Dynamical Fluctuations & Entropy Production Principles Karel Netočný Institute of Physics AS CR Seminar, 6 March 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLLICOTT-RUELLE RESONANCES, FRACTALS, AND NONEQUILIBRIUM MODES OF RELAXATION Pierre GASPARD Brussels, Belgium J. R. Dorfman, College Park G. Nicolis,
Advertisements

and Fluctuation Theorems
Two Approaches to Dynamical Fluctuations in Small Non-Equilibrium Systems M. Baiesi #, C. Maes #, K. Netočný *, and B. Wynants # * Institute of Physics.
Lect.3 Modeling in The Time Domain Basil Hamed
Probability evolution for complex multi-linear non-local interactions Irene M. Gamba Department of Mathematics and ICES The University of Texas at Austin.
Heat flow in chains driven by noise Hans Fogedby Aarhus University and Niels Bohr Institute (collaboration with Alberto Imparato, Aarhus)
The Plasma Effect on the Rate of Nuclear Reactions The connection with relaxation processes, Diffusion, scattering etc.
Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ Berlin, Robustness and Entropy of Biological Networks Thomas Manke Max.
A field theory approach to the dynamics of classical particles David D. McCowan with Gene F. Mazenko and Paul Spyridis The James Franck Institute and the.
Fluctuation Theorem & Jarzynski Equality Zhanchun Tu ( 涂展春 ) Department of Physics Tamkang University — new developments in nonequilibrium.
On the formulation of a functional theory for pairing with particle number restoration Guillaume Hupin GANIL, Caen FRANCE Collaborators : M. Bender (CENBG)
KTH/CSC March 15, 2011Erik Aurell, KTH & Aalto University1 Optimal protocols and optimal transport in stochastic termodynamics KITPC/ITP-CAS Program Interdisciplinary.
Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics A. Rodríguez August 26th, 2009 Dpto. Matemática Aplicada y Estadística. UPM Grupo Interdisciplinar de.
Scattering theory of conductance and noise Markus Büttiker University of Geneva Multi-probe conductors.
Maximum Entropy, Maximum Entropy Production and their Application to Physics and Biology Roderick C. Dewar Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian.
Energy. Simple System Statistical mechanics applies to large sets of particles. Assume a system with a countable set of states.  Probability p n  Energy.
Two Approaches to Multiphysics Modeling Sun, Yongqi FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg.
The Fluctuation and NonEquilibrium Free Energy Theorems - Theory & Experiment The Fluctuation & Dissipation Theorems Lecture 2 Denis J. Evans, Edie Sevick,
Playing with Non Equilibrium, the Maximum Entropy Way
Quantum thermodynamics: Thermodynamics at the nanoscale
Weakly nonlocal heat conduction – modeling memory and structure with nonequilibrium thermodynamics Peter Ván HAS, RIPNP, Department of Theoretical Physics.
Weakly nonlocal fluid mechanics Peter Ván Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Chemical Physics –One component fluid mechanics.
Heat conduction induced by non-Gaussian athermal fluctuations Kiyoshi Kanazawa (YITP) Takahiro Sagawa (Tokyo Univ.) Hisao Hayakawa (YITP) 2013/07/03 Physics.
MEP and planetary climates: insights from a two-box climate model containing atmospheric dynamics Tim Jupp 26 th August 2010.
Unique additive information measures – Boltzmann-Gibbs-Shannon, Fisher and beyond Peter Ván BME, Department of Chemical Physics Thermodynamic Research.
Hyunggyu Park 박 형 규 Starting … Active …. Hyunggyu Park 박 형 규 Starting … Active …
Program on « NONEQUILIBRIUM STEADY STATES » Institut Henri Poincaré 10 September - 12 October 2007 Pierre GASPARD Center for Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex.
Fundamental gravitational limitations to quantum computing Rafael A. Porto (Carnegie Mellon U. & University of the Republic, Uruguay.) In collaboration.
HYDRODYNAMIC MODES AND NONEQUILIBRIUM STEADY STATES Pierre GASPARD Brussels, Belgium J. R. Dorfman, College Park S. Tasaki, Tokyo T. Gilbert, Brussels.
TIME ASYMMETRY IN NONEQUILIBRIUM STATISTICAL MECHANICS Pierre GASPARD Brussels, Belgium J. R. Dorfman, College ParkS. Ciliberto, Lyon T. Gilbert, BrusselsN.
NON-EQUILIBRIUM IDENTITIES AND NONLINEAR RESPONSE THEORY FOR GRANULAR FLUIDS Hisao Hayakawa (Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University,
© Copyright National University of Singapore. All Rights Reserved. ENHANCING THERMOELECTRIC EFFICIENCY FOR NANOSTRUCTURES AND QUANTUM DOTS Jian-Sheng Wang.
What is thermodynamics and what is it for? II. Continuum physics – constitutive theory Peter Ván HAS, RIPNP, Department of Theoretical Physics –Introduction.
Dynamical Replica Theory for Dilute Spin Systems Jon Hatchett RIKEN BSI In collaboration with I. Pérez Castillo, A. C. C. Coolen & N. S. Skantzos.
General proof of the entropy principle for self-gravitating fluid in static spacetimes 高思杰 (Gao Sijie) 北京师范大学 (Beijing Normal University)
Equilibrium Information from Nonequilibrium Measurements in an Experimental Test of Jarzynski’s Equality Simon-Shlomo Poil 9.december 2005 Single Molecule.
Experimental results on the fluctuations in two out of equilibrium systems S. Joubaud, P.Jop, A. Petrossyan and S.C. Laboratoire de Physique, ENS de Lyon,
Stochastic Thermodynamics in Mesoscopic Chemical Oscillation Systems
Chemical Reactions in Ideal Gases. Non-reacting ideal gas mixture Consider a binary mixture of molecules of types A and B. The canonical partition function.
New Vista On Excited States. Contents Monte Carlo Hamiltonian: Effective Hamiltonian in low energy /temperature window.
AB INITIO DERIVATION OF ENTROPY PRODUCTION Pierre GASPARD Brussels, Belgium J. R. Dorfman, College Park S. Tasaki, Tokyo T. Gilbert, Brussels MIXING &
. What is truly quantum about quantum thermodynamics? Thermodynamic laws and bounds are not well understood for quantum-system manipulations. We challenge:
Efficiency of thermal radiation energy-conversion nanodevices Miguel Rubi I. Latella A. Perez L. Lapas.
Black Holes and the Fluctuation Theorem Susumu Okazawa ( 総研大, KEK) with Satoshi Iso and Sen Zhang, arXiv: work in progress.
Beyond Onsager-Machlup Theory of Fluctuations
Equilibrium statistical mechanics of network structures Physica A 334, 583 (2004); PRE 69, (2004); cond-mat ; cond-mat Thanks to:
Assignment for the course: “Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics of Soft and Biological Matter” Dima Lukatsky In the first.
Application of the Renormalization- group Method for the Reduction of Transport Equations Teiji Kunihiro(YITP, Kyoto) Renormalization Group 2005 Aug. 29.
Markus Quandt Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum St. Petersburg September 9,2014 M. Quandt (Uni Tübingen) A Covariant Variation Principle Confinement.
Nonlinear Dynamics and Non- equilibrium Thermodynamics in Mesoscopic Chemical Systems Zhonghuai Hou ( 侯中怀 ) Shanghai , TACC2008
Network Science K. Borner A.Vespignani S. Wasserman.
What happens to detailed balance away from equilibrium? R. M. L. Evans University of Leeds School of Physics & Astronomy.
Thermodynamics, fluctuations, and response for systems out of equilibrium Shin-ichi Sasa (University of Tokyo) 2007/11/05 in collaboration with T.S. Komatsu,
Composition of the Earth’s core from ab-initio calculation of chemical potentials Department of Earth Sciences & Department of Physics and Astronomy, Thomas.
Modeling Surface Energy Balance Using the MEP Method Jingfeng Wang 1 and Rafael L. Bras 1,2 1 University of California at Irvine 2 Georgia Institute of.
A fresh look at hydrodynamics from fluctuation formulas Shin-ichi Sasa and Masato Itami 1.
Fluctuation relations in Ising models G.G. & Antonio Piscitelli (Bari) Federico Corberi (Salerno) Alessandro Pelizzola (Torino) TexPoint fonts used in.
Ch 2. THERMODYNAMICS, STATISTICAL MECHANICS, AND METROPOLIS ALGORITHMS 2.6 ~ 2.8 Adaptive Cooperative Systems, Martin Beckerman, Summarized by J.-W.
Stochastic thermodynamics and Fluctuation theorems
Thermodynamics and Information Alex Thompson Phys 495, UW, Autumn 2015.
PHYS 172: Modern Mechanics Lecture 22 – Entropy and Temperature Read Summer 2012.
                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Entropy and Thermodynamic 2nd laws : New Perspective
Uncertain, High-Dimensional Dynamical Systems
New Vista On Excited States
Energy Fluctuations in the Canonical Ensemble
Thermodynamics of quantum coherences
Energy dissipation and FDR violation
Assa Auerbach, Ilya Finkler, Bert Halperin and Amir Yacoby
Revisiting Entropy Production Principles
Presentation transcript:

Dynamical Fluctuations & Entropy Production Principles Karel Netočný Institute of Physics AS CR Seminar, 6 March 2007

To be discussed  Min- and Max-entropy production principles: various examples  From variational principles to fluctuation laws: equilibrium case  Static versus dynamical fluctuations  Onsager-Machlup macroscopic fluctuation theory  Stochastic models of nonequilibrium  Conclusions, open problems, outlook,... (In collaboration with C. Maes, K. U. Leuven)

Motivation: Modeling Earth climate [Ozawa et al, Rev. Geoph. 41(4), 1018 (2003)]

Linear electrical networks explaining MinEP/MaxEP principles U 22  Kirchhoff’s loop law:  Entropy production rate:  MinEP principle: Stationary values of voltages minimize the entropy production rate  Not valid under inhomogeneous temperature! X k U j k = X k E j k ¾ ( U ) = ¯ Q ( U ) = ¯ X j ; k U 2 j k R j k

Linear electrical networks explaining MinEP/MaxEP principles U 22  Kirchhoff’s current law:  Entropy production rate:  Work done by sources:  (Constrained) MaxEP principle: Stationary values of currents maximize the entropy production under constraint X j I j k = 0 ¾ ( I ) = ¯ Q ( I ) = ¯ X j ; k R j k I 2 j k Q ( I ) = W ( I ) W ( I ) = X j k E j k I j k

Linear electrical networks summary of MinEP/MaxEP principles Current law + Loop law MaxEP principle + Current law Loop law + MinEP principle Generalized variational principle I U U, I

From principles to fluctuation laws Questions and ideas  How to go beyond approximate and ad hoc thermodynamical principles?  Inspiration from thermostatics: Equilibrium variational principles are intimately related to structure of equilibrium fluctuations  Is there a nonequilibrium analogy of thermodynamical fluctuation theory?

From principles to fluctuation laws Equilibrium fluctuations H ( x ) = N e M ( x ) = N m eq ( e ) H ( x ) = N e Typical value P ( M ( x ) = N m ) = e N [ s ( e ; m ) ¡ s eq ( e )] Probability of fluctuation H h ( x ) = H ( x ) ¡ h M ( x ) = N [ e ¡ h m ] The fluctuation made typical! s ( e ; m ) = s h eq ( e ¡ h m ) add field

From principles to fluctuation laws Equilibrium fluctuations Fluctuation functional Variational functional Thermodynamic potential Entropy (Generalized) free energy

From principles to fluctuation laws Static versus dynamical fluctuations  Empirical ergodic average:  Ergodic theorem:  Dynamical fluctuations:  Interpolating between static and dynamical fluctuations: H ( x ) = N e P ( ¹ m T = m ) = e ¡ TI ( m ) P ¡ 1 N P N k = 1 m ( x ¿ k ) = m ¢ = e ¡ NI ( ¿ ) ( m ) S t a t i c:¿ ! 1 I ( 1 ) ( m ) = s ( e ) ¡ s ( e ; m ) D ynam i c:¿ ! 0 ¹ m T ! m eq ( e ) ; T ! 1 ¹ m T = 1 T R T 0 m ( x t ) d t

Effective model of macrofluctuations Onsager-Machlup theory  Dynamics:  Equilibrium:  Path distribution: R d m t d t = ¡ sm t + q 2 R N w t P ( m 1 = m ) / e ¡ 1 2 N sm 2 S ( m ) ¡ S ( 0 ) P ( ! ) = exp £ ¡ N 4 R T 0 R 2 ¡ d m t d t + s R m t ¢ 2 ¤

Effective model of macrofluctuations Onsager-Machlup theory  Dynamics:  Path distribution:  Dynamical fluctuations:  (Typical immediate) entropy production rate: P ( ! ) = exp £ ¡ N 4 R T 0 R 2 ¡ d m t d t + s R m t ¢ 2 ¤ ¾ ( m ) = d S ( m t ) d t = N s 2 2 R m 2 I ( m ) = 1 4 ¾ ( m ) P ( ¹ m T = m ) = P ( m t = m; 0 · t · T ) = exp £ ¡ T N s 2 8 R m 2 ¤ R d m t d t = ¡ sm t + q 2 R N » t

Towards general theory EquilibriumNonequilibrium Closed Hamiltonian dynamics Open Stochastic dynamics Mesoscopic Macroscopic

Linear electrical networks revisited Dynamical fluctuations  Fluctuating dynamics:  Johnson-Nyquist noise:  Empirical ergodic average:  Dynamical fluctuation law: R 1 R 2 E C E f 1 E f 2 E f = q 2 R ¯ » white noise U total dissipated heat E = U + R 2 I + E f 2 I = C _ U + U ¡ E f 1 R 1 ¹ U T = 1 T R T 0 U t d t ¡ 1 T l og P ( ¹ U T = U ) = 1 4 ¯ 1 ¯ 2 ( R 1 + R 2 ) ¯ 1 R 1 + ¯ 2 R 2 h U 2 R 1 + ( E ¡ U ) 2 R 2 ¡ E 2 R 1 + R 2 i

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium jump Markov processes  Local detailed balance:  Global detailed balance generally broken:  Markov dynamics: l og k ( x ; y ) k ( y ; x ) = ¢ s ( x ; y ) = ¡ ¢ s ( y ; x ) entropy change in the environment breaking term ¢ s ( x ; y ) = s ( y ) ¡ s ( x ) + ² ( x ; y ) x y k ( x ; y ) k ( y ; x ) d ½ t ( x ) d t = X y £ ½ t ( y ) k ( y ; x ) ¡ ½ t ( x ) k ( x ; y ) ¤

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium jump Markov processes  Entropy of the system:  Entropy fluxes:  Mean entropy production rate: S ( ½ ) = ¡ P x ½ ( x ) l og½ ( x ) Warning: Only for time-reversal invariant observables! x y k ( x ; y ) k ( y ; x ) ¾ ( ½ ) = d S ( ½ t ) d t X ( x ; y ) j ½ ( x ; y ) ¢ s ( x ; y ) = X x ; y ½ ( x ) k ( x ; y ) ½ ( x ) k ( x ; y ) ½ ( y ) k ( y ; x ) j ½ ( x ; y ) = ½ ( x ) k ( x ; y ) ¡ ½ ( y ) k ( y ; x ) |{z} zeroa t d e t a i l e db a l ance

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium jump Markov processes  (“Microscopic”) MinEP principle:  Can we again recognize entropy production as a fluctuation functional? x y k ( x ; y ) k ( y ; x ) In the first order in the expansion of the breaking term : ¾ ( ½ ) = m i n, ½ = ½ s

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium jump Markov processes  Empirical occupation times:  Ergodic theorem:  Fluctuation law for occupation times?  Note: ¹ p T ( x ) ! ½ s ( x ) ; T ! 1 P ( ¹ p T = ½ ) = e ¡ TI ( ½ ) ¹ p T ( x ) = 1 T R T 0 Â ( ! t = x ) d t x y k ( x ; y ) k ( y ; x ) I ( ½ s ) = 0 Natural variational functional

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium jump Markov processes  Idea: Make the empirical distribution typical by modifying dynamics:  The “field” a(x) is such that p(x) is stationary distribution for the modified dynamics:  Comparing both processes yields the fluctuation law: P y 6 = x £ p ( x ) k a ( y ; x ) ¡ p ( y ) k a ( x ; y ) ¤ = 0 k ( x ; y ) ¡ ! k a ( x ; y ) = k ( x ; y ) e a ( y ) ¡ a ( x ) I ( p ) = P y 6 = x £ k ( x ; y ) ¡ k a ( x ; y ) ¤ difference of escape rates

Stochastic models of nonequilibrium fluctuations versus MinEP principle  General observation: In the first order approximation around detailed balance  The variational functional is recognized as an approximate fluctuation functional  A consequence: A natural way how to go beyond MinEP principle is to study various fluctuation laws I ( ½ ) = 1 4 £ ¾ ( ½ ) ¡ ¾ ( ½ s ) ¤ + o ( ² 2 )

General conclusions open problems  Similarly, MaxEP principle is obtained from the fluctuation law of empirical current  Is there a natural computational scheme for the fluctuation functional far from equilibrium (e.g. for ratchets)?  Natural mathematical formalism: the large deviation and Donsker-Varadhan theory  Might the dynamical fluctuation theory provide a natural nonequilibrium thermodynamical formalism far from equilibrium?

Outlook from fluctuations to nonequilibrium thermodynamics? Fluctuation functional Variational functional Nonequilibrium potential “Corrected” entropy production ? ?

References  C. Maes, K. N. (2006). math-ph/  S. Bruers, C. Maes, K. N. (2007). cond-mat/  C. Maes, K. N. (2006). cond-mat/  M. D. Donsker and S. R. Varadhan. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 28:1–47 (1975).  M. J. Klein and P. H. E. Meijer. Phys. Rev., 96: (1954).  I. Prigogine. Introduction to Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Wiley- Interscience, New York (1962).  G. Eyink, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn. In: Chaos, Soviet-American  Perspectives in Nonlinear Science, Ed. D. Campbell, p. 367–391 (1990).  E. T. Jaynes. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 31:579–601 (1980).  R. Landauer. Phys. Rev. A, 12:636–638 (1975)