LIGO- G020337-00-R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/021 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Dennis Ugolini, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G020337-00-R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, Aug m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G R AJW/40m, LSC meeting, March Caltech 40 meter Prototype Program  Objectives  Accomplishments in the last year »Infrastructure.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G R AJW/40m, NSF Review, 1/29/011 Caltech 40 meter Prototype Program  Objectives  Accomplishments in the last year »Infrastructure »IFO.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO- G R 40mAdvLIGO R&D program, 10/8/ Meter Lab program for AdvLIGO R&D Alan Weinstein, Caltech AdvLIGO R&D Technical Review, 10/8/02.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Report to 40 Meter TAC  Caltech 40 Meter Prototype »Objectives and scope »Trade-offs and compromises.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 Prototyping for eLIGO: Power Recycled Fabry Perot Michelson DARM RF ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
40m TAC Update October 2006 The 40m Team 11 April 2019 G I.
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Presentation transcript:

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/021 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Dennis Ugolini, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R Primary objective: full engineering prototype of optics control scheme for a dual recycling suspended mass IFO, as close as possible to the Advanced LIGO optical configuration and control system

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/022 Advanced LIGO technical innovations tested at 40m  a seventh mirror for signal recycling »length control goes from 4x4 to 5x5 MIMO  detuned signal cavity (carrier off resonance)  pair of phase-modulated RF sidebands » frequencies made as low and as high as is practically possible »unbalanced: only one sideband in a pair is used » double demodulation to produce error signals  short output mode cleaner » filter out all RF sidebands and higher-order transverse modes  offset-locked arms » controlled amount of arm-filtered carrier light exits asym. port of BS  DC readout of the gravitational wave signal Much effort to ensure high fidelity between 40m and Adv.LIGO!

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/023 Differences between AdvLIGO and 40m prototype  Initially, LIGO-I single pendulum suspensions will be used »No room for full scale AdvLIGO multiple pendulums – to be tested at LASTI »Scaled-down versions to test controls hierarchy in 2004?  Only commercial active seismic isolation »STACIS isolators in use on all test chambers, providing ~30 dB of isolation from Hz »No room for anything like full AdvLIGO design – to be tested at LASTI  LIGO-I 10-watt laser, negligible thermal effects »Other facilities will test high-power laser (LASTI, Gingin) »Thermal compensation also tested elsewhere  Small (5 mm) beam spot at TM’s; stable arm cavities »AdvLIGO will have 6 cm beam spots, using less stable cavities »40m can move to less stable arm cavities if deemed useful  Arm cavity finesse at 40m chosen to be = to AdvLIGO »Storage time is x100 shorter »significant differences in lock acquisition dynamics, in predictable ways  Control RF sidebands are 36/180 MHz instead of 9/180 MHz »Due to shorter PRC length »Less contrast between PRC and SRC signals

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/024 Milestones Achieved as of March LSC Meeting  Building renovation: Control room added; electronics racks, power conditioners, cable trays, computers & networking infrastructure installed  Vacuum revision: 13m MC and OOC added to envelope; pumps, controls updated  Active seismic isolation (STACIS) installed at all test mass chambers  Initial LIGO PSL commissioned and characterized; NPRO replaced and realigned  DAQ installed and logging frames; trends saved since July 2001  PEM installed and running (dust, seismometer, weather, STACIS readback)  Conceptual Design Review completed in Oct 2001  Optical layouts complete for in- and out-of-vacuum; parts lists assembled  Procurement of CDS, ISC, etc. begun  Mode cleaner optics and suspensions in hand, specs for core optics completed

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/025 Further Infrastructure  Final optical table, beam tubes, table covers installed  MC reflected and transmitted optical paths assembled  IR-coated viewports, cameras installed  MC, OOC seismic stacks installed and cabled  MC optics hung, balanced, installed in April

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/026 Digital Suspensions  Digital suspensions for the mode cleaner optics were installed in May; full control system for all 10 core optics expected by end of 2002  Digital notch filter added at 23.7 Hz to eliminate anomalous “roll mode” in MC1; may be due to lateral misalignment of OSEMs  GDS/DTT/AWG installed; used Mark Barton’s code to diagonalize input, output matrices of MC2, MC3

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/ meter Mode Cleaner Lock ~8.7 hours M=3.0 earthquake at 3:10 AM Lock has been achieved using an SR560 preamplifier in place of the MC servo VCO path. The SR560 is set to a Hz bandpass with very high gain (70 dB).

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/028 Core Suspended Optics  The core optics for the main dual recycled interferometer were produced, polished, and coated as of Aug Completed pieces have been delivered and are being measured by LIGO optical engineers.  The mechanical suspensions for the remaining 7 optics, for the main dual recycled interferometer, have been designed, fabricated, cleaned and baked.  We plan to assemble the suspensions, hang the remaining 7 optics, and install them in the vacuum envelope in the fall of 2002.

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/029 Alignment Sensing  SURF Marcus Benna has studied the WFS alignment signals for 40m and AdvLIGO.  He studied ModalModel, but could not succeed in making it work reliably for dual recycling.  He wrote his own, compact Mathematica calculation, comparing against Twiddle for DC fields, and ModalModel for Initial LIGO alignment sensing.  He finds that the sensing configuration (lengths, RF sidebands, pattern of resonances) which were designed for good length sensing, are NOT good for alignment sensing.   (ETM) and  (ITM) signals are degenerate; the signals only appear in the dark port, and no signal is available in the bright port to break the degeneracy (as in Initial LIGO).  Reducing the sideband contrast (9/180 -> 36/180) may help; more f 2 at bright port gives some  (ITM) signal there.  Still under investigation!

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0210 SURF 2002  Surjeet Rajendran, Caltech »Analysis of coincident burst data  Marcus Benna, Cambridge University »Dual recycled AdvLIGO Alignment sensing  David Bonfield, Cambridge University »Mode Cleaner servo tuning and characterization  Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University » Digital suspension controller characterization  Aya Sekido, Tokyo University » Mode matching and characterization of IOO

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0211 Next 9 months  Install alignment sensing and control on 13m mode cleaner.  Fully characterize 13m mode cleaner performance.  The digital suspension controllers for all 10 suspended optics should be complete by the end of calendar  Assemble, hang, and install the seven core suspended optics (PRM, SRM, BS, ITMx, ETMx, ITMy, ETMy) by the end of calendar 2002, and have them damped by the controller system.  Fabricate and install all remaining optical sensing equipment on the existing enclosed optical tables, by 2Q 2003.

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0212 Next 9 months Fabricate and install auxiliary optics systems: scattered light control, initial alignment system, optical levers, video monitoring. Fabricate and install the length sensing and control system. Fabricate and install the alignment sensing and control system. Data handling: fiber link to CACR? (Currently, we only save all trend frames, backed-up to AIT occasionally). There may be some necessary augmentation of the DAQS, computing, networking, and environmental monitoring systems.

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0213 Longer term  All systems installed, commissioning begun by summer » First experiments in dual recycled configuration response, lock acquisition, and control are expected to take at least a year. » We expect that LSC members, as well as students, will participate in this most interesting phase of the project.  Elements not designed in detail will be delayed until FY04: » Output mode cleaner » DC demodulation scheme » Multiple suspensions?

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0214 Milestones revisited  2Q 2002: »All in-vacuum cables, feedthroughs, viewports, seismic stacks installed. »12m input MC optics and suspensions, and suspension controllers.  3Q 2002: »Begin commissioning of 12m input mode cleaner. »Acquisition of most of CDS, ISC, LSC, ASC.  4Q 2002: »Core optics (early) and suspensions ready. Ten Suspension controllers. Some ISC. »Glasgow 10m experiment informs 40m program »Control system finalized  2Q 2003: »Core optics (late) and suspensions ready. »auxiliary optics, IFO sensing and control systems assembled.  3Q 2003: Core subsystems commissioned, begin experiments »Lock acquisition with all 5 length dof's, 2x6 angular dof's »measure transfer functions, noise »Inform CDS of required modifications  3Q 2004: Next round of experiments. »DC readout. Multiple pendulum suspensions? »Final report to LIGO Lab.

LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/0215 (Some) outstanding issues and action items (40m, AdvLIGO)  Any significant changes in people’s thinking re: optical configuration, controls, CDS architecture??  180 MHz PD’s for WFS, LSC. Double demodulation(180  36 MHz).  Develop ASC model with ModalModel.  Design servo filters for LSC, ASC!  Detailed noise model (RSENOISE, Jim Mason)  Lock acquisition studies with E2E/DRLIGO. Develop lock acquisition algorithms, software.  Triple-check thermal effects (Melody) – negligible?  Output mode cleaner – will PSL-PMC-like device be adequate? (For 40m, for AdvLIGO). Suspended?  Offset-lock arms - algorithms, software.  DC GW PD – in vacuum? Suspended?