Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Advertisements

Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Critical Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Izzy S.- Audio Visual Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction.
Flight Readiness Review March Vehicle Criteria Testing and vehicle design Bulkheads: 9-Ply ½” birch plywood made by Public Missiles, Ltd or ¼ inch.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Preliminary Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction Izzy S.- Audio Visual.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Critical Design Review Presentation
Preliminary Design Review
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
Characteristics,Construction, Recovery
Target Altitude Safety Document
Presentation transcript:

Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston, TX rocketry.sths.org* Mr. Lynch- Head Mentor Mr. D. Laney,mentor Mr. M. Loughlinmentor Steven Schroeder- Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket design Thomas Loughlin- Payload Andy Holm-Construction Gregory Katsaros- Audio Visual Nick Yuan- Safety Robert Forzano- Outreach/Publicity Chris Jardine- Communications Navin Kalluri- Communications

Agenda Mission Statement and Goals Project Update Launch Vehicle and Payload Summary Vehicle Body System Propulsion System Recovery System Payload System System Tests Full Scale Launch Payload Experiment Safety Budget and Outreach

Mission statement and Goals Mission Statement Our mission is to supply accurate data about cosmic radiation by building a safe and functioning rocket that can provide ample time for data collection. Our Major Project Goals Reach an altitude of one mile. Payload records data on ionizing radiation. Both parachutes deploy at predetermined altitudes. Land within one square mile. Rocket retrievable with payload intact. Shed light on radiation variation with altitude.

Project Update Since the CDR we have finished construction of the full-scale rocket, which included: Coating the body tubes with fiberglass and epoxy finishing the motor mount and attaching it and the fins to the lower body tube Securing the nose cone to the upper body tube Constructing full-sized payload section Assembling and inserting the recovery system Things we still have left to do: Make repairs to the rocket (will explain later)

Fins – (L) Fins are carefully aligned and affixed to the Motor Mount Tube with epoxy and fiberglass cloth. (R) The finished fin assembly without the all-thread rods connecting the upper and middle Centering Rings, and the Retention Bolts on the Lower Centering Ring.

Centering Rings (L) Two U-bolts were placed on the Upper Centering Ring in order to distribute the forces involved in the deployment of the Shock Cord. (R) All-Thread Rods were used to connect the upper two Centering Rings, also, to distribute forces involved in ejection.

Launch Vehicle and Payload Summary Vehicle: Length – 99” Gross Liftoff Weight – 17.8 lb Diameter ”Payload Mass lb Motor – K700WStability Margin – 2.92 Maximum altitude ft Launch System - 1.5”x1.5” (10’) Section 2 weight: 3.43 lbs Section 3 weight: 4.34 lbs Recovery: Drogue – 28” at Apogee Main – 120” at 900 ft. Payload Experiment Summary: Measure levels of cosmic radiation with altitude through the use of scintillator probes whose data will be correlated with time and altitude.

SYSTEMS Vehicle Body PropulsionRecoveryPayload System Tests

(1) Vehicle Body System Modified LOC Precision Magnum 3e Three Body Tubes (5.40”- size needed for payload) Lower ( 31 ”) – K700W, Drogue, G10 Fins Middle (28”) – Payload Bay Upper (11”) – Main Chute Nose Cone (21”) GPS Transmitter MHz | | CG CP Rocket Length: 99” Center of Gravity: 62” Center of Pressure: 78” Stability Margin: 2.92

(2) Propulsion System Motor: Aerotech K700W Thrust / Weight: 10 N/ lb Velocity off Launch Rod:87.2 ft/s Rail Length:10 ft Burn Time:3.594 s

(3) Recovery System Drogue Chute 28” LOC Precision Deployed at Apogee Harness: braided nylon, in. thick, 30 ft in length Deployment Velocity: 61.2 ft./s Main Chute 120” LOC Precision Deployment at 900 ft Harness: braided nylon, in. thick, 30 ft. in length Deployment Velocity : 71.9 ft/s Redundancy Plan 2 Perfectflite Dual Deployment Altimeters mean velocity: Each one will connect to a drogue and main ejection charge Landing Landing at 152 sSection 1 KE: 37 (ft-lb) Expected Drift: 1092 ft.Section 2 KE: 46 Mean velocity: 24.9 ft./sSection 3 KE: 65

Bay #1 - Circuit Board, Scintillator Probe Bay #2 - Two Altimeters – Linked to ejection charges at either end of Payload Bay. Within Nose Cone GPS Transmitter Outside of Lower Body Tube Video camera (4) Payload System

Sled holding two dual-deployment altimeters. Ring at the end of the sled is designed to hold six switches – two to activate the Altimeters, two safety switches for the Drogue, and two safety switches for the Main Parachute. (4) Payload System

Full Scale Launch Although our rocket performed well in most aspects, our launch wasn’t successful because our recovery had two errors The charges for the main and drogue chutes were wired backwards, the drogue chute deployed at 700 feet The main chute did not deploy at apogee as it would have because the connecting shear pins were too thick We did not test the ejection charges on ground before the flight, a mistake we certainly will not make again. The rocket sustained heavy damage, but we are making repairs and will ground test this Saturday

Payload Experiment Hypothesis After consideration of the effects due to terrestrial radiation, we would expect the counts to increase with elevation as the net absorption of Secondary Cosmic Radiation by the atmosphere decreases.

Payload Experiment Significance (1) Radiation will be measured using scintillator probes which are much more sensitive to gamma radiation than Geiger Mueller tubes and can give as a more accurate picture of how radiation is distributed with altitude. (2) Radiation levels are suggested to be associated with changes in atmospheric conditions (such as cloud formation and global warming; chlorine production and ozone depletion) (3) Radiation levels are linked to the breakdown of DNA in organic tissue and so merit further study.

System testing Tested GPS – Locality tracking. Camera – Video testing. Vehicle – Scale model launch. Testing Payload – scintillator probes and (a) consistency of data collection, (b) background counts, (c) isolation of ray sources. Will Test Recovery – Ejection charges and chute deployment. Safety and RF Signals. Propulsion – (a) Inspection of parts, (b) assembly supervision.

safety plans Prior to each project phase: Review system risks and mitigations. Review Safety Codes. Pass test on Safety Procedures. Sign Safety Statement.

Budget and Outreach Upon completion of the rocket, documented expenses will be submitted to NASA for reimbursement. In coordination with the Advancement Office at our school, funding requests are being forwarded to alumni and local businesses. Funds are beginning to accrue.