WG 1: Measuring what matters December 5 th meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

Ad Hoc Committee Meeting June 17, Meeting Topics State WIB Examples Brookings Update WIA Reauthorization.
The Out of School Time System. CBASS-City of Racine Partnership Purpose: Advise on the development of a comprehensive out-of-school time strategy that.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Regional Technical Forum Funding Discussion February 14, 2014 RTF PAC Presentation.
 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
D EEMED M EASURE R EVIEW P ROJECT Final Report December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker.
AACE Goals Goals as identified by AACE’s Board of Directors for
MARCH 26, 2014 TASKSTREAM TASKFORCE UPDATE. WORKGROUP OUTCOMES Workgroup training summary What the workgroup learned regarding template and workspace.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency at BPA Northwest Clean & Affordable Energy Conference Josh Warner May 31, 2013.
1 Measuring What Matters – Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed? NEET Workgroup #1 Report Co-Chairs: Massoud Jourabch and Mary Smith Executive.
Regional Governance: Lessons from Alberta and Elsewhere Subhead Goes Here Bullet points or copy goes here Bullet points or copy goes here Bullet points.
The Wisconsin Way Inventing Coordination Through Creativity, Flexibility, and Risk-Taking Bobbie Beson-Crone Human Services Transportation Coordination.
[Local] Workforce Investment Board New Member Orientation.
Measuring What Matters November 7 th Agenda Review and update of tasks and timeline Review and update of tasks and timeline Role of RTF Role of.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Maryland Health Benefit Exchange: An Update October 5, 2011 Charles Milligan DHMH Deputy Secretary, Health Care Financing.
Office of Space Planning & Management Developed with mission of: Providing strategic and thoughtful planning Efficient management and utilization of both.
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
{ PIHOA Financial Packet Presented to the Board on March 11, 2014.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
A National Approach to Cancer Control in Canada Remarks by Jeff Lozon, Chair Canadian Partnership Against Cancer.
City Council October 21, 2013 Strategic Planning Retreat Next Steps.
GOMC Organizational Assessment Progress to Date Joan LeBlanc GOMC Council Coordinator.
Looking Toward the Future: An Evaluation of the Regional Technical Forum Presented to: Regional Technical Forum Portland, Oregon April 6, 2010 Robert D.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N PTR System Long-Term Strategy Regional Technical Forum September 15, 2009 Rasa Keanini.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Regional Technical Forum Future Funding Discussion November 22, 2013 RTF PAC Presentation.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Options for RTF Funding Allocation Mike Weedall Theresa Drake Jim West September 30, 2011.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of the Regional Technical Forum in PNW Energy Efficiency Programs May 14, 2008.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Care Network of the Treasure Coast.  The mission of the Care Network of the Treasure Coast (CNTC) is to serve as the advisory body for the Ryan White.
1 Northwest Energy Efficiency Taskforce Workgroup # 1 Measuring What Matters Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed?
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
JANUARY 24, 2013 LAUREN GAGE, BPA NICK O’NEIL, RTF ERIKA KOCIOLEK, ETO RTF PAC: Qualitative Survey Options 1.
Proposal to Establish the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item 14.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Action Plan Summary.
Proposed 2013 RTF Work Plan October 23, compared to 2012.
Market Scan & Sustainability Recommendations For Board Discussion November 19, 2008.
Advocacy: Influencing Facility Development in Public Parks and Recreation Departments Tennis advocacy should occur year round through informal communications.
Guidelines Revisions Defining What RTF Means by “Savings” December 17,
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
1 VGIN’s GIS Strategic Plan Dan Widner VGIN Advisory Board Meeting January 6,
1 Exchange Network Performance Measures Exchange Network Users Conference Mary Greene, Chief Information Exchange Partnership Branch Office of Environmental.
November 1, 2011 Regional Technical Forum. RTF CHARTER RTF BYLAWS -Establishes RTF as advisory committee to the Council -Details RTF’s purpose and scope.
Barriers to Implementing Energy Efficiency at Small and Rural Utilities Jennifer Anziano and Ryan Firestone August 19, 2015.
1 Retail Structure Review Committee 2006 Report & Recommendations December 14, 2006 NAESB Board of Directors Meeting By: Bill Bourbonnais.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: The Prairie Adaptation Research Cooperative Mark Johnston Forest Ecosystems Branch, Environment and Resource Management.
A conceptual framework for the design, implementation, and monitoring of a sub- national government capacity building strategy Options, Strategies and.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
ELIXIR SAB Feedback December 2014.
Introduction and Goals for Today Mark Rehley, Senior Manager Emerging Technology / Product Management Regional Emerging Technology Advisory Committee.
Building a Public Health Informatics Division. OSDH Public Health Informatics Division Identify the needs Develop the proposal Establish division Reality.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Bonneville Power Administration Energy Efficiency Emerging Technologies (E3T) Program Introduction.
BC SUPPORT Unit: Overview and update
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
Airport Planning.
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
Research Program Strategic Plan
Work Group #2 Emerging Solutions and Technologies
Presentation transcript:

WG 1: Measuring what matters December 5 th meeting

Review sub group recommendations Customer data –And building data –Meter level and sub meter –Load shapes Products, services Market Characterization Evaluation results

Summary Survey: Regional role – not full agreement as to the scope Committee Recommendation: $8 - $10 Million / year; 4-5 FTE Some projects to generate data that doesn’t exist, needs update, new needs Advise on data collection needs, protocols Coordinate Data gathering/aggregation Plus Clearinghouse Summarizing Interpreting and creating a user friendly result Making sense of the varied data sources Help facilitate coordinated strategies for region

DATA:Where Currently at Regional Level Primary Customer/Meter DataUtilities Customer and Building CharacteristicsUtilitiesNEEA States/ govt Products and ServicesBPANEEARTF Measure dataRTF.BPAutilities Market CharacterizationNEEAUtilitiesBPA Evaluation Utilities/ ETORTFNEEA *BPA-past ldrship Note: No clear “winner”

Role of the RTF Review Current role What it’s not Recommendation from Staff

Options 1.Propose resources in alignment with current mission. Look for solutions elsewhere 2. a. Propose resources more in alignment with the vision for Products and services (e.g. a portion of the regional data collection and/or coordination) b. Similarly, align other data coordination with other existing organization 3. Propose RTF take on the whole enchilada Pros and Cons?

Considerations for who-ever Governance –Setting priorities Funding Source Responsiveness

Other Workgroups struggling with the “entity” question Work group 2: Pros and Cons of emerging technologies in one of the existing entities, as well as those of a “new entity”

wg 2/ET: NEEA ProsCons Established organization of significant size Electric-centric - Looking at adding Gas Large enough to absorb tasks without significant modification Funding does not allow for R&D/'dry holes; tied to results Good Track Record Would require new advisory Group Wide support and buy-in BPA may not support ET function in NEEA Representation of Already managing and assimilating Abe to share results Focus on technology and business of EE Market Assessments

wg2, ET BPA ProsCons Establish ET Group with Structure IOUs not represented, nor gas utilities Network with national entities, incl. Fed. Labs Federal entity has restrictive contracting Good source of funding May not be able to have non- federal board for oversight competitive procurement Focusses more on T&D emerging tech than EE Becoming more fiscally transparent Currently about a dozen projects underway

Wg 2/ET RTF ProsCons RespectedCurrent role narrow Independentvery limited staff Accountable to Council, and therefore Statesrelies on volunteers Technical focus RTF needs to make decisions at arm's length from actual work

Wg 2/ET New Entity ProsCons Designed specifically for the function Compete with existing entities for limited resources - Staff and funding Overlapping mission with others

Recommendations for additional work to inform decision-makers –Mapping data needs to the current users throughout region, beyond at the regional level. Including further role for states –More comprehensive inventory of what data exists and being developed; where and possibilities for getting access to it now that new EE needs are identified