Overview Mission Overview and Significance History Challenges NGS 10-Year Plan NGS Programs Details on Programs and California Focus Marti Ikehara, State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
NGS Updates MARTI IKEHARA, Geodetic Advisor CLSA Monterey Chapter June 2011.
Geodetic Control Framework Theme 6 th of the CA Core Framework Themes Marti Ikehara Geodetic Advisor for California NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Sacramento,
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
NGS Geodetic Tools and Education Services Marti Ikehara: California Geodetic Advisor
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Ronnie Taylor alternate Subcommittee Chair Deputy Director, National Geodetic Survey.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch
Vertical Datums and Heights
Datums and Coordinates How the Evolution of GPS is Transforming Survey and Mapping GITA/ACSM April 25, 2010 Pam Fromhertz Colorado State Geodetic Advisor,
Geodetic Vertical and Tidal Datums, focus on South SF Bay, CA Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Geodesy and Map Projections Geodesy - the shape of the earth and definition of earth datums Map Projection - the transformation of a curved earth to a.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Introduction to Geodesy and Geomatics Position, Positioning Modes, and the.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS FOR GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Feedback on the New Datums Reference Frames 2015 Geospatial Summit April 14, 2015 Amar Nayegandhi Dewberry Consultants LLC.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
NGS Updates MARTI IKEHARA, Geodetic Advisor CLSA Marin Chapter June 2011.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Guidelines for Positioning the Oregon Real-time GPS Network Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT 31 July 2013 NGS Real-time GPS Network Webinar.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
The Delta Levees Program
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
VERTICAL DATUMS APRIL 08, 2008 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
Overview of Datums Commonly Used in Michigan and the National Spatial Reference System Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors 70 th Annual Meeting.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
Ggim.un.org Positioning geospatial information to address global challenges Global and National Geodetic Reference Frames: how they are connected and why.
Update on NGS Activities ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Dozen New Things in 2-0-Dozen
California Geodetic Advisor,
Presentation transcript:

Overview Mission Overview and Significance History Challenges NGS 10-Year Plan NGS Programs Details on Programs and California Focus Marti Ikehara, State Geodetic Advisor

Detailed Topics New datums from NGS in your future Development of a RTN backbone for California Passive monumentation— who will maintain? – Legislative safeguards adequate? Publication of GEOID09 CBL usage, program

Rationale for new Datums Terminology – Horizontal becomes GEOMETRIC – Vertical becomes GEOPOTENTIAL When?2018, if GRAV-D program is complete Why? But why?! 1.Primarily needed a better vertical datum for “vertical” data(geoid, ortho ht) not obtained by traditional leveling Airborne gravity observations will be used to develop next geoid – Geodetic Data collection relies upon navigation (GNSS) satellites orbiting around the mass center of the Earth – NAD83 reference frame/datum is not geocentric 2.NAD83 is not defined to include vertical velocities – Earth is not stable in all directions; reference frame must account for this to be as geodetically accurate as possible

X Z Y Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed (ECEF) Coordinate System Earth Mass Center Conventional Terrestrial Pole Bureau International de l'Heure (BIH) now the IERS Greenwich Meridian -X-Y -Z X, Y, Z = 0 X A, Y A, Z A (not NAD83) GRS 80 Ellipsoid

ELLIPSOIDS used in the US (More than 60 have been used around the world) CLARKE 1866 (1879 – 1986) a = 6,378,206.4 m 1/f = GEODETIC REFERENCE SYSTEM (GRS 80) ( Present) a = 6,378,137 m 1/f = WORLD GEODETIC SYSTEM (WGS 84) a = 6,378,137 m 1/f = BESSEL 1841 (1848 – 1879) a = 6,377, m 1/f =

Simplified Concept of NAD 83 vs. ITRF00 Datums 2.2 meters NAD 83 Origin ITRF 00 Origin Earth’s Surface h 83 h 00 Identically shaped ellipsoids (GRS-80) a = 6,378, meters (semi-major axis) 1/f = (flattening)

Types of GEODETIC DATUMS HORIZONTAL 2 D (Latitude and Longitude) (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83 (1986)) VERTICAL 1 D (Height) (e.g. Orthometric: NGVD 29, NAVD 88; Local Tidal) GEOMETRIC 3 D (Latitude, Longitude and Ellipsoid Height) Fixed and Stable - Coordinates seldom change (e.g. NAD 83 (1991), NAD 83 (2007)) also 4 D (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Height, Velocities) Coordinates change with time (e.g. ITRF00, ITRF08)

H + H t + V E + V Et ITRF00 ( ) Evolution of Geodetic Datums: from NAD27/NGVD29 to NAD83/NAVD88 to ?/ ? H + V , 29 H + V (86), 88 H + V E + V O (92), 88 GPS +VELOCITIES (time) H + H t + V E + V O (07)+HTDP, 88 + GRAVITY (geoid model) H + H t + V E + V Et GEOMETRIC (V E +G)[+V Et ] + G t GEOPOTENTIAL

International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service (IERS) ( ( The International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) constitutes a set of prescriptions and conventions together with the modeling required to define origin, scale, orientation and time evolution ITRS is realized by the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) based upon estimated coordinates and velocities of a set of stations observed by Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), Satellite Laser Ranging ( SLR), Global Positioning System (GPS) and GLONASS (GNSS), and Doppler Orbitography and Radio-positioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS). ITRF89, ITRF90, ITRF91, ITRF92, ITRF93, ITRF94, ITRF95, ITRF96, ITRF97, ITRF2000, ITRF2005

International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Service (IGS) International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS) International Very Long Baseline Service (IVS) International DORIS Service (IDS) International Terrestrial Reference Frame 4 Global Independent Positioning Technologies

Tectonic Horizontal Motions

Treatment of velocity in new datum ITRF has velocities relative to the COM Big question for our new datum is how is velocity treated: like ITRF OR “stable” North America like NAD83?

Horizontal Velocities, relative to NAD83 datum reflected in HTDP model

CORS Data allows for Monitoring Vertical Crustal Motion Vertical velocities associated with Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (rebound)

Treatment of velocities in new datum ITRF has velocities relative to the COM Big question for our new datum is how is velocity treated: like ITRF OR “stable” North America like NAD83? West Coast, esp CA, is accustomed to needing to account for velocity, at least horizontal How do we incorporate vertical velocity? How often would we change Coordinates? – ITRF: >1cm H, 2cm Eht; if ITRF changes, NAD83 too – Should it be 5mm, 10mm? At least annually??

NGS CORS, as of Feb, 2010: 108 in CA

Proposed Backbone for a streaming RTN Total statewide=154 Funded, currently, by various programs=76 Funded needed=78 Partners being sought – $15,000 or $150,000 Data streams – Regular: 20 – Sustaining: Unlimited Not network solution

Elements of CRTN CA Real Time Network Currently, single base positioning available free How do you get it? Contact Yehuda Bock, CSRC Goal: RT data streaming to partners Partners could be public agencies, private providers of RTN service Funds needed to establish telemetry at 78 sites Operational partners: MWD, USGS, SOPAC, Counties: LA, Orange, SD, and UNAVCO PBOpartners

Current status: /projects/realtime

NGS and RTNs Draft RTN Guidelines indicate that RTN providers should incorporate some CORS (10%, minimum of 3) into their network Doing so will enable connection with the NSRS or CSRS in the case of CRTN NGS may ‘certify’ RTN providers, after reviewing practices, adjustment, etc NGS long-term goal is to have national backbone of RT CORS that we operate Maintenance of passive monuments is nil/low

Passive monumentation MAINTENANCE? In LS Act, protected along R/W, transportation Not protected on private property Only actions by surveyors

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS’ ACT (Business and Professions Code §§ 8700 – 8805) INCLUDES AMENDMENTS MADE DURING THE 2007 LEGISLATIVE SESSION (Effective January 1, 2008, unless otherwise noted) CHAPTER 15. LAND SURVEYORS pg 20 of 31: NOTE, in (b): When monuments exist that "...provide horizontal or vertical survey control,"

8771. Record of survey - monumentation (a) Monuments set shall be sufficient in number and durability and efficiently placed so as not to be readily disturbed, to assure, together with monuments already existing, the perpetuation or facile reestablishment of any point or line of the survey. (b) When monuments exist that control the location of subdivisions, tracts, boundaries, roads, streets, or highways, or provide horizontal or vertical survey control, the monuments shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer prior to the time when any streets, highways, other rights-of- way, or easements are improved, constructed, reconstructed, maintained, resurfaced, or relocated, and a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filed with the county surveyor. They shall be reset in the surface of the new construction, a suitable monument box placed thereon, or permanent witness monuments set to perpetuate their location if any monument could be destroyed, damaged, covered, or otherwise obliterated, and a corner record or record of survey filed with the county surveyor prior to the recording of a certificate of completion for the project.

Questions from reading PLS Act If it’s on a superceded datum or has VERTCON elevations, does the monument still “provide” control? Or did it “used to provide” control? Should monuments on private property or on public property that is NOT a road easement also be protected? Do they need to be replaced or ‘merely’ referenced to something local? This pertains to practice of licensed surveyors; there are many others capable of destruction

GEOID09 published in Sept 09 In California, GEOID03 considered 567 bench marks with GPS data (ellipsoid heights), and kept 549 In GEOID09, there were 833 considered; 747 were included, a 36% increase

GEOID09 compared to GEOID03 09: teal, good; yellow: State advisor-rejected; red: analysis-rejected 03 (underlying dots): dk blue, kept; orange: rejected

From Helmer’s article in Winter 09/10 issue of California Surveyor

Calibration Base Lines Possible CBLs to be measured 1.Briggsmore, Modesto: not done by NGS 2.Concord: usage shows discrepancy of 1cm 3.Camarillo: last monument knocked out 4.Sacramento: monuments about to be set Need to hear interest/POC for: 1.Inyokern: last measured in 1990! 2.Reno: re-measurement

CBL Usage, Maintenance Who has used one in the past 3 years? Why? orWhy not? – Distance from nearest one? – Bothersome to get key? – Usage procedures? Forms needed for usage, filing with host? Other issues??

geodetic/geodetic_control.html

Kml’s and shapefiles downloadable

5 data types available/possible: HVL, H, CORS, VL and HVHM

Using NGS DSWORLD software and Google earth to get the latest geodetic data for your project Start by downloading “Google earth” at: Click here

Mouse-over the “TOOLS” button Click on “DOWNLOAD PC SOFTWARE” Open the NGS main page at Mouse over the “Tools” button and then click on the “Download PC Software” link.

Click here Next, click on the link: “User Contributed Software is also available…..”

Next, click on the DSWORLD (Version *.**) link. A “file download” window will appear. Choose to save the file where you can easily find it. It will be a zip file, so you will need to unzip it and then double click on the setup.exe file. That will install the program for you. For additional information or assistance, please contact your NGS State Geodetic Advisor

Anything Else?! If you think of something: ftp://ftp.ngs. ftp://ftp.ngs noaa.gov/pub/marti