CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Centered Care and a Business Case for Quality Improvement in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Team Check-up Tool. Slide 2 Learning Objectives To understand the tool we use to: – Describe the anticipated activities of your ICU quality improvement.
Advertisements

Magnet Recognition Program®
Patient Centered Care Model The model which was drawn from NMH’s Henderson Framework for Nursing Practice proposes to provide a healing environment centered.
Title Patient Patient Advisory CouncilAdvisory Council Patient Advisory Council.
1 Leadership for Safety Web Workshop: Reality Rounding Essential Hospitals Engagement Network July 17, 2013.
Sean Berenholtz, MD MHS FCCM September 20, 2011 at 2ET/1 CT/12 MT/11 PT Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention CLABSI Supplemental Call Series.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 The Expert In The Room: Engaging Family in Direct Care The Johns Hopkins.
Learning Objectives Define roles and responsibilities of team members
An Acute Care World without Registered Nurses Kathleen Gallo, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN Senior Vice President & Chief Learning Officer.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Team Leadership Behaviors Michael A. Rosen, PhD Assistant Professor,
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) January 13, 2015 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability 1.
Welcome to the Learning Community 2015 Roll out webinar Hosted by the Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly.
Welcome! Thank you for joining today’s webinar! Please make sure you’ve called in using the audio conference function so that you can ask questions While.
CSTS: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD The.
SUSP: Improving Surgical Care through TRIP and CUSP
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation frequently marks end of life. Less than 17% of successful resuscitations survive to discharge. Current healthcare practice.
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
Lack of Outcome Measure for Family Satisfaction
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
The Cardiac Surgery Translational Study (“CSTS”) The Quality And Safety Research Group Data We Can Count On Lisa H. Lubomski, PhD April 8, 2011 Immersion.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Using the Online HSOPS & RC Apps for CSTS Armstrong Institute for.
CUSP for VAP: EVAP Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Reports Review.
Assessing Patient Safety Culture and Navigating the CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Portal.
Indiana Healthcare Associated Infection Initiative Kickoff.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP Adaptive CUSP Sustainability Sustainment and Spread David.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Strategies for Collecting and Entering Early Mobility ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Implementation Assessment Kisha Ali, MS May 13, 2015 ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Building a Team. © 2009 Learning Objectives To understand the central importance of your ICU quality improvement team To.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Data Webinar 5 Defining the Early Mobility Measures ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
Learning Objectives 2 2 Explain the role of the senior executive in addressing technical and adaptive work Identify characteristics to search for when.
Building Your SUSP Team Part I Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Working Effectively with Diverse Populations Sponsored by the Northeastern Regional Training and Medical Consultation Consortium Best Practices in TB Control.
Building a Team. Slide 2 Immersion Call Overview Week 1: Project overview Week 2: Science of Improving Patient Safety Week 3: Eliminating CLABSI Week.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
Who We Are ~Where We are Going. Slide 2 Workshop Objectives Describe the purpose and vision of the ICU Safe Care Initiative/Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety.
Curricular Innovation Awards 2010 Information and Instructions Regarding Submission of Materials.
CUSP/Stop CAUTI Collaborative Carol Hafley, MHA, BSN, RN Assistant Director Missouri Center for Patient Safety Jefferson City, MO
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
NEXT STEPS Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 1.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2012 Optional SUSP Tools: Briefing Audits, Morning Huddle, and Shadowing.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Content Webinar Data Feedback and Team Presentation on All Sedation Data From Daily Care Processes Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 2:00-3:00.
ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program 1.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Revisiting Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
July 2012 Your hosts: Jody Rothe, MetaStar Stephanie Sobczak, WHA.
Chronic Care in the 21 st Century Building an Infrastructure for Quality and Efficiency March 2, 2009 Philadelphia, PA John Tooker MD,MBA,FACP Chief Executive.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Connecting the Dots Education, Data and Implementation of the CAUTI-LTC Program Cohort 4 July 30, 2015.
Engaging Residents and Families in CAUTI Prevention
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9d: The Patient.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Nurse Empowerment Christine A. Goeschel RN MPA MPS ScD (candidate) Tennessee Center for Patient Safety December 2, 2009.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Quantitative Implementation Assessment 1: Aggregated Results Kisha Ali, MS Mayo Levering, BS September 2, 2014.
Linda Huddleston, RN, MSN, MPHc Director of Infection Prevention Robin Cater, RN, BSN, CCRN Clinical Educator Critical Care/Cardiac Care Stepdown Unit.
System of Shared Care (COPD) Learning Session 3. 2  Share ideas  Billing  Next steps in collaborating with services in your community  Sustainment.
Patient and Family Engagement in the ED Sue Collier, RN, MSN, FABC Clinical Content Development Lead Health Research & Education Trust American Hospital.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Providing Feedback: Structural Assessment 2 Results & Exposure Receipt.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Early Mobility: Data Feedback and Team Presentations ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Sustaining and Spreading Surgical Safety Improvements with SUSP Mike Rosen, PhD Elizabeth Wick, MD ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY.
Conversation Stopper: What’s Preventing Physicians from Talking With Their Patients About End-of-Life and Advance Care Planning Media Webinar – April 14,
Welcome to CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools Coaching Call 5 The session will begin shortly. To access the audio for the session, Dial: ,
“Opening our doors to better communication between patients/families and the WRHA Critical Care Team” Basil Evan, RN, BA, BN, TQM Critical Care Quality.
Using CUSP as a Framework for Improving Patient Safety Steve Levy Director of Operations MHA PSO.
April 1, 2016 IPCP Websites and Resources: What’s at your Fingertips? Barbara F. Brandt, PhD Director, National Center for Interprofessional Practice and.
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI Patient and Family Engagement in the ED
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
Presentation transcript:

CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Centered Care and a Business Case for Quality Improvement in the ICU ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY Johns Hopkins University

2 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Housekeeping Notes Once you are on the webinar, choose the "Call Me" option and enter your phone number to be connected to audio. If you cannot join the webinar online, please call in with the information below: US Toll Free Access code: Your phones are on mute, but we want to hear from you! Please use the chat box to ask questions or write comments during the call. The recording file and presentation slides will be uploaded to the project website in the next two weeks.

3 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Polling Question Who is on the call? IP – infection preventionist RN – registered nurse RT – respiratory therapist PT – physical therapist OT – occupational therapist MD – physician Quality improvement professional Healthcare executive Educator Coordinating entity representative National project team Other 

4 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case CUSP 4 MVP - VAP Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program for Mechanically Ventilated Patients and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

5 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Today’s Discussion Bill Ward, MBA Guest Speaker Rhonda Wyskiel, RN, BSN Guest Speaker

The Expert In The Room: Engaging Family in Direct Care ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY Rhonda Malone Wyskiel

7 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case How many of you have been a patient or had a loved one in the hospital? What kinds of things did you do while you were visiting? –Likely watched T.v, read newspaper, computer

8 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case What Could Have Improved the Experience? What if the nurse had invited you to help? What if you built a relationship where you were a trusted member of the healthcare team?

9 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Why Are You Doing This? Exercise: Imagine your mother, father, loved one in this ICU. What would you want for them? For you as a family member?

10 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient- centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005 “endorsement of a shared decision-making model, early and repeated care conferencing to reduce family stress and improve consistency in communication, honoring culturally appropriate requests for truth-telling and informed refusal, spiritual support, staff education and debriefing to minimize the impact of family interactions on staff health, family presence at both rounds and resuscitation, open flexible visitation, way-finding and family-friendly signage, and family support before, during, and after a death.”

11 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case What Do We Have In Place Currently? What are current patient-centered care practices? What patient-centered care practices or behaviors have you witnessed or participated in? Any practices/behaviors as either active or passive engagement?

12 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Family Involvement Menu

13 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Development of Family Involvement Menu Developed the Family Involvement Menu using results from nurse exercise and family survey Educated nursing staff on the availability and intended use of the menu Displayed the Family Involvement Menu on a reusable white board in each patient room and encouraged its use

14 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Barriers and Early Wins Early adopters versus late adopters (never users) Nursing perspective Patient-provider relationships Documentation Sharing

15 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Next Steps Evaluation process/research National recognition Betty and Gordon Moore Foundation Support –Project Emerge Development of toolkit for implementation

16 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Remember your experience

17 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Making Families Part of Patient- centered Care Example: Family involvement menu Developed by Rhonda Wyskiel, RN Implementation strategies: What might your team put on the menu?

18 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case References Mahoney D. Nurturing a collaborative culture. Partners 2014 Oct/Nov: Wyskiel RM, Weeks, K, Marsteller, JA. Inviting Families to Participate in Care: A Family Involvement Menu. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement (1): PMID: Wyskiel, RM, Chang BH, Alday AA, Thompson D. A., Rosen, M. A., Dietz, A. S., & Marsteller, J. A. (2015). Towards Expanding the Acute Care Team: Learning How to Involve Families in Care Processes. PMID: Mitchell ML, Chaboyer W. Family Centered Care—A way to connect patients families and nurses in critical care: A qualitative study using telephone interviews. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2010;26: PMID: Davidson JE. Family-Centered Care: Meeting the needs of patients’ families and helping families adapt to critical illness. Critical Care Nurse. 2009;29(3): PMID:

Next Steps CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients

20 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Wednesday, October 14, :00 PM – 3:00 PM ET Executive Engagement Join Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD, FCCM for a candid discussion on patient safety: Role of engaged executives and successful efforts to improve patient safety Business case for patient safety Creating an infrastructure to improve organizational quality A practicing anesthesiologist and critical care physician, Dr. Pronovost is the Senior Vice President for Patient Safety and Quality and Director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality at Johns Hopkins Medicine. Invite Your Hospital Executives

21 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Progress List Enrollment documents due dates Letter of CommitmentComplete! Data Use Agreement Due as soon as possible Online Registration Due by August 31 st Choose a track on the online registration form: Daily care processes Early mobility BOTH

22 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case Tune in to the content webinars for evidence supporting each intervention Content webinars are 90 minutes and occur at 2:00 PM ET DATETOPIC Sept 8, 2015Project Kickoff! Mark Your Calendar: Upcoming Sessions

23 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Website Visit: esearch.hopkinsm edicine.org/cusp4 mvp.aspx esearch.hopkinsm edicine.org/cusp4 mvp.aspx Project site will be password protected on Aug 31 st, 2015.

24 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding 5: Patient Perspective & Business Case