Introduction SOCPR Objectives Document experiences of children with SED and their families enrolled in systems of care. Document adherence to the system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 30 Early Intervention Overview Rationale for early intervention services Principles of early intervention Services and supports available for early.
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
EHDI Systems and the Medical Home Carlos Quezada-Gomez, PsyD National Center of Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs American Academy.
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Developing the Learning Contract
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Elementary School Counselor
Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
Campus Improvement Plans
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Nevada PEP. 2 A System of Care is a child-centered, family-focused plan of care in which the needs of the child and family dictate the types of services.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Continuing Competence in Nursing
Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative COSA Conference March 10, 2006 Bill Bouska Matthew Pearl Office of Mental Health & Addiction Services.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Use of OCAN in Crisis Intervention Webinar October, 2014.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
Building Capacity for Better Care Behavioural Support Systems Across Canada Dr. J Kenneth LeClair Sarah Clark.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
The Iowa Pediatric Integrated Health Home Program (PIHH) is for children and youth, 0 to 18 years old, who are Medicaid eligible and have a Severe Emotional.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
April 2005-IOM1 SSA/AUCD: A National Collaboration.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Challenging / Responsive Behaviours Symposium: Developing an Alberta Action Plan November 21, 2012 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy University of Alberta,
A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base Using the System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR) to Facilitate System Transformation.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Mary Jo Meyers WrapCT Presents: Building a System of Care Utilizing the Wraparound Process.
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Pickaway County Board of Developmental Disabilities THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Family-Guided Routines-Based Intervention Introduction Module
AspireMN Member Meeting
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Comprehensive Youth Services
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction SOCPR Objectives Document experiences of children with SED and their families enrolled in systems of care. Document adherence to the system of care (SOC) philosophy by the direct service providers and system. Assess the degree to which the SOC philosophy is implemented at the practice level and generate recommendations for improvement. System of Care Values 1.Child Centered and Family Focused 2.Community Based 3.Culturally Competent 10 Guiding Principles SOC values are further defined by the 10 guiding principles listed on slide 9.

Sections of The SOCPR Section 1 Demographic Information: Includes the child’s demographic information. Creates a “snapshot” of the child’s current service situation. Section 2 Document Review: Criteria that guides the case record review. Comprised of case history summary and the current service/treatment plan. Completed prior to conducting interviews. Section 3 Interview Protocol: Interview for the primary caregiver, the child/youth, the formal service provider and the informal helper. The interview protocol allows for the collection of data related to the 3 system of care values and a 4 th value that explores the impact of implementing the SOC values with the child and family receiving services. Section 4 Summative Questions: Requires case reviewers to summarize and integrate information gathered from the above noted sections. The summative questions allow the interviewer to assign ratings to each of the sections described above.

SOC Guiding Principles Children have access to a comprehensive array of services. Services are individualized. Services are received within the least restrictive environment. Families are included as full participants. Services are integrated and coordinated. Case management is provided to ensure service coordination and system navigation. The system promotes early identification and intervention. Children with SED are ensured a smooth transitions to adult services when they reach maturity. The rights of children with SED are protected. Children with SED receive services regardless of race, religion, national origin, sex, physical disability, or other characteristics.

Applications of the SOCPR Purpose: The SOCPR was designed to provide a tool for assessing whether system of care principles are operationalized at the level of practice, where children and their families have direct contact with service providers. The SOCPR collects and analyzes data obtained from multiple sources to determine adherence to system of care values and principles. Agency Application Used to evaluate the fidelity of practice to the SOC principles. Documents the experience of the child and family within the agency/program. Effective Quality Assurance and Improvement measure. Provides recommendations for staff training. System Application Identification of strengths and areas that need improvement. Provides decision makers with valuable information for system enhancements. Provides guidance and identifies system training needs. Holden, and Hernandez 2004) highlight the utility and importance of the SOCPR: “Further understanding of service experience and other practice level parameters is a fundamental component to understanding and improving our approaches to children’s mental health services.”

Domain 1 : Child Centered and Family Focused: The needs of the child and family dictate the types and mix of service provided. Subdomains: 1.Individualization: A unique service plan for each child and family that incorporates strengths and needs across life domains. 2.Full Participation: The child, family, providers and other significant persons are involved in setting the service plan goals. 3.Case Management: The child and family receive the services they need in a coordinated manner, the type and intensity are appropriate and are driven by changing needs over time. SOCPR Domains Domain 2: Community Based: Services are provided within or close to the child’s home community, in the least restrictive setting possible. Subdomains: 1.Early Intervention: positive outcomes are enhanced with early identification and intervention. 2.Access to Services: Each child and family has access to comprehensive services across physical, emotional, social and educational domains. The services are flexible enough to allow the family to integrate them into their daily routine. 3.Minimal Restrictiveness: Systems serve the child in as normal an environment as possible. Interventions provide the necessary service in the least intrusive manner possible. 4.Integration and Coordination: Coordination among providers, continuity of services and movement within the components of the system are of central importance.

Domain 3: Culturally Competent: Services are attuned to the cultural, racial and ethnic background and identity of the child and family. Subdomains: 1.Awareness: Service providers are aware of the impact of their own culture and the culture of each family being served. 2.Agency Culture: The child and family are assisted in understanding the agency’s culture; how the system operates, its rules and regulations and what is expected of them. 3.Sensitivity and Responsiveness: The ability to adapt services to the cultural context of each child and family. 4.Informal Supports: Cultural competence is reflected in the inclusion of the family’s informal/natural sources of support in formal service planning and delivery. SOCPR Domains Domain 4: Impact: The SOC philosophy implies that the implementation of SOC principles at the practice level produce positive outcomes for child and family receiving services. Subdomains: 1.Improvement: Services that have had a positive impact on the child and family have enabled them to improve their situation. 2.Appropriateness of Service: Services that have had a positive impact on the child and family, have provided appropriate services that have met their needs.

The Policy Framework & SOCPR Services are integrated & coordinated. Case management ensures service coordination and system navigation. Children with SED are ensured a smooth transition to adult services when they reach maturity. Community driven – services and supports should be provided as close to home as possible. Child, youth and family centered. By using the SOCPR an organization/ system is taking steps to ensure that they are accountable. All of the SOC principles help an agency and system deliver evidence-based and accountable services. Ontario’s Policy FrameworkSOC Principles Accessible. Children have access to a comprehensive array of services. Services are received within the least restrictive environment. Children with SED receive services regardless of race, religion, national origin, sex, physical disability or other characteristics. The rights of children with SED are protected. Services are individualized. Families are included as full participants in service planning and delivery. Services are received within the least restrictive environment. Coordinated and collaborative. Evidence-based and accountable.

Training and Evaluation Evaluation Opportunity: Define scope of the evaluation. Independent review team conducts the evaluation. Provision of a final report. Facilitate feedback and discussion of results to community/agency. Training Opportunity: Review the SOC philosophy. Communicating the purpose and objectives of the SOCPR. Review implementation procedures. Practice using qualitative interviewing techniques. Hands-on use of the SOCPR protocol and the rating/scoring system using a coaching model. Facilitate debriefing/feedback sessions. “The SOCPR is useful in providing specific and contextual feedback to services providers and systems as they attempt to make quality improvements while implementing a system of care.” In order to ensure a high level of inter-rater reliability, uniform training of the review team is essential.

SOC Project Logistics and Operations Coordinated Access & Referral Project Management Task Committees SOCPR Training Team System of Care Ottawa Project

CYMHN: SOC PROJECT LEADERSHIP TEAM Responsibilities: Lead governing body for SOC Project in Ottawa and the proposed model. Guides and Implements System of Care Values and Principles in the Ottawa community. Delegates duties and tasks to SOC Project Logistics and Operations Team. Approve implementation of strategic work plans. Liaison with stakeholder groups. Liaison with MCYS.

SOC Project Logistics and Operations Team (Cont’d) Consult with CYMHN SOC project Leadership Team on SOC Values and Principles. Helps set strategy related to implementation of SOC in the Ottawa community including evidence based practices. Coordinates training for communities in Ontario interested in the SOC. Collaborates with interested third parties related to research, development and other funding opportunities.

SOC Project Logistics and Operations Team Develop proposed work-plan, activities, associated outcomes and measurement tools to be used in implementing SOC. Input into the community training plans related to the SOC and Multicultural Competence. Creates sub-committees addressing special interests and linking with community networks (LHIN, Cross Sectoral and caregiver/consumer groups).

Coordinated Access Responsibilities: Liaison with CYMHN SOC Project Leadership Team. Project management of SOC in Ottawa. Collaboration with CoE and other possible funding sources. Coordinates training of new evaluators. Coordinates systems training strategy for the community. Administrative support to the committees

Task Committees Committees SOCPR Training Team SOC Consulting Team Multicultural Brokerage Team Other as needed

SOCPR Training Team Responsibilities: Provide training and coaching to the community. Continue to support system evaluation efforts using the SOCPR tool. Assist with the development of the SOCPR community training plan. Recommendations to CYMHN for on- going use of the SOCPR.

Contact Us Natasha Tatartcheff-Quesnel, Manager, Ottawa Children’s Coordinated Access and Referral to Services. Address: 2675 Queensview Dr. Ottawa, ON K2B 8K2 Telephone: (613) ext Fax: (613) Michael Hone, Director of Clinical Services, Crossroads Children’s Centre. Address: 1755 Courtwood Cr. Ottawa, ON K2C3J2 Telephone: (613) ext. 228 Fax: (613) Francine Gravelle, Director of Clinical Services, Youth Services Bureau of Ottawa Address: 2675 Queensview Dr. Ottawa, ON K2B 8K2 Telephone: (613) ext Fax: (613)