The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model: Overview, Current Research and Future Plans Rolando Garcia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Imposed ozone calculations Qualitatively same behaviour in all models (which qualitiatively agrees with the observations). Significant quantitative differences.
Advertisements

Steve Rumbold Keith Shine, Lesley Gray Charlotte Pascoe (CASE, RAL) Picture: Strat Hour - July 05, 2006 The University.
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Climate-Chemistry Interactions - User Requirements Martin Dameris DLR-Institut für.
1 Trend and Year-to-year Variability of Land-Surface Air Temperature and Land-only Precipitation Simulated by the JMA AGCM By Shoji KUSUNOKI, Keiichi MATSUMARU,
I/1 Overview: Atmospheric transport and ozone chemistry SS2008 Learning more about variability of atmospheric ozone related to transport and chemistry.
1 Effects of solar activity, co-rotating interaction regions, and climate change on thermospheric density during the solar cycle 23/24 minimum Stan Solomon.
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
Requirements for monitoring the global tropopause Bill Randel Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
SBUV/2 Observations of Atmospheric Response to Solar Variations Matthew DeLand Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) Background -SBUV/2 instruments.
Water Vapor and Cloud Feedbacks Dennis L. Hartmann in collaboration with Mark Zelinka Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington PCC Summer.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Modeling of the Middle and Upper Atmosphere M. A. Giorgetta E. Manzini 1, M. Charron 2, H.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Using global models and chemical observations to diagnose eddy diffusion.
Modelling studies of metallic layers in the mesosphere using a GCM model Wuhu Feng 1,2, John Plane 1, Martyn Chipperfield 2, Dan Marsh 3, Diego Jaches.
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GG 101 – Spring 2005 Boston University Myneni L31:
Modeling of Stratospheric Ozone in the Climate System Steven Pawson GMAO, NASA GSFC Judith Perlwitz CIRES, CU/NOAA ESRL Richard S. Stolarski Atmospheric.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
Solar Forcing on Climate Through Stratospheric Ozone Change Le Kuai.
Attribution of Stratospheric Temperature Trends to Forcings A coupled chemistry-climate model (CCM) study Richard S. Stolarski NASA GSFC In collaboration.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
Some analyses of updated SSU data –merging Nash data with NOAA-11 and NOAA-14 –derived trends, solar cycle –comparisons with NCEP/ERA40/HALOE data.
Influence of the sun variability and other natural and anthropogenic forcings on the climate with a global climate chemistry model Martin Schraner Polyproject.
Links between ozone and climate J. A. Pyle Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept of Chemistry University of Cambridge Co-chair, SAP 7th ORM, Geneva, 19.
1 Energetic Particle Impacts in the Atmosphere Charley Jackman 1, Dan Marsh 2, Cora Randall 3, Stan Solomon 2 1 Goddard Space Flight Center 2 National.
The Penetration of Solar Storm Effects into the Earth's Atmosphere Maura Hagan and Ray Roble Gang Lu, Jens Oberheide*, Stan Solomon, Art Richmond National.
Altitude (km) January Global AverageTemperature (K) Pressure (hPa) With O( 3 P) Cooling WACCM-X The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – eXtended.
Use of CCSM3 and CAM3 Historical Runs: Estimation of Natural and Anthropogenic Climate Variability and Sensitivity Bruce T. Anderson, Boston University.
The effects of solar variability on the Earth’s climate Joanna D. Haigh 2010/03/09 Pei-Yu Chueh.
Chemistry Climate Modeling of the UTLS An update on model inter-comparison and evaluation with observations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR & CCMVal Collaborators.
Status of the Sea Ice Model Testing of CICE4.0 in the coupled model context is underway Includes numerous SE improvements, improved ridging formulation,
Stratospheric temperature trends from combined SSU, SABER and MLS measurements And comparisons to WACCM Bill Randel, Anne Smith and Cheng-Zhi Zou NCAR.
Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling - TOSCA WG1 Workshop, May 2012, Berlin Stratospheric and tropospheric.
Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.
Evaluation of climate models, Attribution of climate change IPCC Chpts 7,8 and 12. John F B Mitchell Hadley Centre How well do models simulate present.
Research Activities in Japan and other Asian Countries 1. Ground-based observation - AGAGE monitoring stations: China, Korea, and Japan - NDACC stations:
Strengthening of Brewer- Dobson circulation since 1979 seen from observed lower- stratospheric temperatures Qiang Fu Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Past and Future Changes in Southern Hemisphere Tropospheric Circulation and the Impact of Stratospheric Chemistry-Climate Coupling Collaborators: Steven.
IAC ETH, 26 October 2004 Sub-project: Effects of Solar irradiance variability on the atmosphere (steady-state sensitivity study) Progress report (final)
How do Long-Term Changes in the Stratosphere Affect the Troposphere?
TOSCA workshop, Berlin, 15 May 2012 Comparison of the SSI data sets using observed and simulated evolution of the middle atmosphere during A.
Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting (March 22-24, 2006) Background –SSC expectations and the next IPCC (Bill Collins) Summarize where we are now Discuss.
Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
Dynamical balances and tropical stratospheric upwelling Bill Randel and Rolando Garcia NCAR Thanks to: Qiang Fu, Andrew Gettelman, Rei Ueyama, Mike Wallace,
Dynamical Impacts of Antarctic Stratospheric Ozone Depletion on the Extratropical Circulation of the Southern Hemisphere Kevin M. Grise David W.J. Thompson.
Prepare For The Apocalypse. The largest coronal mass emission (CME) ever detected by scientists breaks off from the sun and hurtles toward the Earth. With.
Trends in lower stratosphere Jean-François Lamarque (NCAR and NOAA) and Susan Solomon (NOAA)
The impact of solar variability and Quasibiennial Oscillation on climate simulations Fabrizio Sassi (ESSL/CGD) with: Dan Marsh and Rolando Garcia (ESSL/ACD),
GCM simulations for West Africa: Validation against observations and projections for future change G.Jenkins, A.Gaye, A. Kamga, A. Adedoyin, A. Garba,
slide 1 Polar Ozone: Past and present Chapter 4 of WMO 2006 Ozone Assessment Summary Part 1 Polar stratospheric observations update Part 2 Progress.
March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Chem-Clim WG Meeting 3/ 2006, Boulder The Stratosphere: Point / Counterpoint.
A global model of meteoric metals and smoke particles: An update  Model for metal layers and MSPs  Validation of model results  Sensitivities/uncertainties.
March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
WACCM STATUS August 28 th, UCAR Quarterly – winter 1999.
Proposal Science Issues How will ozone recover over the next few decades in a changing climate? How has past ozone change affected the changing climate.
SCSL SWAP/LYRA workshop
Chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM
Hauchecorne, M. Meftah, P. Keckhut,
CCSM Working Group Meeting, February 2008
GOMOS measurements of O3, NO2, and NO3 compared to model simulations
Nowcasting of neutral and ion composition of the mesosphere:
Thermosphere-Ionosphere Issues for DASI - I:
Natural Causes of Climate Change
Tomoko Matsuo DAI/GSP *in collaboration with Jeff Anderson(DAI),
Prepare For The Apocalypse
Update on Stratosphere Improvements in Reanalysis
Han-Li Liu, Raymond G. Roble, Arthur D. Richmond, Stanley C
The Upper Atmosphere: Problems in Developing Realistic Models
Description and Public Release of WACCM3
Presentation transcript:

The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model: Overview, Current Research and Future Plans Rolando Garcia

CCSM June Outline 1.WACCM overview 2.Research with WACCM –Solar cycle impacts – trend simulations –21 st century prognostic simulations –Upper atmosphere dynamics (2-day wave) 3. Future work

CCSM June Acknowledgments… Doug Kinnison (ACD) Dan Marsh (ACD) Katja Matthes (Free University Berlin) Astrid Maute (HAO) Jadwiga Richter (CGD) Fabrizio Sassi (CGD) Stan Solomon (HAO) the following colleagues contributed to the work presented in this talk...

CCSM June and, of course, Byron Boville … … to whose memory this talk is dedicated

CCSM June Overview of WACCM

CCSM June NCAR Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model MOZART-3 CAM3 WACCM-3 TIME-GCM Chemistry Dynamics + Physical processes MLT Processes + extensions Based on The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3) km (66 levels;  z =1.3 km in lower stratosphere to 3 km in thermosphere) Finite-volume dynamics 30 minute time step MOZART-3 chemistry package (55 species) Upper atmosphere extensions: –Lindzen GW parameterization –Molecular diffusion –NO cooling –non-LTE long-wave heating in the 15 µm band of CO 2 and the 9.6 µm band of O 3

CCSM June WACCM3 additions The following processes are now dealt with in a self- consistent manner in WACCM: –Solar variability –Chemical heating –Airglow –Ion chemistry (5 ion species & electrons) –EUV and X-ray ionization –Auroral processes Particle precipitation Ion drag Joule heating Chemistry is completely interactive with dynamics

CCSM June Current interdivisional collaborators Current external collaborations Mark Baldwin (NWRA) – annular modes Natalia Calvo (U. of Madrid) and Marco Giorgetta (MPI, Hamburg) – effects of ENSO on the middle atmosphere; comparison of models and reanalysis data Charlie Jackman (NASA/Goddard) – impacts of solar proton events on ozone Judith Perlwitz and Martin Hoerling (NOAA/Boulder) – climate impacts of changing chemistry and SST Cora Randall et al. (CU/LASP) [plus John Gille (ACD/HIRDLS) and Laura Pan (ACD/UTLS initiative)] – process-oriented evaluation of chemistry-climate models vs. observations

CCSM June Zonal-Mean T: JULY WACCM 140 K 270 K 200 K SABER: broadband IR radiometer onboard TIMED satellite; measures T, O3, H 2 O, CO 2

CCSM June Zonal-Mean U: JULY WACCM URAP/UKMO: UARS/UK Met Office reference atmosphere, based upon UARS satellite observations assimilated with the UK Met Office GCM

CCSM June Zonal-Mean O 3 : JULY 11 ppm WACCM SABER SABER: broadband IR radiometer onboard TIMED satellite; measures T, O3, H 2 O, CO 2

CCSM June Research with WACCM

CCSM June Solar min/max simulations Fixed solar minimum and solar maximum conditions (constant F10.7 and Kp typical of minimum/maximum)

CCSM June definition of solar variability 15 years ea. solar maximum and minimum conditions S max : F10.7 = 210, Kp = 4 S min : F10.7 = 77, Kp = 2.7 Photolysis and heating rates are parameterized in terms of f10.7 and Kp

CCSM June SSU/MSU4 ( ) Courtesy of Bill Randel (2005) WACCM (annual mean) Stratospheric temperature response

CCSM June SAGE I/II ozone change 2.4% 3.6% % ozone change for 1% change in Mg II (~6% Mg II change over solar cycle) WACCM (annual mean) % ozone change over solar cycle

CCSM June Ozone column vs. f10.7 regressions: WACCM and observations WACCM WACCM

CCSM June An ensemble of “retrospective” runs, , including solar variability, observed SST, observed trends in GHG and halogen species, and observed aerosol surface area densities (for heterogeneous chemistry) trends simulation

CCSM June Calculated and Observed Ozone Trends SAGE-I and SAGE-II Red inset on left covers approximately same region as observations on right Agreement is quite good, including region of apparent “self-healing” in lower tropical stratosphere

CCSM June Total Column Ozone Trends (Global)

CCSM June Calculated and Observed Temperature Trends SSU + MSU Red inset on left covers approximately same region as observations on right Note comparable modeled vs. observed trend in upper stratosphere, although model trend is somewhat smaller

CCSM June Temperature Trends (Global), K / Decade Courtesy of Bill Randel (NCAR )

CCSM June Whole-atmosphere zonal-mean T trend Note lack of trend at km Ozone decrease and CO 2 increase CO 2 increase (greenhouse effect) Antarctic O 3 hole CO 2 decrease

CCSM June An ensemble of prognostic runs, , to look at climate change and ozone recovery in the 21 st century. Follows WMO A1B scenario. An additional ensemble assumed constant CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O to assess the role of stratospheric cooling by these gases. 21 st century prognostic simulations

CCSM June Global-mean ozone column sim sim (A1B scenario) column minimum ~ recovery to 1980 values ~2040 smoothed with 12-month running mean 21st century prognostic simulation (red) shown together with the results of the 1950–2003 simulation (black) discussed earlier

CCSM June Global-mean ozone column all smoothed with 12-month running mean A1B scenario “no-climate change” scenario A1B scenario produces “super-recovery” compared to “no climate change” simulation wherein CO 2, N 2 O, CH 4 are held at 1995 values. This is due to colder stratospheric T in A1B scenario.

CCSM June Stratospheric “age of air” is also affected by changing GHG A1B fix GHG

CCSM June Apart from the tides, the 2-day wave dominates high-frequency variability in the MLT Has large amplitude at solstice, especially in the summer hemisphere Has been interpreted as a normal mode (e.g., Salby, 1981), a result of baroclinic instability (e.g., Plumb, 1983), and a combination of both (e.g., Randel, 1994) Comparison of WACCM simulations and observations by the SABER instrument on the TIMED satellite Upper atmosphere dynamics: The 2-day wave

CCSM June SABER T Spectrum Similar spectral behavior in WACCM calculations as in SABER data Wavenumber/frequency T spectra at 36°N and 80 km (July) Note concentration of variance along line of constant c in both data and model WACCM T Spectrum

CCSM June Components of 2-day wave in SABER data and WACCM simulation k=3, ~2-day SABER k=4, ~1.8 day SABER SABER observations and WACCM results for July WACMM

CCSM June … more components of 2-day wave in SABER data and WACCM k=2, ~3 day SABER k=2, ~ 2 day SABER WACCM

CCSM June Future Work Climate sensitivity to doubling CO 2 : CAM vs. WACCM Impact of ozone hole and changing tropical SST on Arctic/Antarctic surface climate Climatology of stratospheric sudden warmings: impacts of resolution, gravity wave parameterization, SST variability; relationship to annular modes Process-oriented evaluation of model chemistry (comparisons with EOS/Aura observations) Impact of solar proton events on mesospheric and stratospheric composition Energy budget and dynamics of the MLT – comparison with SABER observations

CCSM June To keep in touch …. WACCM website and new model release WACCM website is being hosted under ACD ( Website has been updated and reformatted 2006 CSL proposal posted on site WACCM3 description to be completed Release WACCM3 in summer 2006