March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar Climatology of Tornadoes in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Jason Davis Matthew Parker North Carolina State University.
Advertisements

The 4 Sep 2011 Tornado in Eastern New York: An Example for Updating Tornado Warning Strategies Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, NY NROW XIII 2-3 November.
Echo Tops Fairly accurate at depicting height of storm tops Inaccurate data close to radar because there is no beam angle high enough to see tops. Often.
SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Miller Diagrams A Brief Introduction. Outline Origins Origins Overview Overview Fields to Analyze Fields to Analyze Pattern Types Pattern Types Final.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
“A Study of Causes Behind the Heavy Rainfall Amounts From Tropical Storm Allison” Paul Lewis National Weather Service WFO Houston/Galveston Contact information:
Severe Weather Radar Features. Weak Echo Region (WER) Region of low radar reflectivities on inflow side of storm o Near the surface High reflectivities.
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
A Convective Wind Event over Southeastern Alberta on 15 July 2008 Stephen Knott and Chris Wielki Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre - Edmonton.
Mike Evans / NWS Binghamton, NY. Outline Large-scale pattern / meso-analysis Radar data High resolution model output Summary.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
Dr. Scott M. Rochette Department of the Earth Sciences The College at Brockport.
A Case Study of the August 25, 2007 Severe Weather Event in Eastern New York and Western New England Brian J. Frugis NWS WFO Albany, New York.
Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather Meteorology 515/815 San Francisco State University Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
The Father’s Day 2002 Severe Weather Outbreak across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
Fine-Scale Observations of a Pre-Convective Convergence Line in the Central Great Plains on 19 June 2002 The Problem Questions: 1. How do mesoscale atmospheric.
Characteristics of an Anomalous, Long-Lived Convective Snowstorm Rebecca L. Ebert Department of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences University.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
July 4 th 2012 Severe Weather Case Review and DSS Andrew Loconto NWS Burlington, VT Andrew Loconto NWS Burlington, VT.
Forecasting Convection An overview of how radar can help in the forecast process. Presentation to MSC radar course, March 24, 2010 By James Cummine, Lead.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
National Flood Workshop “Precipitable Water Values Associated with Recent Flood Events in Southeast Texas” Paul Lewis 1.
EXAMINATION OF A BANDED, HEAVY SNOWFALL EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH A TROWAL: 10 November 1998 Marc J. Singer, James T. Moore, and Charles E. Graves Department.
Comparison of the 29−30 June 2012 and 11 July 2011 Derechos: Impact of the Appalachians Matthew S. Wunsch and Ross A. Lazear Department.
George D. Phillips NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, Kansas.
A Preliminary Evaluation of Heavy Snow Conceptual Models for East Vancouver Island (EVI) Rodger WU and Brad Snyder Pacific Storm Prediction Centre, EC,
SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY LABORATORY The Dallas and Fort Worth Storms of May 5, 1995 Storms of May 5, 1995 BY: Brent Crisp, Phil Grigsby, Thomas Jones, Devon.
Using the SPoRT MET Scripts to Assess the WRF EMS for a Southeast Texas Heavy Rainfall Event Patrick Blood and Lance Wood 19 Z.
Using The Short Fuse Composite to Forecast Severe Convection: Part II – “The Next Generation,” Updating the Technique By Jim Johnson & Mike Umscheid NWS.
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA.
The April 18 th 2009 Extreme Rain Event Presentation by Lance Wood Image Courtesy: Galveston Daily News Friendswood, TX Taylor Lake Village, TX My house.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Surface weather maps 500mb weather maps Satellite Images Radar Images.
Mark Conder, Todd Lindley, and Gary Skwira – NOAA/National Weather Service, Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION  A complex storm system brought a.
THE DRAMATIC EFFECT OF TORNADIC SEVERE WEATHER ON A RAPIDLY GROWING URBAN INTERFACE IVORY J. SMALL, TED MACKECHNIE, AND STEVEN VANDERBURG National Weather.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
THUNDERSTORMS 5 Ingredients for a thunderstorm Lift from Lift from Cold/warm front Cold/warm front Gust front Gust front Daytime heating Daytime.
ORIGINAL PRESENTATION – 11 MAR 2010 NBGSA CONFERENCE – SAN DIEGO UPDATED – 5 APR THIS IS A SAMPLE PRESENTATION KINEMATIC STRUCTURE.
A Downburst Study of the June 2012 North American Derecho Kenneth L. Pryor NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Colleen Wilson University of Maryland/Dept. of Atmospheric.
The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the Storm’s life cycle and mesocyclogenesis Roger M. Wakimoto, Chinghwang Liu, Huaquing.
Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D.
Meteo 3: Chapter 14 Spawning severe weather Synoptically-forced storms Read Chapter 14.
Observations of Characteristics During FP 2007 Ellen Ramirez Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne,
Forecasting Technique: Pattern Recognition Associating a “weather pattern” to a “weather event” Significant weather events have patterns –surface features.
Jennifer Belge And Mike Baker ESC 452 4/20/06
A Review of the March 28, 2007 Tornado Event Teresa Keck NWS North Platte, Nebraska Courtesy of Mike Hollingshead.
Precursors to the Initiation of Nocturnal Convection in the Eastern Plains Matthew Dux March 1, 2006 WFO Pleasant Hill, MO.
A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.
1 National Weather Service Response to Partner Issues Eli Jacks, Chief Fire and Public Weather Services Branch 1) Intended Use of “Tornado Emergency” 2)
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
THE MARCH 2006 MID-SOUTH TORNADO OUTBREAK... WHY IT NEVER OCCURRED Dan Valle National Weather Service Memphis, TN.
Upper Level Jet and Large Hail in Summer Jonathan D. Finch.
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
The April 9 th Tornado Outbreak Across the Four-State Region By Nick Fillo & Ismari Ramos WFO Shreveport, LA 4 th Regional Severe Storms/Radar and Hydrology.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Morris L. Weisman Joseph B. Klemp Presented to you by: Elizabeth Polito.
Mesovortices within the 8 May 2009 Bow Echo over the Central United States: Analyses of the Characteristics and Evolution Based on Doppler Radar Observations.
Balanced or Slightly Shear Dominant Regions of the QLCS Line Normal 0-3 km Bulk Shear ≥ 30 Knots Surge or Bow in the Line 1 1.Define the Updraft Downdraft.
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
Severe Weather Forecasting: A Western North Carolina Case Study
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
Presentation transcript:

March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II

Objectives 1.Brief overview of Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence (MARC) 2.Summary of the synoptic and meso- scale pattern for March 14, How the MARC signature analysis can be utilized to pinpoint warnings 4.Questions or comments?

A MARC analysis is a tool that can be utilized with other severe weather analysis techniques The MARC signature can help pinpoint locations of strongest surface winds Useful in understanding the model of a bow echo that generates damaging downbursts MARC Overview

From Gary Schmocker & Ron Przybylinski at WFO St. Louis: –“The MARC velocity signature is a Doppler radar-velocity based precursor towards forecasting the initial onset of damaging straight-line winds in a linear Quasi Linear Convective System (QLCS) or bowing convective system.” –

More from Schmocker & Przybylinski: –MARC signature = Vmax in + Vmax out –Look for MARC signature of 24 m/s (~50 kts) along 3 to 6 radials –Enhanced wind damage possible with a local area of enhanced radial convergence of 35 to 40 m/s (70 to 80 knots) within the larger MARC signature MARC Overview

From Gary Schmocker & Ron Przybylinski - WFO St. Louis and Yeong-Jer Lin – SLU See:

MARC Overview From Gary Schmocker & Ron Przybylinski - WFO St. Louis and Yeong-Jer Lin – SLU See:

Summary of the Synoptic and Meso- Scale Pattern for March 14, bow echoes affected SE Texas 1 st produced damage west of Houston (mobile home example) 2 nd moved over the radar site...Focus of this case study Paul Lewis NWS HGX

Meso/Synoptic Scale Overview Ongoing convection from the previous day: Soundings  a worked over air mass but with a downburst potential

Soundings CRP at 12 UTC 14 March 2001 Low-Level Jet forming?

Soundings LCH at 12 UTC 14 March 2001 One item stuck out after the post-storm analysis: DCAPE! Low-Level Jet? – No!

StationLIKIPWCAPECINDCAPE LR CRP NA FWD NA LCH NA SHV NA UTC 14 March 2001 Thermodynamic Parameters Downdraft CAPE (DCAPE) – An indicator of downburst strength potential DCAPE computed by RAOB using the “density weighted 6 km method” DCAPE reference: Gilmore, M. S., and Wicker, L. J., 1997: The influence of midtropospheric dryness on supercell morphology and evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 943–958.

Ongoing convection from the previous day: Soundings  a worked over air mass but with a downburst potential Active pattern with an approaching upper trough Increasing low-level moisture Increasing instability Meso/Synoptic Scale Overview

Developing Diffluent Flow Aloft 12 UTC 3/ mb 00 UTC 3/ mb Images courtesy of the Storm Prediction Center Map Archives

Approaching Upper Trough 12 UTC 3/ mb 00 UTC 3/ mb Images courtesy of the Storm Prediction Center Map Archives

Mid-Level Dry Air Punch 12 UTC 3/ mb 00 UTC 3/ mb Images courtesy of the Storm Prediction Center Map Archives

Low-Level Moisture Increase 12 UTC 3/ mb 00 UTC 3/ mb Images courtesy of the Storm Prediction Center Map Archives

Low-Level Moisture Increase 12 UTC 3/ mb 00 UTC 3/ mb Images courtesy of the Storm Prediction Center Map Archives

Soundings CRP at 00 UTC 15 March 2001

Soundings LCH at 00 UTC 15 March 2001 Low-Level Jet – Yes!

Event Evolution

2059 UTC 14 March 2001 Developing bow echo Previous bow echo Utilizing MARC to Pinpoint Warnings High situational awareness was present during the event due to damage reports received during the 1 st bow echo MARC analysis was conducted during the post-storm review

Location of MARC signatures can help pinpoint potential wind damage areas County-based warnings were issued during the event –The technique can greatly aid in issuing modern storm-based warnings –Can be utilized to update warnings (SVS) Conclusions from Post-Storm Analysis

2.4˚ 5.9˚ 9.3˚ 6-Panel Method – Imagine “All Tilt” or “4-Panel” Developing MARC

Developed MARC Signature at 2208 UTC 2.4˚ 5.9˚ 9.3˚

Developed MARC Signature at 2223 UTC 2.4˚ 5.9˚ 9.3˚ MARC signature is a bit tough to see – probably better in the AWIPS environment Cross sections were seen to be the best way to view the MARC during the post-storm analysis

Cross Section Location Following slides are cross sections of Reflectivity and Storm Relative Motion The cross sections were taken WSW of the radar site

Cross Sections Note...Radar site to the left – directional sense reversed 2158 UTC 14 March 2001 Developing MARC signature ~ 18,000 ft & 40 nm WSW HGX About 39 knots – 32 minutes before 1 st wind damage

Cross Sections Note...Radar site to the left – directional sense reversed 2203 UTC 14 March 2001 Developed MARC signature ~ 14,000 ft & 40 nm WSW HGX About 52 to 65 knots – 27 minutes before 1 st wind damage

Cross Sections Note...Radar site to the left – directional sense reversed 2208 UTC 14 March 2001 MARC signature 12,000 – 14,000 feet & 30 nm WSW HGX Around 65 Knots – 22 minutes prior to the 1 st wind damage

Cross Sections Note...Radar site to the left – directional sense reversed 2214 UTC 14 March 2001 MARC signature 8,000 – 14,000 feet & 22 nm WSW HGX 78 and 91 knots (16 minutes prior) – SVS to update warning?

Cross Sections Note...Radar site to the left – directional sense reversed 2224 UTC 14 March 2001 MARC signature > 65 knots (4 minutes prior) Last MARC signature before the 1 st damaging wind report

MARC & Damage Locations Note the pattern of severe events & MARC locations MARC times listed: –2208 UTC (1608 LST) –2213 UTC (1613 LST) –2218 UTC (1618 LST) –2223 UTC (1623 LST)

Highlighted Wind Reports Note...LST = UTC – LST – Trees and street signs down in Pearland 1625 LST – 80 mph est. wind gust in Friendswood 1630 LST – Wind damage in Alvin 1636 LST – 62 mph gust at NWS 1640 LST – Tornado report in Sante Fe 1645 LST – 65 mph gust at Texas City PD 1700 LST – Wind damage on Galveston Island

Wind Damage near KHGX Paul Lewis NWS HGX

Questions or Comments? Paul Lewis National Weather Service 1353 FM 646 Rd W Suite 202 Dickinson, TX Sunset view of the backside of 14 March 2001 bow echo at NWS HGX Paul Lewis NWS HGX