1 Action Items for Management Board Challenges for Implementation of Recommendations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT) Formed in 1983 to provide a common voice for our region through the collaborative efforts of the Upper Columbia.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Motivation for the Forum Coordination Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Corps Watershed Plan Corps.
THE LUBRECHT REPORT: A MID-WAY ASSESSMENT OF THE 10 -YEAR WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP CHALLENGE Developed By: The Wilderness Advisory Group April 2010.
Executive Order Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.
Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Ensure the Disaster Housing Strategy is institutionalized throughout the jurisdiction Identify a process to update and maintain the Disaster Housing Strategy.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
“The conservation objective in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is to provide forested habitat capable of supporting sustainable populations of all forest.
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
 Reforestation: the re-establishment of a forested land use on areas that were previously converted from a forested to non-forested land use  e-RTS 
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Research Issues & Projects On behalf of the Research Team 17 March 2005.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Private Lands Partners Day Sept 25, 2014 Conservation Delivery Networks.
Overview of District Operations Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 5.
Summary Next Steps April 28-30, 2005 Omni Hotel at CNN Center Atlanta, GA.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
EFFECTING THE NABCI VISION: EXPECTATIONS OF JOINT VENTURES Scott C. Yaich Director of Conservation Programs Ducks Unlimited, Memphis, TN.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
- The Basics - Training Module 1. What You’ll Learn In This Module What is a Conservation District? What is it suppose to do? Who are the people involved.
Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
Gulf Coastal Plains & Ozarks LCC Steering Committee SECAS, Surrogate Species, and SHC: Connecting the Dots in the GCPO LCC Hot Springs, AR - October 2,
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Joint Venture Conservation Business Model Roundtable December 12, 2006 Austin, TX Working with Work Groups: The PLJV Experience.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Conservation Design: A State Agency Perspective Doyle Shook, Chief Wildlife Management.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
A Public, Private Partnership Fiscal Sponsor-Wildlands Restoration Volunteers Steering Committee, Fiscal Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, & Education.
1 Implementing the Danube Strategy : macro-regional mechanisms and structures GOVERNANCE OF THE EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION Ruse, 10 May 2010 David.
Crossing the Barrier: Integrating GIS beyond the Land Records Arena Ken Curry Land Records Coordinator Land Records Department Trempealeau County Greg.
School Based Teams. Basic Assumptions  All teachers have responsibility for students with special learning needs  All students can be helped by regular.
WLIA Emergency Management Task Force. Introduction ► Video Presentation ► Purpose ► History  How EMTF was started  11 meetings in 13 months ► Tasks.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
1 Records Management Organization The Committee provides guidance on operating the company’s records management program.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Americas (Washington D.C., United States, 21 September 2015) Guidelines for Establishing a National Standardization.
PRESENTATION TO THE FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 12, 2013 Capital Improvement Program FY 2013/14.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
1 Item #10 Progress Report on Actions to Improve Regional Transportation Communication and Coordination During Incidents John M. Contestabile Director,
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.02Public Facilities.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
Building organic expertise within the public sector
Executive Order – The Basics
Vijay Mauree, Programme Coordinator ITU
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Guidelines for Establishing a National Standardization Secretariat
Research Issues & Projects Sadiq M. Sait
The policy framework for cooperation Casablanca, 4-5 September 2013 Workshop on the Models to Promote Cooperation between Civil Society and Government.
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Water Services Trust Fund Training Workshop for Field Monitors Role of Field Monitors within the Project Task Team Sheillah Karimi (2009, updated in.
Presentation transcript:

1 Action Items for Management Board Challenges for Implementation of Recommendations

2

3 Challenges and Solutions: “……in other words, find us some funding and I can hire someone to do this. At this point, we are maxed out on time”! Anonymous land manager in the MAV, Spring 2007 "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.“ Albert Einstein

4 National Wildlife Refuge System in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley Circa 30 National Wildlife Refuges Biologists n=8 Foresters n=10 For Example:

5 Challenges and Solutions:  Lack of manpower and time Traditional Answers Hire more people Contract work

6 Challenges and Solutions:  Lack of manpower and time Traditional Answers Hire more people Contract work Non-traditional Answers Re-align priorities / job responsibilities Interdisciplinary training Create roving teams Interagency cooperation Etc..

7 Challenges and Solutions:  Lack of manpower and time Traditional Answers Hire more people (e.g., biometrician) Contract work (e.g., State Wildlife Grants, etc..) Non-traditional Answers Re-align priorities / job responsibilities Interdisciplinary training Create roving teams Interagency cooperation Etc..

8 Challenges and Solutions:  Communication/coordination among biologists, foresters, and GIS staff -- No administrative line authority for many of the “point people” (e.g., PIF Coordinators, etc.) Increase communication, coordination, and support (administratively, morally, and financially) among biologists, foresters, and GIS staff.

9 Action Items for Management Board Challenges for Implementation of Recommendations

10 Action Items: Action Item 1 – The Board formally accept the report of the Forest Resource Conservation Working Group entitled “Restoration, Management and Monitoring of Forest Resources in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley: Recommendations for Enhancing Wildlife Habitat” as a technical report of the LMV Joint Venture.

11 Action Items: Action Item 2 – Board members take the appropriate administrative actions within their respective organizations to integrate Report recommendations into their operational programs associated with forest restoration, management, and monitoring to include:

12 Action Items: Action Item 2 – Board members take the appropriate administrative actions within their respective organizations to integrate Report recommendations into their operational programs associated with forest restoration, management, and monitoring to include: 2a. Adopt the Desired Forest Conditions as the operational standards for bottomland hardwood forest management on lands within their respective jurisdictions.

13 Action Items: Action Item 2 – Board members take the appropriate administrative actions within their respective organizations to integrate Report recommendations into their operational programs associated with forest restoration, management, and monitoring to include: 2b. Adopt the technical recommendations for reforestation as operational standards for ongoing reforestation programs.

14 Action Items: Action Item 2 – Board members take the appropriate administrative actions within their respective organizations to integrate Report recommendations into their operational programs associated with forest restoration, management, and monitoring to include: 2c. Adopt the technical recommendations for forest inventory and monitoring as operational standards for lands and programs within their respective jurisdictions.

15 Action Items: Action Item 2 – Board members take the appropriate administrative actions within their respective organizations to integrate Report recommendations into their operational programs associated with forest restoration, management, and monitoring to include: 2d. Ensure that recommendations to other agencies and organizations (through forums such as USDA State Technical Committees and carbon sequestration partnerships) incorporate the technical standards and recommendations included in the Forest Resource Conservation Working Group Report.

16 Action Items: Action Item 3 – To facilitate the implementation, evaluation and progressive refinement of technical standards and recommendations, Board members promote through their respective administrative channels, coordination among managers, foresters, biologists, and GIS staff in developing and maintaining spatially explicit records regarding the implementation of forest management prescriptions and practices on lands within their respective jurisdictions.

17 Action Items: Action Item 3 – To facilitate the implementation, evaluation and progressive refinement of technical standards and recommendations, Board members promote through their respective administrative channels, coordination among managers, foresters, biologists, and GIS staff in developing and maintaining spatially explicit records regarding the implementation of forest management prescriptions and practices on lands within their respective jurisdictions.

18 Action Items: Action Item 4 – Consistent with the “Prospectus for Forest Breeding Bird Monitoring Program: Assessment of Forest Management Activities” the Board endorse and acknowledge its ongoing implementation as the “LMV Joint Venture Coordinated Forest Bird Monitoring Program.”

19 Action Items: Action Item 4 – Consistent with the “Prospectus for Forest Breeding Bird Monitoring Program: Assessment of Forest Management Activities” the Board endorse and acknowledge its ongoing implementation as the “LMV Joint Venture Coordinated Forest Bird Monitoring Program.” 4a. Board members take action through their respective administrative channels to implement the LMV Joint Venture Coordinated Forest Bird Monitoring Program on those units of the LMV system of state/federal management lands within their respective jurisdictions.

20 Thanks for Your Time and Support!