How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOAA in the Antarctic James H. Butler, Director Global Monitoring Division Earth System Research Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Advertisements

CliC (NEG) Climate and Cryosphere Recent, current and planned activities Aike Beckmann
N84 UNCLASSIFIED Rear Admiral Dave Titley, Ph.D. Oceanographer of the Navy / Director Task Force Climate Change October 15, 2009 This Presentation is Unclassified.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
GISP 2003 / Khon Keaen, Thailand1 Summary and Follow on of GAME- Siberia Activity Takeshi OHTA Nagoya University, JAPAN FORSGC, JAPAN.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
Draft Hydrology science questions for WATER HM Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Water HM.
GIIPSY Meeting Agenda Tuesday December 12 6:00PM-8:30PM AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco PERSPECTIVES (~45-60min) 10 min GIIPSY Overview and Meeting Objectives.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
IPY Satellite Data Legacy Vision: Use the full international constellation of remote sensing satellites to acquire spaceborne ‘snapshots’ of processes.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
Summary of Breakout Session 1.2 GEO Societal Benefit Areas (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations and.
How does it all work? Synthesis of Arctic System Science Discover, clarify, and improve our understanding of linkages, interactions, and feedbacks among.
Martin Sommerkorn WWF International Arctic Programme.
INTERAGENCY ARCTIC RESEARCH POLICY COMMITTEE Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
STUDI Land Surface Change & Arctic Land Warming Department of Geography Jianmin Wang The Ohio State University 04/06/
Breakout 2 Nancy Glenn Laura Duncanson. 1. What are the gaps in our current knowledge of carbon-relevant Earth System processes? What are the linkages.
GEWEX, needs of the water cycle modeling community and SWOT Peter van Oevelen (Eric Wood) Presentation for SWOT Workshop, September 15-17, 2008, The Ohio.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
The US CLIVAR SSC is undertaking an examination of progress made and priority science questions and research needs remaining to be addressed to: – improve.
The U.S. Inter-agency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC) 5-year Research Plan, FY13-FY17 1.Understand sea-ice dynamics, ecosystem processes, ecosystem.
Arctic-Coastal Land Ocean Interactions Antonio Mannino (NASA/GSFC) Peter Hernes (UC, Davis) Carlos Del Castillo (NASA/GSFC) Maria Tzortziou (Univ. of MD)
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
Development of Conceptual Models for the ARCN Coastal Ecosystems Workshop Torre Jorgenson, ABR Diane Sanzone, National Park Service.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Future Research at the Toolik Field Station Perspectives from Breck Bowden Science Support Visioning Workshop Portland, Oregon 2-4 August 2012.
VuRSAL Scoping Study. Background NASA’s 2008 ROSES Solicitation (NNH08ZDA001N-TE) called for proposals to carry out “Scoping studies to identify the scientific.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
NASA Vision for Ocean Biology & Biogeochemistry Advance Planning Team
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Lola Fatoyinbo Agueh – NASA GSFC Collaboration – Interest in Large field campaigns/ ecosystem-scale experiments to validate models. – International collaboration.
Draft Report Breakout Session III-5 Ecosystem Consequences of Climate Change Ecosystem Impacts & Feedbacks Effects on Biodiversity, Invasions, Protected.
Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.
1/7 Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
USFWS’ Arctic Strategy: Managing Fish and Managing Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting October.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Coupling between fire and permafrost Effects of permafrost thaw on surface hydrology between better- drained vs. poorly- drained ecosystems Consequences.
Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Natural Resources of the Yukon River Basin.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
Continental Coastal Interactions: Assessing carbon inventories and fluxes in watersheds, inland waters, and associated coastal margins: data sources and.
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
Science Questions Societal Relevance Observational Requirements Observational Strategies Satellite Missions Scientific Basis for NASA OBB Mission Planning.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
Volker Rachold International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Forum Washington, DC May 2007 Panel Discussion "Water in the Arctic and International.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
NOAA OAR innovateincubateintegrate Capt. Craig N. McLean Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research National Oceanic and.
CFusion and NCEO. NCEO Components Ciais et al IGOS-P Integrated Global Carbon Observing Strategy Global Carbon Data Assimilation System.
NSIDC—Enhancing NASA’s Contribution to Polar Science A response to the NRC Polar Research Board’s review of NASA’s polar geophysical data sets Mark Parsons.
Tuesday, 17 January 2006 Synthesis of Arctic System Science Projects Online Meeting.
Science Enabled by New Hyperspectral Observations Related to Physiology and Functional Types (HyspIRI) Dar Roberts, Frank Muller-Karger Reiterate Break.
3-D rendering of jet stream with temperature on Earth’s surface ESIP Air Domain Overview The Air Domain encompasses a variety of topic areas, but its focus.
Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost –
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
Copernicus services 1 6 services use Earth Observation data to deliver … Sentinels Contributing missions in-situ …added-value products.
NOAA Council on Long-Term Climate Monitoring (CLTCM) Presentation to NOAA Science Advisory Board November 5 – 7, 2002 Chair: Tom Karl Executive Secretary:
Physical and Human Geography
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Group 3 Overarching theme: What are the impacts of a warmer Arctic and when/where are the tipping points? Mid-level themes – (past, present, and future)
The Atmosphere during MOSAiC
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Climate and Terrestrial Biodiversity
Presentation transcript:

How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation. Integrating observations and remote sensing and modeling Observations at additional wavelengths (e.g. UV in ocean systems, hyperspectral RS for mapping functional types) are needed. Issues of scaling. Data at higher spatial resolutions are crucial for understanding features that are typical for the Arctic. E.g. LIDAR for mapping micro-topography High latitude ecosystem modeling needs high-quality RS data, validated for high latitudes How do river inputs (DOC) and sea ice cover change affect arctic marine ecology and carbon flux How does the reduction in sea ice cover change the morphology of the Arctic coast How is the terrestrial Arctic system going to change as permafrost degrades (CH4, carbon flux, …)? RS to address ‘shrubification’ of tundra. Characterizing vegetated wetlands (carbon exchange, CH4) Linkage between permafrost degradation and depth of thaw and wetland extent 1&2. Considering what NASA is currently doing and could do in the near future, what are the most important science questions to address? (“ripe” in bold)

Warmer and drier vs. Warmer and wetter (precipitation, ET, hydrology & ecology) Sub-surface processes, carbon storage. The energy budget. Models that can deal with incoming flux, ET, wave energy, sea-surface and troposhperic winds, albedo … Total energy budget of the panarctic How will changes in the surface energy budget affect atmospheric and ocean circulation. How will changes in sea ice and permafrost change cloud structure and how will this feed back Where and how will released energy be stored? The role of atmospheric iron inputs and transformations on Southern ocean systems Permafrost degradation Stored methane-hydrates How will different functional types respond to temperature changes? (shrubs vs trees vs tundra, as well ocean life) What is the sensitivity of ecosystems to changing disturbance regimes? Marine mammal populations, those that require sea ice in particular. Migratory birds and sea mammals. Need for better estimates of the carbon balance of high-latitude systems.

International exchange of data, Data rescue Improved intra and interagency data-sharing and coordination Integrating RS products into models Improve interactions with other funding agencies, both US and international (e.g. leverage polar cruises) Participation in long-term observation networks Long-term data archiving Monitoring of key circumpolar locations (e.g. with respect to CAVM) 3. Is there a need for additional coordination of existing research activities in this topic area?

4. What are the most promising opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration to answer compelling global change research questions? Is sea ice a cap for CO2 exchange? Links the ice community to physical oceanographers, and biologists Antarctic coastal oceanography (ship-based) strengths and duration of katabatic winds and their effects on the formation of polynyas along the coast The chain of events by which increased winds and precipitation (stratification) over the Southern oceans affect the ability of the ocean to take up atmospheric CO2. Dynamics of snow cover distribution, and depth, as well as snow water equivalent. Fluxes of persistent organic pollutants (including mercury) in the absence of ice or snow.

Global climate implications Native communities Marine subsistence communities, herding communities Damage to infrastructure, pipelines, airports (melting permafrost) Sea ice and shipping Fisheries, both Arctic and Antarctic Conservation Resource extraction vs. sustainability, e.g. forestry 5. Where will there be strong societal benefit?

Purpose: Discussions should allow workshop participants to consider scientific questions and issues that will shape future directions for the NASA Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Focus Area. There is an emphasis on cross-cutting topics that involve more than one of the Focus Area's program elements and/or applications areas. All of the session topics are areas for future research by NASA and/or the U.S. Climate Change Science Program. Many have already been the subject of NASA solicitations. Science, Emerging Issues and Future Directions: High Latitude Ecosystems - land and ocean, Arctic and Antarctic

Individual topic breakouts will identify opportunities and priorities for NASA as well as raise issues or concerns for the Focus Area to address. RE: the scientific topic: why it is important, the role of remote sensing in addressing it, and what has been done and what may be proposed in the near future in this regard. The breakouts will open up to allow for general discussion in order to raise and address questions and issues. One issue that is open for discussion is the ability of upcoming NASA missions to address these scientific topics.

1. Considering what NASA is currently doing and could do in the near future, what are the most important science questions to address (in the topic area of the breakout)? 2. Which are especially "ripe" with a high likelihood of producing major results? 3. Is there a need for additional coordination of existing research activities in this topic area? 4. What are the most promising opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration (especially within the CC&E Focus Area, but also with other disciplines and programs) to answer compelling global change research questions? 5. Where will there be strong societal benefit? Questions