profile Stockholm NIP Capacity building in CA

How to ensure a multi-sectoral approach for national SAICM implementation (incl. effective inter-ministerial co-ordination) How to facilitate effective involvement of stakeholder groups in the development of national SAICM implementation strategies. Sharing of national experiencies of existing and planned structures and activities, including lessons learned to date Focus on

Group of initiatives, policies, strategies, actions and coordinated and effective instruments, to prevent, abate and remediate environmental pollution at the local, regional and global leves, through the sound management of chemicals and hazardous waste Mexico´s experiences: The Grey Agenda

How did we start –Intra-agency working group –Identify main issues to be addressed –Identify other sectors / stakeholders –Development of a preliminary working plan

Lack of coordination in public policy. Existence of regulatory instruments but without a coordinated intra/inter agency and inter sectorial approach. Non-compliance and illegal practices. Hot-spot problems unsolved due to lack of resources Limited knowledge on state of the environment Issues identified Need for a Grey Agenda is based on….

Energy Transport Agriculture Economy Internal Affairs Foreign Affairs Labour Complexity of the Grey Agenda Health Customs Environment Social Development State/local authorities

Even more complexity: International linkages STOCKHOLM CONVENTION BASEL CONVENTION ROTTERDAM CONVENTION MONTREAL PROTOCOL BILATERAL AND MULTILATERAL AGENDA OECD, CEC, APEC, UNEP, CDS, SAICM

FEDERAL GOV. Federal agencies Those related to environmet, human health, labour and other issues ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (Lead) Interagency WG - DGGIMAR - DGIRA - INE/CENICA - UCAI - PROFEPA - DGAFE - DGPYE - DGI - IMTA - DGCCA and RETC - CNA - Other OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Representation from all interested actors - States - Municipalities - Industry - Academia - Civil society STRATEGIC PROGRAMME Pollution prevention Risk reduction PRTR PRTR Communication, education programmes Communication, education programmes Capacity building Social participation Social participation Adequate legislation (incl. compliance and enforcement Trade Trade Towards a National Policy SAICM Implementation

Next steps Ministerial endorsement (thus ensuring involvement of relevant government sectors) Encourage and provide for meaningful participation of the public, including non-governmental organizations; business and industry; provincial, state, and municipal governments; academia; and technical and policy experts in developing its recommendations Facilitate stakeholder workshops for further issue identification Request commitment for shared responsibility Promote partnerships and pilot projects in strategic sectors Build upon existing bilateral and multilateral commitments related to the sound management of chemicals Development of a SAICM Implementation plan

Mexico´s experiences: Lindane Objectives –Commitment to phase-out all uses within NARAP –Development of profile document for decision-making –Stakeholder workshops for information sharing –Identify possible substitutes for Lindane –Support for regulatory/non-regulatory initiatives Stakeholder participation –Government, Industry, NGO´s, Academia, Indigenous groups –Set objectives, recommendations from each sector –Identification of issues to focus on –Development of a national position Outcomes –Transparency –Participative process –Productive and results- oriented stakeholders meetings –Information and positions obtained directly from the source –Informed decision-making

Governance is needed to strengthen institutions Multisectorial approach is better when determining national priorities Creation of synergies between domestic and international agendas improves effectiveness (Grey Agenda SAICM) Better results by scaling of national projects through international initiatives (UNEP´s mercury programme, SAICM, OECD). Gains on capacity building, technology transfer, sharing of information and experiences, international cooperation. Use of consensus building as a strategy Leveraging of resources is important. Team work is better…and much more fun Lessons learned

Thank you for your attention !