State of progress on debriefing & evaluation Silvia Panzavolta, Antonella Turchi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
Advertisements

COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 WP 4 – DATA HARMONISATION London, 5 – 7 September.
LLP Leonardo TOI INCOM-VET Quality Assurance of Deliverables WP5 WP’s Leader: University of Aosta Valley (IT) Kick off Meeting Vilnius, 7-8 November 2013.
Timetable TaskDate Project SelectionThursday Oct 11 / Monday Oct 15 Outline Project SpecificationMonday Oct 22 Progress ReportMonday Nov 19 Mid-project.
Patient Feedback –why bother? Setting the national context Jason Leitch Clinical Director The Quality Unit, Scottish
INSTRUCTIONAL BEST PRACTICES IN TEACHING
Quality Management System The Mentor Way. Inconsistency thy name is humanity Wise men’s answer is the path of Quality Human nature’s to rationalize failure.
Quality Management Systems Chris P. James Its Elementary.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM.
ACTION PLANNING. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: List the goals of Action Planning Explain the Action Planning.
Administrative: “Create New Game” Project (1) 1-Page describing game proposal: September 25 th or earlier Apply the principles of Iterative Design –First.
Interview Team Selection Randall Birkwood. What it is: - A simple, clean process - Convenient resources for interview team - Ensures interview team is.
QUALITY These slides have been added to the standard MRU PM Cert materials and are made available to students who have attended my class. Robin Hornby.
Interview Process. Get Your Facts Straight Gather Information p.212 ◦Read A Few Articles ◦Go online and do research ◦Contact someone who works there ***
Overview of the research process. Purpose of research  Research with us since early days (why?)  Main reasons: Explain why things are the way they are.
Recognizing the Differentiated Instruction We Already Do, and Time- Saving Tips to Help Us Enjoy our Weekends.
Funding: STEER – INTELLIGENT ENERGY EUROPE (IEE) Grant Agreement IEE/10/290/SI Full title: ECOSTARS Europe Acronym: ECOSTARS Project start date:
Feasibility Study of a Wiki Collaboration Platform for Systematic Review Eileen Erinoff AHRQ Annual Meeting September 15, 2009.
GOLD: a ten-year database of school best practices Agenzia Nazionale per lo Sviluppo dell’Autonomia Scolastica (former INDIRE) Antonella.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP Adaptive CUSP Sustainability Sustainment and Spread David.
341 Lab Overview Use this PowerPoint presentation to guide you through the labs this session. To make the links work first make this slide show run by.
Southwark, UK/ Järfälla, SE Regio Project 2013 – 2015 Project meeting (10 – 12 November 2014) External evaluation.
The Scottish Early Years Collaborative. 1941, William A. Foster "Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere.
The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.
Edmodo 101. Home Screen Your profile Action Tabs Calendar, tools and app$ Your Groups Search Box.
Transforming lives through learning Once upon a time….. Graham Dickie Kilchrenan Primary School The story of how we ended up here. And the question about.
From here to the end! Outputs & Deadlines. WORK PACKAGE 1 CONSORTIUM MANAGEMENT – UK October 2009-September 2011 Evaluation Report/Final Report Project.
Britt Wendelboe Danish Society for Patient Safety Work Package 4 BMJ - Paris April 10, 2014.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Case for Quality Initiative Industry Perspective Monica J. Wilkins April 30, 2013.
ENV-NCP-TOGETHER PARTNER MEETING WORK PACKAGE 3 02/03/2010 c Beta Technology.
MJM22 Digital Practice and Pedagogy Week 9 Collaboration Tools.
Effective Project Management Barbara Stone & Jodie Mathies August 30, 2007.
Week 4 Planning Site Navigation. 2 Creating Usable Navigation Provide enough location information to let the user answer the following navigation questions:
1 Academy of Aerospace Quality The Vision for NASA’s academic community Brian Hughitt NASA Headquarters Office of Safety and Mission Assurance.
UPGRADE RUNWAY & ELECTRICAL VAULT PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE 12 July WG/LGC SELFRIDGE ANG BASE MI.
Computers cost money!! The laptops and library computers are extremely expensive! Do not eat or drink while using the laptops (not that you should be.
Working Toward Statewide Standards of Practice (Operationalizing the Strategic Plan) IESBVI Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
What and why of ISO 9001 Adaptive Processes Consulting Experience World Class Processes! An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company
Accountability & Effectiveness Innovation Network, Inc. January 22, 2003.
1 Hamburg, May 2015Francesco RubinoProvincia Autonoma di Trento The SWORD project: Planning of SWORD activities for the next six months and beyond.
Running External Applications 1. There are times when you may wish to run an external application from a VB application. 2 External Applications.
How to Find Your Way Around… SEPT - MANDATORY TRAINING 1. You can play the PowerPoint, and find the Test here EXAMPLE COURSE.
Washington State Work Zone Rule  Work Zone Rule Implementation  New Work Zone Policy Cathy Nicholas, FHWA - WA Division Office Frank Newboles, WSDOT.
Top 10 Interview Questions & Answers
Belgian Technical Cooperation Internal audit presentation.
Speech pathology students’ responses to ePortfolios Abigail Lewis Speech Pathology Psychology and Social Science.
Unit 2: The Impact of School Culture We will be discussing the following in seminar: We will work on developing the questions you will ask in the interview.
CS 575 Spring 2012 Lecture Bapa Rao.
Advanced Higher Computing Science
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Assessing Young Learners
What is feedback?. Giving feedback “ module 17” By: Rana Rihan Submitted to: Dr Suzan Arafat.
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT Improving the Character of Winners
Project Integration Management
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
Alternative group process at large units using the «world cafe» method
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Work Environment Survey 2017 – action plan Date:…… Name of unit:…………………………………………………………… (place on the work environment file of the unit) Concrete actions.
Computers, Technology & Education
Scottish Improvement Skills
Data Quality By Suparna Kansakar.
Welcome to the European Shoemaker e-learning platform introduction
Contributions to SmartGrid Security Centre
Starting out Dr Brian Robson, Executive Clinical Director, Healthcare Improvement Scotland.
Project Management Techniques Project Management Life Cycle
Cooperative & Experiential Education
Checklist for joint engagement - DTM and Partners
Presentation transcript:

State of progress on debriefing & evaluation Silvia Panzavolta, Antonella Turchi, ANSAS LINKED Management Meeting Brussels, September

Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives.” “ William A. Foster

Actions done Quality assurance plan Problem reporting form Project partner questionnaire All documents made public through the project site at the following page: project.wikispaces.com/WP5+Debriefing+and+evaluation project.wikispaces.com/WP5+Debriefing+and+evaluation

Problems reported So far, no problems were reported, apart from the fact that due to summer vacations, it has been a little bit difficult to start again…

Partners questionnaire So far, only one partner has answered the questionnaire. The deadline was August 31°, so please remember to do it when you’re back home. THANK YOU

To-dos Evaluation report (end of project) Analysis of questionnaire data (when available) and publication on project site

Structure of the final report Aims: analysis of the outputs compared with the description of Work; analysis of outputs themselves; shared views on the process Expected result: common report on the quality of the project also defining some ideas to improve future work Tools: interviews with partners; analysis of documents; external reviewer (colleague not involved in the project)

Debriefing on ongoing outputs and process

Outputs All deliverable due have been done The quality of the outputs so far is high Methodology used. Multiple views. References to previous work. Analysis of priorities to partners. Consensus has been searched for and found Organizational note: according to us, it has been a very good choice to use a wiki as a project site, since it gives responsibility on everyone but also gives a change to manage file publication in a more flexible way.

Cooperation The quality of the cooperation is very good Each partner is playing its role Peer learning process

What are your feedback about the points we mentioned? Thank you for your contribution!