Evaluation 2013-2014 School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
MICHIGAN’S THREE- TIER TEACHER LICENSURE SYSTEM MASPA Presentation December 4, 2009.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Peninsula School District
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Holland Central School District New Teacher Mentoring Program Introduction.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
ADEPT Framework
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Volusia System For Empowering Teachers (VSET)
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATOR EVALUATION PROJECT Presentation to the SLCSD Board of Education May 7, 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
UACT and CVUSD Certificated Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures For The School Year.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Resident Educator Summative Assessment
Dissemination Training
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Five Required Elements
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Evaluation Information
PI-34 (It is 3-4, not 34).
MASTER TEACHER PROGRAM
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation School Year Review

Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should be focused on Continuous Improvement  Summative Assessment based on the formal and other informal observations as well as supporting documents or artifacts  Teachers assigned to more than one building shall be assigned a prime evaluator with other principals consulted for input in the Summative Assessment.

Teacher Categories  Initial License Teacher 1 st year; new to the profession 2 nd year; new to the profession 3 rd year or from out of state  Career Teacher New to CRCSD but with several years of experience  Veteran Teacher CRCSD teacher for several years On the regular evaluation cycle  All teachers will be part of a Peer Review Team when developing their IPDP.

Required Forms Teacher Group IPDPPeer Team ObservationSummative Initial License: First Year XXXX (Progress noted) Initial License: 2 nd & 3 rd Year XXXX Career – New in District XXXX Veteran – Year 1 & 2 XX Veteran – 3 rd Year of Cycle XXXX

On Initial License; New to the Profession (Year 1 and 2)  At least one observation of the beginning teacher will be conducted by the evaluator in each of the first and second years of their profession.  The teacher may be asked to provide additional supporting documents/artifacts to verify his/her work under the 8 (eight) Iowa Teaching Standards. The evaluator will determine on a case-by-case basis the amount of other artifacts/documentation required of the teacher. The professional portfolio is no longer a requirement.  Prior to the last sixty (60) days of the beginning teacher’s first year, the evaluator will complete a summative assessment of the teacher’s performance to that point in the Iowa Teaching Standards.  The evaluator should meet with the teacher during either December or January of the teacher’s second year of teaching to discuss their performance in the eight teaching standards.  At the end of the second year, the evaluator will complete a State Summative Evaluation of the teacher’s performance in the eight (8) Iowa Teaching Standards.  Teachers in a recommended third year or coming from out of state and placed on an initial license by the BOEE will be evaluated with the same process as those completing their 2 nd year.

Initial License: Mentoring will include:  First year works with an Induction Coach  Second year teachers in the mentoring program will continue with their building mentor and an Induction Coach  Third year or out of state teachers will be provided either an Induction Coach or building mentor.  Observations of others and Induction Coach observations  Continual reflective mentoring conversations  Part of a Peer Review Team with an IPDP

Career teacher new to CR  Pre-service evaluation overview/notice of evaluation  Considered to be a Veteran Teacher on the 3 rd year of the evaluation cycle.  At least one Formal Observation before May 1 st  Must complete 8 hours of Safe School training  Summative evaluation and meeting prior to the last 10 days of school

Veterans in 1 st and 2 nd year of the 3 year cycle Yearly- IPDP meeting  Within the first 45 days reflection and discussion of previous year’s IPDP and development of IPDP for the new school year between the teacher(s) and the evaluator  This year the IPDP will be done with a peer team.  Progress may be discussed either at the end of the year or within the first 45 days next fall.  IPDP plans may be modified at any time by mutual agreement.

Veterans requiring an evaluation – 3 rd year (List provided at the beginning of the year.)  Pre-service evaluation overview/notice of evaluation (required to be notified within the first 45 days of the school year by the teacher contract.)  Review and reflection of IPDP  At least one 30 minute observation before May 1 st.  Supporting Documentation  Summative Review form/meeting prior to the last 10 days of school.

Observation Procedures  Should be 30 minutes or more  Mutually agreed upon date and time (not in the first 20 or last 20 days of the contract year and not before or after a holiday)  Pre-conference meeting- 2 days in advance of observation  Post-conference- within 5 days after observation allowing time for reflection  Evaluator’s written comments discussed at post-conference  Teacher will provide a written reflection of the observation to guide a collaborative conversation about the lesson.

Timelines  IPDP should be reviewed during the first 45 days and peer review teams established. (October 29, 2013)  All observations must be completed and reviewed by May 1 st.  All evaluations must be done prior to the last 10 days of school.  Progress on IPDP recommended to be reviewed in the spring.

Teacher Contract  Refer to Article XI of the teacher contract for specific information or guidance.  Evaluation, IPDP and Observation forms may be found on the District website.