Title: Current Status of Research Project : 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010 Title: Current Status of Research Project : Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle in Korea Presenter’s Name: Economy: Republic of KOREA

Table of Contents Overview Analysis of Accidents Vision and Goal Roadmap Research Activities Conclusions

ASV Project Backgrounds Demand for advanced safety vehicle to reduce accident casualties Application of information technology to develop advanced safety vehicle Development of safety assessment technology: Verify new technology, eliminate unwanted effects, rapid commercialization Active participation in UN/ECE/WP.29 legislative activities

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(1) Trend of Accident Casualties Slowdown of decreasing trend of fatalities(07): 6,166, Due to limitation of enforcement and education Sudden Increase in Injuries(07): Police(340 thousand), Insurance Co.(1.2 million) YEAR Safety belt, airbag Enforcement, education New technology for drastic of casualties 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 Fatalities 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 Injured Injured(Police) Injured(Insurance)

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(2) Number of Accidents by Collision Type(Police, 2007) EU 15* Number of Accidents by Collision Type Number of Fatalities by Collision Type EU 15* Number of Fatalities by Collision Type

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(3) Trend of Fatalities Fleet change(Increase in SUV/RV): Small car to SUV/RV ratio 0.08(late 1990’) ⇒ 0.68(mid 2000’) Fatalities from collision(07): Frontal(534), rearend(729), lateral(1,039) Pedestrian fatalities(07): 37%(2,232) Fatalities in night time: daytime(2,567) < nighttime(3,300) Fatalities DUI: 991 Point of death(06): At scene(1,488), under treatment(2,443) Compatibility issue Prevention of pedestrian, nighttime, DUI accidents, efficient emergency Fatalities wrt V-to-V accidents ※ DUI: Driving under Influence

Vision, Goal and Subjects Development of Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle Contributing to “Reducing Traffic Casualties by Half” 1. Develop advanced safety vehicle technology 2. Strengthen safety regulations by developing assessment technology of advanced safety vehicle 3. Establish regulatory system to promote & commercialize advanced safety vehicle Goal 1. Project management, commercialization strategy & study on regulatory system 2. Develop assessment technology for active safety & driver assistance technology 3. Develop assessment technology for integrated safety technology with IT Subjects

ASV Project: Road Map & Budget Institute: KATRI, HMC, SNU, etc. Period: Dec., 2009 ~ Oct., 2016(7 yr 10 m) Budget: 23,400 mWon(Gov-grant) (about 20 m$) Over- view year '09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 Grants(won) 770 2,520 5,610 4,300 2,000 1,900 Goal Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle (1st Stage) 2009 2012 (2nd Stage) 2014 (3rd Stage) 2017 Mitigate Casualties Vehicle compatibility Aggressiveness of SUV Speed-sensitive active head restraint Active hood and bumper Rollover accidents Injury criteria D/B(1) Injury criteria D/B(2) Improve Active Safety Technology ACC/AEBS AEBS Commercial vehicle ACC LDWS LKS Blind spot Human factor for active safety AFLS Detect pedestrian in nighttime Safety integrated with IT Emergency Rescue V2X LED communication Intersection based on V2I communication Stability of integrated EMC V2X control system End of 1st year

Vehicle Compatibility 1st Stage Vehicle Compatibility Target Improve vehicle compatibility b/t passenger vehicle and multi-purpose vehicle by developing energy absorption technology in passenger vehicle structure in the event of frontal and side collision Develop assessment technology of vehicle compatibility Outcome Develop simulation model in the event of passenger vehicle and MPV frontal and side collision. Assessment technology Car to Car Crash Tests FE Model Simulations

Active Head Restraint Target Outcome Speed-sensitive Active Headrest Develop assessment technology of speed-sensitive active head restraint to prevent neck injuries in rear-end collision Outcome Develop algorithm to assess pre-crash sensing to detect rear-end collision in advance, and activation mechanism Develop assessment technology of seat integrated with speed-sensitive active head restraint Speed-sensitive Active Headrest Rear Detect Radar Signal sensor ECU Test, Simulation and Develop. Algorism FV2 FV1 SV

(Radar & Camera Data Com.) ACC & AEBS Target Develop assessment technology of passenger vehicle ACC, commercial vehicle AEBS to improve vehicle stability Outcome Develop test procedures of AEBS and verify sensors Develop assessment algorithm of AEBS and AEBS assessment system Develop assessment technology of passenger vehicle ACC, commercial vehicle AEBS / international joint research / BC Analysis, economic feasibility AEBS: Automatic Emergency Braking System Development of AEBS Warning (Alarn, Buzzer) Camera Cluster/Speaker Main Brake Controller Radar Sensor Brake ECU controller Sub Brake (Exhaust,TM) Forward Vehicle Engine/TM ECU Front Detection (Radar & Camera Data Com.) ECU Algorism & H/W Development Protocol Development (SAE J1939 CAN Com.)

LDWS / Blind Spot Detection Target Develop assessment technology of LDWS for inattentive drivers and blind spot detection system to warn drivers of vehicles in the blind spot Outcome Develop assessment algorithm and system Develop assessment technology of LDWS / BSDS LDWS: Lane Departure Warning System Speed-sensitive Active Headrest

AFLS Target Outcome Development of AFLS Lab. Test Method Develop assessment technology of AFLS adjusting low beam under various driving environments Outcome Develop assessment technology and draft safety regulations and test procedures AFLS: Adaptive Frontal Lamp System Development of AFLS Lab. Test Method Installation Screen Lamp on Measurement Forward Visibility Target Move 70 m 50 m

e-Post Target Outcome Event Data (EDR) Passenger Status Develop assessment technology of emergency rescue system stability - accident location, time, vehicle information and injuries, etc. Outcome Develop algorithm of assessing crash severity based on EDR information Develop e-Post communication protocol and Build communication test bed Video-based monitoring and analysis of driver state Develop assessment technology e-Post: emergency rescue call Event Data (EDR) Passenger Status

Applications Development Technologies Assessment Technologies Commercialization and facilitation of compatibility technology, active head-restraint, commercial vehicle AEBS, etc. Add new technology in NCAP Major contribution to national agenda “Reducing traffic casualties by half” Assessment Technologies Apply assessment technology to verify emerging technology Reflect assessment technology to global technical regulations and ECE regulations in WP.29 Vehicle compatibility, LDWS, AEBS Develop safety regulations and test procedures AFLS (highway mode). LDWS, AEBS, blind-detection system

Expected Outcome Technological Aspects Socio-economic Aspects Verify emerging technology and eliminate unwanted effect by developing assessment technology Reflect results to domestic and international safety regulations(WP.29 ECE R & GTR) Reduce traffic accidents Lead world vehicle market by improved technology Socio-economic Aspects Contribute to new traffic system with assessment technology and safety regulations Improve national status in traffic accident by drastic decrease AEBS(18%), LDWS(12%) Contribute to reduce CO2 by improving traffic congestions due to decrease in accidents

Thank you for your attention (Q & A) Acknowledgement This research was supported by a grant (09-Transport System-Furture-01) from Transportation System Innovation Program funded by MLTM