Carbon Sequestration and Fire Risk in a East-Side Pine Forest Martin Ritchie Research Forester Pacific Southwest Research Station.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dry-conifer Ecology and Silviculture in Western Oregon John D. Bailey Oregon State University.
Advertisements

Using FFE-FVS to estimate potential fire behavior in early settlement Black Hills ponderosa pine Mike Battaglia, Colorado State University Skip Smith,
Thinning intensity studies and growth modeling of Montana mixed conifer forests at the University of Montana’s Lubrecht Experimental Forest Thomas Perry.
Jeremy Fried, Jamie Barbour, Roger Fight, Glenn Christensen, Guy Pinjuv & others at USFS PNW, Rocky Mountain, and Southern Research Stations Development.
Overstory and understory vegetation management to meet fire resilience and wildlife habitat objectives Eric Knapp, Becky Estes, and Carl Skinner U.S. Forest.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
NASP IMDS Stand Density THE BIG THREE: Absolute stand density Quadratic Mean Diameter Basal Area.
Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed.
Whittell Forest. Jeffrey Pine Forest The Jeffrey pine forest is the dominant habitat in the Whittell Forest, covering nearly 1,800 acres and about two-thirds.
Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance Douglas-fir biomass and nutrient removal under varying harvest intensities designed for co-production of timber.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Brief History of Site Quality Estimation from a Forest Mensuration Perspective Eric C. Turnblom ESRM Forest Soils and Site Productivity - Autumn.
Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm.
Estimating Response of Douglas-fir to Urea in Western Oregon & Washington By: Eric Sucre M.S. Thesis Defense.
Pinyon Juniper Community. Microbiotic Crust Ecological roles for biological crusts 1. Fix carbon and nitrogen 2. Trap dust 3. Increase water retention.
Sustainable Forest Management on the Yakama Reservation.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
Our Forest Resources. Forest Facts  Canada’s most abundant renewable resource  Canada owns 10% of the global forest  Continuous band of forest stretches.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
The Value of FIA Remeasurement Data Paul Van Deusen NCASI Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011.
FVS Carbon Reporting Using the Forest Vegetation Simulator USDA Forest Service Forest Management Service Center Forest Vegetation Simulator staff.
Jenna Forsyth 12/07/09 Chester Morse Lake, Cedar River Watershed, WA Photo Courtesy of
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Effect of Fire on Soil ability to Sustain Plant Life Becca Gentile and Erica Garroutte.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Tree distribution patterns in the southwest Jemez Mountains Kamal Humagain 1, Robert Cox 1, and James Cain 2 1 Texas Tech University 2 New Mexico State.
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
The Evolution of Forest Inventory on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation Allan D. Derickson Forest Planning & Inventory Supervisor Confederated Tribes.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
Mortality over Time Population Density Declines through Mortality.
Forest Ecological Relationships: Teakettle and Plumas Lassen Administrative Study Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Davis, CA
m | °C | Oak (Quercus kelloggii) woodlands with pine, annual grasses and native grasses and forbs 513 mm precipitation per year, predominantly.
Local Climate & Management: Using stand-level modeling to predict climate change effects on forests WADE TINKHAM Wildfire in Idaho, 2007 © National Geographic.
Vegetation Module Seth Bigelow, Michael Papaik, Malcolm North USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
Understanding drivers and patterns of forest management in the region * A Snapshot of the Chequamegon-Nicolet.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
Understanding Site-Specific Factors Affecting the Nutrient Demands and Response to Fertilizer by Douglas-fir Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2010.
Fairy Lake Rx Burn Monitoring Stated objectives:  Mimic light to moderate ground fire  To minimize the mortality of mature whitebark pine (
Experience Michigan! Kirtland's warbler Photo by Ron Austing Taken in Huron-Manistee National Forest.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Intermediate Stand Management – The Crop Tree Approach.
Potential Biomass Volumes From Forest Treatments in the West Bryce Stokes National Program Leader Washington, DC ______ USDA Forest Service R&D.
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
CFI NPT Forestry & Fire Management Division.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
Cruise Summaries.
How is science like sausage?
Soil ASSESSMENT Values at Risk Soil Productivity
Cold Springs Fire Project
OGWC – Forest C Bev Law Prof. Global Change Biology & Terrestrial Systems Science Oregon State University Oct 6, 2016.
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Modeling hemlock woolly adelgid risk and impacts of presalvage harvesting on carbon stocks in northern hemlock forests Modeling the impacts of hemlock.
Funding: National Park Service, U.S.G.S.
Fuels reduction effectiveness: Case studies review of the evidence
Stand and Tree Characteristics at Age 30
Beaver Ridge Restoration
Big Creek Plantation Establishment and Management
Forestry Clipboard Tables
Presentation transcript:

Carbon Sequestration and Fire Risk in a East-Side Pine Forest Martin Ritchie Research Forester Pacific Southwest Research Station

Consider the relationship between goals of managing for carbon sequestration and minimizing risk of loss due to catastrophic fire

Location Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest 10,400 ac Aggressive fuels management program – Demonstration sites (437 acres) – Experimental plots (3,280 acres) – Operational fuels management (1,773 acres) – Untreated Control plots (513 acres)

Location Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest Aggressive fuel management program – Demonstration sites (437 acres) – Experimental plots (3,280 acres) – Operational fuels management (1,773 acres) – Untreated Control plots (513 acres) Elevation range 5,400-6,900 feet, gentle slopes, <15%. Precipitation ~20 inches annually about 2/3 rd falls as snow Nov- March Site index ~75-85 feet at base age 100. Predominantly Ponderosa pine with some Jeffrey, White fir and cedar.

BMERP and RNA High Diversity – Burned – Unburned Low Diversity – Burned – Unburned Untreated – Research natural area, unburned & no harvest.

Stand Density High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 135 tpa, 100 ft 2 acre tpa, 38 ft 2 acre -1 Unburned 121 tpa, 103 ft 2 acre tpa, 39 ft 2 acre tpa, 140 ft 2 acre -1 ThinBurnM M M Study Timeline

Untreated: RNAD

What about fire and fuels?? 3 metrics: Surface fuels, Standing live biomass and torching.

Surface Fuels 1000 hr Tons acre -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 116 Unburned Untreated highest, followed by High Div. then Low Div.; Prescribed fire reduced surface fuels by about 50% ThinBurnM M M Study Timeline

Surface Fuels 1000 hr Tons acre -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 116 Unburned Standing Live Tons acre -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 5219 Unburned Similar trend for effect of structure on standing live biomass, but relatively little effect of prescribed fire.

Surface Fuels 1000 hr Tons acre -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 116 Unburned Standing Live Tons acre -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 5219 Unburned Probability of Torching (severe and moderate) High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned – 0.02 Unburned – High Med. Low

What about productivity (carbon)?? 2 metrics First: BF volume, Scribner. Second: Above ground tree carbon, foliage excluded.

Net Growth BF* acre -1 year -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned -15 (s.e. = 48)55 (s.e. = 5) Unburned 90 (s.e. = 27)78 (s.e. = 9)-71 (s.e. = 129) *Scribner 32 foot logs, 6 inch top BurnM M M

Above-ground Carbon Sequestration (Trees) Zhang, Ritchie, Maguire & Oliver 2013 Crawford Creek 5 year PAI GSL 98 – 1.4 Mg C ha -1 year -1 Biomass → 0.7 in C Lookout Mountain 5 year PAI GSL 100 – 1.6 Mg C ha -1 year -1 Biomass → 0.8 in C At Blacks Mountain : 20 treated stands: Mean=0.50 Mg C ha -1 year -1 ; Range to 1.1

Net Growth BF* acre -1 year -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned -15 (s.e. = 48)55 (s.e. = 5) Unburned 90 (s.e. = 27)78 (s.e. = 9)-71 (s.e. = 129) Tree Carbon (Mg C ha -1 year -1 ) High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 0.04 (s.e. = 0.35)0.44 (s.e. = 0.19) Unburned 0.76 (s.e. = 0.23)0.79 (s.e. = 0.21)-0.29 (s.e.=1.22) *Scribner 32 foot logs, 6 inch top

Net Growth BF* acre -1 year -1 High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned -15 (s.e. = 48)55 (s.e. = 5) Unburned 90 (s.e. = 27)78 (s.e. = 9)-71 (s.e. = 129) Tree Carbon (Mg C ha -1 year -1 ) High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 0.04 (s.e. = 0.35)0.44 (s.e. = 0.19) Unburned 0.76 (s.e. = 0.23)0.79 (s.e. = 0.21)-0.29 (s.e.=1.22) Carbon P-values High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned Unburned

So What? Across a range of conditions related to fire behavior, productivity varied substantially. In these east side pine stands our treated units averaged about 0.5 Mg ha -1 year -1 ; twenty were positive and two were negative (both were burned high diversity plots). Untreated stand mortality was high and net C seq. was not different from zero, maybe negative even. Prescribed fire reduced net Carbon sequestration in trees (short term ~10 years) Both thinning treatments (without Rxfire) produced net C sequestration ~0.75. High structural diversity stands were also highly variable; i.e. productivity is highly unstable due to mortality, but among unburned treatments, no difference in C; negligible difference in Bfvol.

Questions? High Structural DiversityLow Structural DiversityRNA Burned 135 tpa, 100 ft 2 acre tpa, 38 ft 2 acre -1 Unburned 121 tpa, 103 ft 2 acre tpa, 39 ft 2 acre tpa, 140 ft 2 acre -1