Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program Closing Date: May 4, 2015 At 4:30:00pm Washington, DC Time Note: Please mute your telephones.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Grants.gov Work for You: U.S. Department of Education Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program CFDA #84.206A Find. Apply.
Advertisements

Alaska Native Education Program (ANEP) Technical Assistance Meeting September 2014 Sylvia E. Lyles Valerie Randall Almita Reed.
TRIBAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES PROGRAM (TCUP). Purpose of the Program To assist Tribal Colleges and Universities to: Build, expand, renovate, and equip.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Everything You Wanted to Know About Grants.gov. Through the Eyes of the Applicant Register, Find, and Apply.
Grant Writing 101 – Part 2 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting a Grant Application Nancy Alexander, MBA Office of Sponsored Programs.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
Quality Improvement Capacity for Impact Project (QICIP) Pre-Review Conference Call Competitive Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA March 25,
SKILLS FOR SUCCESS PROGRAM COMPETITION OVERVIEW—JUNE 2015 Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official documents published.
CFDA E 2014 Technical Assistance Webinar for Prospective Applicants.
Centers for International Business Education—Technical Assistance.
Find HRSA Funding Opportunities. Grants.gov All discretionary grants offered by the 26 federal grant-making agencies can be found on Grants.gov. You do.
Navigating and Preparing a HRSA Application Responding to a Funding Opportunity Announcement Sarah Hammond, Grants Policy Analyst HRSA’s Office of Federal.
School Leadership Program Pre-Application Slides United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Teaching American History Grant Program (TAH) FY 2009 Grants.gov.
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program Closing Date: June 24, 2014 At 4:30:00pm Eastern Daylight Time Note: Please mute your telephones.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview of the FY 2010 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey 1.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
Grant Writing Workshop for Research on Adult Education Elizabeth R. Albro National Center for Education Research.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Professional Development for Arts Educators Program (PDAE) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement.
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. Purpose of the Program To assist Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) to expand their role.
HISPANIC-SERVING INSTITUTIONS ASSISTING COMMUNITIES (HSIAC) PROGRAM.
Grant Writing 101 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application Debbie Kalnasy Bryan Williams Office of Safe and Drug-Free School s.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Grant Program (AEMDD) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and.
Presented by Nicole Dalton HB 3233—STUDENT- CENTERED TEACHING AND LEARNING MODELS PROFICIENCY-BASED TEACHING AND LEARNING GRANT THE WEBINAR WILL BEGIN.
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Training Grant Program Capacity Building Grants
Cindy Collins ETEC 665 Electronic Submissions Submitting Proposals Through Grants.Gov.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting March 31, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived Information.
ALASKA NATIVE/NATIVE HAWAIIAN INSTITUTIONS ASSISTING COMMUNITIES (AN/NHIAC) PROGRAM.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
CFDA E 2012 Application Technical Assistance Webinar.
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (NCITSPSD) NCITSPSD Technical Assistance Workshop Orientation.
Fiscal Year 2011 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCAs) HRSA NCAs Technical Assistance (TA) Webpage:
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Innovative Approaches to Literacy Closing Date: August 10, 2012 At 4:30:00pm Eastern Daylight Time Note: Please mute your telephones.
Fiscal Year 2011 Oral Health Training and Technical Assistance National Cooperative Agreement (Oral Health NCA) HRSA Oral Health NCA Technical Assistance.
FULL-SERVICE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PRE-APPLICATION WEBINAR (MAY 21, 2014)
Welcome U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs CFDA K Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children.
Management Plan Describe the adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project: On time and within budget Include clearly.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Making Grants.gov Work for You: U.S. Department of Education International Education Program Service Technical Assistance Workshop January 2009 Find. Apply.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting March 12, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NPD) NPD Grant Competition Webinar 2: GPRA & Selection Criteria January.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop Preparing The Application These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural.
84.323A State Personnel Development Grants Program FY 2012 Competition Jennifer Coffey, PhD August 9 th, 2012.
HRSA Mission and Goals As the Nation's access agency, HRSA focuses on uninsured, underserved, and special needs populations in its goals and program activities:
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
FY16 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session Wednesday June 15, :00 AM EDT Teleconference number: , conference code 51857#
CPRC: COMMUNITY PARENT RESOURCE CENTERS (84.328C) Understanding the Application and Process ► March 17, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. (E.D.T)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & DISSEMINATION: MODEL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO IMPROVE ADOLESCENT LITERACY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN GRADES 6 – 12 (84.326M)
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
Skills for Success Program
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program Closing Date: May 4, 2015 At 4:30:00pm Washington, DC Time Note: Please mute your telephones.

Today’s Agenda Legislation and Purpose Special Rule Application Requirements Allowable Program Activities Competitive Preference Priority Funding The Selection Criteria The Application Format Grants.gov Overview of the Competitive Process Your Q&As

Legislative Authority Program Authority: 20 U.S.C U.S.C Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and CFR parts 74 (b) The Education Department suspension and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part CFR part 3485 (c) The notice inviting applications published in the Federal Register on March 20, 2015 (80 FR 14985).80 FR 14985

Purpose The purpose of this competition under the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program (Javits) is to provide grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) to enable them to carry out a coordinated program of scientifically based research, demonstration projects, innovative strategies, and similar activities designed to build and enhance the ability of elementary and secondary schools nationwide to meet the special educational needs of gifted and talented students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds or underrepresented groups.

Special Rule

This grant competition implements the “special rule” in section 5464(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA), that requires any Javits program funds appropriated for the fiscal year in excess of the amount of funds appropriated for FY 2001 (i.e., $7.5 million) be used to award competitive grants to SEAs, local educational agencies (LEAs), or both. Due to the limited amount of funds available for the FY 2015 competition, the Assistant Secretary has opted to award competitive grants to SEAs only.

Application Requirements The following application requirements and allowable program activities are from section 5464 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253c). Each SEA must describe in its application how: (1) The proposed gifted and talented services, materials, and methods can be adapted, if appropriate, for use by all students; and (2) The proposed programs can be evaluated.

Allowable Program Activities Applicants under this competition may propose to carry out one or more of the following activities: ◦Conduct scientifically based research on methods and techniques for identifying and teaching gifted and talented students and for using gifted and talented programs and methods to serve all students; and program evaluations, surveys, and the collection, analysis, and development of information needed to accomplish the proposed project; ◦Carry out professional development (including fellowships) for personnel (including leadership personnel) involved in the education of gifted and talented students; ◦Establish and operate model projects and exemplary programs for serving gifted and talented students, including innovative methods for identifying and educating students who may not be served by traditional gifted and talented programs (such as summer programs, mentoring programs, service learning programs, and cooperative programs involving business, industry, and education);

Allowable Program Activities Continued ◦Implement innovative strategies, such as cooperative learning, peer tutoring, and service learning; ◦Carry out programs of technical assistance and information dissemination, including assistance and information with respect to how gifted and talented programs and methods, where appropriate, may be adapted for use by all students; ◦Make materials and services available through State regional educational service centers, institutions of higher education, or other entities; or ◦Provide funds for challenging, high-level course work, disseminated through technologies (including distance learning), for individual students or groups of students in schools and LEAs that would not otherwise have the resources to provide such course work.

Allowable Program Activities Additional Guidance Applicants do not need to address all of the allowable activities – each applicant can focus their project on the allowable activities that align with the needs in their state.

Competitive Preference Priority This competition includes one competitive preference priority. In accordance with 34 CFR (b)(2)(iv), this priority is from section 5465 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7253d). Competitive Preference Priority (up to 20 points). For FY 2015 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference priority. Under 34 CFR (c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 20 points to an application that meets elements (1) and (2) of this priority. We award up to 10 points to an application that meets either element (1) or element (2) of this priority. The priority points awarded under this section are in addition to any points the applicant earns under the selection criteria described in this application package (See the Selection Criteria).

Competitive Preference Priority Continued Competitive Preference Priority Elements Under this competition, we will award these additional competitive preference priority points to programs and projects designed to develop new information that: ◦ Improves the capability of schools to plan, conduct, and improve programs to identify and serve gifted and talented students (10 points); and ◦ Assists schools in the identification of, and provision of services to, gifted and talented students (including economically disadvantaged individuals, individuals with limited English proficiency, and individuals with disabilities) who may not be identified and served through traditional assessment methods (10 points).

Competitive Preference Priority Continued Competitive Preference Priority It is important to understand that depending on how well the applicant addresses each element under the competitive preference priority, up to (10) points will be awarded to applicants that address either element (1) or element (2). If the applicant addresses both elements (1) and (2), up to 20 points may be awarded. Note: In accordance with section 5465(b) of the ESEA, at least 50 percent of the applications approved under this competition must address element (2) under the competitive preference priority section.

Eligibility Who May Apply State educational agencies (SEAs) Note: Due to the limited amount of funds available for the FY 2015 competition, the Assistant Secretary has opted to award competitive grants to SEAs only.

Funding Estimated Available Funds:$2,500,000. Estimated Range of Awards:$250,000-$400,000. Estimated Average Size of Awards:$350,000 per year. Estimated Number of Awards: Project Period: Up to 36 months. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost sharing or matching.

Participation of Private School Children and Teachers Applications for funds under the Javits program must provide for the equitable participation of private school children and teachers in private nonprofit elementary and secondary schools, including the participation of teachers and other personnel in professional development programs serving such students, located in areas served by the grant recipient.

Selection Criteria

(a) Need for the Project (30 Points) The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project. In determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i)The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or the activities to be carried out by the proposed project (10 points). (ii)The extent to which the proposed project will focus on serving or otherwise address the needs of disadvantaged individuals (10 points). (iii)The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses (10 points).

(b) Quality of Project Design (40 points). The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i)The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable (10 points). (ii)The extent to which the design of the proposed project is appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target population or other identified needs (10 points). (iii)The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of Federal financial assistance (10 points). (iv)The extent to which the proposed project is supported by evidence of promise (10 points).

( c) Quality of Project Personnel (20 points) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed project. In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of the project director or principal investigator (10 points). (ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of key project personnel (10 points).

(d) Quality of Management Plan(30 Points) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks (15 points). (ii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project (15 points).

(e) Quality of Project Evaluation(30 Points) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project (10 points). (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative data to the extent possible (10 points). (iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well- implemented, produce evidence of promise (10 points).

Note on Project Evaluation A strong evaluation plan should: - Be included in the application narrative, and shape the development of the project from the beginning; - Include benchmarks to monitor progress towards specific project objectives and also outcomes to assess the impact on teaching and learning and other important outcomes; - Identify the individual/organization that have agreed to serve as evaluator for the project and describe the qualifications of that evaluator.

Note on Project Evaluation The plan may describe:  What type of data will be collected;  When various types of data will be collected;  What methods will be used;  What instruments will be developed and when;  How the data will be analyzed;  When reports of results and outcomes will be available; and  How data will be used to monitor the progress of the project.

The Application Process

Content and Form of Application Submission The application narrative is where the applicant addresses the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages, using the following standards; A “page” is 8.5" x 11", on one side only, with 1" margins at the top, bottom, and both sides; Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs; Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch); Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial.

More on Application Submission The page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget section, including the budget narrative; the one-page abstract; the assurances and certifications; and the other attachments, including the resumes, and indirect cost rate agreements, Please note the page limit does apply to all of the application narrative section. The narrative page limit is 50 pages. Our reviewers will not read any pages of your application that exceed the page limit.

Grant.gov Grants.gov Contact Center: or

Grants.gov Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov) at What is Grants.gov? A Federal portal that allows users to electronically find, apply for and manage Federal Grant Opportunities Grants.gov is THE single access point for over 1000 grant programs offered by 26 Federal Granting Agencies. It is part of the President’s Management Agenda and E-Government Initiatives.

Grants.gov Helpful Hints (cont.) For additional information on the registration process please view the overview tutorial located on the Grants.gov website. Grants.gov Contact Center: or

Grants.Gov Tips

Grants.gov TIPS ATTENTION – Adobe Forms and PDF Files Required Applications submitted to Grants.gov for the Department of Education will be posted using Adobe forms. Therefore, applicants will need to download the latest version of Adobe reader (at least Adobe Reader ). Information on computer and operating system compatibility with Adobe and links to download the latest version is available on Grants.gov. We strongly recommend that you review these details on before completing and submitting your application. In addition, applicants should submit their application a day or two in advance of the closing date as detailed below. Also, applicants are required to upload their attachments in.pdf format only. (See details below under “Attaching Files – Additional Tips.”) If you have any questions regarding this matter please the Grants.gov Contact Center at or call

Grants.gov TIPS REGISTER EARLY – Grants.gov registration involves many steps including registration on SAM ( which may take approximately one week to complete, but could take upwards of several weeks to complete, depending upon the completeness and accuracy of the data entered into the SAM database by an applicant. You may begin working on your application while completing the registration process, but you cannot submit an application until all of the Registration steps are complete. Please note that once your SAM registration is active, it will take hours for the information to be available in Grants.gov, and before you can submit an application through Grants.gov. For detailed information on the Registration Steps, please go to: [Note: Your organization will need to update its SAM registration annually (formerly Central Contractor Registry (CCR)*.]

Grants.gov TIPS Primary information about SAM is available at However, to further assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in SAM or updating your existing SAM account, the Department of Education has prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet which you can find at: SUBMIT EARLY – We strongly recommend that you do not wait until the last day to submit your application. Grants.gov will put a date/time stamp on your application and then process it after it is fully uploaded. The time it takes to upload an application will vary depending on a number of factors including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection, and the time it takes Grants.gov to process the application will vary as well. If Grants.gov rejects your application (see step three below), you will need to resubmit successfully to Grants.gov before 4:30:00 p.m. Washington, DC time on the deadline date.

Grants.gov TIPS To submit successfully, you must provide the DUNS number on your application that was used when you registered as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) on Grants.gov. This DUNS number is typically the same number used when your organization registered with the SAM (formally CCR - Central Contractor Registry). If you do not enter the same DUNS number on your application as the DUNS you registered with, Grants.gov will reject your application. VERIFY SUBMISSION IS OK –To see the date/time your application was received, login to Grants.gov and click on the Track My Application link. For a successful submission, the date/time received should be earlier than 4:30:00 p.m. Washington, DC time, on the deadline date, AND the application status should be: Validated, Received by Agency, or Agency Tracking Number Assigned. Once the Department of Education receives your application from Grants.gov, an Agency Tracking Number (PR/award number) will be assigned to your application and will be available for viewing on Grants.gov’s Track My Application link.

Grants.gov TIPS If the date/time received is later than 4:30:00 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, on the deadline date, your application is late. If your application has a status of “Received” it is still awaiting validation by Grants.gov. Once validation is complete, the status will either change to “Validated” or “Rejected with Errors.” If the status is “Rejected with Errors,” your application has not been received successfully. Some of the reasons Grants.gov may reject an application can be found on the Grants.gov site: application.html. application.html For more detailed information on troubleshooting Adobe errors, you can review the Adobe Reader Error Messages document at support/troubleshooting/encountering-error-messages.html.. support/troubleshooting/encountering-error-messages.html.

Grants.gov TIPS Submission Problems – What should you do? If you have problems submitting to Grants.gov before the closing date, please contact Grants.gov Customer Support at or or access the Grants.gov Self-Service web portal at: portal.psc.gov/Welcome.aspx?pt=Grants portal.psc.gov/Welcome.aspx?pt=Grants If electronic submission is required, you must submit an electronic application before 4:30:00 p.m., unless you follow the procedures in the Federal Register notice and qualify for one of the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these exceptions. (See the Federal Register notice for detailed instructions.)

Grants.gov TIPS Please note, once you download an application from Grants.gov, you will be working offline and saving data on your computer. Please be sure to note where you are saving the Grants.gov file on your computer. You will need to logon to Grants.gov to upload and submit the application. You must provide the DUNS number on your application that was used when you registered as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) on Grants.gov. Dial-Up Internet Connections When using a dial up connection to upload and submit your application, it can take significantly longer than when you are connected to the Internet with a high-speed connection, e.g. cable modem/DSL/T1. While times will vary depending upon the size of your application, it can take a few minutes to a few hours to complete your grant submission using a dial up connection. MAC Users For MAC compatibility information, review the Operating System Platform Compatibility Table at the following Grants.gov link: software.html. If electronic submission is required and you are concerned about your ability to submit electronically as a non-windows user, please follow instructions in the Federal Register notice to obtain an exception to the electronic submission requirement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. (See the Federal Register notice for detailed instructions.) software.html

Grants.gov TIPS Attaching Files – Additional Tips Please note the following tips related to attaching files to your application, especially the requirement that applicants only include read-only, non-modifiable.PDF files in their application: ◦ Ensure that you attach.PDF files only ◦ Applicants should limit the size of their file attachments.

Overview of the Competitive Process Applications reviewed by ED staff for completion and eligibility – May Applications peer reviewed – June Scores totaled and rank ordered to determine final awards – July Assistant Secretary approved and Congressional notification – September Awards announced – September

Questions and Answers

Team Javits Pat Johnson (202) Jennifer Brianas (202) Lynyetta Johnson (202)