SUBJECTS AND METHODS. PURPOSE RESULTS BACKGROUND.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)
Advertisements

What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Example: In a heart study the systolic blood pressure was measured for 24 men aged 25 and for 30 men aged 40. Do these data show sufficient evidence to.
A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence Rohini R Rattihalli
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.
Campbell Collaboration Colloquium 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programmes Dr Sarah Miller Centre.
Meta-Analysis: Low-dose dopamine Increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142:
Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review Journal club presentation
Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.
E. McLaughlin, P. D. Chakravarty, D. Whittaker, E. Cowan, K. Xu, E. Byrne, D.M. Bruce, J. A. Ford University of Aberdeen.
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.
Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.
Clinical Information Resources Sandra A. Martin, M.L.I.S. Health Sciences Resource Coordinator Instructor of Library Services John Vaughan Library Room.
The effect of fruit and vegetable interventions on micronutrient status among women of reproductive age: a systematic review Sarah Kehoe 1*, Elena Rayner.
Background Information : Projected prevalence of arthritis is expected to increase from 2.9 million to 6.5 million Canadians, a rise of 124% (Badley.
JOURNAL CLUB U.NIRANJAN ST6 Paediatrics. Article Effectiveness of home based early intervention on children’s BMI at age 2: randomised controlled trial.
Research Methodology For IB Psychology Students. Empirical Investigation The collecting of objective information firsthand, by making careful measurements.
Design & Methods Background The high energy demands of the spasticity and dystonia frequently associated with CP may affect engagement in activities such.
Systematic Reviews.
Searching beyond the RCT - looking for sibling studies on qualitative, economic and process research Faten Hamad and Christine Urquhart.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Introduction to Systematic Reviews Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /9/20151.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
Common Facts 4 DMD is a recessive, genetic disorder Most common X chromosome linked disorder Disorder of the motor neuron, neuromuscular.
Plymouth Health Community NICE Guidance Implementation Group Workshop Two: Debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics. Pressure ulcer risk assessment.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
CHRIS BAUMERT, MD MONTANA FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY 2/25/15 PURLs Journal Club.
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Clinical Information Resources Sandra A. Martin, M.L.I.S. Health Sciences Resource Coordinator Instructor of Library Services John Vaughan Library Room.
Childhood Overweight & Obesity DANA BURNS APRIL 7, 2014.
7.0 Evaluating Reviews of Research. Systematic Review (Meta-Analysis)
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
WHO GUIDANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE-BASED VACCINE RELATED RECOMMENDATIONS August 2011.
Type Your Title Here Author’s First Name Last Name, degree,…. Mentor’s First Name Last Name, degree Dept. Name here, NYU Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn,
Critical Appraisal (CA) I Prepared by Dr. Hoda Abd El Azim.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Evidence-Based Practice
Findings suggest that: Participants were willing to learn and perform tai-chi exercise Participants enjoyed socializing with others and group exercise.
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Indications and Empirical Evidence Falk Leichsenring & Eric Leibing University of Goettingen,
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Efficacy of Colchicine When Added to Traditional Anti- Inflammatory Therapy in the Treatment of Pericarditis Efficacy of Colchicine When Added to Traditional.
Effects of Alcohol on U.S. Adolescent Sleep Patterns: A Systematic Review Nancy Carballo, MSIV Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, PhD 2015 DIDARP 10 th Annual Drug.
Systematic Reviews of Evidence Introduction & Applications AEA 2014 Claire Morgan Senior Research Associate, WestEd.
A1 & A2 The aim: (separate) Critique a Qualitative study on “Telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.” Critique a Quantitative.
Discussion & Conclusion
25 – 26 March 2013 University of Oxford Intubation or CPAP ?
NURS3030H NURSING RESEARCH IN PRACTICE MODULE 7 ‘Systematic Reviews’’
Critical Appraisal of: Systematic Review: Bisphosphanates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Basil Al-Saigh August 2006.
Intervention to Advance Postural Transitions and Problem Solving Ability in Children With Cerebral Palsy Xin Zhang 1, Swati M. Surkar 2, Regina T. Harbourne.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal injury identified through medical screening and training load monitoring in professional football (soccer): a systematic.
By: Jane Barlow, Esther Coren, Sarah Stewart-Brown
Management of Type II Diabetes
Pearls Presentation Use of N-Acetylcysteine For prophylaxis of Radiocontrast Nephrotoxicity.
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY Name Institutional Affiliation
After the OR: Exploring variation in therapy intervention and the relationship between therapy dose and outcomes after SEMLs Amy F Bailes PT PhD.
Module 4 Finding the Evidence: Individual Trials
Tac vs Cyc Non DM Pt Post RTx
قطب قلب اصفهان 12/8/2016.
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic. Ask What is a review?
Principles of Experimental Design
Ovid User Training -Medline-
Getting to grips with evidence that matters!
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
Presentation transcript:

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. PURPOSE RESULTS BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of Neurodevelopmental Treatment on GMFM scores in Children with CP Tanja Argirovska-Hebert, Rhiannon Bailey, Kelly Coughlan and Alissa Engel Purpose Background Methods of Review Summary of Results EBM Question Conclusion The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the strength of the evidence of Neuro-Developmental Treatment (NDT) on improvement of motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Outcome measure is the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Search Strategy Four Databases: CINAHL, Medline, Open Door, Pedro Total number of titles/abstracts identified Selection Process Articles reviewed by 4 investigators, rejected if did not meet criteria 10 full text articles obtained and examined 5 articles met criteria and critically reviewed Data Extraction and Validity Assessment Standardized data extraction form; second reviewer examined for agreement Standardized validity form 4 reviewer split in teams of 2. Articles were divided equally between the groups of 2. Each investigator reviewed each article assigned to their groups. Differences were resolved via consensus. Level of Evidence and Recommendation Grade Scotland National Health Service Criteria used Does NDT sufficiently improve scores on the Gross Motor Function Measure for children with Cerebral Palsy? Grade of Recommendation: Application to Practice Application to Future Research Increased use of RCTs with double blinding and NDT application Increased use of NDT with children 4 years and above Methodological Quality of Studies Participants ages 4 mos to 18 years Cerebral Palsy type Outcomes: GMFM Types of studies: RCTs, case studies, grade, low/mod/high Results by Outcome Measures # with statistically + clinically sign # with statistical (?) # with neither CP affects children in every 1,000 live births in the United States. Bobath approach developed in the 1940s for the treatment of children with CP. This methodology has become the foundation of the NDT approach. Updated systematic review required to elucidate strength of evidence on NDT for children with CP Statistically significant Clinically significant Clinically and Statistically Significant Neither Clinically or Statistically Significant Author and Study Design Sample Size and Study Duration GMFM Outcome Arndt (2008) – Repeated measures randomized block design N=19 (10), 10 sessions over 15 days +Statistical +Clinical Bar-Haim (2006) - RCT N = 24, 20 sessions over 4 wks +Statistical for 10 mo follow up -Statistical for mechanical efficiency index Tsorlakis (2004) - RCT N = 34, 32 sessions over 16 wks +Statistically significant +Clinically significant for 10 children in treatment group and 7 children in control group Knox (2002) – repeated measures design N = 15, 36 sessions over 12 wks +Statistically significant Kerem (2002) – Quasi-experimental N = 659, 5 years, 18 months treatment time +Statistically significant pre & post intervention for late intervention +Statistically & Clinically significant pre & post intervention for early intervention