Matching/Cost Share/Off Set Session 66 Wednesday, May 25, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business and Fiscal Officers Meeting - 4/20/10 Presented by: Glen Jones, Director Post-Award Research and Sponsored Programs.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Office of Management & Budget
Solving the Matching Dilemma Rochelle McCrea Team Leader and Towana DeShazo Grants and Agreements Specialist Awards Management Branch Office of Extramural.
Financial Requirements Child Nutrition Programs Oregon Department of Education By Chris Facha, SNS.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium. Documentation.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Cost Sharing-Presented By Cindy Kiel, CRA, Washington University in St. Louis Kim Small, Washington State University Wanda Bowen, CRA, University of Alaska.
Head Start Non-Federal Share Training
OMB A-133 Audits and Issues NCURA Region VI & VII Spring Meeting April 17-20, 2005 Maureen Rhea, Internal Audit University of Washington.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
PROGRAM INCOME / IN-KIND ASSISTANCE / IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION
Match & Leveraged Resources. Non-Federal Share AKA Match.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Securing and Documenting Match and In-kind Support
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Head Start Fiscal Training April 2009 Trainer: PhuongY Nguyen.
Proposal Budget Building Part II of II CALS Research Division Julene Gaspard Meredith Luschen Becky Bound September 16, 2008 Website:
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
UGA Restricted Account Management and Closeout May 10th, 2007.
Office of Sponsored Programs Matching, Cost Sharing and In-kind.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Presenter: Darrick Mallad.  In the beginning………..
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Leveraged Resources, Match & Intellectual Property June 2009.
YouthBuild Learning Exchange January 13-15, 2009 Leveraged Resources and Match.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session VI: Cost Share Part One.
“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Sponsored Programs at Penn
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs
Cost Sharing May 15, 2013.
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Cost Sharing Documentation
Presentation transcript:

Matching/Cost Share/Off Set Session 66 Wednesday, May 25, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska

Matching/Cost Share/Off Set Presented by: Adriene Woodin Branch Chief Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial Management NIFA-USDA

Matching/Cost Share/Off Set Definitions Do’s and Don’ts What’s Not Acceptable Matching What is Allowable as Matching Common Matching Costs Valuing Donations Other Information

Definitions Cash Matching: The recipient’s cash outlay, including the outlay of money contributed to the recipient by non- Federal third-parties. Examples: The recipient’s cost to purchase an item of equipment for use on the project; Salaries for staff time committed to project; purchase of supplies; travel of project staff.

Definitions In-Kind Contribution: The value of non- cash contributions of property or services. Includes use of facilities, use or donation of equipment, supplies, and other non-expendable property.

Definitions Third Party Matching: Any contribution to the project by an organization other than the recipient. Can include cash or in-kind contributions.

Do’s and Don’ts Funds used as matching for NIFA Awards: Cannot be used as matching for another Federally-assisted project or program May not be provided by another Federal award or agency unless specifically authorized by Federal Statute Must be for costs incurred specifically for project during project period

Do’s and Don’ts Entire amount of required matching must be secured at time of award No “contingencies” allowed (i.e. Pending approval, submission, or earning) Includes Continuation Awards First year plus future year commitments must be secured in advance The sources and amounts of all matching should be summarized as part of the budget justification as a separate narrative (not combined with the Federal funds narrative)

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Funds provided from another organization for another, similar project. Can’t use funds twice The value of equipment previously purchased by, or donated to the recipient. The purchase or donation must be specifically for the project Equipment must be used specifically for this project and pro-rated to project usage

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Income expected to be earned during the project period. All matching must be in place at time of award. The income will not have been earned by then. Indirect Costs over the allowable limit (with the exception of the SCRI Program). When indirect costs are limited by program authorization, the recipient cannot claim more than the allowable limit.

What’s Not Acceptable Matching? Some matching may be deemed unallowable during the review process requiring additional matching resources. Award may be reduced or may not be issued if required matching is not met.

What’s Allowable as Matching Costs? Any costs which would normally be allowable under the applicable cost principles (OMB A-21 or A-122) for Federal funds would be allowable as matching Except for unrecovered indirect costs (with one exception) Costs must be specifically identifiable and directly benefiting the project.

Common Matching Costs Salaries/wages for project personnel Materials or Supplies Travel costs Office Rent Equipment costs

Valuing Donations Value of donated property (transfer of property ownership) should be based on fair market value at time of donation. Value should be established by an independent appraisal

Valuing Donations Value of donated space (usage) should not exceed the fair rental value of comparable space as established by an independent appraisal of similar space in the same area. Value is not based on purchase price

Other Information It is important that all matching is documented with letters of commitment and cost justifications for both recipient and Third-party donors. An award with required matching cannot be issued until all matching has been verified as allowable, reasonable and secured. Continuation awards require matching verification for the entire length and amount of the award.

Questions? For any questions regarding matching costs or any other grant issues, contact:  Awards Management Division –  Adriene Woodin, Branch Chief – or