____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 Hartmut Beyer, Birgit Hegerding UNICONSULT Universal Transport Consulting GmbH, Hamburg The SEAPLANE Project Project Evaluation - SEAPLANE Final Conference, Bruges / Ostend June 2nd and 3rd, 2005

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation ____________________________________________________________________________________ Questionnaire Of the 13 Partners, 10 have answered the questionnaire and given it back to UNICONSULT

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation A. ORGANISATION A.1How would you judge the offered opportunities to participate actively in the project execution?

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation A. ORGANISATION A.2What is your general assessment of the General Assemblies in the various fields?

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation A.3a)What do you think about the communication among the project partners?

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation A.3b)What do you think about the communication with the consultants?

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation B.PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND WORK PACKAGES B.1Quality of technical services and support Activity 1 – Status Analysis Air Transport Network

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation Activity 2 – Airport Quality Improvement and Development Strategies

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation Activity 3 – Airport Passenger Market Potential

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation Activity 4 – Airport Safety and Security

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation Activity 5 – Promotion and Publication

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation Additional Activities

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation C CO-OPERATION AND NETWORKING C2 What parts of the SEAPLANE project have been possible as per your opinion only because of the trans-national co-operation ? Resolution Networking / contacts Airport quality improvement Airport development strategies Airport safety and security Airport passenger market potential Airport comparative analysis Transnational cooperation essential for nearly all activities!

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation D.GENERAL D.1To what extent have your expectations on the outcomes been met by the project?

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation ____________________________________________________________________________________ D.3How will you use the output, results and contacts of the SEAPLANE project in the future ? Continue to press for action on airport slot protection for regional services As benchmark for future development and planning As support to local airport promotion cluster For possible regional future engagement in aviation Continue networking

____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 SEAPLANE Project Evaluation ____________________________________________________________________________________ D.4 Are there any specific aspects that should be considered in a future project? More Partners from more countries Involve airports of a more similar size and nature Integrate major airlines and LCCs more actively in a project Slot allocation procedures More emphasis on meetings / discussions among the partners