1 An Impulsive Heating Model for the Evolution of Coronal Loops Li Feng & Weiqun Gan Purple Mountain Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaporation driven by thermal conduction Heidi Dritschel REU student working in collaboration with Sean Brannon and Professor Longcope at MSU.
Advertisements

RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Probing Magnetic Reconnection with Active Region Transient Brightenings Martin Donachie Advisors: Adam Kobelski & Roger Scott.
Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
The effects of canopy expansion on chromospheric evaporation driven by thermal conductions fronts Authors: F. Rozpedek, S. R. Brannon, D. W. Longcope Credit:
The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Lecture 15. Guiding Questions 1.What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
SH13A-2240 Automatic Detection of EUV Coronal Loops from SDO-AIA Data Alissa N. Oppenheimer¹ ( ), A. Winebarger², S. Farid³,
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
MSU Solar Physics REU Jennifer O’Hara Heating of Flare Loops With Observationally Constrained Heating Functions Advisors Jiong Qiu, Wenjuan Liu.
TOWARDS A REALISTIC, DATA-DRIVEN THERMODYNAMIC MHD MODEL OF THE GLOBAL SOLAR CORONA Cooper Downs, Ilia I. Roussev, Bart van der Holst, Noe Lugaz, Igor.
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL)
Quiescent Loop Heating Profiles with AIA Henry (Trae) Winter, Kerry Neal, Jenna Rettenmayer, & Piet Martens Montana State University--Bozeman.
Solar Turbulence Friedrich Busse Dali Georgobiani Nagi Mansour Mark Miesch Aake Nordlund Mike Rogers Robert Stein Alan Wray.
Solar-B Science MeetingKyoto, Nov. 9, 2005 Quantifying Reconnection* Dana Longcope, Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain, Jason Scott Montana State University.
Aug 16, 2004 Coronal loops formed by separator reconnection: The birth & life of AR9574 Dana Longcope Montana State University.
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI and SXI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL) Fall 2003 AGU Meeting.
Winds of cool supergiant stars driven by Alfvén waves
HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.
Feb. 2006HMI/AIA Science Team Mtg.1 Heating the Corona and Driving the Solar Wind A. A. van Ballegooijen Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge,
Thermal Diagnostics of Elementary and Composite Coronal Loops with AIA Markus J. Aschwanden & Richard W. Nightingale (LMSAL) AIA/HMI Science Teams Meeting,
Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
ABSTRACT This work concerns with the analysis and modelling of possible magnetohydrodynamic response of plasma of the solar low atmosphere (upper chromosphere,
Solar eclipse, , Wendy Carlos and John Kern Structure of solar coronal loops: from miniature to large-scale Hardi Peter Max Planck Institute for.
Thermal, Nonthermal, and Total Flare Energies Brian R. Dennis RHESSI Workshop Locarno, Switzerland 8 – 11 June, 2005.
Multiwavelength observations of a partially occulted solar flare Laura Bone, John C.Brown, Lyndsay Fletcher.
The effects of canopy expansion on chromospheric evaporation driven by thermal conduction fronts Authors: F. Rozpedek, S. R. Brannon, D. W. Longcope Credit:
Magnetic Reconnection in Flares Yokoyama, T. (NAOJ) Reconnection mini-workshop Kwasan obs. Main Title 1.Introduction : Reconnection Model of.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
Evidence for chromospheric heating in the late phase of solar flares David Alexander Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Lab. Collaborators: Anja CzaykowskaMPI.
Where is Coronal Plasma Heated? James A. Klimchuk NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Stephen J. Bradshaw Rice University, USA Spiros Patsourakos University.
Using potential field extrapolations of active region magnetic fields, observed by SOHO/MDI, as a representation of a real active region, we apply hydrostatic.
Coronal Dynamics - Can we detect MHD shocks and waves by Solar B ? K. Shibata Kwasan Observatory Kyoto University 2003 Feb. 3-5 Solar B ISAS.
Modelling the radiative signature of turbulent heating in coronal loops. S. Parenti 1, E. Buchlin 2, S. Galtier 1 and J-C. Vial 1, P. J. Cargill 3 1. IAS,
Measurement of the Reconnection Rate in Solar Flares H. Isobe 2004/12/6 Taiyo-Zasshikai.
A Self-consistent Model of Alfvén Wave Phase Mixing G.KIDDIE, I. DE MOORTEL, P.CARGILL & A.HOOD.
Flows in hot coronal loops: mass cycle and coupling from chromosphere to corona Pia Zacharias, Sven Bingert, Hardi Peter Solar Cycle 24 Napa, California.
Mass loss and Alfvén waves in cool supergiant stars Aline A. Vidotto & Vera Jatenco-Pereira Universidade de São Paulo Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica.
“ HINODE workshop” Zhanle Du & Huaning Wang 杜占乐 王华宁 中科院国家天文台 (NAOC) December 9, 2007 Problem of coronal temperature diagnostics 2007 年 12 月 8-10 日北京九华山庄.
Emission measure distribution in loops impulsively heated at the footpoints Paola Testa, Giovanni Peres, Fabio Reale Universita’ di Palermo Solar Coronal.
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
Determining the Heating Rate in Reconnection Formed Flare Loops Wenjuan Liu 1, Jiong Qiu 1, Dana W. Longcope 1, Amir Caspi 2, Courtney Peck 2, Jennifer.
Prominence Dynamics: the Key to Prominence Structure Judy Karpen Naval Research Laboratory SVST.
Today’s Papers 1. Flare-Related Magnetic Anomaly with a Sign Reversal Jiong Qiu and Dale E. Gary, 2003, ApJ, 599, Impulsive and Gradual Nonthermal.
Analysis of the Temperature and Emission Measure of Solar Coronal Arcades and Test of Flare/Arcade Loop Length ( Yamamoto, Shiota, Sakajiri, Akiyama, Isobe,
Cycle 24 Meeting, Napa December 2008 Ryan Milligan NASA/GSFC Microflare Heating From RHESSI and Hinode Observations Ryan Milligan NASA-GSFC.
Centre for Astrophysics Space- and time-dependent heating of solar coronal loops S. W. Higgins & R. W. Walsh
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
Flares and Eruptive Events Observed with the XRT on Hinode Kathy Reeves Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
2 nd Solaire Network Meeting Catania, January 2009 Investigating the characteristics of coronal loop heating by 1D hydrodynamic simulations R.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
On the frequency distribution of heating events in Coronal Loops, simulating observations with Hinode/XRT Patrick Antolin 1, Kazunari Shibata 1, Takahiro.
Nicholeen Viall & James Klimchuk NASA GSFC
Nanoflare Properties in the Solar Corona
Zurab Vashalomidze (1) In collaboration with
P.Zacharias1, S. Bingert2 & H. Peter2 1ISSI, Bern, Switzerland
Emission measure distribution from plasma modeling
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Quantifying Reconnection*
Chromospheric and Transition Region Dynamics
Understanding solar flares from optical observations Heinzel, P
Generation of Alfven Waves by Magnetic Reconnection
Presentation transcript:

1 An Impulsive Heating Model for the Evolution of Coronal Loops Li Feng & Weiqun Gan Purple Mountain Observatory

2 Background Parker : nanoflare heating of the solar corona Winebarger et al. (2003) : evidences of unsteady heating Some relative works: Reale et al.(1994); Betta et al. (1999); Mendoza-Briceño et al. (2002, 2004, 2005)… flux braiding

3 ◆ The hydrodynamic model ◆ Dynamic evolution of the coronal loop Effects of different heating positions Effects of different pulse numbers Effects of different elapsed time ◆ Conclusions and discussion Outline

4 The Hydrodynamic Model Basic Equations: Heating Function:

5 Initial and Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions: T, n e, v=0 Symmetrical Loop Supposed L=110Mm Boundary Conditions: Lower Boundary: Chromosphere(T=10 4 K) Upper Boundary: Temperature gradient is zero

6 Some Notes: Energy Deposition: Background heating: E 0 =1.5*10 -6 ergs cm -3 s -1 , Maximum amplitude of the heating: E F =1.0 ergs cm -3 s -1 , Spatial width of the heating: σ s = 0.6Mm. Keep the total heating input (about ergs) constant in all simulations. Physical parameters (T, n, v) used to be analyzed : NRL SOLFTM(Solar Flux Tube Model) to solve the three equations. All the physical parameters are averaged over the coronal part of the loop.

7 Dynamic Evolution 1.Effects of Different Heating Positions Description of the Evolution ( 1 ) Initial heating phase ( 2 ) conductive phase ( 3 ) radiative cooling phase ( 4 ) return to a new equilibrium The conclusion of Winebarger(2003) : An impulsive heating with different parameters (S 0, E F, 2 δ ) ; The differences cannot be shown in the radiative cooling phase; TRACE observations of cooling loops do not provide adequate information to discriminate different heating scenarios. Our similar simulation gets the similar result: heating centered at s 0 =25Mm and s 0 =50Mm in the corona. Single pulse (2δ=500s)

8 Left: s 0 =25Mm(corona), s 0 =10Mm (chromosphere top); TRACE observations are not entirely ineffective. Right: s 0 =10Mm : catastrophic cooling : T: in 2000s,1  0.1MK n e : a condensation forms and expands downwards v : downflows maximum:110kms -1 Spadaro et al. : maximum: 85kms -1. stronger transient heating, larger downflows. Effects of Different Heating Positions

9 Dynamic Evolution 2.Effects of Different Pulse Numbers s 0 =25Mm, one, five, and ten pulses: Maximum temperatures are almost the same; Number of temperature peaks varies with the pulse number.

10 Left : s o =25Mm no difference during the radiative cooling phase. Right : s o =10Mm The effects are shown almost the whole evolution. Main roles: Weaken and delay the catastrophic cooling. Effects of Different Pulse Numbers

11 Dynamic Evolution 3. Effects of Different Elapsed Time Left : s 0 =25Mm , Delay the evolution; Decrease the maximum temperature Right : s 0 =10Mm , Catastrophic cooling disappears; A sudden temperature decrease in the initial few hundred seconds.

12 According to Mendoza-Briceño et al.(2003, 2005): Increasing the elapsed time can increase the possibility of catastrophic cooling during the initial evolution. Lowest temperature: 1.65*10 5 K; In this example, it doesn’t happen due to the background heating Elapsed Time and Catastrophic Cooling Five pulses, s 0 =10Mm : 0s~200s, two pulses ; 1200s~1500s, three pulses. Elapsed time : 1000s

13 Conclusions and Discussion ► Contrary to the conclusion of Winebarger et al. TRACE can discriminate different heating senarios. ► When the heating is located in the corona, increasing the elapsed time will delay the evolution and decrease the maximum temperature. ► Increasing the pulse number and then the elapsed time, the catastrophic cooling weakens, delays and even disappears. So the more concentratively the heating deposits, the more possibly the catastrophic cooling happens. ► The response of the loop becomes more sensitive when the energy release is located below the transition region than in the corona. It is mainly due to the different conductive efficiency in the two regions.

14 SXT and TRACE Loops As an extended discussion: spatially random heating 33Mm~110Mm0.8Mm~12Mm TRACE loops do not always cool from SXT loops.

15 The End