FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Modeling augmentations Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Examples of augmentations Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text) Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text) Text with foreword, notes Text with foreword, notes Music and words Music and words Music and choreography Music and choreography Not the best term, because it implies that one content part is more important...

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Delsey (1998) Document part: Document part: Examples: physically separate component of a multipart document, accompanying material, issue of a serial Content part: Content part: “Individual component of the intellectual or artistic content of document or document part (article in a serial, chapter/section/part, illustration for a text, sound aspect of a film...)”

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Our augmentation Content part Content part –segmental (foreword and text) –systemic (words and music) –Dependent (choreography) –Independent (foreword)

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 FRBR and parts Whole/part relationship Work Work Expression Expression Complement, supplement (work-to-work, expression-to-expression of different works, expression-to-work)

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Categories of parts in FRBR Dependent: Dependent: Component parts of a work that are intended to be used in context of the larger work and depend on the context of the larger work for their meaning segmental (prefaces, chapters, sections, parts) segmental (prefaces, chapters, sections, parts) systemic (illustrations) systemic (illustrations) Independent: Independent: They do not depend on the context provided by the the larger work for their meaning

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Examples in FRBR Supplement (referential) Supplement (referential) –index, concordance, teacher’s guide Complement (referential) Complement (referential) –libretto, choreography Whole/part Whole/part –illustration for a text

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Page 70: “There will often be no reason for a dependent part of a work to be separately identified or described in a bibliographic record. In certain instances... it may be considered useful to identify and describe the component in its own right.” Added entry Added entry Contents note Contents note

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Issues Is there always the ‘main work’? Is there always the ‘main work’? Should segmental and systemic parts be modeled differently? Should segmental and systemic parts be modeled differently? Should dependent and independent parts be modeled differently? Should dependent and independent parts be modeled differently? Should the model take into account the context in which the “combination” occured? Should the model take into account the context in which the “combination” occured?

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Most manifestations embody more than one expression (work) For example: text text illustrations illustrations editor’s contribution editor’s contribution layout design layout design cover design cover design......

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Possibilities Choose the ‘main work’ and treat as a new expression of this work Choose the ‘main work’ and treat as a new expression of this work Treat as embodiment of several expressions Treat as embodiment of several expressions

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 wo rk manifestation expression I M TI M T

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 work expression manifestation T T+I+M

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 work expression manifestation T I M

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 work expression manifestation T I M

FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Proposal Embodiment of several expressions Embodiment of several expressions Treat as composite work if necessary Treat as composite work if necessary Record all expressions (works) important for the intended user Record all expressions (works) important for the intended user