Three State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Benchmarking for 3SAQS base 2008 CAMx simulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCARF Duncan Tooke RAL HPCSG. Overview What is SCARF? Hardware & OS Management Software Users Future.
Advertisements

Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
 Copyright, HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC, George Delic, Ph.D. HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC (919) P.O. Box 569, Chapel Hill, NC.
Leader in Next Generation Ethernet. 2 Outline Where is iWARP Today? Some Proof Points Conclusion Questions.
Copyright HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC, George Delic, Ph.D. HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC (919) P.O. Box 569, Chapel Hill,
Copyright HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC, George Delic, Ph.D. HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC (919) P.O. Box 569, Chapel Hill,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.
AASPI Software Computational Environment Tim Kwiatkowski Welcome Consortium Members November 18, 2008.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Time: Nov 3, 1998 South Coast Air Basin CAMx model 210 x 120 km domain 1 hour time step 2 x 2 km grid cells mid noon Concentration (  g m -3 )
Time: Nov 3, 1998 South Coast Air Basin CAMx model 210 x 120 km domain 1 hour time step 2 x 2 km grid cells mid noon Concentration (ppb) benzene.
Performance of CMAQ on a Mac OS X System Tracey Holloway, John Bachan, Scott Spak Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment University of Wisconsin-Madison.
* CPU (Central Processing Unit ) * CPU is the abbreviation for central processing unit. the CPU is the brains of the computer where most numerical and.
3D multi-fluid model Erika Harnett University of Washington.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
A COMPARISON MPI vs POSIX Threads. Overview MPI allows you to run multiple processes on 1 host  How would running MPI on 1 host compare with POSIX thread.
Experiments with running ALADIN on LINUX PC, using different FORTRAN compilers Andrey Bogatchev NIMH,Bulgaria.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Parallelizing Security Checks on Commodity Hardware E.B. Nightingale, D. Peek, P.M. Chen and J. Flinn U Michigan.
3SAQS Technical Committee Workshop Overview of updated schedule / deliverables related to ongoing 3SAQS technical work October 31, 2013 Tom Moore.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
Chapter One Understanding Computer Hardware Part I: Processors.
Chemical transport modeling in support of NPS-CIRA activities Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Bill Malm 1 Jenny Hand 2.
 Copyright, HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC, George Delic, Ph.D. HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC (919) P.O. Box 569, Chapel Hill, NC.
AES Encryption Code Generator Undergraduate Research Project by Paul Magrath. Supervised by Dr David Gregg.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA)
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) Status of 3SAQS Air Quality and Emissions Modeling University of North Carolina.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
PM 2.5 Response to Different Emissions Reductions Scenarios Over São Paulo State, Brazil. Taciana T. de A. Albuquerque a, J. Jason West b, Rita Yuri Ynoue.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
FFT Accelerator Project Rohit Prakash Anand Silodia Date: June 7 th, 2007.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
Parallelization of likelihood functions for data analysis Alfio Lazzaro CERN openlab Forum on Concurrent Programming Models and Frameworks.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Microprocessors BY Sandy G.
Georgia Institute of Technology Adaptive Grid Modeling for Predicting the Air Quality Impacts of Biomass Burning Alper Unal, Talat Odman School of Civil.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting Comparison of CMAQ and CAMx for an Annual Simulation over the South Coast Air Basin Jin Lu 1, Kathleen Fahey.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx 2004 PSAT Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 CAMx Model Performance Evaluation University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Air Quality Modeling of PM2.5 Species Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium & Midwest RPO 10/21/2002.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
GFE in RFCs Tom LeFebvre ESRL/Global Systems Division.
16-1 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Workshop Agenda Introduction to HYSPLIT Introduction.ppt Model Overview Model_Overview.ppt Meteorological Data Meteorological_Data.ppt.
Synthesis of work on Budget of Water Vapor and Trace gases in Amazonia Transport and Impacts of Moisture, Aerosols and Trace Gases into and out of the.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Rochelle Balmori, Shu-Yun Chen, Prakash Karamchandani and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Justin T. Walters and John J. Jansen.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Multi-Core CPUs Matt Kuehn. Roadmap ► Intel vs AMD ► Early multi-core processors ► Threads vs Physical Cores ► Multithreading and Multi-core processing.
Assessment and Calculations of Plume Rise for Forest Fires during Texas Air Quality Study period. Uarporn Nopmongcol Dept. of Chemical Engineering The.
Simulation of PM2.5 Trace Elements in Detroit using CMAQ
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
High-resolution air quality forecasting for Hong Kong
What happens inside a CPU?
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
CMAQ PARALLEL PERFORMANCE WITH MPI AND OpenMP George Delic, Ph
Understanding Performance Counter Data - 1
Development of a 2007-Based Air Quality Modeling Platform
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update
7th Annual CMAS Conference
Georgia Institute of Technology
CRGAQS: CAMx PSAT Results
Presentation transcript:

Three State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Benchmarking for 3SAQS base 2008 CAMx simulations

Overview Modeling 5-day period from January 1-5, 2008 Instructions and input data provided for 36- and 12-km modeling grids from UNC CAMx v5.41 with in-line plume rise for DEASCO3 fires (differs from public release of CAMx v5.41) Perform simulation using provided inputs and then compare against UNC results generated using different compiler and hardware. Maximum expected differences between simulations should be less than 1% for both gas and aerosol species

Configuration Operating System: 64- bit Fedora 14 Hardware: dual 6 core 3.06 GHz Intel, 12M cache (Model X5675) Fortran Compiler: Portland Group Fortran version 8.02 MPI: MPICH3 CAMx: v5.41 hybrid MPI-OpenMP Operating System: 64- bit RHEL Hardware: 12 core 2.93 GHz Intel, 12M cache (Model X5670) Fortran Compiler: Portland Group Fortran version MPI: mvapich2-1.7 CAMx: v5.41 hybrid MPI-OpenMP ENVIRONUNC

Concentrations [O 3 and NO x ] Note: concentrations below 1 ppt/.001 ug m -3 are not included in calculations as to prevent numerical “blow-up”

Concentrations [SO 2 and PM 2.5 ]

Concentrations [PNO 3 ]

Concentrations [NH 3 and CO]

Concentrations [PM2.5 and PNO3] Note: concentrations below.1 ug m -3 are not included in calculations

Concentrations [PSO4 and PNH4]

Conclusions In some cases, maximum absolute relative differences between model runs over the 5-day period are much larger than the expected 1%. Largest errors are for SO 2, NH 3, and aerosol species. O 3, NO X, and CO differences are generally < 1%, as expected.