Science Data in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Jeffrey J.E. Hayes Program Executive for MO & DA, Heliophysics Division August 17, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Archive Requirements Working Group A NOAA clearinghouse for requirement planning in support of the science objectives related to archive, access, and reprocessing.
Advertisements

Pulling it all together… with thanks to Sheila Anderson.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
Research developments at the Census Bureau Roderick J. Little Associate Director for Research & Methodology and Chief Scientist Bureau of the Census.
Science Archives Workshop - April 25, Page 1 Archive Policies and Implementation: A Personal View from a NASA Heliophysics Data Policy Perspective.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
PCOS Program Office Mission Studies and Technology Development Jackie Townsend Advanced Concepts and Technology Office PCOS and COR Program Offices
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
PV2013 Summary Results Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-37 Meeting Cocoa Beach (Florida-US) - April 14-18, 2014.
March 2010 PDS Imaging Node 1 NASA PDS Imaging Node: NASA PDS Imaging Node: Digital Data Archives and Distribution Archiving and distributing data and.
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.
EGY Meeting March Page 1 The Data Policy for NASA's Heliophysics Science Missions & the eGY Geoscience Information Commons D. A. Roberts.
Archiving 40+ years of Planetary Mission Data - Lessons Learned and Recommendations K. E. Simmons LASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
November 2004 NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7,
T. Scott Plutchak UAB Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences Georgia Health Sciences Library Association Atlanta March 9, 2012.
Software Engineering Committee Status Report: Preliminary Findings and Recommendations Richard Loft and Gerry Wiener SE Committee Co-chairs National Center.
“Guidance on the Selection and Appraisal of Geospatial Content of Enduring Value, April 2014 Draft” groups-subcommittees/hdwg/index_html.
ORGANIZATIONS AT THE MARGINS: PROSPECTS AND NEW DIRECTIONS Deanna B. Marcum July 20, 2002.
2004 Annual Report Summary. 2 Summary of Responses.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office slide 1 of 19 CAMEO Data Management Bob Groman Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management.
The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe Break-Out Session: New Partnership Models Bob Hanisch and Brian Schottlaender Co-Leaders ARL.
1 Rita Sambruna Lia LaPiana NASA HQ NASA HQ The Science Definition Team for the astrophysics-focused use(s) of the Telescope Assets.
29 Nov 2006PDS MC NSSDC MOU history PDS-NSSDC MOU circa 1994 Reviewed in Jan 2003, June 2004, Oct 2005, Nov 2006 Add words to remove HQ changes Change.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
“A Library outranks any other one thing a community can do to benefit its people.” --Andrew Carnegie.
Breakout # 1 – Data Collecting and Making It Available Data definition “ Any information that [environmental] researchers need to accomplish their tasks”
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Data Integrity Issues: How to Proceed? Engineering Node Elizabeth Rye August 3, 2006
Existing knowledge Grey literature and other documents, images, videos, and more represent the mission and work of an agency, but preserving and creating.
Systems Engineering “Understanding Where it Fits in Your Agency” a session in fhwa’s Systems Engineering t3 series aug. 02, 2007.
Challenges of Coping with Funding and Data Management in a Changing World Rick Lyons Director Infectious Disease Research Center.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-40 Meeting Preservation of SW & Documents at CEOS Agencies Approaches and Lessons.
ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe September 26-27, 2006 ARL Prue.
S cience M ission D irectorate Research Solicitation Overview.
SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
A Perspective on the Electronic Geophysical Year Raymond J. Walker UCLA Presented at eGY General Meeting Boulder, Colorado March 13, 2007.
Planetary Data System (PDS) Tom Morgan November 24, 2014.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Data Stewardship Interest Group ESA – EO Data Stewardship Maturity Matrix WGISS#41 Meeting, Canberra, (AUS) 14–18 March,
UNDERSTANDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (IM) WITHIN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
Data Management Scope and Strategies K.L. Sender and J.L. Pappas Information and Technical Services National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries.
NASA PLANETARY DATA SYSTEM ARCHIVING IPDA Steering Committee Reta Beebe, Dan Crichton Paris, France July
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
Nurse Education Practice Quality and Retention- Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Behavioral Health Integration (NEPQR-IPCP:BHI) Program FY 2016.
Demonstrating Success: NASA Performance and Results Mike A. McNeill Environmental Management Division NASA Headquarters.
Egerton University, Njoro 28 th April, 2009 OER Africa An introduction.
6/7/05 Partner Scientist PI privileges within the GSFC Sciences and Exploration Directorate (SED) Scientists working with SED under cooperative agreements.
Planetary Data Archiving Activities at the Italian Space Agency (ASI) Maria Teresa Capria INAF – IAPS, Rome, Italy Paolo Giommi ASI, Rome, Italy International.
NASA Earth Science Data Stewardship
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Proposal Development Services
DM Is Greater Than The DM Organization
Agency Requirements: NOAA Administrative Order Management of environmental and geospatial data and information This training module is part of.
Dr. Malcom Phelps Presentation by
Presentation to the National Council of Space Grant Directors
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Science Data in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Jeffrey J.E. Hayes Program Executive for MO & DA, Heliophysics Division August 17, 2011

Science Data: Guiding Principles SMD has stewardship responsibility for the integrity and preservation of science data assets as a national resource and ensure usability for the U.S. scientific (and world) community. There are a couple of implications:  Open Data: Universal access, sharing, and collaboration to science community, educators, students, and general public (implies standards).  One Size Doth Not Fit All: Organize around science discipline and allow for diversity and tailored approaches; Each science division responsible for its data environment, often through partnerships with other federal agencies and international partners; Coordination and federation as appropriate under the auspices of SMD Chief Scientist.

Science Data: Preservation Aspects SMD has set up a series of discipline-specific data centers (different meaning from the OCIO definition) to carry out the following:  Maintaining bits with no loss as they move across systems and media, as well as over time (forward/backwards compatibility with evolving technology) ;  Ensuring readability over time (again evolving technology issues);  Providing for long-term understandability (involves metadata and documentation long after a mission and expertise has ended);  Publically funded data must be accessible to the public (evolving presidential and NARA requirements – this is the law).

Science Data: SMD Policy on Science Data  Project Data Management Plans are developed at initial stages of science mission/project describing all data handling aspects, including data reduction, pipeline processing, distribution and delivery to public archive. Active data repositories are usually co-located to where the science expertise resides.  Data management issues are addressed throughout the implementation process to assure appropriate resources are applied as critical element for mission success.  Science mission processing systems provide all the data functions during the operational phase of the mission, including production of the higher level data products and serving to the community.  Timely delivery of data to public archives is a key performance measure throughout life of mission.

Science data  Science missions are responsible for identifying and organizing the data and metadata and other information for long-term preservation and utilization in post-mission research. Such identifications are concurred by SMD.  These data constitute the “final” archive record for the mission which, in general will include:  Level 0 data, along with software tools, algorithms, and ancillary data to regenerate higher level data products;  Engineering reports and other relevant “housekeeping” data;  Best data products from the mission with sufficient documentation to understand and reconstitute that product.  Organized late in mission life to incorporate recalibrations, reprocessing, and other validated results through operational phase, but early enough to capture knowledge and lessons learned from PI teams and science community.

Science data After the mission ceases operations research archives continue to maintain and serve the science data so long as data are used for scientific research. This latter may have a caveat, in that we are now seeing requirements from the National Archives that may require the retention, in perpetuity, of all data collected using public funding. The implications of this are being worked. Research archives (aka data centers in SMD parlance) are generally aggregated by science discipline, or communities of practice, to provide science expertise in using the data. These are not necessarily located at NASA or government centers, but are run at universities or non-profits under grants or contracts. These archives continue with the responsibility for all aspects of the preservation of their holdings: maintaining the integrity of the resources by safeguarding them against loss or corruption; and provide off-site back-up and recovery facilities. Note that some data centers house the results of computer models. The same logic applies to these data as to data collected via missions, and are considered as important to the communities they serve.

Science Centers Breakdown  Earth Science Data Systems Program—DAAC’s, Advancing Collaborative Connections (ACCESS), etc.  Astrophysics—Science Archive Research Centers, Astrophysics Data System (ADS) bibliographic database, NASA Extragalactic Database (NED), etc.  Planetary Data System —Topical nodes, Data nodes, et al.  Heliophysics—Mission Science Centers, Solar Data Analysis Center, Space Physics Data Facility, VxO’s, etc.  National Space Science Data Center—Legacy Long-term Archive, Deep Archive (safekeeping back-up) for Space Physics, Planetary Sciences.

Science Centers Challenges:  SMD (broadly speaking) has 2 classes of missions:  Competed missions, like Explorers which are proposed by the science community to an AO (PI missions);  Strategic missions which the agency undertakes as recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences.  Differing approaches to the way data is archived/preserved/maintained:  PI missions tend to have the data center at the host institution (until final close out of said mission, when the data is delivered to NASA). These active data centers are distributed all over the country and are hosted by FFRDCs, for-profit industry, universities, government labs (non-NASA);  Strategic missions tend to have their data centers hosted at NASA centers, but there are enough exceptions to make this statement only vaguely general.  The rapidly evolving nature of IT; we (NASA) should not impose new requirements on missions, as It was not solicited in the AO (procurement law); Represents a loss to the baseline science by imposing an unfunded mandate on any given mission (i.e. lose science analysis to pay for new requirements).