1 Consideration of the Eligibility Criteria, Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Reuse Assistance Grants Program FY 2007/08 and 2008/09 November.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

THE LUBRECHT REPORT: A MID-WAY ASSESSMENT OF THE 10 -YEAR WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP CHALLENGE Developed By: The Wilderness Advisory Group April 2010.

Advertisements

High Cost Services Allocation Round Overview of Webinar Agenda (1)Overview of High Cost Services (2)Allowable Costs (3)Application Process-Round.

W HO A RE W E A group consisting of grant managers, financial specialists, government administrators and associated employees of the State of Florida.

Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Agenda Item 5 (Committee Item F) September 8, 2008 Agenda Item 5 (Committee Item F) September 8, 2008 Consideration.

Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.

Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting

Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,

Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.

PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved.

1 Delta Levees Investment Strategy Delta Stewardship Council Central Valley Flood Protection Board Levees Workshop July 10, 2015.

Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.

Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview

Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.

Evaluating the impact of the Quality Research in Dementia (QRD) Consumer Network on the Alzheimer’s Society’s Research Programme Shirley NurockTed Freer.

JOINING THE TEAMCFA CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK. BRIEF OVERVIEW One Year Process 300 Point Scale Divided Evenly Between Three Committees (Academics, Business,

California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Scope Of Work, Contractor, And Augmentation Of Contract Allocation For The At-Store Recycling.

NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.

Principal’s Meeting December 6, Budget Process Operating Budget: Senior Staff will work with Budget Directors to develop listing of system wide.

Agenda Item No. 5 Consideration of Approval of New Sites for the Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program October 2003 Permitting and Enforcement.

[Idea Title] [Name of EERE program/office] FY11 Idea Summit [DATE]

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration Of Applicant Eligibility, Project Eligibility & Evaluation Process for the Tire-Derived Product.

July 18, 2006 Agenda Item 15 Michelle Martin Consideration Of Applicant Eligibility, Project Eligibility & Evaluation Process for the.

Consideration of Approval of New Projects for the Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program Permitting and Enforcement Committee Agenda.

Paratransit Grants Workshop  Funding Resources  Application Timeline  Project Applications 5310 MEHTAP NGOs MoDO T PAC Loca l 5309 Public EW G.

Cornerstone Programs RFP NYC Department of Youth and Community Development Pre-Proposal Conference October 7, 2015.

Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Used Oil Nonprofit Grant Program (7 th cycle – UNP7) FY 2006/2007; and the Used Oil Research, Testing,

2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.

SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.

Downtown Shuttle (D-Link) Interlocal Agreement Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.

Consideration of Applicant Eligibility, Project Eligibility, and Evaluation Process for the Tire-Derived Product Grant Program FY 2005/2006 Michelle Martin.

FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.

RMDZ Program Evaluation Project Agenda Item 12 February 2008 Corky Mau.

Waste Tire Track and Other Recreational Surfacing Grant Program FY 2003/2004 Grant Manager: Elena Yates.

2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Grant Awards for the Rubberized Asphalt Concrete Grant Programs (FY 08/09) Pamela Kelley Committee Item.

BRAND NEW DATABASE Borooondara Community Grants Program.

By: Linda Dickinson Agenda Item 7 May 11, 2004 Tire Product Commercialization and Applied Technologies Grant Awards.

Budget and Program Advisory Committee Interest Meeting November 12, 2015 Hammondsport Central School High School Library.

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Agenda Item 6 (Committee Item G) June 9, 2008 Agenda Item 6 (Committee Item G) June 9, 2008 Consideration.

Contracting Process Overview Agenda Item #12 July 2007.

E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State and Local Assistance Programs 2014 LWCF Outdoor Recreation.

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration Of Reallocation And Of Grant Awards For the Joint Solicitation Of The Used Oil Nonprofit Grant.

Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.

Pre Award Process for Federal Program Officers Competitive Grants Randi Neff Federal Program Officer.

Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.

WATER & SEWER ENTERPRISE FUNDS. Criteria for Rates  Overall Goal – to set rates to recover costs & avoid significant fluctuations Criteria: o Project.

FY2013 OneCPD+ TA NOFA Q & A Webcast U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) Community Planning & Development (CPD) July 15,

Consideration of the Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for a Joint Solicitation of the Used Oil Nonprofit Grant Program (6 th cycle) FY 2004/2005;

March Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust & Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund  There are a number of documents that relate to the NWRT and NWSF:  1.)

Selection of System Operators 1.  WIOA Requirement  Competitive Selection  RFP Team  Selection Process  Key Elements of the RFP  County Considerations.

Item 4B Approve SPDC Matching Funds request from Southlake Carroll Lacrosse Association for amenities at North Park game fields.

Project Selection Choosing Your Investments Jessica Iselt, DPS Wendy Mazzurana, DIR 1 Positioning Your Agency for Success with Project Portfolio Management.

HEALTH RESOURCES & SERVICES ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS LaToya Ferguson.

Planning and Budget Committee May 15, Agenda Current Financial Position Changes in Recurring and One-time Dollars for FY16 FY16 Budget Timeline.

County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.

Dave Jones, Water Quality Program Manager Division of Conservation

Merit Process Budget Planning and Development FAR Meeting

Finance Subcommittee City of Arvada May 27, 2008

Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting

Austin/Travis County HUD YHDP Bidders Conference FY2016 February 23, 2018 Presentation for Interested Parties Ending Community Homelessness Coalition.

Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund

“How We Do Business”.

Proposed Budget Summary

FY2017 HUD CoC Competition NOFA: What to Look For

M E A S U R E ‘G’ P R O G R A M U P D A T E

BOARD of GOVERNORS State University System of Florida

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Proposed Budget Summary

Presentation transcript:

1 Consideration of the Eligibility Criteria, Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Reuse Assistance Grants Program FY 2007/08 and 2008/09 November 7, 2006 Agenda Item 9 Committee Item E

2 Eligibility Criteria: Applicants must be a local public agency Project specifically targets reuse Commitment of matching funds

3 Scoring Criteria: #1) General Review Criteria (90 points) Need (25) Goals and objectives (20) Work plan (10) Evaluation (5) Budget (10) Application completeness (5) Recycled-content purchasing policy (15)

4 Scoring Criteria: Key Priority Wastes/Innovative Projects (7)  Projects targeting key priority wastes  Projects that are ground breaking and/or have a unique approach to reusing.  Projects that transform how daily business is conducted or structured. Vocational/Job skills (3) #2) Preference Criteria (10 points)

5 Preference Criteria: Innovative Programs Kenter Canyon Charter School

6 Evaluation Process: GAU conducts initial completeness review Panel of 3 staff review & evaluate applications Panel discuss scores Final scores are averaged and ranked Board considers agenda item

7 Options For The Board: Direct staff to issue a Notice of Funds Available (NOFA) in accordance with the recommended approaches discussed in this item … Direct staff to revise the eligibility and scoring criteria and evaluation process of applying funds; Direct staff to bring the item back to the Board for subsequent consideration.

8 Questions?

9 Comparison of General Criteria CURRENTPROPOSED General Review Criteria (90 Points) General Review Criteria (75 Points) Need (25) Goals and objectives (20) Work plan (10) Evaluation (5) Budget (10) Application completeness (5) Recycled-content purchasing policy (15) Need (25) Goals and objectives (20) Work plan (6) Evaluation (5) Budget (6) Application completeness (5) Recycled-content purchasing policy (8) Minimum Points 65Minimum Points 55

10 Comparison of Preference Criteria CURRENTPROPOSED Preference Criteria (10 Points) Preference Criteria (25 Points) Key Priority Wastes/Innovative Projects (7)  Projects targeting key priority wastes  Projects that are ground breaking and/or have a unique approach to reuse.  Projects that transform how daily business is conducted or structured. Vocational/Job skills (3) Key Priority Wastes/Innovative Projects (15)  Projects targeting key priority wastes  Projects that are ground breaking and/or have a unique approach to reusing.  Projects that transform how daily business is conducted or structured. Vocational/Job skills (5) New Applicants (5)