Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA Remaining duties ITPA CC meeting & IEA/ITPA JE planning meeting –12 – 14 (15) December 2011, Cadarache –Ide, Sips and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 3rd meeting Working Group 5. 2 Agenda WG5 2nd Meeting Agenda: Discuss existing proposals Indicate missing proposals Allocate persons to develop proposals.
Advertisements

Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
1/15 D. C. McDonald et al, Particle and Energy Transport in Dedicated  *,  and  * Scans in JET ELMy H-modes, IAEA - 20th Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura,
R Sartori - page 1 20 th IAEA Conference – Vilamoura Scaling Studies of ELMy H-modes global and pedestal confinement at high triangularity in JET R Sartori.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Steady State High  N Discharges and Real-Time Control of Current Profile in JT-60U T. Suzuki 1), A. Isayama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), S. Ide 1), T. Fujita 1),
IOS-5.2 Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime Spokes person: M. Goniche M.-L. Mayoral (JET), R. Pinsker (DIII-D), L. Colas (TS), V. Bobkov.
Summary Session October 10, 2008 The Joint Meeting of 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and 14th International Workshop on Spherical Torus.
Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
1 Garching, 20/3 2009EFDA Fuelling Meeting A Ekedahl 1, M Goniche 1, G Granucci 2, J Mailloux 3, V Pericoli 4, V Petrzilka 5, K Rantamäki 6, JET-EFDA contributors,
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
1 ITPA-IOS meeting, October 2011J. Stober ITPA-IOS Meeting Kyoto 10/2011 Report from ASDEX Upgrade Reported by Jörg Stober for the AUG Team.
Report on W66 at W69 M. L. Watkins 1 (4) MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 11 December 2008 Report on Sixth Joint Workshop (W66) “Implementation of the ITPA Coordinated.
ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
H-mode characteristics close to L-H threshold power ITPA T&C and Pedestal meeting, October 09, Princeton Yves Martin 1, M.Greenwald, A.Hubbard, J.Hughes,
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
Status and Plans Transport Model Validation in ITER-similar Current-Ramp Plasmas D. R. Mikkelsen, PPPL ITPA Transport & Confinement Workshop San Diego.
9th ITPA Confinement Database and Modelling Topical Physics Group meeting in St. Petersburg 1/5 NF paper on H-mode confinement DB3 Darren McDonald.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Status of Progress on Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 12/5/07 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM Control: 1.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Association Euratom - Confédération Suisse Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH.
M.E. Fenstermacher - 2nd Inter-Mtg Conf Call, PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 8/31/09 18:05 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM Control: 2 nd Inter-Meeting.
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
1ITPA meeting IOS, Oct 2011Arne Kallenbach IOS-1.2 Study seeding effects on ITER demo discharges (Oct 2011) - closely related to IOS-1.1, development of.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
E. Doyle (Chair), V. Mukhovatov (Co-chair) for the ITPA Transport Physics Group 2nd IEA Large Tokamak Workshop on Implementation of the ITPA Coordinated.
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
ITPA Topical Group on MHD, Control, and Disruptions Summary of 5th meeting, Nov. 8-10, 2004 Presented by Ted Strait Workshop on MHD Mode Control Princeton,
DIVERTOR INVESTIGATIONS ON NSTX-U LEADING TO FNSF Mike Kotschenreuther Brent Covele Swadesh Mahajan Prashant Valanju Jonathan Roeltgen Zhong-Ping Chen.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ROTATION AND MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SESSIONS 10th ITPA Transport Physics and CDBM TG Meetings Princeton.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
SUMMARY OF 4th IPTA TRANSPORT AND ITB PHYSICS TG MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, April 8-11, 2003 Presented by E.J. Doyle for the TG Note: this summary.
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
Confinement & Transport Plan Classical theory of confinement and transport. o Diffusion equation Particle diffusion in a magnetic field.
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas.
SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
Status of H-mode confinement Database by K. Thomsen, Naka, September 2007  New version DB4v5 (12395 obs) - New data from AUG, DIII-D, JT-60U, NSTX - Hybrid.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Darren McDonald, TFS1 meeting, 20th April /20 Proposed JET 2006 confinement experiments D C McDonald Structure of talk: Hybrid studies ELMy H-mode,
Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Association Euratom - Confédération Suisse Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH.
Tuomas Tala 1/16 ITPA TC Meeting, Princeton, USA 5 October – 7 October 2009 T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX) and S. Kaye, L.F. Delgado-
Evaluation of a Field Aligned ICRF Antenna in Alcator C-Mod 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference San Diego, USA October S.J. Wukitch, D. Brunner,
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Heat flux width scaling in ITER limiter configurations
TC-2 – Power ratio April 2011, San Diego
Methane Screening on C-MOD EDA ELM-mitigated Plasmas Jim Strachan, PPPL Nov. 30, 2004 Goal: compare impurity behavior in ELM mitigated plasmas – ergodic.
ITER ICRF Scenario Demonstration in Hydrogen with 3He Minority Heating
SOL plasma in ITER is dense and hot  thick to gas puff as in C-mod
IOS-6.3: Control of experimentally simulated burning state
[EX / P7-8] 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – J. Jang, et. al
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA Remaining duties ITPA CC meeting & IEA/ITPA JE planning meeting –12 – 14 (15) December 2011, Cadarache –Ide, Sips and Luce –Present annual summary of the group, summary of JE2011 and proposal of JE2012 in one presentation (1H including discussion). => Ide Joint Experiment (JE) –I have to end summary and proposal (Word doc) by 14 th Nov. to CC. –Spokes persons should send them before 7 th Nov. to ME (cc Sips, Luce). –I need ppt files from each JE for the JE planning meeting. –Spokes persons should send them before 14 th Nov. to ME (cc Sips, Luce). 2-3 pages and should contain figure(s) to appeal results 2011 effectively.

S. Ide, 2 IOS-1.2: Study seeding effects on ITER demonstration discharges Contributors: A. Kallenbach (AUG), T. Petrie (DIII-D), J. Rapp/G. Maddison (JET), M.Reinke/S.Wolfe (C-Mod) Objective: development of ITER demonstration discharges with integrated impurity seeding. Due to technical constraints and difficulties, seeded scenarios and ITER demonstration discharges (IOS-1.1) are developed in parallel, to be combined in the future. The combination of low q95, and high  is in particular challenging for high-Z devices. Sufficient central heating and ELM control are essential.. Result 2010: First exps. in 2009/10 collected on seeding in AUG, JET {see fig. next page}, C-mod, and seeding + RMP in DIII-D partly reported on PSI conf. (Review talk by A. Kallenbach, J. Nucl.Mat. in press) Plan 2011: AUG: Seeding combined with RMP ELM control, increase triangularity C-Mod: N 2, Neon / Argon seeding (EDA and ELMy  ITER shape). DIIID: Radiative divertor studies in with RMP for ELM control. JET: Operation with ILW+seeding start in 2011, IOS-1.2 scheduled in 2012 Status: continue

S. Ide, 3 NeN G. Maddison, PSI 2010, O-23 JET: Gas and seeding scans to optimize H98 and power load Confinement degradation with increased seeding level in JET in line with C-Mod but in contrast to AUG (even improvement of H98 with N 2 level)  Further studies required for better understanding

S. Ide, 4 IOS-2.2: Ramp-down from q 95 =3 Contributors: G. Sips (JET), S. Wolfe (C-Mod), G. Jackson (DIII-D), J. Schweinzer (AUG) Objective: Demonstrate ramp-down from an ITER base-line plasma (q 95 =3), from both H- and L-mode. Demonstration how to stay within (k, l i, q 95 ) stability envelope of ITER. Develop shape control (kappa reduction), document merits/demerits of staying in H mode or L mode (  heating requirements). Status: close Result 2010: DIII-D, AUG and JET, have completed the experiments, while in C-Mod the last set is planned for late Results show that a strong kappa reduction controls l i (3) excursion and/or maintaining H-mode keeps l i (3) in ITER operational range. AUG and JET results were presented at the IAEA This JE is completed, summary publication may be prepared in 2011.

S. Ide, 5 - ICRH Coupling improvement with gas injection is found on JET, DIIID & AUG - Strong gas injection leads to large increase of the loading at the expense of degradation of the confinement - Specific effect on near-antenna gas puff clearly seen on AUG and on early JET experiments, but weaker effect with new JET plasma configuration Connected to Ant.4 Connected to Ant.1 Gas  AUG IOS 5.2: Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime Contributors: M.L.Mayoral (JET), V.Bobkov (AUG), S. Wukitch (C- Mod), R. Pinsker (DIII-D), J.Hosea (NSTX), M. Goniche & L.Colas (TS), J.G.Kwak (KSTAR), S. Moriyama (JT-60U) Objective: Improve ICRH coupling by gas injection near antenna Result 2010: Results on JET, DIIID, AUG & TS have been summarized in IAEA paper (M.L.Mayoral & al.) Status: continue

S. Ide, 6 IOS 5.2: Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime - Plans JET: Not 2011 priority. AUG: Investigate role of near fields Tore Supra: Conduct experiment at higher density and use new poloidally distributed connected valve and new edge reflectometer DIII-D: New poloidally distributed puffing location adjacent to the 285/300 FW antenna Improve reliability of reflectometer near 285/300 FW antenna Analysis using TOPICA continues (data of campaign) C-Mod: Measurement with new SOL reflectometer of local density profile as a function of RF power, target density, local gas puffing..... NSTX: Investigation of the upper limit of edge density for ITER KSTAR: Experiment with new gas puff near ICRF antenna